[00:00:04] Broadcasting live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West, you are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show. J.D. Vance in the news, ladies and gentlemen, Donald Trump always in the news. We got so many questions. You know, are we going to bomb Iran again? Are we just saying, hey, we've had enough of it, they're not cooperating?
[00:00:29] What are the things that Rubio basically says and Trump says and Hegseth says? And, hey, they can't have a nuke. It's that simple. That's non-negotiable. They cannot, you know, etc. And they're simply saying we're not going to back away. We're not getting rid of our capabilities. And the question is, is it for peaceful use? Is it for, you know, whatever use? Who knows? The problem is I just don't see where we get authority to say they can or cannot have something.
[00:00:55] And whether we want them to have a nuke or not, hey, the communist Chinese and the Russians and the North Koreans, they've all got that capability and they can give it to Iraq, Iran, and there's nothing we can do about it. And that's the reality, folks. Look, Iran's submarine capabilities and some of the Iranian capabilities they have, hey, they bought it from Russia years ago. And then they've improved on it. And China and Russia and others have helped them. And we've actually helped them. And so the European nations have helped them through all kinds of special deals and financing.
[00:01:24] And, you know, you watch the way the money goes and we're, you know, we're as guilty as the next guy in many, many, many ways. There you have it. But J.D. Vance is standing in doing a good job, I think, compared to Trump and even in many ways compared to the lady before him. Right. She, you know, gets quite combative and defends Trump almost to the extreme sometimes, but it's not even justified. Will J.D. Vance level with the people more? And I think the answer is clearly a yes, doctor.
[00:01:53] Well, he could be an authority figure, but he wasn't authoritarian. He wasn't a tyrant when I watched it. Right. And I think that he still continued to deflect things that he said he didn't want to get over his skis and all that kind of stuff. But but it was done in a more congenial kind of way. And Carolyn Levitt, a more presidential kind of way, you could say, right? You could and a more diplomatic way. And that's exactly what they're trying to make you, you know, think and believe.
[00:02:22] And that's the that's what they're peddling, right? I think so. No. So so anyway, this I think that he didn't harm himself by the way he did this. And he did at one point. You know, he had a little banter with a guy and they were talking about who had the most purple tie because he had this garish purple tie on, in my opinion. And, you know, so anyway, rather than being a fashion statement, they were just kind of teasing each other a little bit.
[00:02:47] And he gave this guy a question and the guy made a speech and it kind of created a box that he was going to try and put Vance into before he could answer it. And Vance says, wait, wait, wait, just a minute. If you've got a question, ask a question. You don't have to frame everything to the point that you feel like you've had a debate before I even get a chance to talk to you. I mean, he got a little bit stern, but he was still, you know, he wasn't. You're stupid. How could you be so dumb to ask that question? And that's what Trump would have done.
[00:03:16] Yeah. And Trump is garish in everything that he does. By the way, that's your word of the day, ladies and gentlemen. Dr. Bradley said garish. And if you don't know what that means, it means, you know, overly bright, flashy, loud, showing in a way that looks tasteless or kind of unpleasant. It's just over the top would be another way. So, you know, Donald Trump is garish by nature. Anyway, I just thought I'd help people with the word a little bit, doctor.
[00:03:44] Okay. Well, yeah, I like words of the day. Try and use it in the Senate today. Now you got this $1.8 billion. Donald Trump had a battle with the IRS. They outed his records. They shouldn't have done it. Now they're paying the penalty. There's a big old lawsuit battle back and forth. Donald Trump, the art of the deal, claims he was going to get $10 billion. That's what he pushed for. And now he's kind of settling, saying, hey, you never come after me or my family again. Special privilege for the Donald. And then, hey, we're going to get $1.8 billion for the rest of y'all
[00:04:12] to kind of fight over. We'll set it aside, compensate people for the, you know, who the government's really abused. I agree the government's abused people. That's a serious, serious issue. At the same time, it's kind of weird that Trump gets carte blanche protection for his family, kind of like an equivalent of a pardoning of himself in some ways. Yet $1.8 billion is going to be split between, what, J6ers and other people? And, I mean, I really think I should be able to get some of this. They literally lied on the congressional record and allowed it to be put on there
[00:04:39] that I was the nexus of hate and anti-government in America. There's no evidence to that. Richard Mack and I have increased the number to $25,000. If you can tie me or Richard Mack to any violent events, you can't do it because it doesn't exist. So we've got a $25,000 we'll pay out if you can, you know, tie us to violence. But it's very interesting how all that works, but I won't get a penny. It's just going to be Donald's friends that get the money, doctor.
[00:05:06] Well, that's certainly much of the story that's being told. The thing is that you also know that many of those people in the J6 thing, I mean, they were slammed in solitary confinement for literally years. Oh, sure. They were wrong, for sure. And the habeas corpus stuff that never happened and the evidence that was so absolutely flimsy, people that weren't even in the neighborhood or the state, well, D.C. is not a state.
[00:05:33] But, you know, they end up being, she's even severe. For example, Stuart Rhodes, to make the point, never even went into the buildings. Stuart Rhodes, I didn't even think, I think he was in Maryland when all this happened. But be that as it may, injustice has been done. And people say, oh, you can't do taxpayer money for this. Well, the problem is. You can under these circumstances. You can. And here's the deal. So think just really quick constitutionally so everybody understands.
[00:06:02] Even when you take land or anything from somebody that's an asset, you have to give just compensation. And when you literally destroy somebody's lives, or for an example, if you're a military vet and you give your physical capabilities away in the service of your country and different things, at some point we do owe just compensation for these people. And when they've been wrongly thrown in prison, many of them now they're felons, even though you've let them go with a pardon. They still can't get jobs. They can't get back on their feet. They've lost family. They've lost, well, wherewithal.
[00:06:29] Many of them, through the abuse they've taken from the solitary confinement and everything else, can't work. I mean, there's so many issues here to discuss. So I think the money's justified. I just hope it gets to the right people timely. Well, and here's the deal. And I fully believe that just compensation is a responsibility to be done. It should be a warning shock to the future. Okay. So, but here's what happens when free money's out there. You look at Minnesota with the Medicaid, Medicare things.
[00:06:59] I mean, they were giving away money like hotcakes. People started coming in and feeding at the trough. And there's a lot of that in the news, too. And so the problem is, and they say, okay, this will be an individual case basis. We'll look at each case individually. We don't know the process. Is somebody going to have to apply? Will they have to get an attorney? Will they have to have a judicial review? I mean, all of these kind of things.
[00:07:26] I don't know if the ones that get the most will be the attorneys that handle the cases. Well, that's probably the reality. And there'll be a few cases that are flashing the pan, kind of like winning the lottery, that get highlighted. But day in and day out, we'll get nothing. How do I know? I'll give you an example. When Donald Trump first became president, you know, he talked about the media a lot. Then when he became president the second time, he literally rolled out a program called whitehouse.gov slash new media, a term I've been using forever. So, you know, there you go.
[00:07:56] But I bring this up because and then they said, hey, apply. Everybody who applies will get, you know, we'll get back to you. We'll get some some things rolling. Not only did I apply, but I haven't heard a single word. And there's been no Trump surrogates that have come on my show hardly at all this go around. However, in 2015, when Trump really wanted to get elected the first time, I mean, they had literally Donald Trump Jr. on my show on Super Tuesday. And so, see, they're not if they're not going to even give me a chance at the media trough, they're going to give me a chance at the personal trough. Doctor?
[00:08:28] No, but I don't. I mean, we're running out of time so fast. Let me just say that the people that say it's only for Trump's buddies somehow. And there may be a real slant that way. But there was a comment made that Hunter Biden could apply under it because of his if he felt like the government had done him justice about his his drugs and his taxes and his gun charges and all that kind of stuff. And he could apply and see if he could get something to reimburse him for any might.
[00:08:57] And that's my point. You'll have a few high profile on each side that gets it. And then Trump will be pitched as the fair, you know, deliberator of honesty. Both sides have been attacked. And look at these high value situations where they highlight it and everything else. And the rest of us will end up getting the shaft. And, you know, I pray that's not true, but that's my prediction. Because, again, we always hear these vague details. I mean, if it's really real and it's really money, then I mean, hey, putting me on the congressional record, suggesting that I'm the nexus of anti-government and hate.
[00:09:25] When have I been in the nexus of hate, doctor? Anywhere, anytime. Well, I've known you for quite a few years and you're a pretty gentle soul. Okay. When have I, you know, when am I anti-government? I mean, every day for 30 years I've talked about, hey, we promote the supreme law of the land. We stand for God, family, country. We protect the checks and balances. I'm not anti-government in any way unless it's rogue government. Well, it's restoring proper government is what you advocate for. And then how is that anti-government?
[00:09:55] So, see, if they're going to put me on that congressional record, that's a besmirchment of my character to say the least. I mean, I should be able to get a chunk of that 1.8 bill, right? Well, I don't know. $1.98 or something is what you'll end up with after your turn. $1.380, yeah. You know, and I'm not really suggesting that I need money as much as I'm making a point here. Is at what point of abuse do you get for how much and whatever and, you know, et cetera? Anyway, there you have it. What about the primary defeat? Yes, sir.
[00:10:25] Well, no, I was just going to say the free money thing, that always needs to be carefully adjudicated because, quite frankly, holy cow. That won't be. When you roll out publicly, there's 1.8 bill, man. People are lining up already. That was kind of my joke saying, hey, where's my money? But the problem is they've already drummed the right people out of office, in my opinion. U.S. Congressman Thomas Massey took a beating. It was foreign money, even Israeli money that took him out. The question is, does that vote fraud?
[00:10:55] Dr. Bradley responds in seconds. Are you watching what's happening in our country and asking, what can I do? Join the John Birch Society in Salt Lake City, June 6th, for a powerful one-day conference. The day includes a host of respected speakers, two meals, and meaningful connections. You'll gain clarity on the issues and walk away with practical steps you can take to your community. Reserve your seat today at jbs.org forward slash slc26.
[00:11:22] That's jbs.org forward slash slc26. Cybercrime is exploding. Take Sarah from Sweet Delights, whose world crumbled after having to close with not being able to bounce back. Small businesses are prime targets, but the right strategies can keep yours safe.
[00:11:43] Jay Hill, CEO of Network Providers, has co-authored The Cyber Playbook Simplifies Cybersecurity for Business Owners with Strategies to Avoid Costly Breaches and Fines. Build a strong cyber attack response. Secure your business with key protections. Cyber threats aren't slowing down, but you can stay ahead. Protect your business. Ensure its security for tomorrow.
[00:12:08] Get the Cyber Playbook today at networkprovidersinc.com slash cyber dash playbook or call 385-446-5500 now.
[00:12:36] Thomas Massey's gone, ladies and gentlemen. In my opinion, one of the most constitutional voting congressmen we had. And I submit that it's vote fraud that took him out. They literally had Israeli foreign money tied with Donald Trump's, you know, vendetta agenda. And they literally spent $20-plus million, the most expensive primary race in history for a congressman. And now he's gone. I think it's vote fraud, doctor, personally. Well, I, you know, you say $20-plus million.
[00:13:05] I have seen reports that exceed $32 million. The one I saw... Well, part of that is Massey spending money to defend himself, though. No, no, no, no. This was on the opposite side. This was Trump's makeovers. This was the American-Israeli pact. This was very rich, Zionist... Yeah, is it vote fraud, do you think? Well, I think that Israel just bought a congressman.
[00:13:32] Yeah, but in America, is that fraud for Israelis to buy a congressman? I think, well, I think it is, but it's not because the... Here's the deal. You're going to get a pushback on... These were American citizens, probably most of them, that were donating their own money, but it was donated for a cause to buy the loyalty of a congressman. Yeah, but they can only spend a certain amount of citizens if you use these PACs and all that kind of stuff. You can circum... You got this dark money that circumvents all that.
[00:14:02] You do. And this was absolutely... There were three things that were really heartburn for Trump. One was nasty... Was against the big, beautiful bill, which I was and you were, and anybody that could think about why this was a problem was... Sure. He was pushing the Epstein-Files disclosure, and he opposed the Iran war at the behest of... But that's where I sit on all three of the issues. I'm with Thomas 100%.
[00:14:28] So the fact of the matter is, that was the target that said he's not an Israeli acolyte. He's not somebody that's in the pocket of Israel. And he wasn't. He didn't have a hander and all this kind of stuff. So think about this for a second, Sam. If somebody... Let's see, the Communist Party, China, Communist Party, China, bought a congressman in our home state, which I kind of wonder if hasn't happened sometimes with at least a governor.
[00:14:56] But at any rate, what would the people say? Wait, wait, wait, wait. What's going on? China's buying influence in the Congress. Well, that's exactly what happened with this. Now, you say Massey's gone. I know we can't dwell on this. Again, I'd like an hour on this. Massey's gone, but he's a lame duck. Whoa, that's bad, isn't it? No, he's got seven more months that he can wreak havoc. I mean, he's got all the gloves off.
[00:15:24] He could say, okay, people, this is what really happened. And hopefully he'll prove to be a fly in the ointment for all of the unconstitutional Bravo Sierra that's going on there. And I hope Thomas takes off the gloves and gets that done. I do too, but he's got seven months to do that.
[00:15:41] And I don't know, I hope maybe a little bit of recognition comes through all of the states that this was done on behalf of a foreign power that Trump and the vast majority of the House and the Senate are actually in the – their efforts are on behalf of Israel. In fact, I talk about Ted Cruz.
[00:16:08] Ted Cruz, he's the only Cuban born in Canada, elected in Texas to the United States Senate to be a senator for Israel. I mean, Ted Cruz has – And blatantly admitted so, let's be clear. Yes, yes.
[00:16:25] And so what's happening is he's a representative of Israel in the United States Senate, and so many, including people from our own home state, have accepted large sums of money to be able to sweeten the pot to make sure that they vote correctly. And I believe that's criminal, though. It is. And I believe that we, the people, should hold those people responsible.
[00:16:52] And the only way to do that is to make sure they get turned out and somebody else takes their place that won't be on the dole. That's our recourse, right? Do you think that Utah is going to turn incumbent Republicans out of office? Come on, Sam. Not a chance. I mean, so the thing is people are willing to squint their eyes, hold their mouth just right, put up with a sour taste in their mouth, whatever, and continue to send these people back to office. Not doing it.
[00:17:20] I want these people gone, and I want to be able to stand tall for things that matter. But I'm just telling you, that's why, since I agree with Thomas Massey on all these three points, Trump's never going to give me anything of any kind at all. And I'm not saying I'm looking for things, but I'm expecting nothing but hostility from both sides of the aisle for our stance on this. Whenever you stand with Christ, things go south from a worldly point of view. It's just that simple. Always has been. And the fact is, it always will be, ladies and gentlemen.
[00:17:46] Now, the DOJ indictment of Cuban Raul Castro. What do you think of that thing? It's not a formal indictment, or is it? It is. I mean, I watched the acting. Well, how do you indict somebody from a different nation? Well, they did at Maduro. I mean, come on, Sam. I know, but that's not a formal one either. That's the problem. Okay, now, here's the deal. Yeah, well, we... Do you have the authority to indict people from foreign nations? You can do whatever you want internationally.
[00:18:15] I mean, it's... But the fact of the matter is, it ended up in a military action. We sent our people into harm's way to get him and his wife out of the country. I mean, you saw the guy that got all shot up that was riding the chopper. Well, he was driving the chopper. Yeah, that's right. Anyway... And he was a hero and everything. I get all that. Yeah, all that's cool. But the fact of the matter is, we have a... It's kind of a rinse and repeat kind of thing in my mind. We do these things.
[00:18:44] And Raul's, what, 96 or something like that? He was Castro... Fidel's brother. But let's just say that somebody... I'll tell you why he got indicted in just a minute. But let's say somebody decided that Trump had killed people wrongly, you know, whether it was bombing in Tehran or if it was some kind of stuff that happened. Well, there's a lot of people that have already decided that. Right. Okay. So what if he got an indictment against him? From where?
[00:19:14] Huh? From where? Why couldn't Tehran indict him? From Iran? Yeah. Yeah. Here's the deal. Maybe from China. Maybe from Cuba. That's kind of what my point is. What if somebody tried to abscond with him and take him to there? It would be an international affair that was huge. Yeah, they'd be a war criminal there, you know? Well, it would be war. But here's what happened.
[00:19:40] 30 years ago, Raul was leading in Cuba, and he ordered the shooting down of two airplanes. Wait a minute. Haven't we ever shot up some boats off of Venezuela? I don't know. I don't know. You can draw so many parallels on this thing. But it's okay when we do it, and if we indict, because we have authority and they don't, see? So anyway, we've now dispensed – not dispensed.
[00:20:03] We've deployed, I guess I should say, military assets to the area of Cuba, including an aircraft carrier. And it has nothing to do with the defense of America, really? No. I mean, and Cuba is a poverty-stricken country, and it's largely because of the way we've treated them. I'm not suggesting I support the communist regime. But the fact of the matter is America, since the early 60s, has basically blockaded Cuba, and they're living in the 1950s still.
[00:20:32] Well, we better be careful, because if we're not careful, we're going to lose Taiwan and Cuba to the Chinese. So there you go. Well, what happened for the longest time was that Russia basically propped them up. Then when Russia decided it wasn't going to do that anymore, Venezuela came to their thing. We shut Venezuela off. We've now got a big blockade. They're out of oil. Oil. Yeah, fuel and medicine and everything else. Yeah.
[00:21:00] So anyway, I mean, there's been talk of putting Marco Rubio in as president of Cuba. Now, I hope it's tongue-in-peak. But the fact of the matter is there's just so much bizarre stuff going. Well, the problem is we're becoming the world's agitator, and countries are taking notice. And they're not ready to respond too belligerently or brazenly yet.
[00:21:25] But if this continues, they eventually will harden and eventually will change and eventually will unify against us is what will happen. Write it down and remember who warned you about that first. I want to talk about SCOTUS eliminating racially established representation. Doctor? Well, you know, if you read the Constitution, the states were supposed to be over their elections. Imagine that.
[00:21:51] And they're quite a qualifier to make sure the states actually sent someone to Congress. But by and large, that was the intent of the American County Fathers. But with amendments 14, 15, 17, 19, 24, 26, and the 1965 Voter Act, the feds have basically bonded, that's another word of the day, with the election process.
[00:22:16] And the Supreme Court said you can't gerrymander these congressional districts to assure a person of color, whether they're black or brown or whatever, is going to be the Congress. What about a person of a private party? Well, yeah, that's another discussion we should and could have. Anyway, the bottom line is I agree it shouldn't be based on race. But the people are saying, oh, no, no, no, the Supreme Court has become so partisan,
[00:22:46] and they're jettisoning the deal of fairness and everything. No. If you're using race as a determining factor, I don't care if it's hiring somebody or letting them into college or putting them in Congress, whatever it is, and it's being done by an authentic institutional demand and requirement, it is wrong. It's wrong and it's got to stop. So the bottom line is SCOTUS did decent on that one, right?
[00:23:15] They did, but it's sure causing some contention. I mean, you know. Only to the racists. Who's Justin Jackson? Justice Jackson. You might look and see what she's pushing on, and it's really interesting. She's saying you can't do this. I mean, it's not. Yeah, only the racists say you can't do this. The rest of us are fine with it. America's fine with it, and there you go. Trump and Putin visit China's Xi Jinping, I think is how you say it or whatever.
[00:23:45] What do you think of that? Well, the thing is that this is showing the power dynamic shift in the region because of this Iran war, and the people are coming to China's doorstep. It sounds like we're out of time. They're putting China in the driver's seat, folks, whether you realize it or not. That's what's happening. And even Trump is being forced to, on the national stage, display that reality.
[00:24:14] Pray it isn't so. But I know that it is. Dr. Bradley, freedomsizingsun.com. I'm Sam Bushman. We're everywhere. Check us out. Libertyroundtable.com. Well, all I can say is this. Check us out on TV. YouTube. X. We're everywhere, folks. Radio and TV. Spread the word, will you? All right, I'm Sam Bushman. God save the Republic of the United States of America. Yeah, it's worth it when you try.