Radio Show Hour 1 – 11/11/2024

[00:00:13] Broadcasting live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West, you are listening

[00:00:19] to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show.

[00:00:24] All right, happy to have you along my fellow Americans, Sam Bushman on your radio, hard

[00:00:29] hitting news that I've refused to use, no doubt, starts now.

[00:00:32] This is, what, November the 11th already?

[00:00:35] Wow.

[00:00:36] In the year of our Lord, 2024, Hour 1 of 2, myself, Dr. Scott Bradley, talking about promoting

[00:00:42] God, family, country, protecting life, liberty, and property, rejecting revolution unless it's

[00:00:46] Jesus' revolution, using the supreme law of the land, the Constitution for the United States

[00:00:50] of America as our guide, knowing that the checks and balances are brilliantly put in place by

[00:00:54] the Founding Fathers, one of the peaceful, restorative solutions we have at our fingertips.

[00:00:58] Dr. Bradley with me, freedomsrisingsun.com.

[00:01:00] Check out his weekly webinars and more Q&As on the Constitution.

[00:01:04] Speaking of that, let's dig right in, shall we?

[00:01:08] Farewell.

[00:01:10] Yeah, RIP.

[00:01:11] Rest in peace, my brother.

[00:01:12] What are we talking about?

[00:01:13] Former John Birch Society CEO, Art Thompson, passes away.

[00:01:18] Our prayers are with his family.

[00:01:20] He had a long run and was a dedicated man, doctor.

[00:01:25] Fought a good fight.

[00:01:26] He was a dedicated, principled man that was seeking to preserve the foundation of the nation.

[00:01:34] You know, and I know a few of the little bits and pieces.

[00:01:38] He and I have spoken at a number of events together, had dinner together a time or two,

[00:01:42] and he's a quiet, unsung, unassuming kind of hero.

[00:01:49] He wrote a number of books, but he rarely put himself in the limelight.

[00:01:57] I personally know of instances where he was offered an honorarium to come and speak and everything like that,

[00:02:04] and he accepted it and donated it immediately to the John Birch Society.

[00:02:08] I mean, he just deflected the things from his own benefit.

[00:02:12] You know, he was not a patriot for profit.

[00:02:14] That's for darn sure.

[00:02:15] So, yeah, he's a...

[00:02:16] I think that, you know, he'll be able to stand tall before the bar of God when they say,

[00:02:21] what did you do to preserve the blessings of liberty?

[00:02:23] And I think he's one guy that did quite a bit, and yeah, I think he'll be missed, but you know...

[00:02:31] He didn't seek for credit either, in my opinion, not a man that's a patriot for profit,

[00:02:36] but certainly a patriot on principle.

[00:02:39] Farewell, our dear friend.

[00:02:41] I will say that.

[00:02:42] Wisely, Donald Trump rejects.

[00:02:44] Let me say that again.

[00:02:46] Wisely, Trump rejects.

[00:02:48] Haley and Pompeo.

[00:02:50] Wow, that's good news, doctor.

[00:02:54] Well, you know, and in many ways I could say, duh.

[00:02:58] I mean, you know, we have a track record here, kids.

[00:03:02] Say again?

[00:03:03] I said, no question.

[00:03:04] Oh, yeah.

[00:03:05] I mean, we have a track record.

[00:03:06] It's like a kid to even consider it would be nuts on braid.

[00:03:09] And, you know, he gave them praise and then rejected them.

[00:03:15] And I don't know if he was vindictively doing it or he was trying to just kind of make softer the exit from the thing.

[00:03:24] But I remember when he brought Mitt Romney in back in 2016 to talk to him about being on the, you know, being the Secretary of State.

[00:03:35] And I thought, holy cow, what the heck is he thinking about?

[00:03:39] I mean, you know, I just, of course, about swallowed my tongue.

[00:03:42] And then he rejected him.

[00:03:44] And Romney kind of, you know, took this left turn and off the rails and became a never-Trumper and everything.

[00:03:52] I think Romney was feeling like, you know, maybe if I'm going to be the Secretary of State, maybe I could work in there.

[00:03:59] And this is what politicians do, and this is kind of my problem with Trump, and this is kind of my problem with, you know, all these people.

[00:04:05] It's like, why even work together?

[00:04:07] I, for one, would never call Romney to be involved in anything ever.

[00:04:11] The guy's a clown.

[00:04:12] No offense, but the guy's against everything we stand for.

[00:04:15] He's a carpetbagger.

[00:04:17] He's, you know, came and ran the Olympics to try to, you know, do the precursor to go ahead and get elected.

[00:04:23] Nobody wanted him there.

[00:04:24] He circumvented the system, the caucus system, and played all kinds of games to get there in the first place.

[00:04:29] I mean, the guy's an absolute disaster of everything I hold dear.

[00:04:33] And so, you know, I'm glad that Trump rejects Haley and Pompeo, but, man, I don't know why we even spend time with these kind of clowns when there's so many good people in the country that could do a stellar job.

[00:04:44] Speaking of that, Trump did select Representative Elise Stefanik, that's of New York, right, to serve as United Nations ambassador.

[00:04:53] What do you think of that, sir?

[00:04:55] Well, I kind of expected her to be somewhere in the administration because of her abject, unwavering support for Trump.

[00:05:04] In fact, there was people talking at one point of her being a vice presidential pick.

[00:05:09] I thought it would have been a mistake then.

[00:05:11] The United Nations thing is questionable, but it is the United Nations.

[00:05:15] So what's not questionable about the United Nations?

[00:05:17] I'll tell you what you do.

[00:05:18] You don't appoint anybody to the United Nations at all.

[00:05:21] You hold up funding to it, and you push Congress to shut that sucker down tomorrow.

[00:05:25] Just get out of it.

[00:05:27] I'm fully in support of that concept, for sure.

[00:05:31] But somebody's going to be replacing Stefanik, and I'm wondering, did she not run this time?

[00:05:39] I don't really know what happened with that.

[00:05:41] I'd have to research that.

[00:05:41] All I can tell you is it's interesting, and I wouldn't put her near the administration personally.

[00:05:46] Yeah.

[00:05:48] All right.

[00:05:48] So there you have that.

[00:05:49] Now, Trump also basically appoints or will appoint former ICE director Tom Holman as, quote, U.S. borders are.

[00:05:58] Now, I don't even like the term czar.

[00:06:00] We don't have czars in the Constitutional Republic.

[00:06:02] So I don't really like the phrase or the headline.

[00:06:05] But anyway, there it goes, Tom Holman to be there.

[00:06:08] And, you know, that was pretty expected as well, right?

[00:06:11] I think so.

[00:06:12] I think a lot of people were blowing on those embers to kind of fan up into a bonfire.

[00:06:17] But you're right.

[00:06:18] Let me just, that commentary on the czar thing.

[00:06:21] That's a Russian term used throughout the Soviet era for the, you know, the chief cook and bottle washer that was overall the torture or whatever.

[00:06:33] Anything they did as czar was, to me, it's a kind of a bridge to communism.

[00:06:39] I don't like the term either at all.

[00:06:42] It just grates on my nerves.

[00:06:44] You know, there's, you know, we don't have princes and dukes and czars and all that kind of stuff.

[00:06:50] And it just sounds like somebody's trying to soften this up for kind of a Soviet era kind of government, you know.

[00:07:00] Let me give you an example.

[00:07:01] If you look up czar on Google, the first definition you get says this.

[00:07:05] A male monarch or emperor, especially one of the, quote, emperors who ruled Russia until the revolution of the 1917.

[00:07:16] Okay.

[00:07:16] A person having great power or authority.

[00:07:20] A king.

[00:07:21] A chief.

[00:07:22] The title of the emperor of Russia.

[00:07:25] I mean, none of that is what we stand for in America.

[00:07:28] And, in fact, the founding fathers were against every bit of even a hint of those things, doctor.

[00:07:35] Well, they said no titles of nobility.

[00:07:38] I mean, you know, it's one of those things where, yeah, you know, you might not, as an American citizen, immediately think of some noble title.

[00:07:49] But that's basically what it is.

[00:07:51] If you go to Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8, no titles of nobility shall be granted by the United States.

[00:07:59] Amen to that.

[00:08:00] How about that, sports fans?

[00:08:01] Anyway, I leave that czar term in my notes.

[00:08:04] And here's what I find interesting.

[00:08:05] A lot of people read the notes of this show and they don't listen to the details, Dr. Bradley.

[00:08:09] And they get deceived and make comments on Facebook and Twitter and different places based on the notes that they see.

[00:08:15] The problem is they go out in the weeds and their comments are sometimes so ignorant and so irrelevant based on what we talk about.

[00:08:21] For example, you know, hey, I'm saying Tom Holman is not maybe who I would pick, but he's way better than most.

[00:08:26] Right?

[00:08:27] But nevertheless, I'm against czars.

[00:08:30] And the whole reason I leave czar on the headline is because I want to speak up against czars.

[00:08:35] But none of that makes it to the notes, though.

[00:08:36] All you see is Trump to appoint former ICE director Tom Holman as border czar.

[00:08:42] That's all the notes say.

[00:08:44] But you've got to listen to the show to get the real context on what we really think and believe in the points that we're really making.

[00:08:49] There's no other way.

[00:08:50] And you say, well, Sam, why don't you make sure you put that in the show notes?

[00:08:53] Because we want you to listen.

[00:08:55] If you get everything we say in the show notes, then I might as well just release a transcript and, you know, delete the audio.

[00:09:01] Right?

[00:09:01] I mean, come on.

[00:09:02] At some point, the notes are intended to tease the show.

[00:09:05] Just so you know.

[00:09:06] Anyway, the Gateway Pundit endorses Rick Scott for the Senate majority leader.

[00:09:12] They're saying, hey, call your senators and call your Congress and call everybody because they're going to choose their leader this Wednesday.

[00:09:19] And there's a big old scandal about this going on right now.

[00:09:23] The outgoing thug trying to deep six the process.

[00:09:27] Doctor.

[00:09:29] Well, Mitch McConnell is is I don't know, maybe just this side of a never Trumper.

[00:09:35] I don't know if you can call it exactly that harshly.

[00:09:39] But but the point of the matter is I don't think he has any love lost for Trump.

[00:09:44] And Trump does have he's the newly elected president.

[00:09:47] They have a you know, they have a right responsibility to pick their own people in many ways.

[00:09:51] Obviously, there are separate branches, the Senate and the executive.

[00:09:55] But I think that there's a concerted, well-planned, you know, kind of approach to to deep six Trump.

[00:10:03] You might say, doctor.

[00:10:05] It could very well be.

[00:10:06] But I'll tell you what meeting in secret to accomplish a goal.

[00:10:09] That kind of deal.

[00:10:10] Yeah.

[00:10:10] Musk kind of unloaded on on the concept, too.

[00:10:15] He and he's he feels like Scott's the only guy that had any kind of, you know, competence to work with Trump in the future.

[00:10:23] And the fact they're pulling this stunt.

[00:10:28] He's he's better than I mean, I think he has more to say for him in favor than than than some of the other.

[00:10:35] For sure.

[00:10:36] Go ahead and skip the break.

[00:10:38] You know, the only other one that could be considered to be a Mike Lee or somebody like that.

[00:10:42] You know, he's not even on the list.

[00:10:43] No, they're not even on the list guy.

[00:10:46] I know.

[00:10:46] But I'm just throwing out other people that could do it.

[00:10:48] That's the sad part is that, hey, you know, I don't think Mike Lee's perfect by any means either.

[00:10:52] But he's ever been as good as a Rick Scott would be.

[00:10:55] Yeah.

[00:10:55] But Rick Scott.

[00:10:57] I mean, if you got the three guys that were that were throwing their name in the hat, he's the better of the three.

[00:11:04] Yeah.

[00:11:05] By far.

[00:11:06] But that's the point that I'm kind of making with this thing, folks, is that, hey, do we even have to have a member of the Senate be the, quote, majority leader?

[00:11:15] Does it even have to be somebody from the Senate for sure?

[00:11:17] Could it be somebody else?

[00:11:18] Well, they write their own rules.

[00:11:20] I mean, because they could just put somebody else is what I'm saying.

[00:11:22] Well, yeah, maybe.

[00:11:24] But tradition is this.

[00:11:26] And of course, the vice president is the president of the Senate.

[00:11:28] But so Vance is, you know.

[00:11:32] Yeah.

[00:11:33] I like I like to jettison tradition in many, many cases.

[00:11:37] And I think if you've got a different Senate majority leader that wasn't one of the members, then you would increase your power by doing that.

[00:11:46] You know what?

[00:11:47] I'm always kind of taking a tangent.

[00:11:51] And I apologize.

[00:11:51] I won't take much time here.

[00:11:53] But it just came to mind that, you know, George Washington was inaugurated the 30th of April in 1789.

[00:12:02] John Adams was inaugurated the 21st of April.

[00:12:06] What?

[00:12:07] What are we talking about?

[00:12:08] You know, more than a week in advance.

[00:12:10] What's the deal here?

[00:12:12] And it was a procedural kind of thing so that he could be installed as the president of the Senate so the Senate could do its business.

[00:12:20] I mean, it's one of those things people don't think about.

[00:12:24] There were kind of steps to take.

[00:12:27] There was a process.

[00:12:28] And the founding fathers touched the stones as they went down the road.

[00:12:32] And it wasn't just a helter-skelter, willy-nilly, throw it together.

[00:12:36] You know, like the, oh, after the Franco-Prussian War, how the communist commune took over in Paris, an international group of communists that was going to administer.

[00:12:48] What?

[00:12:48] A bunch of clowns.

[00:12:50] They didn't know anything about governance.

[00:12:51] They botched everything.

[00:12:53] But they were, by golly, they were going to be in charge.

[00:12:56] And the founding fathers didn't do that.

[00:12:59] And so there are processes that we go through.

[00:13:03] And some of them are long-held tradition.

[00:13:05] Well, some of them are clown shows.

[00:13:07] For example, when you say, oh, that person that I just mentioned, I mentioned two well-known senators that are very conservative, very, you know, that certainly could qualify for that.

[00:13:17] But they've talked about Mike Lee being on the Supreme Court and everything else.

[00:13:20] So, you know, credentials aren't in question for some of these people, Dr. Ron Paul or whatever, or Rand Paul, I mean.

[00:13:25] But you look at this and you go, hmm, let me get this right.

[00:13:28] I find out Monday morning that their gateway pundit endorses Rick Scott.

[00:13:34] I find out that over the weekend, hey, you got McConnell trying to deep six people and, you know, put somebody in that's pretty much anti-Trump, you know, put a fly in the ointment.

[00:13:43] And then I hear this.

[00:13:44] Senate chooses leader this Wednesday.

[00:13:47] Why are we choosing a leader so fast with no debate?

[00:13:50] And, wow, Sam, that person's not even on the list.

[00:13:52] We're not even really going to consider anybody.

[00:13:53] Some clowns in the back room somewhere in a conspiracy drew up the list, and now you got big deep six people tweaking people's arms behind the scenes and browbeating people to try to let's just ram this sucker through and get this before anybody even is aware it happened almost.

[00:14:07] It's insane, doctor.

[00:14:09] Well, I think that, you know, if it happens in politics, it was planned.

[00:14:13] And absolutely, there's a scheme, a conspiracy, whatever, behind this thing.

[00:14:19] And that's what people do.

[00:14:21] I mean, people say, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist.

[00:14:23] Well, tell me a time.

[00:14:24] I mean, people conspire.

[00:14:27] I mean, three third-grade girls conspire to keep another third-grade girl from coming to the birthday party.

[00:14:33] I mean, it happens from the youngest of ages throughout all of our history and our lives.

[00:14:37] Well, then they mock us for this, but it just shows how ignorant they really are.

[00:14:40] They mock us because they don't have any evidence to prove otherwise.

[00:14:44] And they know we have plenty of evidence as we see conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory or turn into conspiracy fact is the reality here.

[00:14:54] But I basically say we ought to call a halt to this, ram it through.

[00:14:57] Let's have an open debate in the discussion.

[00:14:59] Should it be somebody other than a senator?

[00:15:01] Should it be a senator, Rand Paul?

[00:15:03] And see, if I was involved, I would basically want a Rand Paul to be the leader of the Senate.

[00:15:07] He's probably the most cogent on budget of anybody else.

[00:15:10] And boy, howdy, if we need something in government, it would be a reduction in spending.

[00:15:15] Who would do best at that?

[00:15:16] But as far as I can tell, on the table that I know, Rand Paul would be the best one to lead unless we're going to look outside the Senate.

[00:15:23] That's my opinion.

[00:15:24] Yeah, and his old man, Ron, I mean, was always there trying to get the money thing back on track to begin with.

[00:15:30] So Rand came by his, you know, kind of his bona fides naturally.

[00:15:36] I mean, his dad, I think, raised him to be a lot of the things that he's doing right now.

[00:15:40] So, no, I agree, and this truly is, I believe, an effort to derail the agenda that Trump's put out.

[00:15:51] Trump's going to have enough trouble getting his agenda through with all his friends in office.

[00:15:55] He's overpromised everything.

[00:15:58] I mean, to get some of the things through that he has told everybody he's going to do,

[00:16:02] I think he's going to be standing there with egg on his face in two years when everybody in the House is up for election

[00:16:09] and the third of the Senate's up for election, and they're going to say, look, this guy hasn't, he promised and promised.

[00:16:15] Look where he failed.

[00:16:16] I think he's going to have a horrid time getting his promises through.

[00:16:21] If he has his favorite friends in position, it's going to be an up-here slog.

[00:16:27] It will.

[00:16:27] It will be, no question.

[00:16:28] And that's why when we were together on our five-hour election 2024 election roundtable breakdown,

[00:16:36] you know, we had Steve Stockman on with us, and he basically said, listen, Donald's got one year to seriously lay out and get accomplished plenty.

[00:16:44] And if he doesn't get it done in a year, then it's going to come back to haunt him in such a big way.

[00:16:50] They'll use the elections preparation over the next year to just beat him up all the way, and it'll be, you know.

[00:16:57] So there you have it.

[00:16:58] Anyway, so the Gateway Pundit says, hey, they endorse Rick Scott.

[00:17:02] And I guess I would say Rick Scott's better than most, for sure.

[00:17:05] And if that's the only choices we're going to get, then I would say Rick Scott as well.

[00:17:08] But if I'm going to open up the discussion, which to me, there's been no discussion on this.

[00:17:13] Who drew up the list?

[00:17:14] I mean, it's a selection, people.

[00:17:17] It's not anything else, but I would say this.

[00:17:20] Sam Bushman endorses Rand Paul for Senate Majority Leader.

[00:17:25] Right?

[00:17:25] That's just how it is.

[00:17:29] I don't know really why no one's discussing this.

[00:17:33] It almost seems like we just accept the selection that we get.

[00:17:36] Oh, yeah, out of the choices we get, Rick Scott.

[00:17:40] Now, I'm not saying Rick Scott's awful, but I don't see him as a rock star to cut spending.

[00:17:45] If you want somebody in the Senate that's the leader, they need to be the cut, the spending guy.

[00:17:49] The buck stops here.

[00:17:50] We're going to not spend this money.

[00:17:52] We need that big time if we're going to have any chance of turning anything around at all, doctor.

[00:17:59] Well, let's just take some of the big promises that Trump has made.

[00:18:03] No tax on Social Security.

[00:18:05] No tax on tips.

[00:18:06] No tax on overtime.

[00:18:07] Okay.

[00:18:08] Now, okay, okay, okay.

[00:18:09] We're all really, whoo-hoo.

[00:18:11] Let's cut taxes everywhere.

[00:18:13] Let's get all rid of all taxes.

[00:18:14] I mean, I've got to see people.

[00:18:16] So I'm for the not get rid of all taxes plan.

[00:18:17] I mean, I'm for the get rid of all taxes plan.

[00:18:19] But this pulling the lever of government for specific groups.

[00:18:24] Okay.

[00:18:24] Why should somebody that gets tips get a special deal at the tax trough different from me?

[00:18:28] Or what I mean is we're just dividing America on all kinds of issues.

[00:18:33] I mean, I'm not going to be against tax reduction for the other guy.

[00:18:37] So I'm not really against it.

[00:18:38] But I do have my concerns, though, when we just slice up this pie.

[00:18:41] If you're an old person with Social Security, you get this break.

[00:18:43] If you're a person that gets tips, you get this break.

[00:18:46] And if you're that, you get that break.

[00:18:48] And I don't like that's how the IRS code has become so behemoth and so abusive and so hostile and hate-filled in the first place is it pits everybody against everybody.

[00:18:56] What we need to do is get rid of all those special privileges and just reduce taxes for everybody.

[00:19:02] I concur completely.

[00:19:04] But we do have to have taxes.

[00:19:06] I mean, what you're talking about is this conflict-based, you know, fragmentation.

[00:19:11] But even if you say we're reducing taxes, unless we're going to reduce them all across the board, let's get rid of them all.

[00:19:18] Whatever you're saying.

[00:19:19] If you don't do a reduction in your expenditures, you're just going to see a ballooning.

[00:19:27] I mean, a behemoth of a – we already got that, I guess – of a national debt.

[00:19:31] So let's say we reduce tax, reduce tax.

[00:19:33] And everybody's saying, I got my piece of the pie, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

[00:19:37] But here we are at $36 trillion in debt admitted right now.

[00:19:41] But if you don't reduce the expenditure side, it's a balance sheet, you're going to find that all you've got is a ballooning deficit that adds to the inflationary problem because you're creating money out of thin air.

[00:19:55] That's right.

[00:19:55] And that's why I'm pushing for Rand Paul because he's the only one that's shown a direct, clear effort to reduce spending, isn't he?

[00:20:03] When was the last time you heard Rick Scott be the big we're-going-to-reduce-spending guy?

[00:20:08] No, Rand Paul has taken the task on alone.

[00:20:12] Oftentimes he's done a one-man road show that he's put on there.

[00:20:19] And he's been up there trying to talk as long as he can with his little – he puts them up on poster boards, you know, kind of thing, showing this and that and the other.

[00:20:29] Nobody else is there in his camp.

[00:20:31] Well, maybe a couple other senators, honestly, that occasionally talk to.

[00:20:34] And Mike Lee has talked in favor of that, too.

[00:20:37] But the fact of the matter is –

[00:20:39] That's why I say a Mike Lee or a Rand Paul.

[00:20:41] Mike Lee would be way better.

[00:20:42] But I think Rand is the guy.

[00:20:43] But, see, you're saying he's not even on the list, and you're right about that.

[00:20:46] But that's the problem that I'm pointing out.

[00:20:48] If we're going to reduce spending, why on earth would he not be on the list if that's one of the key components of the campaign for Donald Trump?

[00:20:54] Surely you would have to say, well, Rand's got to be the guy, right?

[00:20:57] Well, you would.

[00:20:58] But I don't think he ever said he's going to reduce the expenditures.

[00:21:02] He's going to reduce the taxes.

[00:21:04] And that's the thing.

[00:21:05] Yeah, but that's clown show.

[00:21:07] You've got to balance it.

[00:21:09] You've got to have both, folks.

[00:21:11] Well, speaking of this, though, Donald Trump loves to troll people.

[00:21:14] And since we're talking about finance, I thought I'd throw this into the hopper.

[00:21:18] Epic troll, the headline says.

[00:21:20] Since Trump offers to help Democrats pay off the Kamala Harris campaign debt with his leftover campaign funds, Mike Lachance writes this article over at the Gateway Pundit.

[00:21:34] Here's the deal.

[00:21:34] So I guess Kamala raised a billion dollars from all kinds of, you know, dark money sources and everything else.

[00:21:41] A billion dollars, people.

[00:21:42] But now at the end of the day, she's like 20 million plus in debt after a campaign.

[00:21:46] And the Democrats are wringing their hands going, now what do we do?

[00:21:48] So Donald mocks them and says, hey, I've got some leftover campaign funds.

[00:21:53] Maybe I ought to just pay it off for you.

[00:21:55] Now, whether it's really the epic troll, as Mike Lachance writes, or whether Donald was really serious about helping the Democrats pay off their debt, I don't know.

[00:22:02] I know Donald says a lot of things.

[00:22:04] I know he mocks people at a lot of things.

[00:22:05] I don't know really what the truth is.

[00:22:07] But the idea that Kamala's broke after all that and in debt tells you plenty about, you know, they always said, oh, Kamala will spend a lot less than Donald.

[00:22:16] Really?

[00:22:17] Well, Donald spent way less during the campaign, and he has leftover funds, and Kamala has no leftover funds.

[00:22:23] That tells you quite a bit of the story.

[00:22:25] But the idea that Donald Trump is going to use his, you know, election money, I mean, when everybody gave that to Donald, did they really expect him to give it to Harris?

[00:22:33] In the back?

[00:22:33] I don't know.

[00:22:34] Is it a clown show?

[00:22:35] Is it just trolling, or do you think there might be something to it, Dr. Bradley?

[00:22:40] Well, there's a lot of peeling we could do on this onion.

[00:22:43] First of all, if she raised a billion, he raised $400 million.

[00:22:47] So 40% of what she raised, roughly, round numbers.

[00:22:51] That's right.

[00:22:51] I mean, if he spent that, that's a philosophical approach to things, you know, that you say, okay, spend, spend, spend, pour money people out.

[00:22:59] You know, you get money from wherever and you pour it out.

[00:23:01] Well, that's kind of what the Kamala mentality philosophy is.

[00:23:06] Trump, exactly, is not really what you would call a miserly guy.

[00:23:12] But still, for him to raise and spend 40% of what she did, I think that says something.

[00:23:20] But you have a very valid point.

[00:23:22] You know, if you had, you know, the widow's mite that was given to Trump to try and help him win.

[00:23:28] I remember one time I was running for the Senate.

[00:23:32] And I finished a campaign speech, and a little gray-haired lady about 4'11 walks up to me.

[00:23:38] She was probably well into her 80s.

[00:23:41] And she handles me an envelope on it that says Scott on it.

[00:23:46] And she says, I'd like to contribute to your campaign.

[00:23:49] And as I took the envelope out of her hand, I had the impression set upon me that it was the widow's mite.

[00:23:56] And she says, I feel like I've just taken the widow's mite.

[00:23:58] And she says, well, it is all I've got, and it is $5.

[00:24:02] I mean, that's the kind of money some people give to these things when they believe in the cause, you know?

[00:24:10] Yep, there you have it.

[00:24:13] I don't know what to think about it except to say this.

[00:24:16] I'm concerned when Rand Paul's not even on the list,

[00:24:21] and we're talking about decreasing the expenses the American people pay without decreasing the amount government pays.

[00:24:29] It doesn't make any sense to me, right?

[00:24:31] And this epic troll, I don't want my widow's mite to go to Kamala under any circumstances, no matter what.

[00:24:36] So if Donald does it, shame on him.

[00:24:38] I get the mocking troll to make the point.

[00:24:41] Anyway, hopefully Donald Trump will spend 60% less on government, huh?

[00:24:46] Just hoping.

[00:24:54] You're listening to Liberty News Radio.

[00:24:56] Every day aches and pains, I've got a question.

[00:25:01] What are you missing out on?

[00:25:03] Probably a lot.

[00:25:04] So let me tell you about Relief Factor.

[00:25:07] Relief Factor is a drug-free daily supplement that helps your body fight pain naturally.

[00:25:12] It doesn't just mask pain.

[00:25:13] It helps reduce or even eliminate it.

[00:25:16] In about three weeks, you'll discover what it's like to feel better.

[00:25:20] Go to ReliefFactor.com or call 1-800-4-RELIEF and save on your first order.

[00:25:25] That's 1-800-4-RELIEF.

[00:25:28] Drivers who switch and save with Progressive could save hundreds, which could be life-changing.

[00:25:33] Life-changing.

[00:25:34] I mean, you could put that money towards concert tickets for your daughter to see that singer who sings about painful breakups.

[00:25:40] And one song will inspire your little beauty to break up with that beast she's dating, Brian.

[00:25:46] Instead, she'll date someone who's nice and worthy of her love, not someone who addresses you and your spouses, bro.

[00:25:52] And it's all because you could save money switching at Progressive.com.

[00:25:56] Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates not available in all states.

[00:26:00] The chairman of a UN climate summit in Azerbaijan launches the meeting with another prediction of catastrophe.

[00:26:06] The two-week UN climate negotiations, COP29, opened with a speech from its president, Mukhtar Babayev, warning of the dire predicament the world's in.

[00:26:17] Collegues, we are on the road to ruin.

[00:26:21] But these are not the future problems.

[00:26:24] Climate change is already here.

[00:26:26] Curbing and coping with climate change is worsening heat, floods, droughts and storms is a vast cost.

[00:26:33] The focus, then, is striking a new deal on how many hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars a year will flow from rich nations to poor ones to try to curb and adapt to climate change.

[00:26:45] I'm Charles Dilladesma.

[00:26:46] China's Singles Day online shopping festival looks somewhat less attractive this year amid a sluggish economy, forcing e-commerce firms to look abroad for growth.

[00:26:56] News and analysis, townhall.com.

[00:27:00] A Wisconsin state Supreme Court ruling on an 1849 abortion ban is expected to take weeks, but it's considered little more than a formality.

[00:27:09] Liberal justices control the Wisconsin Supreme Court, so abortion rights advocates stand an excellent chance of winning.

[00:27:16] But Sheboykin County District Attorney Joel Ermansky, a Republican, says the 1849 ban should be enforced because it was never repealed.

[00:27:25] Correspondent Donna Warder.

[00:27:27] President-elect Trump has chosen New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik to serve as his ambassador to the U.N.

[00:27:32] In announcing the pick, Mr. Trump writes,

[00:27:35] Elise is an incredibly strong, tough and smart America first fighter.

[00:27:39] Stefanik serves as House Republican Conference Chair and has long been one of Mr. Trump's most loyal allies in the House of Representatives.

[00:27:47] She was among those discussed as a potential vice presidential choice before that job went to Senator J.D. Vance.

[00:27:54] More on these stories, townhall.com.

[00:27:59] Do you treasure your liberty?

[00:28:01] Well, at LovingLiberty.net, we most certainly do.

[00:28:05] And we want to help protect your liberty, too.

[00:28:07] Become part of the family.

[00:28:09] Everyone knows that the core of any society is the family.

[00:28:12] Therefore, the government should foster and protect the integrity of its family.

[00:28:17] We the people.

[00:28:18] Won't you join us as a Loving Liberty sponsor to help us promote the principles in the 5,000-year leap?

[00:28:24] Let's restore the miracle that changed the world at LovingLiberty.net.

[00:28:29] As you are aware, America is divided over every fault line possible.

[00:28:33] This is intentionally fostered by those who do not love God, family, or country.

[00:28:38] We believe a peaceful future as a free people absolutely depends on civility.

[00:28:43] Clarion Call for Civility is looking for funding and volunteers at every level to make our hopes and efforts a reality.

[00:28:49] Please donate.

[00:28:50] Sign our pledge.

[00:28:51] And help us in our sacred cause.

[00:28:53] Please visit CallForCivility.com for more details.

[00:28:57] CallForCivility.com.

[00:29:00] Why don't we say to the government writ large that they have to spend a little bit less?

[00:29:05] Anybody ever had less money this year than you had last?

[00:29:09] Anybody ever having a 1% pay cut?

[00:29:12] You deal with it.

[00:29:13] That's what government needs, a 1% pay cut.

[00:29:15] If you take a 1% pay cut across the board, you have more than enough money to actually pay for the disaster relief.

[00:29:22] But nobody's going to do that because they're fiscally irresponsible.

[00:29:26] Who are they?

[00:29:27] Republicans.

[00:29:28] Who are they?

[00:29:29] Democrats.

[00:29:29] Who are they?

[00:29:30] Virtually the whole body is careless and reckless with your money.

[00:29:35] So the money will not be offset by cuts anywhere.

[00:29:38] The money will be added to the debt, and there will be a day of reckoning.

[00:29:42] What's the day of reckoning?

[00:29:44] The day of reckoning may well be the collapse of the stock market.

[00:29:47] The day of reckoning may be the collapse of the dollar.

[00:29:50] When it comes, I can't tell you exactly, but I can tell you it has happened repeatedly in history when countries ruin their currency.

[00:30:12] Broadcasting live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West, you are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show.

[00:30:23] All right, back with you live, ladies and gentlemen.

[00:30:26] Sam Bushman, Dr. Scott Bradley, breaking it down for you.

[00:30:29] freedomsrisingsun.com.

[00:30:30] If you want to check out Dr. Bradley's collegiate work to preserve the nation,

[00:30:33] if you also want to join his weekly webinars, two days on the Constitution, and a whole lot more,

[00:30:38] that is freedomsrisingsun.com.

[00:30:41] So Trump trolls.

[00:30:42] Kamala Campaign says, I'll pay off your debt.

[00:30:44] How dare you, Donald?

[00:30:45] I know it's a good troll, but don't you dare literally do it.

[00:30:49] But many people are saying, hey, Trump should take him up on it big time.

[00:30:53] I'm sorry, Kamala should take him up on it.

[00:30:55] Why not?

[00:30:55] Get the debt paid.

[00:30:56] Yeah, you got to eat crow to do it, but it's better than being in debt.

[00:31:00] Anyway, all I can tell you, very, very strange stuff.

[00:31:03] Now, Donald Trump on with our dear friend Josh Phillip over at the Epoch Times.

[00:31:09] Trump says he'll end birth citizenship on day one.

[00:31:13] Wow.

[00:31:14] What?

[00:31:15] Yeah.

[00:31:16] He'll end birth citizenship on day one.

[00:31:19] And Dr. Bradley, I don't know about this, my friend.

[00:31:23] How can he just do that?

[00:31:25] Well, here's what the deal is.

[00:31:28] The Plyler v. Doe case that happened in 1982, in which the Supreme Court created out of whole cloth, thin air,

[00:31:37] complete fabrication, whatever you want to call it,

[00:31:40] this idea that if you get over the border and have a baby, that baby is a U.S. citizen.

[00:31:46] Okay?

[00:31:47] Now, the Article I, excuse me, Section I of the 14th Amendment was used as the excuse for that.

[00:31:56] And we could deconstruct that and peel this onion at great length about how this is.

[00:32:02] Now, by the way, this is how people like Kamala Harris and Obama and whatever.

[00:32:09] I know you've got a little different opinion about how Obama got his citizenship.

[00:32:13] But the fact of the matter is Vivek Ramaswamy, you look at a lot of these people that are in the forefront,

[00:32:20] they did not qualify for the constitutional.

[00:32:25] They did not and still don't.

[00:32:27] Let's be clear.

[00:32:27] Correct.

[00:32:28] The founding father's definition of a natural born citizen.

[00:32:32] But what happened in 1982 with the Plyler v. Doe case is that, as a footnote, in a Supreme Court decision,

[00:32:39] they said, oh, by the way, anybody that happens to come into the country and have a baby,

[00:32:44] that baby is a citizen.

[00:32:45] They can invite their mom and dad, their brothers and sisters or aunts and uncles or cousins or friends,

[00:32:49] everybody to be a citizen, ultimately.

[00:32:52] Now, it's kind of interesting to me that...

[00:32:56] And that was an unconstitutional lie, by the way.

[00:32:59] It is, and it was, because that's not how citizenship has been.

[00:33:04] And it ultimately and finally comes back, the immigration and naturalization stuff that in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution,

[00:33:11] Congress has authority to define some of those things.

[00:33:14] They can't redefine how the American founding fathers originally defined natural born citizen,

[00:33:20] because that is set in history.

[00:33:22] But there's a lot of people that come to the United States on kind of a vacation to have a baby.

[00:33:28] And then, you know, you're Chinese, you're wealthy, you come here to Florida, you have a baby,

[00:33:33] and your baby's a U.S. citizen.

[00:33:35] Anyway, this stuff that Trump says he's going to overthrow has been entrenched, if you will, since 1982.

[00:33:44] And he's going to...

[00:33:46] What he said, I guess I should review it more carefully, but he said that one of the parents has to be a U.S. citizen already,

[00:33:54] and you have to have your parent here legally working in a, you know, kind of an environment where, you know,

[00:34:04] you've got authorization to be here and work.

[00:34:05] And we could spend some time on the clause that's in the 14th Amendment to explain how he has some validity to this.

[00:34:16] But he's going to get blowback, pushback, and nth degree, because we have had millions upon millions of people...

[00:34:23] That's right.

[00:34:24] ...that have run here to get this thing.

[00:34:25] So it's going to be blowback.

[00:34:27] So if you end birth citizenship on day one, the question is, is do you just say, hey, going forward,

[00:34:31] and no baby's born in the United States if they're not, you know, legitimately...

[00:34:35] You know, how does all this work, and how would Trump do it?

[00:34:37] Would he just make an executive order, or how would this go down, right?

[00:34:42] Well, here's my take on it.

[00:34:44] It sounds like he's going to do an executive order, which, you know, is kind of...

[00:34:48] He doesn't have authority to do, right?

[00:34:49] Yeah, let's talk about that for a while.

[00:34:51] But here's how it could be corrected.

[00:34:53] It isn't going to be, because we have spineless individuals, at least the vast majority.

[00:35:00] What we're saying is that, hey, in the first place, this idea of birth citizenship is bogus,

[00:35:05] okay?

[00:35:05] It's unconstitutional.

[00:35:06] It should have never happened.

[00:35:08] Aside from that, Donald Trump's likely going to use an executive order to mandate this.

[00:35:12] He's going to get massive blowback.

[00:35:14] If you're not careful, he's going to look like a czar.

[00:35:16] He's going to look like a despot.

[00:35:18] Because he's just mandating everything like as if he's God and the president.

[00:35:21] That's a serious problem, okay?

[00:35:24] However, there are ways this could be accomplished.

[00:35:26] Doctor?

[00:35:26] Doctor, well, Section 5 of the 14th Amendment.

[00:35:30] By the way, I'll just say, parenthetically, the 14th Amendment was written with venom.

[00:35:34] It was purposely a poison pill for everything.

[00:35:38] And it is the principal means by which the independence and sovereignty of states is being undermined

[00:35:46] today and has been since 82.

[00:35:48] Yeah, it was a tradition of unraveling that was before that.

[00:35:52] But by 82, they said, oh, yeah, this is how we're going to do it.

[00:35:56] So anyway, it really became a major thing.

[00:36:00] But Section 5 says that Congress can straighten out misunderstandings on this, okay?

[00:36:05] So literally, if Congress had some backbone, they'd sit down and say, you know what?

[00:36:11] Well, let's look at Article 1, Section 8.

[00:36:13] You know what?

[00:36:13] Donald's right on this.

[00:36:14] Go ahead.

[00:36:16] Well, Congress, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, that Congress has the power to establish uniform rules of naturalization.

[00:36:23] They can say how you become a citizen.

[00:36:26] It's their prerogative because it's their power delegated constitutionally.

[00:36:32] The president doesn't have that authority.

[00:36:34] So my point is Donald, in partnership with Congress, could put something together right now,

[00:36:40] have a group of people write up the deal, pass it immediately, and you'd have both branches of government involved in it.

[00:36:46] And it could be legitimate and legal and appropriate, and we could stop it.

[00:36:49] But Donald thinking he can unilaterally do this, I don't think so, doctor.

[00:36:54] Well, he can't.

[00:36:55] And again, this is going to cause a whole bunch of grief.

[00:36:59] He's way overpromising a whole bunch of things.

[00:37:01] And by the way, you know, just for the fun of it, too, we need to recognize that Article 3 of the Constitution is the judicial side, okay?

[00:37:14] But if you look at Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2, get it out and read it, people,

[00:37:20] that Congress will make such exceptions that can keep the Supreme Court out of things.

[00:37:26] So when this thing gets passed, Congress could, at that point, accept the Supreme Court from making further discussions and determinations about how you get citizenship,

[00:37:41] because that is a congressional prerogative that is not delegated in Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1 as an inherent power of the Supreme Court.

[00:37:51] So the point is Congress could say, yes, Donald's right, we're going to help him do this,

[00:37:55] and we're going to stop the Supreme Court from meddling with it going forward.

[00:37:59] Yeah, they could.

[00:37:59] That's right.

[00:38:00] But Donald can't make these claims by himself that, hey, on day one I'm going to get this done.

[00:38:06] Unless he has significant support from Congress, which I, you know, the margins, as you pointed out last Friday several times,

[00:38:12] and I think you're spot on on this, margins are razor thin.

[00:38:15] And even so, you've got dissenters in our ranks.

[00:38:18] I don't think that this is even possible on day one.

[00:38:22] And if you force it, you'll get so much blowback, it won't even be funny.

[00:38:25] You'll lose so much political capital on that, Dr. Bradley.

[00:38:29] And I'm not saying that I want these babies to be citizens.

[00:38:31] I'm not saying that at all.

[00:38:32] I'm just saying we have created such a, as you wisely pointed out last week,

[00:38:36] hey, I want to abolish the Federal Reserve so bad I can taste it.

[00:38:39] But your point is that, Sam, even though you desire it, even though your ideas are good,

[00:38:44] and even though morally you might be on the right track, it doesn't work that way, right?

[00:38:49] Well, and it's like, and some of the example we used last week with what's happened when the Federal Reserve of their day came in effect.

[00:38:58] When you did something that was a direct opposition, you're going to get blowback,

[00:39:05] and especially if there's a kind of a well-established fan club for something.

[00:39:13] There's a well-established fan club on this one, trust me.

[00:39:16] You are going to get blowback, and the president may even get an attempt,

[00:39:20] but just like when Biddle was kicked out back in the Andy Jackson days,

[00:39:26] and Jackson was impeached over it.

[00:39:29] When you got somebody that tried to fire.

[00:39:31] How much capital can you expend is the point, and would you want to survive it is the next point, right?

[00:39:36] Another impeachment process on day one.

[00:39:39] I mean, there's people, and what you need to do is work with the process.

[00:39:43] We talked about how John Adams was inaugurated on the 21st of April,

[00:39:51] 1789, days before Washington was inaugurated as president,

[00:39:55] but they needed to have a president of the Senate.

[00:39:57] There's a process.

[00:39:58] There's a procedure.

[00:40:00] There's rules of engagement that have to happen,

[00:40:03] and you can do this if you understand and you make your case,

[00:40:08] and I think in this case, again, Trump kind of is on a wave on this thing.

[00:40:13] He got elected largely because of his position on illegal immigration.

[00:40:17] He did, and so the next headline plays into this big time,

[00:40:21] and I hate to steal your thunder on this, but I really need to make this point

[00:40:24] so people understand the value proposition, if you will,

[00:40:28] and the concern that goes along with that value proposition.

[00:40:31] Here it is.

[00:40:32] Looks like Trump achieved an electoral college landslide, 312 to 226,

[00:40:41] as well as Donald Trump won the popular vote this time.

[00:40:44] It hasn't been done since, what, Reagan or whatever?

[00:40:46] So, I mean, he's got an absolute mandate.

[00:40:49] The problem with that mandate is you can't abuse the system

[00:40:55] and exhibit too much authority or power, whatever you want to call it,

[00:41:00] that you don't really properly, morally, legally have.

[00:41:04] And where that balance is going to come down for Donald, I don't know yet,

[00:41:08] but that's the concern.

[00:41:09] And I don't want Donald to overreach too far because if he does,

[00:41:12] he's got to get a lot done in the first year, but he can't overreach too much.

[00:41:15] If he does, either case will be used against him so badly,

[00:41:19] it might be a landslide in the other direction two years later.

[00:41:22] This is serious, doctor.

[00:41:24] Well, it is very serious, and that's kind of how the system works.

[00:41:28] I mean, if he becomes a monarch, presto, chango, everything,

[00:41:32] wave the magic wand, and he abuses the power,

[00:41:35] you know, all men would be tyrants, as Defoe said, if they could.

[00:41:40] So we have to use the process, use the system.

[00:41:44] I think you can take this to the people, this immigration citizenship thing,

[00:41:51] and get them behind it.

[00:41:53] And if the senators and congressmen got enough pressure from below, if you will,

[00:41:57] they're going to respond.

[00:41:59] And so Trump, you know, first of all, I mean, what do we need to talk about?

[00:42:05] I can't believe that they say Kamala got 68 million votes and Trump got 73 million.

[00:42:10] I mean, I can't believe that she got 226, you know, electoral college votes,

[00:42:15] although I predicted a little more than that when I was looking through it.

[00:42:19] But the fact of the matter is, I can't believe the nation has that much fragmentation.

[00:42:25] It should have been so much different if people were thinking, which I guess they weren't.

[00:42:31] But you're right.

[00:42:33] In spite of the fact they're calling it a landslide, you cannot begin to be a dictator or a monarch or whatever.

[00:42:40] You still have limits and bounds.

[00:42:42] They're constitutionally established.

[00:42:44] And if you overstep them, there's justification for pushback.

[00:42:48] And I predict that the Senate and the House will both be lost in two years if Trump goes about this wrong.

[00:42:57] And that's the reason that I played the devil's advocate on Friday to say, yeah, but I want to do this and I need to do this.

[00:43:03] And I'm right.

[00:43:03] I'm morally right to do this.

[00:43:05] And I went on and on and on and on.

[00:43:07] I'm really demonstrating the case, folks, that I get the desire.

[00:43:11] OK, I get the we've got our chance now.

[00:43:13] Let's let's get after it.

[00:43:15] And I get it.

[00:43:16] But I also get that it doesn't work that way.

[00:43:19] And I want to Dr. Bradley to highlight how it works.

[00:43:22] And I want to highlight, hey, Donald wants to get rid of, you know, babies born in America and instantly their citizens.

[00:43:27] I agree 100 percent.

[00:43:28] But, man, if you just do that with an executive order, if you just do that, you know, hey, just burn the barn down.

[00:43:34] You're going to regret it.

[00:43:35] It's not going to go well.

[00:43:36] And how much political capital can you waste or use in certain situations for what purposes?

[00:43:41] Now, do I want reform on the border?

[00:43:44] Absolutely.

[00:43:45] Do I want the border to be locked out?

[00:43:46] Yes.

[00:43:46] Do I want babies to be just instantly born in America and their citizens?

[00:43:50] No.

[00:43:50] But you've got to go about this right.

[00:43:52] Same thing with the Federal Reserve.

[00:43:53] I want to get rid of it so bad.

[00:43:55] But how could I really accomplish that goal?

[00:43:58] And being the clown just, you know, in everybody's face on top at some point will backfire and it will not work.

[00:44:05] Now, by the way, there's a guy by the name of Jamal Simmons.

[00:44:08] He's a former communications director for Harris, I guess.

[00:44:11] He said the move to resign.

[00:44:15] The presidency could, quote, disrupt Trump's transition.

[00:44:20] So they talk about how awesome Joe Biden was as president.

[00:44:24] And then they say one promise left to fulfill being a, quote, transitional figure.

[00:44:29] You see, he could resign the presidency within the next 30 days.

[00:44:34] Then Kamala Harris becomes president, Simmons said.

[00:44:40] This would basically, you know, make it so she doesn't have to oversee the January 6th transition thing.

[00:44:46] Trump would be the, I mean, Joe Biden would be the transitional figure to Harris.

[00:44:50] Donald wouldn't be the 47th president.

[00:44:52] Everything he did would have to be kind of rebranded and redone and everything else.

[00:44:55] And the first woman president would be a president for a little while.

[00:44:58] And then the next woman had to have an easier time.

[00:45:00] And anyway, they paint this whole idea.

[00:45:03] Now, I mentioned last week when the Democrats were super nice.

[00:45:07] And they're like, yeah, we're going to peacefully transition power.

[00:45:10] No problem.

[00:45:11] Donald won fair and square.

[00:45:12] Wow.

[00:45:13] Congratulations, Donald.

[00:45:14] And I said it wouldn't be so easy.

[00:45:15] Now, at first you can say this is just a clown discussion, but it's starting to become a real possibility.

[00:45:21] Doctor, what do you say to that?

[00:45:23] Well, everything they're talking about here should have happened three years ago.

[00:45:27] I mean, you know, realistically.

[00:45:29] No doubt.

[00:45:29] There was no traction on Biden's ability to do anything.

[00:45:33] But I think it's really rather superficial.

[00:45:37] I mean, whether he's 47 or 48, I mean, yeah, they've got to change the label on the baseball cap, whatever.

[00:45:44] But the fact of the matter is that it would be a bozo thing to do, really.

[00:45:51] But they should have done it three years ago anyway.

[00:45:56] And I just, I mean, I'm not saying that Biden should have ever been president, obviously.

[00:46:02] But the fact of the matter is everybody's playing their cards like a five-year-old that's never played the game before.

[00:46:12] And the Democrats are doing this thing right now.

[00:46:15] Of course, Trump's doing the same thing when he's coming back into president with a so-called landslide in his favor,

[00:46:21] which I do not consider a landslide based on the votes counted or attributed.

[00:46:27] I agree.

[00:46:27] I think they were improperly done.

[00:46:29] But nonetheless, everybody's got this little, it's a fulfillment of Daniel Defoe's statement.

[00:46:36] You know, the beginning of the 1700s, all men would be tyrants if they could.

[00:46:40] They're just grabbing and grabbing everything they can.

[00:46:42] It's just ridiculous.

[00:46:43] So do you think Biden will do it?

[00:46:44] Will Biden resign the presidency and turn it over to Harris and should be president for a day?

[00:46:49] How would you like to be president for a day?

[00:46:50] How about 30 days or whatever kind of, I mean, this is actually comical on one hand.

[00:46:53] On the other hand, these people are seriously considering these kind of moves.

[00:46:57] And I told you, watch out for the lame duck session.

[00:47:00] Yeah, the whole lame duck session between now and the first week in January and then on to the presidency.

[00:47:08] If I was Kamala, tell them to pound sand.

[00:47:11] You know, it's one of those things where this thing has gone on long enough.

[00:47:16] I mean, they've been saying everybody's going, oh, yeah, Biden's on his A game.

[00:47:19] He's been nothing better ever.

[00:47:20] And, you know, it's one of those things that everybody's been lying through their teeth up to this point.

[00:47:27] And for them to do it now, it really would be, you know, like I say, I was, this is kind of an assumption on my part,

[00:47:36] but I had a lot of supporters to become a president of a university.

[00:47:41] Okay.

[00:47:42] And it came to my attention that they were going to put me in, very potentially, as a transitional president,

[00:47:50] to hold it until they could get a more prominent, preeminent name in there.

[00:47:54] And I told them, pound sand, I'm not going to take this over.

[00:47:57] If you want me and you want my vision, pick me.

[00:48:01] If you don't and you want to save it for somebody else, do it.

[00:48:05] But I'm not playing your game.

[00:48:06] And I withdrew my name.

[00:48:08] I mean, sometimes people got to have a little bit of, if you will, pride or self-respect.

[00:48:13] I don't know how you want to put it.

[00:48:14] But for them to do this right now is just absolutely absurd.

[00:48:19] They should have done it three years ago and been done with it.

[00:48:22] And then Kamala could have had three years to prove her own salt or not, which I'm confident she would not have done.

[00:48:28] I get all that, but they're abusing the system, and they have so far.

[00:48:32] I mean, they literally knew full well.

[00:48:33] And to me, it's election fraud.

[00:48:35] You can't have Biden stay there long enough to skip the primary and then pretend he's totally fine, but he steps down.

[00:48:42] Either he steps down because he's not fine, and they need to prove that, or he needs to be the contender.

[00:48:47] And Kamala shouldn't be able to fill that vacuum, so to speak.

[00:48:51] So they've already committed these shenanigans.

[00:48:53] The question is, will they do it?

[00:48:55] I don't know how much it will matter if they do it, but it will certainly – I don't know that that's ever been done before.

[00:49:01] Has it, doctor?

[00:49:03] No, it hasn't been done before, and it will not.

[00:49:07] All it is is a thumb your nose at the system kind of thing that I think –

[00:49:13] It's disastrous.

[00:49:14] It shows how much they have disrespect.

[00:49:16] It shows disrespect for the system, but will they do it, do you think?

[00:49:18] No.

[00:49:19] I can't imagine.

[00:49:20] You don't think they'll do it?

[00:49:21] No.

[00:49:22] No, it's just – to me, it's like, you know what?

[00:49:25] Put the guy in his bunny slippers out the door on the end of the parade, and let's just go down our road.

[00:49:31] The nation should say, this clown act, it was bad enough.

[00:49:35] We put up with it.

[00:49:37] You guys just – okay, thank you.

[00:49:40] Go into the sunset.

[00:49:41] You know, I – what do they call it, sundowning when you go to bed at 4 o'clock in the afternoon?

[00:49:46] Yeah.

[00:49:46] I mean, I think that's what he was doing.

[00:49:49] Anyway, I just can't imagine it.

[00:49:52] It just seems to me it'll be another offense.

[00:49:55] It'll be another – you know, just disrespectful to the whole office, to everything that's happened.

[00:50:01] There's no value from it whatsoever except for to try to cause problems.

[00:50:05] And I believe that the communists do want to overwhelm and manipulate and mock and do everything they can to make the system look like it's janky and doesn't work well and the system's problematic.

[00:50:15] By the way, speaking of that, Tim Scott announced his candidacy.

[00:50:19] Yes, sir.

[00:50:19] He did.

[00:50:20] Well, let me just – before you leave, I just – something came to mind.

[00:50:23] I mentioned earlier in the broadcast this Paris commune that ran after the Franco-Prussian thing, you know.

[00:50:30] Yeah.

[00:50:30] Anyway, and what a disaster they were at governance.

[00:50:34] When they came to the end, when it was apparent they could not govern and they decided to get out of town, they burned – they burned as much of Paris as they could.

[00:50:45] Priceless art of facts.

[00:50:47] They killed 30,000 people as they went out the door.

[00:50:50] I mean, they were absolutely slash-and-burn kind of attitude.

[00:50:54] And will this be the Biden-Harris equivalent?

[00:50:56] That's kind of the problem is what I see this – there's a lot of parallels between the Franco-Prussian and the Paris commune dissolving.

[00:51:04] And I think that there's – history will view it just as favorably as what the Paris commune did.

[00:51:10] Yeah, as unfavorably.

[00:51:11] So I just say –

[00:51:12] And I agree with you, Dr. Bradley.

[00:51:13] We pray this doesn't happen, and we're warning that it could, and we're telling you we pray for calmer heads and patient people.

[00:51:20] People that truly do respect the proper role of limited government and the rule of law in America.

[00:51:25] Our country is better than this is the point, people.

[00:51:29] Tell me about Scott.

[00:51:31] All right.

[00:51:31] Senator Tim Scott, ladies and gentlemen, announced his candidacy to lead the National Republican Senatorial Committee, NRSC, if you will.

[00:51:40] On Friday, he announced his bid to do so.

[00:51:43] This move positions the South Carolina Senator to head the party's strategy for the upcoming midterms with goals to expend the Senate majority.

[00:51:57] And he says he's been contemplating this for quite a while.

[00:52:00] Well, let's do this, he says.

[00:52:02] I'm running for NRSC chair because two years of a Republican agenda is good, but four years of success in a Donald J. Trump is even better, he says.

[00:52:12] And the last statement on this, then your response.

[00:52:15] I guess he's the only one running for it right now, Dr. Bradley.

[00:52:20] I have mixed emotions about this.

[00:52:23] I understand.

[00:52:24] I'm not a big Scott fan, but here's the deal.

[00:52:27] Right now, he's in this Senate majority leader race, okay?

[00:52:32] And that's trying to be derailed by the rhinos, okay?

[00:52:37] And trying to derail Trump, okay?

[00:52:39] So all of that stuff's happened, and now he's got another mix on this thing.

[00:52:43] It could very well be say, hey, let's give him this consolation prize to run the midterm elections.

[00:52:50] I say, big term elections?

[00:52:52] Who the heck ever heard of this assignment?

[00:52:55] And what kind of prestige, what kind of real impact do you have as the one that's over there as the cheerleader for the midterm elections?

[00:53:03] What needs to happen is some real, true, principles-based governance right now, today.

[00:53:10] And if I were him, you know, somebody may have said to him, here's your consolation prize.

[00:53:14] We're going to do something different.

[00:53:16] And yeah, yeah, you're still going to get a lot of applause.

[00:53:19] You're going to be on the stage.

[00:53:20] And tell him to pound sand.

[00:53:22] I mean, and he sounds like he's done it himself.

[00:53:25] Well, and the interesting thing to me about this, again,

[00:53:27] this just backs the foundation of and increased power for and whatever you want to call it,

[00:53:33] I would say the violation of principles, based on this party idea.

[00:53:37] You know what?

[00:53:37] We don't want to give the party more and more authority and power and prestige.

[00:53:41] And although the Democratic Party is slipping and losing authority and power,

[00:53:44] because everybody realizes what a clown show it is,

[00:53:46] if you're not careful, you'll consolidate into the Union Republican Party,

[00:53:49] and it'll have so much power, it'll be shocking.

[00:53:52] And we've got to guard against that and reject parties like the Founding Fathers warned.

[00:53:55] And so I understand everybody's all excited, oh, Tim Scott can now get a position.

[00:53:59] To me, it's disaster, Doctor.

[00:54:02] Well, like I say, I think if I were him, I'd keep the eyes on the prize

[00:54:07] and go for the trying to set the agenda to get all the right things done in the Senate.

[00:54:12] And I kind of hope he'll pass up on that.

[00:54:15] But he's the only candidate now.

[00:54:17] I mean, what happens?

[00:54:20] It happens as he gets coordinated.

[00:54:21] That's what happens, sir.

[00:54:23] All right.

[00:54:24] Thank you so much, Dr. Scott Bradley.

[00:54:26] freedomsrisingsun.com is his incredible website.

[00:54:28] Get signed up so that you can check out the weekly webinars Thursday evening.

[00:54:32] Q&As on the Constitution and more.

[00:54:33] Thank you, Dr. Bradley.

[00:54:36] Have a great week, everybody.

[00:54:38] All right.

[00:54:39] God bless you, brother.

[00:54:40] All right.

[00:54:40] Ladies and gentlemen, Hour 1 of the Cantu coming up.

[00:54:42] God save the Republic.

[00:54:44] Have a look.

[00:54:44] Thank you.