* Trump Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS News Over Edited Kamala Harris Interview - Patrick Houck, AmericanLiberty.News
The lawsuit claims CBS intentionally edited the segment to portray Harris in a favorable light, with the aim of influencing the 2024 presidential election in favor of the Democratic Party.
* Trump's legal team argued that CBS engaged in "deliberate deception," presenting an edited version of the interview that avoided what the lawsuit calls a "word salad" of mixed messaging from Harris.
* The complaint seeks a jury trial and $10B in damages under Texas laws prohibiting deceptive business practices.
* When will CBS release their Transcript of the fraudulent Interview with Comrade Kamala Harris?
* Joe Rogan Interview: An Appreciation of "The Weave"? - Or Is Trump 'Gaslighting America' Again?
* A large majority of Americans believe words can be equated to physical violence, a poll released Thursday found.
* In total, 80% of respondents at least slightly agreed with the statement that "words can be violence," while 22% said it describes their thoughts "completely," according to an October poll by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which it described as "shocking.
Only 12% of Gen Z respondents disagreed that speech could be violence.
[00:00:14] From atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West, you are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show.
[00:00:25] All right, happy to have you along, my fellow Americans, Sam Bushman, Dr. Scott Bradley, freedomsizingsun.com on your radio.
[00:00:31] This is the broadcast for November the 1st in the year of our Lord, 2024.
[00:00:36] This is Hour 2 and 2, promoting God, family, country, protecting life, limiting property.
[00:00:40] That's who we are. That's what we do.
[00:00:42] Last hour, we talked about Puerto Rico's self-determination.
[00:00:46] Boy, do we need that.
[00:00:48] Donald Trump filing a lawsuit.
[00:00:54] Trump files $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News over, quote, edited Kamala Harris interview.
[00:01:04] Patrick Halk writes the piece over at AmericanLiberty.News.
[00:01:09] AmericanLiberty.News, Patrick, doing a great job as always.
[00:01:12] The lawsuit claims that CBS intentionally edited the segment to portray Harris in a favorable light with the aim on influencing the outcome of the 2024 presidential elections in favor of the Democratic Party.
[00:01:31] In a, quote, formal statement, Trump's legal team accused CBS of election interference, alleging the network sought to mislead the public by and through their skillfully edited segment, transcript, if you will,
[00:01:51] that protected Harris and covered up her answers in an effort to make her look more educated.
[00:02:03] All right.
[00:02:05] To promote her abilities, intelligence and appeal.
[00:02:11] The problem is it's not real, right?
[00:02:14] Trump's legal counsel emphasized that this edit was designed to sway voter perception.
[00:02:21] The former president's legal team argues that CBS's action cause or cause constitutes.
[00:02:32] What they call deliberate election interference.
[00:02:36] The lawsuit claimed that they edit a curated version.
[00:02:41] Anyway, it goes on.
[00:02:44] Deliberate deception.
[00:02:46] And I think Trump's right on this, although I don't have a lot of confidence that the lawsuit's going to go anywhere.
[00:02:51] They protect the mainstream press at every turn.
[00:02:54] They've lied about me and the press forever.
[00:02:56] And if you're a celebrity, which I don't believe that I am, and they know that I'm not, but yet they say, hey, Sam, when you want to sue us, we're calling you a celebrity.
[00:03:04] And therefore, hey, the rules are different for you.
[00:03:06] And then when they want to attack me, they say I'm so little.
[00:03:08] I don't matter a tinker's damn.
[00:03:10] Well, which is it?
[00:03:11] Either I matter or I don't.
[00:03:12] If I don't, why don't you just leave me alone?
[00:03:14] And if I do, then there should be accountability and culpability for their dishonest libel and slander, et cetera.
[00:03:23] Anyway, I digress.
[00:03:24] I don't mean it to go to me.
[00:03:25] My point is Donald is a celebrity, if anybody is.
[00:03:28] And so they're going to say, hey, they can do whatever they want to.
[00:03:32] They can, you know, whatever.
[00:03:33] They can put their views forward.
[00:03:36] It's opinion, not journalism and so on.
[00:03:38] And anyway, will this lawsuit have any merit, Dr. Bradley?
[00:03:41] And what do you think of the whole thing?
[00:03:44] Well, my opinion of the matter is that it obviously has occurred not just with CBS but NBC, CNN.
[00:03:51] You know, I mean, this type of thing, you know, and the different little Internet kinds of news feeds that are out there.
[00:04:00] The biases are the editorial license that happens in all of those things.
[00:04:07] I mean, and whether it's New York Times and Washington Post and the L.A. Times and the Wall Street Journal and the USA Today.
[00:04:18] I mean, this kind of stuff is just rampant today.
[00:04:22] Everything has become politicized.
[00:04:24] And so while it's true and while they have, in fact, done this, I don't see anything happening.
[00:04:30] I mean, if you're basically kind of, you know, off limits, if you will, for them to try and correct because you're a celebrity,
[00:04:41] well, obviously all these other places are going to be able to get away with it too.
[00:04:45] The First Amendment is probably going to be brought into play about this kind of thing and the place of the freedom of press and speech.
[00:04:53] But I think Americans ultimately and finally bear the responsibility to be able to use some kind of wisdom, some understanding, some intelligence,
[00:05:02] and actually analyze what is being said and by whom and make decisions that are principles-based.
[00:05:09] And again, I keep coming down to everything that happens in this country boils down to we the people.
[00:05:15] I mean, if we are so inane and stupid and unintelligent that we cannot discern these things ourselves,
[00:05:25] we probably deserve the government we get.
[00:05:28] And what ought to happen is the American public.
[00:05:31] Unfortunately, there's a trick to this reality check.
[00:05:32] I mean, it's serious business now.
[00:05:34] Now, Trump's complaint seeks a jury trial and $10 billion in damages under Texas law, quote,
[00:05:44] prohibiting deceptive business practices.
[00:05:47] And then they finalize the article with this question.
[00:05:51] When will CBS release their transcript of the fraudulent interview with comrade Kamala Harris?
[00:06:02] So it's great, and it's tinged with some pretty good stuff.
[00:06:05] And I agree with the point that, look, these news organizations are, in my opinion, criminalistic.
[00:06:10] They're full of libel, slander, dishonesty, and everything else, fake news, whatever you want to call it.
[00:06:15] But here's the deal, in my opinion.
[00:06:17] They have the right to lie if they want to, just like I have the right to lie if I want to.
[00:06:21] And so do you.
[00:06:22] What we need is the American people to say, you clowns over there at CBS,
[00:06:28] hey, we're going to turn you off.
[00:06:30] We're not interested in you anymore.
[00:06:31] You have destroyed your credibility.
[00:06:33] You've got a credibility crisis, and we're turning you off.
[00:06:36] And the American people could dismiss CBS News in five seconds, doctor, as you wisely point out.
[00:06:43] Indeed, we have a responsibility as a people to have a discerning spirit.
[00:06:48] I mean, there's a term that's really, it's archaic.
[00:06:54] It's a, I don't know, have I ever used it on your program before, jack and ape?
[00:06:58] A jack and ape is an arrogant, narcissistic, impish, misleading kind of character.
[00:07:06] We follow every jack and ape out there.
[00:07:08] That describes almost every politician on the planet, my friend.
[00:07:10] Indeed, it does.
[00:07:11] Every jack and ape, political leaders, religious leaders, wannabes.
[00:07:17] I mean, when you get somebody like Taylor Swift, is that her?
[00:07:22] Is that the singer?
[00:07:23] I mean, you know, I'm so removed from that kind of stuff.
[00:07:26] Where she can become a kind of an influencer, and millions of people vote based upon the words
[00:07:33] that drip from her lips.
[00:07:34] I mean, come on, people.
[00:07:36] We have got to regain our sense of responsibility.
[00:07:42] Our birthright is at stake.
[00:07:44] And we need to start growing a backbone and making decisions based upon intelligent, principles-based analysis.
[00:07:52] And so we turn our lives over to people that are just jack and apes.
[00:07:59] And we follow them just pandering to their every need.
[00:08:05] And we are led by jack and apes, therefore.
[00:08:08] So I don't know.
[00:08:09] Look the term up.
[00:08:10] It's a archaic term.
[00:08:12] It's 100-plus years ago it was in usage.
[00:08:16] But you know what?
[00:08:17] I'm a little older than a lot of people, although I'm not 100-plus.
[00:08:21] So okay.
[00:08:22] But we're led by jack and apes.
[00:08:24] We truly are.
[00:08:26] And that's where these news people are coming from.
[00:08:28] And it's a true story.
[00:08:30] But there you have it.
[00:08:31] That's what, you know.
[00:08:32] So I appreciate the lawsuit from Trump.
[00:08:34] How far it will get, I don't really know.
[00:08:36] I think he's right to sue them because I think they have wrongfully manipulated elections.
[00:08:40] And that's a problem.
[00:08:41] But they have every right to lie, just like we do.
[00:08:43] And you say, well, Sam, we can't embrace lying.
[00:08:46] No, we can't.
[00:08:47] The morality of the people, though, will stop lying in its heartbeat.
[00:08:50] You lie once or twice or three times.
[00:08:52] You know, hey, once, shame on me.
[00:08:55] Or shame on you.
[00:08:56] Second time, shame on me.
[00:08:57] You know, at some point, we just need to turn off CBS News and say, hey, you guys are clowns.
[00:09:02] We're not going to pay attention to you.
[00:09:03] You've lied to the American people.
[00:09:05] You've betrayed us.
[00:09:06] We don't trust you anymore.
[00:09:07] You're gone.
[00:09:08] The American people could do that tomorrow if they had no viewers, no listeners, no readers.
[00:09:12] They'd be done.
[00:09:13] Okay?
[00:09:13] And that's the reality.
[00:09:14] So American people need to take responsibility, as Dr. Bradley wisely points out.
[00:09:18] But I will say one more thing about this.
[00:09:20] They have every right to lie or to have their opinion or to edit any interview they want to.
[00:09:25] Okay?
[00:09:25] The problem that I have, if we start to sue and win and say they can't do that, then pretty soon what happens?
[00:09:33] Who decides who can do that and who can't?
[00:09:35] See, I'm not for lying.
[00:09:37] And I'm not advocating for lying one bit.
[00:09:39] But what I'm saying to you is if you take away that, then who decides who's lying?
[00:09:44] Right?
[00:09:45] Who decides who puts what out?
[00:09:47] So let's say that I play a clip.
[00:09:49] But I don't play the whole clip.
[00:09:51] I just play part of it.
[00:09:53] Right?
[00:09:53] Like, I played some clips from Donald Trump the other day.
[00:09:56] I'm going to digress and go into those right now for a second because it's relevant to make my point.
[00:10:01] Liz, if you can pull these up real quick in the test folder.
[00:10:04] There's two Trump clips or Joe Rogan Trump clips.
[00:10:07] I've played them before, but I'm going to play them again.
[00:10:10] And let's skip the break and let's play this Joe Rogan clip, for instance.
[00:10:15] What he says is very concerning in these clips.
[00:10:18] I'm going to ask Dr. Bradley about them.
[00:10:19] So Joe Rogan and Donald talked for three hours.
[00:10:21] It's got 40-plus million views on YouTube alone, not even counting Apple or Spotify or anywhere else for that matter.
[00:10:28] I mean, just a huge interview, three hours long.
[00:10:30] But Joe Rogan and Trump, I cut out two clips that I think are relevant as all get out.
[00:10:36] Here's the first one.
[00:10:37] You know what they did?
[00:10:38] They did something that's only done in third world countries.
[00:10:41] They came after their political opponent.
[00:10:43] I could have put Crooked Hillary in jail.
[00:10:45] Well, not only that, but they're weaponizing it by saying that that's what you're going to do once you get in office.
[00:10:50] Isn't it great?
[00:10:51] By ignoring what they're doing right now.
[00:10:53] It's crazy.
[00:10:54] I heard it.
[00:10:55] Somebody was defending me today.
[00:10:56] No, that's – they say that's what you're doing to him.
[00:10:59] They're going, he's going to put us in jail.
[00:11:02] He's going to invest –
[00:11:03] That's what you're doing.
[00:11:04] That's what you're doing to him.
[00:11:06] Yeah.
[00:11:06] A lot of people say, will you do that?
[00:11:08] Will you do that to him, to them if you win?
[00:11:11] You know, the presidency has tremendous power.
[00:11:14] I could have put Crooked Hillary in jail.
[00:11:16] I respected that you didn't because what you said was it would be bad for the country.
[00:11:20] No, I couldn't even imagine you have –
[00:11:22] First of all, Secretary of State, but more importantly, the wife of the President of the United States of America going into jail.
[00:11:30] And if you ever saw when I'd say something about her, they'd all say – I didn't say it.
[00:11:34] I never said it.
[00:11:35] They'd say, lock her up, lock her up.
[00:11:36] And I'd always go, take it easy.
[00:11:38] Just relax.
[00:11:39] We're going to win this thing.
[00:11:40] Take it easy.
[00:11:41] Take it easy.
[00:11:41] And I'm telling you, I kept it down.
[00:11:43] Just the opposite.
[00:11:44] Now they say, oh, Trump wanted to put her in jail.
[00:11:46] No.
[00:11:47] I saved her from going to jail.
[00:11:49] They had more stuff on her.
[00:11:51] And Comey had it because when Comey got up –
[00:11:54] All right, go ahead and stop it now.
[00:11:54] And he just talked about Comey, clown show, and he basically brought out all the charges he shouldn't have.
[00:11:59] Donald just says, hey, you should have said, hey, I've looked at this.
[00:12:01] There's nothing here.
[00:12:02] Let it go.
[00:12:04] Donald Trump literally telling you on the campaign trail, letting the chant, lock her up, go.
[00:12:11] And then making us believe that's what he was going to do when he got in office.
[00:12:13] Then when he got in office, he's like, hey, I wouldn't even consider doing that.
[00:12:16] In fact, I saved Hillary from jail.
[00:12:19] What do you think of that reality check by Donald himself, Dr. Bradley?
[00:12:23] Well, when you can actually go back and replay the video, audio tapes, and then have denials.
[00:12:32] I mean, it's kind of a gaslighting world too.
[00:12:35] I mean, the reality of the memory hole that Orwell talked about in his book 1984 is a very real thing today.
[00:12:44] I mean, we put things down the memory hole constantly.
[00:12:48] And the Americans are just, oh, yeah, I guess that's what it was.
[00:12:54] And they go on watching.
[00:12:56] I didn't even know the World Series were being played right now.
[00:12:58] Sam, I've got to admit to you.
[00:13:00] I mean, I am so isolated from some of the diversions of the world.
[00:13:06] And, again, you've got to take some time to sharpen the saw to keep being able to work.
[00:13:09] So people have got to have some way.
[00:13:11] But to make diversions your only thing in life seems to be a little bit much to me.
[00:13:17] But we really are diverted.
[00:13:20] Bread and circuses keep us disconnected.
[00:13:24] And we don't have an institutional memory.
[00:13:27] We don't.
[00:13:28] It's like I say this all the time.
[00:13:31] Russia cannot lose in Ukraine.
[00:13:34] They will not lose in Ukraine because they have a context of history that what has happened in invasions from the West,
[00:13:43] they will not allow themselves to let their guard down in Ukraine.
[00:13:48] And Americans don't have any context of history.
[00:13:52] They also have a supply chain and everything else to sustain things that we don't have.
[00:13:54] True, true.
[00:13:55] But the fact of the matter is we Americans do not keep track of the important pieces on the chess table.
[00:14:03] I mean, think about that for a minute.
[00:14:05] I mean, you're not – you don't even know where your king is.
[00:14:08] The queen, what's she going to be doing?
[00:14:10] Okay, maybe people don't play chess.
[00:14:12] But the point of the matter is you've got to keep an idea in front of you of the parts and pieces that are in play right now
[00:14:22] and then be able to say, wait, wait, wait a minute.
[00:14:26] This – for some reason, they just gave a deception away.
[00:14:31] And it's kind of gaslighting, I guess they call it, don't they?
[00:14:34] Well, it is.
[00:14:34] And Donald gaslighted us on that Hillary thing.
[00:14:36] He made us believe that he was going to lock her up.
[00:14:38] He made us believe that we've got to – you know, hey, she's a criminal.
[00:14:41] She's one of the leaders of ISIS.
[00:14:42] He made all those statements and then let the crowd chant, lock her up.
[00:14:46] And whether he kind of mouthed that with them is debatable.
[00:14:49] He says he didn't say it.
[00:14:50] I think that he mouthed it and he did say it and he kind of quietly said it with them too.
[00:14:54] He certainly let the crowd believe that's what his intentions were.
[00:14:57] And then when he got in office, he's like, you know, I had no intention of that.
[00:15:00] In fact, I saved her.
[00:15:01] I protected her.
[00:15:03] Yeah.
[00:15:03] Wow.
[00:15:04] Ladies and gentlemen.
[00:15:05] It's an interesting speem.
[00:15:06] That came out of the Joe Rogan interview.
[00:15:07] No one's bringing that up but me.
[00:15:08] I find that interesting.
[00:15:09] Here's the next piece.
[00:15:10] Joe – or Donald Trump promised to get to the bottom of the Barack Obama-Burk certificate issue.
[00:15:14] Never did.
[00:15:15] Now we don't even hear a word about it.
[00:15:17] But what about the JFK assassination?
[00:15:20] Yeah.
[00:15:21] What about the Martin Luther King assassination?
[00:15:23] We're well past time where they claim that it can be classified.
[00:15:26] It should be released.
[00:15:27] Donald promised he'd release it.
[00:15:28] Well, he didn't.
[00:15:31] He didn't.
[00:15:32] And Joe asked him about it.
[00:15:34] And good for Joe.
[00:15:35] I don't think Joe pressed hard enough.
[00:15:37] But I do think Joe at least asked the question.
[00:15:40] And I'm telling you right now, no offense, but Donald gave a buffoon answer.
[00:15:44] Here is clip two about JFK.
[00:15:46] One of the things that I want to talk to you about is the JFK files.
[00:15:51] And one of the things that you said was that if they showed you what they showed me, this is your quote, you wouldn't want people to know it either.
[00:16:02] So I opened them up partially.
[00:16:07] I was met with from good people.
[00:16:09] I mean, you know, look, I mean, good people.
[00:16:11] People that were well-meaning.
[00:16:13] Mike Pompeo was one of them.
[00:16:15] He's a good person.
[00:16:18] They called me.
[00:16:19] They said, Sarah would rather.
[00:16:21] Have you not?
[00:16:22] After and I did open them.
[00:16:25] But I was asked by some people not to open them.
[00:16:28] There's a Martin Luther King file, too, by the way, that they'd like to see.
[00:16:31] I don't know if you know, but there is that.
[00:16:34] But JFK in particular.
[00:16:37] So they called me.
[00:16:38] A lot of good people called me.
[00:16:40] People that I, you know, that you would find reasonable people.
[00:16:43] And they asked me not to do it.
[00:16:44] So I said, well, we'll close it for another time.
[00:16:48] But if I win, I'm going to open them up.
[00:16:50] I'm just going to open enough time.
[00:16:51] Why didn't you open it up the first time?
[00:16:52] Because a lot of times.
[00:16:53] What was the hesitation?
[00:16:55] Addresses, people that are still living.
[00:16:57] There are people that are affected.
[00:17:00] And there could be some national security reason that I don't have to necessarily know about.
[00:17:05] But some very good, talented people asked me not to do it.
[00:17:09] I opened it up.
[00:17:10] And then they said, would it be possible for us to do that a different day?
[00:17:15] How much of it did you read into?
[00:17:20] I think it's going to be just fine to open it.
[00:17:23] Let me put it that way.
[00:17:23] I think it's fine.
[00:17:24] It's going to be time.
[00:17:25] It's a cleansing.
[00:17:26] You know, it's really a cleansing.
[00:17:28] So I'm going to do it.
[00:17:29] I'm going to do it immediately.
[00:17:30] Almost immediately upon entering office.
[00:17:32] Well, the thing when people look at it from the outside and you sort of imagine what could be a reason why they would not release those files, it would be there's people that were implicated in the assassination.
[00:17:46] Well, when there are living people, you generally tend not to want to do it.
[00:17:51] When people are still living.
[00:17:53] Living people that formerly worked for the government.
[00:17:55] For the government and living people that were somehow involved in it.
[00:17:58] And you tend not to do that.
[00:18:00] But it's time to open them.
[00:18:03] I can't tell you whether or not they're going to find anything of interest.
[00:18:07] And I did partially open it.
[00:18:08] I think I've opened 50%.
[00:18:11] But I was asked not to do it.
[00:18:13] And I thought that was a reasonable ask.
[00:18:16] But now I'm going to do it.
[00:18:17] I'm going to do it very soon.
[00:18:18] There's a lot of interest in it.
[00:18:21] Now, what Donald attributes this discussion to is the art of the weave.
[00:18:27] Don't you know?
[00:18:27] And the weave is this idea where I talk about 10 topics.
[00:18:30] I kind of stop myself in the middle of a topic and go to something else and derail from that and derail from that.
[00:18:35] And then, of course, I kind of bring it all together and the point that I want to make.
[00:18:41] But to me, ladies and gentlemen, I have a serious problem with this JFK thing.
[00:18:45] Number one, he promised to release him and he didn't, even though the statute of limitations have run out and even though it shouldn't be classified.
[00:18:50] That's one thing.
[00:18:51] He didn't do what he said he would do.
[00:18:53] That's a problem.
[00:18:54] I think it's gaslighting the American people.
[00:18:55] But he also said some things that concern me very much.
[00:18:58] And we've always talked about, you know, good or bad people around the Donald.
[00:19:01] And we've always blamed a lot of what goes on bad that, hey, there's bad people around him.
[00:19:05] And Donald's only mistake is that he listens to them.
[00:19:08] But when you listen to the weave on this soundbite here with Donald and Joe, you kind of gain an understanding that's slightly different, which is this.
[00:19:15] You know, he said, hey, there's good people around me that told me not to do it.
[00:19:18] I'm going to listen to those good people.
[00:19:19] They're like Mike Pompeo.
[00:19:21] Guy's a great guy.
[00:19:22] You know, no, Mike Pompeo's a thug, ladies and gentlemen.
[00:19:25] And he's deep state as all get out, Donald.
[00:19:27] Just so you know, my friend.
[00:19:29] Okay, so you're listening to the wrong people.
[00:19:31] And that's one of Donald's biggest failings.
[00:19:33] But he puts too much faith in them.
[00:19:35] But then he makes the next statement about the JFK assassination files, which fascinates me.
[00:19:41] Either Donald is completely stupid or he thinks you and I are completely stupid or both.
[00:19:48] I don't know which of the three it is, but I'm going to throw that out.
[00:19:51] And we're going to get Dr. Bradley's take on this.
[00:19:52] Let me explain.
[00:19:53] He either thinks we're stupid, he's stupid, or all the above.
[00:19:57] But here's what he said.
[00:19:59] Hey, while there's living people, we don't want to go ahead and release this information.
[00:20:03] Donald, all you got to do is redact the name of the living person or their address or anything that leaves innocent people in harm's way and release the rest.
[00:20:10] Okay?
[00:20:10] That's very easy.
[00:20:11] It's done all the time.
[00:20:12] So don't give me that baloney.
[00:20:14] I don't know if you're ignorant of that or if you just, you know, want to use that as your excuse.
[00:20:18] But there you go.
[00:20:18] So secondarily, he made another point.
[00:20:21] This has been 60 plus years.
[00:20:23] So if national security is a concern on that, fine.
[00:20:28] It either is or is not a concern.
[00:20:30] Either there's information in there that relates to modern day national security or there's not.
[00:20:35] Okay?
[00:20:35] One or the other.
[00:20:35] Let's say there's not.
[00:20:37] Then you have no reason not to release them.
[00:20:41] Okay?
[00:20:42] But then what Donald said was, hey, maybe there's stuff in there that relates to, you know, stuff that I don't really need to know.
[00:20:51] So let me get this right.
[00:20:53] It's of enough consequence that we can't release it because of national security concerns or whatever.
[00:21:00] But the president of the United States, the leader of the free world, the commander in chief of the greatest army, greatest military in the entire world doesn't need to really know about it.
[00:21:09] You can't have it both ways, Donald.
[00:21:10] Either it's inconsequential, then release it.
[00:21:13] Or if it's consequential enough to matter in modern day, you as president better know about it, my friend.
[00:21:18] And if you don't, who can know about it when you, the president, can't?
[00:21:22] See, at some point there's a appreciation for the weaver gaslighting the American people.
[00:21:27] Well, there's a problem here.
[00:21:30] And you can't have it both ways.
[00:21:32] Either it's not consequential, then you can release it.
[00:21:34] If it is consequential, you as president better know about it.
[00:21:37] And if you know about it and you claimed you didn't know or that you shouldn't know, you just lied to the people.
[00:21:42] But there's a fundamental flaw in logic in Donald's, quote, weave on this one, Dr. Bradley.
[00:21:48] On so many fronts, it's not even funny.
[00:21:51] Well, it's deception on the first degree, actually.
[00:21:54] I mean, it's just not a logic flaw.
[00:21:56] I believe that there's deception going on.
[00:22:00] And we're being told not even half-truths.
[00:22:05] My personal opinion on the matter is that the CIA is neck deep in a really bad event that happened in November of 1963.
[00:22:17] And Mike Pompeo was protecting the institution.
[00:22:20] Mike Pompeo rolled the president.
[00:22:22] You know, the president has to have intelligent, capable people around him.
[00:22:27] But that has to be – the trust has to go both ways.
[00:22:31] There has to be a recognition that the buck stops here, so to speak.
[00:22:36] As much as I didn't like Truman, he did say the buck stopped here.
[00:22:40] As much as – I mean, you think about what Kennedy did when he – his people in his cabinet tried to roll him about going to war with Russia over Cuba.
[00:22:50] He said, no, we ain't going to do it.
[00:22:52] And Trump, it's a really lingering – I guess that's a very light way to put it – dread that I have about Trump being in office again.
[00:23:05] He was rolled so easily every time something came up.
[00:23:10] And he did the wrong choice.
[00:23:13] Now, look, if there's somebody whose name is in there, so be it.
[00:23:17] They played in the game.
[00:23:19] If they have responsibility for bad decisions.
[00:23:22] Hold on, it depends, because there could be innocent people in there.
[00:23:24] For example, let's just say there was a big bust where they got information.
[00:23:27] And somehow the information was stored in a public store, just for instance, a store where you buy things or something.
[00:23:34] In the 7-Eleven, they found evidence of this or that relating to the JFK assassination.
[00:23:39] And I happened to be in the store, and when all the witnesses were interviewed, I was a witness.
[00:23:44] And so my name's in there, and my address is in there or whatever, and I'm not even related to it.
[00:23:50] So they let me go, and I have nothing to do with it.
[00:23:52] But yet, if you release that, you release my name and my address.
[00:23:54] I get that there could be some logical redactions to protect innocent people.
[00:23:58] But that's no excuse not to release the whole thing nevertheless.
[00:24:02] So I get that there could be circumstances where, okay, you don't want to out Sam Bushman.
[00:24:06] He wasn't even involved.
[00:24:06] He just happened to be there at that store at the time, whatever store that they, you know, found evidence or whatever.
[00:24:12] So he was interviewed, and his name's in there.
[00:24:14] Good, reject that.
[00:24:14] I get it because I'm innocent.
[00:24:16] I have nothing to do with it, and they know it.
[00:24:18] But that's not a reason not to release the whole thing.
[00:24:20] So the question that I have on this whole thing, Dr. Bradley will finish his response on the other side.
[00:24:25] Are we talking about an appreciation of the weave here?
[00:24:27] Or is Trump gaslighting America again?
[00:24:30] That's my question for Dr. Bradley, who will respond in seconds on your radio.
[00:24:53] Cross the land.
[00:24:55] You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
[00:25:00] If you own a timeshare, don't miss this public service announcement from Chuck McDowell, founder of Wesley Financial Group.
[00:25:06] If you receive an unsolicited phone call or mail piece to discuss selling, renting, or especially canceling your timeshare, don't fall for it.
[00:25:15] If you really want out of your timeshare, hang the phone up immediately or throw that mail piece in the trash and contact your timeshare resort or Wesley Financial Group for assistance with your timeshare.
[00:25:28] As the only Inc. 500 timeshare cancellation company, our knowledge, experience, and results has made Wesley a trusted resource for over 40,000 families we've helped get out of their timeshare.
[00:25:40] Give us a call and I'll send you our timeshare exit information kit free with the straight facts about your timeshare and all of your options for cancellation.
[00:25:50] Call for your free info kit, 800-885-3333.
[00:25:54] That's 800-885-3333.
[00:25:56] 800-885-3333.
[00:26:00] University of Southern California researchers have analyzed the health impact of post-World War II sugar rationing in the U.K.
[00:26:08] The rationing of sugar and sweets ended in September 1953, and almost overnight, the amount of sugar in the nation's diet doubled.
[00:26:17] The study in the Journal of Science looked at 60,000 people who were born either side of the end of sugar rationing,
[00:26:23] and they all grew up through the same societal changes through the following decades,
[00:26:28] but those spending their first 1,000 days in the era of sugar rationing, and that includes time in the womb,
[00:26:35] were 35% less likely to have type 2 diabetes and 20% less likely to have high blood pressure.
[00:26:42] The BBC's James Gallagher.
[00:26:45] A motorcycle bomb has exploded near a vehicle carrying police officers in southwest Pakistan,
[00:26:50] killing seven people among the victims, five children who had been nearby.
[00:26:55] News and analysis, townhall.com.
[00:26:59] One CNN contributor admits downplaying big text censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020.
[00:27:07] On Wednesday night, a CNN panel discussion put a spotlight on comments made by Republican vice presidential candidate Senator J.D. Vance,
[00:27:14] who suggested that President Biden's victory was illegitimate by pointing to how social media giants,
[00:27:18] quote, verifiably censored Americans from talking about things like the Hunter Biden laptop story.
[00:27:23] CNN contributor Kara Squisher reacted, quote,
[00:27:25] there is no proof that tech companies colluded to do this.
[00:27:28] This is nonsense and he knows it.
[00:27:30] Conservative CNN political analyst Scott Jennings pushed back,
[00:27:33] saying there was an institutional effort to support the New York Post's bombshell reporting on the laptop.
[00:27:37] Bernie Bennett reporting.
[00:27:38] The Dodgers victory over the Yankees in Game 5 of the World Series averaged 18.5 million viewers,
[00:27:44] according to Nielsen.
[00:27:46] The most watched game in the Fall Classic since 2019.
[00:27:49] That's when Washington's Game 7 win over Houston averaged about 23 million viewers.
[00:27:54] More on these stories at townhall.com.
[00:27:59] You know where the solution can be found, Mr. President?
[00:28:03] In churches, in wedding chapels, in maternity wards across the country and around the world.
[00:28:09] More babies will mean forward-looking adults,
[00:28:12] the sort we need to tackle long-term, large-scale problems.
[00:28:17] American babies in particular are likely going to be wealthier, better educated,
[00:28:21] and more conservation-minded than children raised in still industrializing countries.
[00:28:27] As economist Tyler Cowen recently wrote,
[00:28:30] Quote,
[00:28:31] By having more children, you're making your nation more populous,
[00:28:34] thus boosting its capacity to solve climate change.
[00:28:37] The planet does not need for us to think globally and act locally
[00:28:42] so much as it needs us to think family and act personally.
[00:28:48] The solution to so many of our problems, at all times and in all places,
[00:28:54] is to fall in love, get married, and have some kids.
[00:28:59] As you are aware, America is divided over every fault line possible.
[00:29:04] This is intentionally fostered by those who do not love God, family, or country.
[00:29:08] We believe a peaceful future as a free people absolutely depends on civility.
[00:29:13] Clarion Call for Civility is looking for funding and volunteers at every level
[00:29:17] to make our hopes and efforts a reality.
[00:29:20] Please donate, sign our pledge, and help us in our sacred cause.
[00:29:23] Please visit callforcivility.com for more details.
[00:29:27] Callforcivility.com.
[00:29:32] Introducing managed IT services from NPI.
[00:29:34] We offer top-notch data backup and recovery, email spam protection,
[00:29:37] and network security tailored to your needs and budget.
[00:29:40] With 20-plus years of experience in the medical field,
[00:29:43] our HIPAA-certified consultants know what it takes to protect sensitive information.
[00:29:46] Don't settle for less.
[00:29:47] Give us a call at 801-706-6980
[00:29:50] and experience the difference with managed IT services.
[00:29:52] Remember, your IT support should be fast, efficient, and reliable.
[00:29:55] Broadcasting live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West,
[00:30:18] you are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show.
[00:30:25] Before the break, we were talking about the Trump-Rogan interview
[00:30:32] in regards to the release of the Kennedy assassination information
[00:30:40] that was basically legally required with a deadline during the first Trump administration,
[00:30:47] and Trump gaslighting everybody about why he didn't do it.
[00:30:51] He got rolled by his own people, Mike Pompeo specifically,
[00:30:54] who was the director of the CIA,
[00:30:56] whom I believe, not him specifically,
[00:30:59] because he wasn't old enough in 1963 to have involvement,
[00:31:03] but I believe the CIA was neck deep in the middle of that,
[00:31:07] and that he is protecting guilty parties that the United States people need to have knowledge of.
[00:31:13] In fact, it might be such, if the truth truly were revealed,
[00:31:19] that it would cause a complete disruption in the CIA operation
[00:31:24] and a recasting of it from top to bottom,
[00:31:27] because they have been, I mean, from the days of Dulles,
[00:31:33] when he was the CIA director during Eisenhower,
[00:31:37] forward, this has been a New World Order globalist arm
[00:31:42] that has been an enemy of the Americanist principles, literally.
[00:31:48] And Dulles, by the way, was made the de facto leader of the Warren Commission,
[00:31:57] and Earl Warren didn't have enough time or energy or something to really participate,
[00:32:01] even though they gave it credibility by putting his name on it.
[00:32:05] Dulles was the true compiler of that thing.
[00:32:09] So anyway, there has been a cover-up for 60-plus years,
[00:32:13] and Sam makes the point that, yeah, there may be some innocent people.
[00:32:17] I would say, okay, I'll give you that.
[00:32:20] But they've got to be very, very, very few and far between.
[00:32:24] Redact their name, move on with it.
[00:32:27] But we have a – the Kennedy assassination was a critical hinge point in American history.
[00:32:35] That changed so much overnight, instantly.
[00:32:41] The LBJ Bravo Sierra that came in, that literally,
[00:32:46] he and his military-industrial complex and Robert McNamara and everything that happened,
[00:32:51] the disruption of the entire nation that occurred because of that,
[00:32:56] the socialistic programs that were passed through Congress in memory of our fallen leader,
[00:33:01] John Kennedy.
[00:33:02] I mean, all of these things that happened hinged on that moment,
[00:33:08] the assassination in Dallas in November of 1963.
[00:33:12] So the American people have a right to know.
[00:33:15] And for Trump to brush it off as, oh, good people ask me not to.
[00:33:20] Bravo Sierra.
[00:33:22] I keep coming back to that common terminology.
[00:33:25] Because Americans have a right to know.
[00:33:28] And this idea of coming up and protecting the guilty.
[00:33:33] Sam's right.
[00:33:34] Don't throw any innocent people under the bus.
[00:33:36] But let's throw the people under the bus that did us in.
[00:33:41] And I believe we were done in during this thing.
[00:33:44] I believe the Warren Report was a charade, a fabrication.
[00:33:49] It was something that pulled the wool over Americans' eyes,
[00:33:55] and we have never had the wool pulled off our eyes ever since then.
[00:33:59] And for Trump to just – you know, if he didn't look at it, what's wrong with that man?
[00:34:04] I mean, he says, well, you know, I really don't know some of these things.
[00:34:08] If I had been President of the United States at that time,
[00:34:10] I would have read cover to cover, paragraph by paragraph,
[00:34:16] punctuation note by punctuation note, footnotes to the nth degree.
[00:34:20] He had, as the President of the United States, a responsibility to know.
[00:34:24] And if there are things there that are still of national security interest,
[00:34:28] as Sam so adroitly pointed out,
[00:34:31] he should know about those national security issues.
[00:34:33] And if he doesn't, then who's running the country, doctor?
[00:34:38] Exactly.
[00:34:38] He was remiss.
[00:34:40] Now, I realize the innocent people there are far and few between,
[00:34:43] and I gave you an extreme example of somebody –
[00:34:46] my example probably doesn't even hold water in these cases.
[00:34:49] I'm just making a point that there is legitimacy to a claim.
[00:34:54] And if we say the claim is just completely illegitimate,
[00:34:56] then they can mock us and say,
[00:34:58] oh, you guys don't know what you're talking about.
[00:34:59] I leave that room only because I can understand the point.
[00:35:03] But let's not miss the point because of that point is my main contingent here.
[00:35:07] I get it.
[00:35:08] I'll give you that.
[00:35:08] But let's not lose sight.
[00:35:10] Let's not lose the forest through the trees on this thing, doctor.
[00:35:13] What he said was so significant, it shocks me to the core.
[00:35:18] There's no question.
[00:35:19] Trump – this is just one symptom of something that I think happened over and over and over again during his presidency.
[00:35:31] Trump is a pleaser.
[00:35:33] Trump is a dealmaker.
[00:35:35] Trump likes consensus and people to be on board and all that kind of stuff.
[00:35:40] He likes loyalty.
[00:35:41] But the fact of the matter is when you're sitting in that desk at that office,
[00:35:46] I mean, and Kamala's another whole order of magnitudes worse than what I think Trump would be on this thing.
[00:35:54] But Trump proved in his first administration that he didn't have the backbone to say the heck you say.
[00:36:02] I'm going to know what is in this thing.
[00:36:04] I mean, look at what Fauci did to him.
[00:36:06] I mean, every single turn of the way on these momentous issues that torpedoed the United States for over four years now,
[00:36:16] and he let his experts dictate it.
[00:36:19] You've got to be a quick study when you're in the office of president.
[00:36:23] You've got to sit down.
[00:36:24] You've got to ascertain the information.
[00:36:26] You've got to make decisions.
[00:36:28] And by the way, Biden has not been able to do that for one moment in his presidential thing.
[00:36:34] But Kamala Harris hasn't added a whit of anything of value to that.
[00:36:40] I mean, you have things where terrorist operations are going down,
[00:36:45] where you have a real dynamic situation with information flowing,
[00:36:51] and analysis needs to be done on the spot, on the fly.
[00:36:55] And if Trump's looking for consensus,
[00:36:58] he's looking for his buddies to nod their head and wink their eye at him,
[00:37:01] if he's looking for an expert to take the blame for it, that's Bravo Sierra.
[00:37:06] The president has to have the ability to stand up and say,
[00:37:11] okay, it's time for a presidential decision.
[00:37:13] And it's got to be principles-based, by the way.
[00:37:16] And I'm not sure he has a sound foundation of principles.
[00:37:18] He may have a good feeling about America,
[00:37:22] but the limits and bounds of constitutional government?
[00:37:27] I mean, if Mike Pompeo's dictating to him decisions that need to be made,
[00:37:32] Pompeo wanted to assassinate people for crying out loud.
[00:37:35] I mean, he had a license to kill, in his opinion,
[00:37:38] when he was the director of the CIA.
[00:37:40] This stuff is just, it's unbelievable.
[00:37:44] And it's more than gaslighting.
[00:37:46] And when we say consensus here, Dr. Bradley,
[00:37:49] I want to point this out as well.
[00:37:50] Well, there's no consensus on doing what's right,
[00:37:54] on the moral high ground.
[00:37:57] But that doesn't change the fact that you've got to stand on that moral high ground
[00:38:01] regardless.
[00:38:02] Every time, you've got to be on the right side of the Constitution.
[00:38:04] You've got to be on the right side of justice,
[00:38:06] on the right side of mercy,
[00:38:08] on the right side of the proper role of limited constitutional government,
[00:38:13] et cetera, et cetera, right?
[00:38:14] I mean, you can't ignore this stuff.
[00:38:16] And you've got to be conversant in all of it all the time.
[00:38:20] It's got to be on the tip of your tongue, on the front of your brain.
[00:38:23] Let's just take an example with Mitt Romney when he was running for president.
[00:38:27] And a question came up about going to war.
[00:38:30] And they couched it in terms and everything like that.
[00:38:33] You know what Mitt said?
[00:38:34] Oh, I'll have to consult with the attorneys.
[00:38:37] Again, bravo, Sierra.
[00:38:39] No.
[00:38:40] Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11 says Congress has power to declare war.
[00:38:44] The president is not going to determine whether we go to war.
[00:38:47] He may take a position with the Congress.
[00:38:50] He may present facts.
[00:38:51] He may give all of those things.
[00:38:52] And by the way, they should be facts,
[00:38:54] not weapons of mass destruction that was completely fabricated out of whole cloth
[00:39:01] that we went into war with Saddam Hussein,
[00:39:04] or Saddam Hussein, or whatever his name is,
[00:39:06] Saddam Hussein,
[00:39:07] where there was not one weapon of mass destruction on his territory,
[00:39:13] but it was the fabricated,
[00:39:17] created war that the war machine wanted.
[00:39:21] And everybody has got to be,
[00:39:24] have a level of integrity.
[00:39:25] And if you can't put somebody in,
[00:39:27] the CIA that can't give you good advice in regards to the limits and bounds,
[00:39:33] and, you know,
[00:39:34] the security of the United States,
[00:39:36] and all that kind of stuff,
[00:39:38] you've picked wrong.
[00:39:39] Your picker is wrong.
[00:39:41] I've known a lot of guys.
[00:39:42] One of my buddies,
[00:39:43] when I was in the service,
[00:39:44] he had been married five times,
[00:39:45] and he said that all the women were at fault.
[00:39:47] I says,
[00:39:48] you know what?
[00:39:48] You're the only common factor in these marriages.
[00:39:52] And you picked five bad women?
[00:39:55] Well,
[00:39:55] your picker's wrong then.
[00:39:56] And if Trump's picking bad people,
[00:39:59] deep state people,
[00:40:00] that are going to roll him every chance he gets,
[00:40:03] we don't have a president of the United States.
[00:40:05] We have a Charlie McCarthy,
[00:40:08] Edward Bergen.
[00:40:11] I mean,
[00:40:11] we got puppets.
[00:40:13] And we can't have that.
[00:40:15] This is not what this is about.
[00:40:18] Substantive things that really matter.
[00:40:21] Long term,
[00:40:22] I mean,
[00:40:23] nuclear attack,
[00:40:24] World War III,
[00:40:26] decisions about,
[00:40:27] you know,
[00:40:28] being involved in blockades of nations,
[00:40:31] and economic embargoes,
[00:40:33] and all of these things are acts of war.
[00:40:35] And the president does it willy-nilly.
[00:40:38] It's shocking.
[00:40:39] Go ahead and skip the break.
[00:40:41] I think this is too critical of a conversation.
[00:40:43] So,
[00:40:43] you know,
[00:40:44] I know I'm hard on Donald,
[00:40:45] and I know there was a three-hour interview,
[00:40:46] and I know I took only a couple of clips.
[00:40:48] But this one especially
[00:40:50] really concerns me,
[00:40:51] though.
[00:40:51] It's not even about JFK now.
[00:40:53] It's about,
[00:40:54] hey,
[00:40:55] is there really
[00:40:57] classified information
[00:40:58] that's relevant for today?
[00:41:00] So it's so important
[00:41:01] you can't release it
[00:41:01] because,
[00:41:02] you know,
[00:41:02] today matters.
[00:41:03] And the president doesn't know about it.
[00:41:05] Is that really true?
[00:41:06] And if that's really true,
[00:41:08] then my question is,
[00:41:09] how can he protect the country
[00:41:10] if he doesn't know about it?
[00:41:11] And number two,
[00:41:12] who does know about it?
[00:41:13] If nobody knows about it,
[00:41:14] then we better open the files,
[00:41:15] and we better know about it,
[00:41:17] and we better know fast.
[00:41:19] And so if he doesn't know,
[00:41:21] but others do know,
[00:41:23] and they're advising him
[00:41:24] not to look,
[00:41:25] to try to keep him
[00:41:26] out of that know,
[00:41:27] that borders on treason,
[00:41:29] doctor.
[00:41:30] Right.
[00:41:31] You can't have
[00:41:32] a president
[00:41:33] that doesn't
[00:41:35] have access
[00:41:36] to knowledge.
[00:41:37] I mean,
[00:41:38] if there's something
[00:41:39] of value there,
[00:41:40] now,
[00:41:40] again,
[00:41:41] we have been kept,
[00:41:42] and I go back again
[00:41:43] to JFK an awful lot
[00:41:45] because that was
[00:41:45] on the table,
[00:41:46] but I personally
[00:41:48] knew the guy
[00:41:49] that was sitting
[00:41:50] in the Gitmo,
[00:41:51] you know,
[00:41:51] in Guantanamo Bay,
[00:41:52] in the crypto room
[00:41:54] that was providing
[00:41:55] information
[00:41:56] to John F. Kennedy
[00:41:57] in regard
[00:41:58] to the Russian
[00:42:00] military
[00:42:02] nuke weapons
[00:42:02] installation
[00:42:03] on Cuba.
[00:42:05] This is,
[00:42:06] he's dead now.
[00:42:07] He's a personal friend.
[00:42:08] I mean,
[00:42:09] this is one of the people
[00:42:09] whose name wouldn't even
[00:42:10] have to be redacted anymore,
[00:42:11] but he wasn't involved
[00:42:12] in the assassination,
[00:42:13] by the way.
[00:42:14] But he was there
[00:42:16] providing information
[00:42:17] to John F. Kennedy
[00:42:19] that Kennedy
[00:42:21] presented falsely
[00:42:23] to the American people
[00:42:25] when he came on the TV
[00:42:27] in October of 1962
[00:42:29] and says,
[00:42:30] we got this problem,
[00:42:31] America.
[00:42:32] Houston,
[00:42:33] we have a problem,
[00:42:34] you know.
[00:42:35] It was incomplete.
[00:42:36] Now,
[00:42:36] okay,
[00:42:37] I can see why
[00:42:37] he may have done that
[00:42:38] the way he did it,
[00:42:40] although I really don't
[00:42:41] in the information
[00:42:43] I know and have,
[00:42:44] but the fact of the matter
[00:42:45] is he did what he did
[00:42:46] and it may have been
[00:42:47] considered a national
[00:42:48] security issue at the time,
[00:42:49] but it's not today.
[00:42:51] It is not today.
[00:42:53] You know,
[00:42:53] we're,
[00:42:54] so what,
[00:42:55] 62,
[00:42:55] 64,
[00:42:56] whatever,
[00:42:57] 62 years later
[00:42:58] than that now,
[00:43:00] and times and seasons
[00:43:01] and everything,
[00:43:02] the issues have changed
[00:43:04] and Americans need to know
[00:43:07] what was really happening
[00:43:08] at that time
[00:43:09] and whether it's
[00:43:10] the Kennedy assassination
[00:43:11] or whatever.
[00:43:12] We need to have names
[00:43:13] brought forth.
[00:43:14] The guilty people
[00:43:16] need to be identified.
[00:43:17] There needs to be
[00:43:18] a recognition
[00:43:19] that when you make calls
[00:43:21] that are destructive
[00:43:22] of everything Americanist,
[00:43:24] someday,
[00:43:24] your name's going to be
[00:43:26] put up in,
[00:43:26] in,
[00:43:27] I don't know,
[00:43:28] you don't want to put them
[00:43:30] in lights,
[00:43:30] but you've got to,
[00:43:31] it's going to have
[00:43:31] to be made
[00:43:32] and you can't let
[00:43:34] the guilty continue
[00:43:35] to slide.
[00:43:37] And everybody think
[00:43:38] that we've got
[00:43:39] this lily white group.
[00:43:41] Snowden and Assange
[00:43:43] did America
[00:43:44] some great,
[00:43:45] great work,
[00:43:46] but Pompeo
[00:43:48] wanted them killed.
[00:43:49] I mean,
[00:43:50] come on.
[00:43:50] He revealed the fact
[00:43:52] that Americans
[00:43:53] were having dossiers
[00:43:54] built on them,
[00:43:55] that bad things
[00:43:57] were happening
[00:43:58] and covered up
[00:43:59] in the name
[00:44:00] of national security
[00:44:02] when stuff was going
[00:44:03] on in the war theaters,
[00:44:05] stuff that we were
[00:44:06] doing bad
[00:44:06] that the Nazis
[00:44:07] would not have been,
[00:44:09] well,
[00:44:09] they were probably
[00:44:10] guilty of it,
[00:44:10] but they shouldn't
[00:44:11] have been let off
[00:44:12] the hook on it,
[00:44:13] okay?
[00:44:13] There's no question
[00:44:14] we're involved
[00:44:15] to our eyeballs
[00:44:16] on that.
[00:44:16] And so,
[00:44:17] this idea
[00:44:17] that the president
[00:44:18] doesn't know
[00:44:19] something of national import
[00:44:20] that could be
[00:44:20] in the JFK files
[00:44:21] or forget that
[00:44:23] JFK files,
[00:44:24] forget that little
[00:44:24] sliver,
[00:44:26] what about
[00:44:27] all the other things
[00:44:27] that they're saying,
[00:44:28] Donald,
[00:44:29] you don't really
[00:44:30] need to know that.
[00:44:31] What?
[00:44:32] Who do you think
[00:44:33] you are,
[00:44:34] clowns?
[00:44:35] What gives you
[00:44:36] the authority
[00:44:36] and the right?
[00:44:37] Okay,
[00:44:37] so Donald Trump
[00:44:38] inadvertently
[00:44:39] let something go
[00:44:40] that nobody else
[00:44:41] that I know of
[00:44:43] is realizing
[00:44:45] and is willing
[00:44:45] to focus on.
[00:44:46] This is serious
[00:44:47] indeed.
[00:44:48] Well,
[00:44:49] I pray we don't
[00:44:50] have violence
[00:44:50] before the 2024
[00:44:51] election or after,
[00:44:54] Dr. Bradley,
[00:44:56] but I am afraid
[00:44:58] that we are going
[00:44:59] to end up
[00:45:00] with violence.
[00:45:02] Okay?
[00:45:02] We've just had
[00:45:03] gaslighting
[00:45:03] from both sides
[00:45:04] of the aisle,
[00:45:05] the deep state
[00:45:05] for way too long.
[00:45:06] The American people
[00:45:07] are sick of it
[00:45:07] and it doesn't matter
[00:45:08] who wins
[00:45:09] or who loses.
[00:45:09] They've created
[00:45:10] a divide in America
[00:45:11] that is so profound
[00:45:13] that not only
[00:45:13] might it spill
[00:45:14] into violence
[00:45:14] after the election
[00:45:15] no matter which side
[00:45:16] wins,
[00:45:16] but it might even
[00:45:18] culminate in a civil war.
[00:45:19] I pray that it does not.
[00:45:20] I'll do everything
[00:45:21] that I can
[00:45:21] to prevent it.
[00:45:22] I follow the Prince
[00:45:23] of Peace.
[00:45:23] So let's be very clear.
[00:45:25] I'm just telling you
[00:45:25] right now
[00:45:26] that I'm very concerned
[00:45:27] about this.
[00:45:28] But there's a headline
[00:45:29] that says this,
[00:45:30] a very large majority
[00:45:32] of Americans
[00:45:34] believe words
[00:45:35] can be equated
[00:45:36] to quote
[00:45:37] physical violence.
[00:45:39] A poll released
[00:45:40] on Thursday found,
[00:45:42] wow,
[00:45:44] in total they say
[00:45:46] 80% of respondents
[00:45:47] at least slightly agree
[00:45:49] with the statement
[00:45:51] that words
[00:45:52] can be violence
[00:45:53] while 22%
[00:45:55] said it describes
[00:45:57] their thoughts
[00:45:58] completely.
[00:45:59] Wow.
[00:46:01] That's according
[00:46:02] to a poll
[00:46:03] by the,
[00:46:04] I don't even know
[00:46:05] what you call
[00:46:05] this thing.
[00:46:07] They call it
[00:46:08] the Foundation
[00:46:08] for Individual Rights
[00:46:10] and Expression
[00:46:11] fire.
[00:46:13] It's described
[00:46:14] as shocking
[00:46:15] this poll
[00:46:16] and they go on
[00:46:17] and say only 12%
[00:46:18] of Gen Z
[00:46:19] respondents
[00:46:20] disagreed
[00:46:21] that speech
[00:46:21] could be violent.
[00:46:22] Or speech
[00:46:23] could be violence.
[00:46:25] Equating words
[00:46:26] with violence
[00:46:28] trivializes
[00:46:29] actual physical harm.
[00:46:30] They go on
[00:46:30] and on and on.
[00:46:31] It's a big old
[00:46:31] long story.
[00:46:33] But I want you
[00:46:33] to take up the time
[00:46:34] and me talking
[00:46:35] about it
[00:46:35] not just go
[00:46:36] into the story
[00:46:37] forever.
[00:46:37] The group
[00:46:37] called FIRE
[00:46:38] is the one
[00:46:39] who did this.
[00:46:40] But this idea
[00:46:41] that words
[00:46:41] equate to violence
[00:46:42] they're literally
[00:46:43] going to turn
[00:46:44] your views
[00:46:45] and my views
[00:46:45] into hate speech
[00:46:46] say that
[00:46:47] equates to violence
[00:46:48] and eventually
[00:46:48] prosecute and
[00:46:49] persecute us
[00:46:50] over our
[00:46:51] free speech.
[00:46:51] That's where
[00:46:51] this is headed
[00:46:52] doctor.
[00:46:53] And now they
[00:46:53] pulled the
[00:46:54] American people
[00:46:54] and they say
[00:46:54] they've got
[00:46:55] a mandate
[00:46:55] to do it.
[00:46:58] Regardless
[00:46:58] of their mandate
[00:46:59] it doesn't
[00:47:00] overcome
[00:47:00] the canonization
[00:47:02] of the individual
[00:47:03] God-given right
[00:47:04] for freedom
[00:47:05] of the press
[00:47:06] and the speech.
[00:47:07] And this has been
[00:47:09] formulating
[00:47:10] for years
[00:47:11] literally.
[00:47:11] We've got
[00:47:12] woke
[00:47:14] snowflake
[00:47:14] people
[00:47:15] in the academic
[00:47:16] worlds
[00:47:17] that are
[00:47:17] threatened
[00:47:18] by free speech
[00:47:20] and they want
[00:47:21] to control
[00:47:22] contain it.
[00:47:23] And they
[00:47:24] want to be able
[00:47:25] to claim
[00:47:25] that their
[00:47:26] insanity
[00:47:26] of whether
[00:47:27] it's their
[00:47:27] made up
[00:47:28] sexual status
[00:47:28] or whatever
[00:47:29] it is
[00:47:29] has to be
[00:47:30] protected
[00:47:31] or we're
[00:47:31] being violent
[00:47:32] against them.
[00:47:33] This is
[00:47:34] something that
[00:47:35] literally
[00:47:36] they've been
[00:47:36] working on
[00:47:37] for years
[00:47:37] and by the
[00:47:38] way in
[00:47:39] 2016
[00:47:40] September
[00:47:41] of 2016
[00:47:42] Barack Obama's
[00:47:44] U.S.
[00:47:45] Civil Rights
[00:47:45] Commission
[00:47:45] put out
[00:47:46] a report
[00:47:47] on religious
[00:47:48] liberty.
[00:47:49] And so
[00:47:49] this isn't
[00:47:50] just speech
[00:47:51] by the way
[00:47:51] so I'm
[00:47:52] saying it's
[00:47:53] as wide
[00:47:53] as the
[00:47:54] whole
[00:47:54] principles
[00:47:56] based
[00:47:56] solution
[00:47:57] that we
[00:47:57] have been
[00:47:57] given in
[00:47:58] America
[00:47:58] by God.
[00:47:59] But they're
[00:48:00] trying to
[00:48:01] as narrowly
[00:48:03] define and
[00:48:04] focus
[00:48:04] religious
[00:48:05] liberty
[00:48:06] as they
[00:48:06] possibly
[00:48:06] can
[00:48:07] so that
[00:48:07] it
[00:48:08] doesn't
[00:48:08] interfere
[00:48:08] with the
[00:48:09] government
[00:48:10] created
[00:48:11] liberties
[00:48:12] that create
[00:48:13] responsibilities
[00:48:14] for others
[00:48:15] to fulfill.
[00:48:15] If you
[00:48:16] create one
[00:48:17] of those
[00:48:18] liberties
[00:48:18] someone else
[00:48:19] has to
[00:48:20] fulfill it.
[00:48:21] And so
[00:48:21] they want
[00:48:21] religious
[00:48:22] liberties
[00:48:23] speech
[00:48:24] and press
[00:48:24] and everything
[00:48:25] as narrowly
[00:48:25] defined as
[00:48:26] possible
[00:48:26] so that
[00:48:28] they can
[00:48:28] control
[00:48:28] and contain.
[00:48:29] And literally
[00:48:31] and truthfully
[00:48:32] what they've
[00:48:32] done is
[00:48:32] they perverted
[00:48:33] and turned
[00:48:34] the First
[00:48:34] Amendment
[00:48:34] on its
[00:48:35] head.
[00:48:36] And this
[00:48:37] idea of
[00:48:39] some kind
[00:48:40] of
[00:48:43] salacious
[00:48:43] communication
[00:48:44] pornography
[00:48:46] words
[00:48:47] profanity
[00:48:48] whatever it
[00:48:49] is
[00:48:49] that
[00:48:50] they're
[00:48:51] protecting
[00:48:51] with the
[00:48:52] First
[00:48:52] Amendment
[00:48:53] is really
[00:48:53] not the
[00:48:54] basis
[00:48:54] of the
[00:48:55] Amendment's
[00:48:56] effort
[00:48:57] at all.
[00:48:57] It's
[00:48:58] to protect
[00:48:58] our ability
[00:48:59] to speak
[00:49:00] about issues
[00:49:01] that face
[00:49:02] us and
[00:49:02] threaten us.
[00:49:03] And if
[00:49:04] in fact
[00:49:05] someone is
[00:49:05] threatening
[00:49:05] to take
[00:49:06] away the
[00:49:06] Second
[00:49:07] Amendment
[00:49:07] for example
[00:49:07] we need
[00:49:08] to talk
[00:49:08] about that.
[00:49:09] Someone
[00:49:10] is talking
[00:49:11] about protecting
[00:49:12] the unborn
[00:49:12] oh no
[00:49:14] they can't
[00:49:14] do that
[00:49:14] that will
[00:49:15] offend me
[00:49:15] I don't
[00:49:16] want to
[00:49:17] have those
[00:49:18] images in
[00:49:18] my mind
[00:49:19] of babies
[00:49:19] being torn
[00:49:20] apart.
[00:49:20] However
[00:49:21] they spin
[00:49:22] this
[00:49:22] they're
[00:49:23] trying to
[00:49:23] control
[00:49:24] and contain
[00:49:24] the dialogue
[00:49:26] the debate
[00:49:27] the discussion
[00:49:28] that's so
[00:49:29] essential to
[00:49:29] liberty.
[00:49:30] You know
[00:49:31] the American
[00:49:31] founding fathers
[00:49:33] they used
[00:49:35] to meet
[00:49:35] in taverns
[00:49:36] in churches
[00:49:36] in courtyards
[00:49:38] and park
[00:49:39] ways
[00:49:40] wherever
[00:49:40] and discuss
[00:49:42] ideas
[00:49:42] and they
[00:49:44] didn't always
[00:49:44] agree
[00:49:45] but they
[00:49:46] exchanged
[00:49:46] ideas
[00:49:46] and they
[00:49:47] came to
[00:49:47] discuss
[00:49:48] the points
[00:49:49] that ultimately
[00:49:50] and finally
[00:49:51] the foundational
[00:49:52] principles
[00:49:53] of this
[00:49:53] nation
[00:49:53] came out
[00:49:54] of that
[00:49:55] and why
[00:49:56] they
[00:49:56] you know
[00:49:57] you look
[00:49:58] at the
[00:49:58] federalist
[00:49:58] papers
[00:49:59] and the
[00:49:59] anti-federalist
[00:50:00] papers
[00:50:00] there was
[00:50:01] an open
[00:50:02] dialogue
[00:50:02] about what
[00:50:03] was perceived
[00:50:04] as right
[00:50:04] and what
[00:50:05] was perceived
[00:50:05] as wrong
[00:50:06] as the
[00:50:06] newly
[00:50:07] signed
[00:50:08] constitution
[00:50:08] and some
[00:50:10] were against
[00:50:10] its ratification
[00:50:11] some were
[00:50:11] for it
[00:50:12] but they
[00:50:13] had a free
[00:50:13] exchange
[00:50:14] and for
[00:50:15] people to
[00:50:16] try and
[00:50:16] say oh
[00:50:17] oh
[00:50:23] it's against
[00:50:24] the law
[00:50:24] in many
[00:50:25] countries
[00:50:25] to even
[00:50:26] say something
[00:50:26] like for
[00:50:27] example
[00:50:29] that Nazi
[00:50:30] Germany was
[00:50:30] right
[00:50:31] I mean
[00:50:32] come on
[00:50:32] come on
[00:50:33] people
[00:50:33] there may
[00:50:35] be a bunch
[00:50:35] of idiots
[00:50:35] that believe
[00:50:36] that
[00:50:36] to say Nazi Germany
[00:50:37] was right
[00:50:37] if they think
[00:50:38] that
[00:50:38] but that's
[00:50:39] the problem
[00:50:40] is there
[00:50:40] there are
[00:50:41] laws against
[00:50:42] that in
[00:50:42] some
[00:50:42] countries
[00:50:43] and the
[00:50:43] United States
[00:50:44] has even
[00:50:45] strayed
[00:50:45] very far
[00:50:46] the recent
[00:50:47] Congress
[00:50:48] anti-Semitic
[00:50:49] words
[00:50:49] if you don't
[00:50:50] believe it
[00:50:50] in the
[00:50:51] climate lies
[00:50:51] then you're
[00:50:52] a climate
[00:50:52] change denier
[00:50:53] and you need
[00:50:54] to be put
[00:50:54] in jail
[00:50:54] and they're
[00:50:55] literally
[00:50:55] going for
[00:50:56] it people
[00:50:56] and this
[00:50:57] is my
[00:50:57] point
[00:50:57] so I'm
[00:50:59] not here
[00:50:59] to attack
[00:50:59] Donald Trump
[00:51:00] I think
[00:51:00] Donald's a lot
[00:51:01] better than
[00:51:01] Kamala
[00:51:02] I hope
[00:51:02] Donald wins
[00:51:03] compared to
[00:51:04] Kamala
[00:51:04] because that's
[00:51:04] the only
[00:51:05] choices
[00:51:05] we've been
[00:51:05] given
[00:51:06] in the
[00:51:07] selection
[00:51:07] process
[00:51:08] not the
[00:51:08] election
[00:51:08] process
[00:51:09] and you
[00:51:10] know
[00:51:10] but I
[00:51:11] fear even
[00:51:11] when Donald
[00:51:12] becomes
[00:51:12] president
[00:51:12] because he
[00:51:13] gaslights
[00:51:13] us so much
[00:51:14] of the
[00:51:14] time
[00:51:14] this idea
[00:51:15] that there's
[00:51:16] things in
[00:51:16] those files
[00:51:17] he shouldn't
[00:51:17] know
[00:51:18] if he really
[00:51:19] thinks that
[00:51:19] as president
[00:51:20] he's as
[00:51:20] ignorant as
[00:51:20] it gets
[00:51:21] and if he
[00:51:22] doesn't think
[00:51:23] that then he
[00:51:23] just lied to
[00:51:24] us
[00:51:24] which is it
[00:51:24] either way
[00:51:25] it's not
[00:51:26] good doctor
[00:51:27] no he's
[00:51:28] he's mistaken
[00:51:28] regardless
[00:51:29] of the intent
[00:51:30] in his
[00:51:30] heart
[00:51:31] and and
[00:51:32] it's it's
[00:51:33] one of the
[00:51:33] things that
[00:51:34] that the
[00:51:34] president really
[00:51:35] does have to
[00:51:36] be thick
[00:51:36] enough skinned
[00:51:37] and smart
[00:51:38] enough a quick
[00:51:39] enough study
[00:51:40] to be able
[00:51:41] to grasp
[00:51:41] principles of
[00:51:42] depth and
[00:51:43] breadth and
[00:51:44] keep them
[00:51:44] in the
[00:51:45] right scale
[00:51:47] we've got
[00:51:48] to weigh
[00:51:48] everything in
[00:51:49] the correct
[00:51:49] scale
[00:51:50] you know
[00:51:51] you can't
[00:51:51] suddenly
[00:51:51] become marks
[00:51:53] and say
[00:51:54] from each
[00:51:55] according to
[00:51:56] his ability
[00:51:56] to each
[00:51:57] according to
[00:51:57] his needs
[00:51:57] and lead
[00:51:58] this country
[00:51:58] there are
[00:51:59] limits and
[00:52:00] bounds on
[00:52:00] what we can
[00:52:01] spend money
[00:52:01] on I
[00:52:02] mean you
[00:52:03] cannot just
[00:52:03] because it's
[00:52:04] popular say
[00:52:05] all right
[00:52:06] we're gonna
[00:52:06] do that
[00:52:07] you know
[00:52:07] you can't
[00:52:08] be a
[00:52:08] glad-handing
[00:52:09] people pleaser
[00:52:10] you've got
[00:52:11] to be somebody
[00:52:11] that says
[00:52:12] you know what
[00:52:12] that's not
[00:52:13] inner bounds
[00:52:13] we can't
[00:52:15] play in
[00:52:15] that
[00:52:15] sandbox
[00:52:16] and
[00:52:17] you've got
[00:52:18] to have
[00:52:18] and I
[00:52:19] think
[00:52:19] really
[00:52:19] what would
[00:52:19] be the
[00:52:20] best way
[00:52:20] to do
[00:52:20] it is for
[00:52:21] a president
[00:52:21] a communicator
[00:52:23] as many
[00:52:23] problems I
[00:52:24] think Ronald
[00:52:24] Reagan had
[00:52:25] he did
[00:52:25] a good job
[00:52:26] of communicating
[00:52:27] to the
[00:52:27] American
[00:52:27] people
[00:52:28] and
[00:52:29] sometimes
[00:52:29] you've got
[00:52:30] to take
[00:52:30] the message
[00:52:31] to the
[00:52:31] people
[00:52:31] I mean
[00:52:32] you look
[00:52:33] at State
[00:52:33] of the
[00:52:34] Union
[00:52:34] address
[00:52:34] and the
[00:52:35] Bravo Sierra
[00:52:35] that goes
[00:52:36] on there
[00:52:36] the pep
[00:52:37] rally
[00:52:43] and doing
[00:52:44] a fireside
[00:52:45] conversation
[00:52:46] if you will
[00:52:46] like
[00:52:47] like FDR
[00:52:48] used to do
[00:52:48] back in those
[00:52:49] great days
[00:52:50] of the
[00:52:50] of the
[00:52:51] depression
[00:52:52] you know
[00:52:52] where you
[00:52:53] know he
[00:52:54] talks about
[00:52:54] the only thing
[00:52:55] we have to fear
[00:52:55] is fear
[00:52:56] itself
[00:52:56] you know
[00:52:56] he rallied
[00:52:57] the people
[00:52:58] through
[00:52:59] bringing the
[00:52:59] message
[00:53:00] to the
[00:53:00] people
[00:53:00] a lot
[00:53:01] of times
[00:53:01] he sucker
[00:53:02] punched
[00:53:02] Americans
[00:53:03] but if
[00:53:04] you're
[00:53:04] a principles
[00:53:05] based
[00:53:05] individual
[00:53:06] and you
[00:53:06] took
[00:53:07] the
[00:53:08] argument
[00:53:08] to the
[00:53:08] people
[00:53:09] and presented
[00:53:10] it
[00:53:11] and allowed
[00:53:11] Americans
[00:53:12] to hear
[00:53:13] it
[00:53:13] straight
[00:53:13] from the
[00:53:13] horse's
[00:53:14] mouth
[00:53:14] you know
[00:53:15] he's got
[00:53:15] to become
[00:53:16] smart
[00:53:16] enough
[00:53:16] to say
[00:53:17] well in
[00:53:17] article 1
[00:53:18] section 8
[00:53:19] clause 11
[00:53:19] it says
[00:53:20] this about
[00:53:20] going to
[00:53:21] war
[00:53:21] I mean
[00:53:23] chapter
[00:53:24] and verse
[00:53:24] let's do
[00:53:25] that
[00:53:25] it's not
[00:53:26] a
[00:53:26] if he even
[00:53:27] has general
[00:53:28] understanding
[00:53:28] of principles
[00:53:29] and staff
[00:53:29] members pull
[00:53:30] up the
[00:53:30] sightings
[00:53:31] for him
[00:53:31] I get
[00:53:31] that
[00:53:32] people might
[00:53:32] not be able
[00:53:33] to quote
[00:53:33] chapter and
[00:53:34] verse
[00:53:34] but you need
[00:53:34] to understand
[00:53:35] the principle
[00:53:35] the principle
[00:53:36] is look
[00:53:36] we can't
[00:53:37] chase after
[00:53:38] monsters
[00:53:38] around the
[00:53:39] world
[00:53:39] we've got
[00:53:40] to have
[00:53:40] a humble
[00:53:41] foreign policy
[00:53:42] based on
[00:53:42] morality
[00:53:43] and based
[00:53:44] on God's
[00:53:44] law
[00:53:44] thou shalt
[00:53:45] not kill
[00:53:45] and if
[00:53:46] there's an
[00:53:46] exception
[00:53:47] to that
[00:53:47] let's hear
[00:53:48] it
[00:53:48] and see
[00:53:49] if it
[00:53:50] fulfills
[00:53:50] the constitutional
[00:53:51] requirements
[00:53:52] and the
[00:53:52] moral
[00:53:52] requirements
[00:53:53] but 9
[00:53:53] times out
[00:53:54] of 10
[00:53:54] if you're
[00:53:54] going
[00:53:54] into
[00:53:54] other
[00:53:55] people's
[00:53:55] countries
[00:53:56] in other
[00:53:57] words
[00:53:57] going out
[00:53:58] looking for
[00:53:58] war
[00:53:59] or going
[00:53:59] out
[00:54:00] that's
[00:54:01] not a
[00:54:01] self-defense
[00:54:01] mode
[00:54:02] by any
[00:54:03] means
[00:54:03] and so
[00:54:04] principles
[00:54:04] can put
[00:54:05] you on
[00:54:05] the right
[00:54:05] track
[00:54:05] in about
[00:54:06] 5 seconds
[00:54:06] whether you
[00:54:07] can quote
[00:54:07] chapter or
[00:54:07] verse or
[00:54:08] not
[00:54:08] so I
[00:54:09] don't expect
[00:54:09] Donald to be
[00:54:09] perfect
[00:54:10] but I do
[00:54:10] expect him
[00:54:11] if he's
[00:54:11] bidding
[00:54:12] to lead
[00:54:13] the free
[00:54:13] world
[00:54:13] he better
[00:54:14] know what
[00:54:14] he's
[00:54:14] talking
[00:54:15] about
[00:54:15] and he
[00:54:15] better
[00:54:15] not be
[00:54:16] snookered
[00:54:16] by those
[00:54:16] around him
[00:54:17] and I
[00:54:17] still see
[00:54:18] that he
[00:54:18] is right
[00:54:18] now
[00:54:19] according to
[00:54:19] the Joe
[00:54:19] Rogan
[00:54:20] interview
[00:54:21] so there
[00:54:22] you have
[00:54:22] it
[00:54:22] I don't
[00:54:22] know what
[00:54:22] to say
[00:54:23] about it
[00:54:23] I'm voting
[00:54:24] for Scott
[00:54:24] Bradley
[00:54:24] we need a
[00:54:26] national day
[00:54:26] of prayer
[00:54:27] Sam
[00:54:27] let's
[00:54:28] let's
[00:54:28] encourage
[00:54:29] that
[00:54:29] man
[00:54:29] all right
[00:54:30] we'll talk
[00:54:30] about that
[00:54:31] more tale
[00:54:31] on Monday
[00:54:32] right before
[00:54:32] the election
[00:54:33] amen
[00:54:33] hang tight
[00:54:34] hour
[00:54:35] two
[00:54:35] finished
[00:54:36] on Monday
[00:54:37] we're live
[00:54:38] Dr. Bradley
[00:54:39] Sam Bushman
[00:54:40] God save
[00:54:41] the Republic
[00:54:41] of the United
[00:54:42] States
[00:54:43] of America
[00:54:44] God


