Episode 74 Hour of Decision: The Establishment Killed JFK and Here’s Why 2; Christ Is Risen, and Lives

Speaker 0: Look around you. Wrong rules the land while waiting justice sleeps. I saw it in the congress and crossing the country, campaigning with Ron Paul. Tyranny rising, unspeakable evil, manifesting, devils lying about our heritage who want to enslave and replace us. But we are Americans with manifest destiny to bring the new Jerusalem of endless possibilities. But first, this fight for freedom. Be a part of it, but don't delay because this is the Hour of Decision. Hour of Decision with Lou Moore starts now. Welcome to Hour of Decision. My name is Lou Moore. This afternoon, we are gonna complete our story about JFK was killed by the establishment, and here's why. John f Kennedy, a scandal, vulnerable president, very vulnerable because of two of his personal scandals, one about his health, one about his sex life that was starting to have national security implications, and a president, JFK, who was very ineffective in prosecuting the Fabian socialist project. His new frontier was failing, folks. He was not expanding government as the way, in the way that the establishment expected he would when he took control of the government in January of nineteen sixty one. But they had him killed, and then he was made a martyr, and then we had the largest expanse of government in the history of our And then we had the largest expanse of government in the history of our country and the torpedoing of a nationalist conservative political movement, the Goldwater campaign. So we're gonna go forward from right here. Where I left off at the end of last week was talking about the so called military industrial complex, which I guess is just the establishment. The idea that they would kill Kennedy because he wasn't playing ball with them for ramping up things in Vietnam. He had just played ball with the CIA in killing the Diem brothers in, I believe it was August of nineteen sixty three. But, the theory is is that Kennedy had sent a lot of signals out that, he might even try to get rid of the CIA. There was a memo from Arthur Schlesinger, a Fabian socialist and a half. If you look at some of my earlier work on the Fabians and on Kennedy, I talk about Arthur Schlesinger, not a good guy, but he did do a memo for Kennedy about how they could eliminate the CIA. I don't know how serious in any way that was. But at any rate, Kennedy was cooperating with him right up until his death on things like assassinating people. And as far as the military industrial complex and Vietnam overall, there's no way that Kennedy would have ramped up in Vietnam in an election year. I mean, Lyndon Johnson swore he wouldn't. He swore on it like a bible when he was running after Kennedy died that he wouldn't, invade Vietnam or or ramp up in Vietnam. Of course, he did as soon as the election was over, and there were plans on the table from the Kennedy years, to add at least two or 300,000 troops, not the 500,000 Johnson put in. But whether Kennedy would have executed that plan, I mean, the Pentagon is full of plans of all different kinds. I'm sure Kennedy did not want to do that. Douglas MacArthur warned us against a land war in Asia, but it's hard to say what Kennedy would have done. But he told Walter Cronkite in September of nineteen sixty three that he was going to stay the course in Vietnam, which is what, politicians had to say in the anti communist era that still existed as late as 1963 and '64. So who knows? I don't I find that a weak argue just weak in terms of a motive for Kennedy's assassination. Then there's the Mossad. This one's kinda cropped up, folks, since, since Israel has become so unpopular in certain quarters. And, indeed, Kennedy threatened to cut off Israel's aid and and wanted their lobby to register, which they never ever have and still don't register as a foreign agent. But he wanted these things to occur because they were pressuring him to get the bomb, and Kennedy was busy on the internationalist CFR project of disarmament. As I said, Kennedy never did anything to cross the establishment, and in fact, he signed the test ban treaty with Russia in August, just not very long before his assassination in 1963, and I just don't believe there's any way that the Jews or that the Mossad in in particular would assassinate Kennedy. He they still had so much leverage over him as a Democrat politician. He would have had to sucked up to, the Jewish community and to Israel again, as you got into the election year. I mean, I'm quite sure of that, folks. There isn't any way he could have won that election as a Democrat without the full support of the Jewish community. So it was a bit of a sticky wicket there for Kennedy, but I don't think I know there's books about this and everything. I don't think the Mossad killed Kennedy. I don't think that. The bankers killed Kennedy. That's another plot out there, and I and, of course, I do believe the establishment killed him. So in a way, that could include some Jewish groups and could include the bankers, but not for the reason that is cited that he issued issued silver certificates or had authorized the issuance of silver certificates. Eisenhower done the same thing. Anyway, folks, not gonna spend a lot of time on that, but you can go to, g Edward Griffin, the creature from Jekyll Island. He torpedoes that idea because that's not what happened, folks. Kennedy was all about the Federal Reserve. The bankers loved him, and he loved them. He had c Douglas Dillon as the secretary of the Treasury from Dillon Read, internationalist all the way. Ridiculous, ridiculous idea. So the idea of the CIA going rogue and killing Kennedy for any of these various reasons, there were all kinds of you know, you know, where I think they could've fit in is where they could've misdirected Oswald, after the Soviets decided not to use Oswald as their assassin and, assassinate Kennedy for the reason I suggest, because he was a complete failure, because he was opening up the door for the possibility of a conservative Republican anti internationalist and anti big government, candidate from becoming president. That's why, you know, that's why the CIA may might have been involved, but I don't think it's because of embarrassment over the Bay Of Pigs. I mean, they screwed up totally. They they should be embarrassed, but not because of anything Kennedy did at the end. They were all weak, and they were all afraid to, be too publicly involved in something they plotted out and planned. And so I I don't go with that. I don't believe that. The Russians have promoted this line that the CIA killed Kennedy because the Russians would like us, the communists, and Putin today would like us not to have an intelligence service, folks, and that's a conundrum with the CIA. I mean, yes, the CIA is usually the tool of the establishment, but the CIA is also our intelligence agency. I mean, we've had intelligence agencies in this country back to George Washington. You're not a sovereign nation if you're not getting intelligence, to know what other people are doing on the game board, and I'm just not quite as quick to criticize every aspect of the CIA as some others are. Of course, I have some family ties, and that might have something to do with it as well. But there certainly was a fight between the blue collar and white collar members of the CIA. We do know that for fact as well. And one thing I can tell you about the CIA, and we absolutely know it now, as I mentioned earlier from these documents that, as I mentioned in the previous episode, from these documents that have just been released unredacted, the CIA had a very, very strong interest in Lee Harvey Oswald. And as, again, as I mentioned last week, James Jesus Angleton, one of the principal officials of the CIA, allegedly had a 180 page file on Oswald on his desk in and around the time of the assassination of John f Kennedy. So, you know, again, I totally believe that they could take somebody primed, somebody trained, somebody positioned to kill Kennedy for the Russians and turn him in what's called the Wilderness Of Mers, that extremely complicated, deceptive world of international intrigue and intelligence. And in that convoluted place with people playing both sides and every other thing going on, they could have steered Oswald to killing Kennedy, they meaning a faction in the CIA not working for the bankers worried about silver certificates, not working for the Mossad worried that Kennedy didn't hand them an atomic bomb, not for some general that wanted to ramp up in Vietnam, but because the powers that be, the basic unit of power that runs a good part of this world, was not getting what they wanted from Kennedy in terms of the big government project that he was failing and that they were now being threatened by a new political force, in the form of the Barry Goldwater campaign. That is why there may have been elements of the CIA, not a policy wide thing. I mean, nothing like that. I mean, come on. And and that's the other thing. These conspiracies, folks, I have heard some of these guys on the radio. They are talking about conspiracies of immense size involved with killing JFK, and that just is a nonstarter for me just right from the get go. I mean, the more complicated you make this idea of a big plot against Kennedy, you know, the less likely it's true. I mean, just think about it. Every moving part is a vulnerability in this kind of thing. You want it as simple and elegant as humanly possible. And again, I'm going to argue the Soviets, we have Ayan Passapa, the highest ranking intelligence officer from the Iron Curtain. He wasn't actually a Soviet, but he worked for them. From the Iron Curtain to ever defect, tell us that Lee Harvey Oswald was programmed to kill, and he was put in position. And he was talking to the highest levels of the KGB in their assassination end of things, and we have to think that he was talking about killing president Kennedy. So he was put in position, but I also don't believe they did it because that would be stupid. Kennedy was a pretty good thing for the Soviets. I'm just gonna tell you. Anyway, so, but I do believe, as I said, that there are is a real possibility of CIA involvement because of establishment desire the establishment desire to get their big government program through and to thwart the right wing nationalist, populist, conservative movement of that day. And they succeeded, folks, in spades. In spades. So how exactly did these people benefit? When we look at the quie bono analysis, how did these people benefit in such a larger way than any of these other alleged, assassins or centers of assassination intrigue, then they would have benefited. A president sinking in the polls and heading for disaster could be made a martyr and a national hero by the news media that the powers that be completely control. And here again, folks, 1963, there are three television networks. There are three sets of nightly news, and that is the news people got as well as CBS, ABC, NBC, and the Mutual Broadcasting Corporation on the radio. That's it, folks. That's the news and the newspapers. The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Saint Louis Post Dispatch, The Atlantic Constitution. All of these papers, folks, establishment CFR to the max, by 1960, they had pretty much gotten rid of rogue newspapers like the Chicago Tribune that at one time was America First and a major publication. They had gotten rid of these papers, folks. They turned to LA Times. The LA Times at one time was an American First newspaper, no longer by 1963. So they had a lock on information that the public would receive almost. I mean, there was just a few elements, fringe elements, primarily on the right, who could provide a different perspective or different information for people to gather in. So there was that factor. There was the fact that the public was already fascinated with JFK, and he was personally very popular. I mean, remember, he won the closest election to date, the closest presidential election we had ever had to date, and of course, as I said in the last episode, I don't think he won that election. I think he stole But anyway, assuming he did not steal it, he won by the closest margin, ever. But yet, he was up in, like, 75% approval in just a few months and he hadn't even accomplished anything. But it was all this Camelot talk, all his cute pictures with the kids, and Jackie was just so elegant. And he was, folks, as charismatic as they get in an era of television where people were no longer primarily getting their news in a newspaper or on the radio, but on the television from those three networks, just pumping out the pro Kennedy propaganda constantly because he was Nixon was playing with the establishment, but Kennedy was the establishment pick of 1960. I absolutely believe that because they thought he would deliver the new frontier, a newer version of the new deal with a whole lot more government, leading us to total government. So he was their candidate. The public was fascinated with JFK. He was personally popular, and the Camelot theme cemented that, but now, after he dies, this Camelot theme is just amplified, folks, to the max. It's hard to even describe it if you didn't live through it. And both parties, after Kennedy died November 1963, both parties agreed to no political communications till the end of the year. So the Republicans, including the Goldwater campaign, said nothing nothing about the adulation, the incredible, almost deification of JFK that occurred after his death that included almost a deification of his legislative program. So that was a heck of a jump start. And they thought to, their thought was to selflessly prosecute the entire Kennedy legislative agenda. In other words, what I was trying to say is LBJ is now the president. He was never very popular, but he just wrapped himself in the mantle of JFK. You've gotta do whatever I say because I'm just trying to get the poor martyred president's program through this selfish, congress and senate, which he was able to do in spades. And that was also his election campaign. A good part of it was just we have to continue the work of our heroic President JFK. And in fact, they passed the sweeping Civil Rights Act of 1964, folks, and we don't have time to digest all of that right now, a bill that had been stalled in Congress for some very good reasons, including starting with a person's property rights and their ability to do what they wish on their own property. But we should talk about the Civil Rights Act of '64, and we will. But I'm not talking about it anymore in this episode. But anyhow, no matter what you think about that bill or if you're aware of all of the ultimate ramifications of that bill, that was sweeping legislation that was totally stalled. There was no chance that Kennedy was gonna get that through, but it just it just moved right on through with added, both with the addition of more Democrats and more Republicans supporting it. JFK essentially became a sainted martyr. You just couldn't criticize him or anything he did when he was in the White House after he died. No speaking against him, and now very difficult to speak in any way against his agenda. Weak congressional opponents in both political parties were now supporting his agenda. And meanwhile, the rising populist nationalist conservative movement behind Barry Goldwater was pounded by the establishment press, starting with the lie that extreme right wing elements, implied to be in the Gowater campaign were the were responsible for Kennedy's death, that they had killed him. This is the the media went to this immediately. You know, once the, Warren Commission issued their report, they couldn't exactly say Oswald was a right wing extremist. That would have been a stretch. They pinned it all on Oswald. But before that happened, the news media essentially was pinning it on the right wing and on the Goldwater campaign. And then after that, they just segued right on over. And once it was the first of the year, and Goldwater's campaign started up again, and political communications were restored. The whole idea then was pushed that Goldwater was crazy. He was crazy. He tried to bog us down in Vietnam and he might use nuclear weapons in Vietnam. Movies came out about crazy generals wanting to use the bomb seven days in May, doctor Strangelove, and that Goldwater, a unusual white member of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the NAACP, that Goldwater was a racist because he was opposing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as he opposed it when Kennedy was president in '63 because he failed to give the federal government too much power and because it took away your property rights, which it did. Johnson, meanwhile, was playing up the martyrdom card to the max, and he crushed Goldwater at the polls with some help, I have to admit folks, from the CIA, but we don't really have time to go into all of that. Again, I have three episodes well over four hours. I talk about all this stuff at length if you go back into the archives of hour of decision. Then we had the big ramp up, 500,000 troops after the election. Johnson didn't do this before the election, folks. And, the largest expansion of government named after a Fabian socialist book of the that was written at the turn of the century. I just talked about this, folks, in my last FDR episode, the book The Great Society, which is what Johnson's legislative program, which he now took unto himself after he won, It was no longer the new frontier. It was now the great society branded in his own name, and, he named it after a Fabian socialist book just as FDR named his program the New Deal after a Fabian socialist book called A New Deal. But the largest expansion of government in history was enabled. What they wanted from Kennedy, but they couldn't get until they killed him. The rest is history folks. The right wing rebellion would continue in America, but the White House, at least in 1964, would be saved from it. And I'll give you an example of how entrenched this rebellion was getting before the election. In 1964, in California, where where Johnson won, I think, two to one, a a, initiative from the people to enact a fair housing law, forcing you to sell your home to somebody you might not wanna sell your home to, lost two to one. The Rumford Fair Housing Act in California, put on the ballot as an initiative to the people, lost two to one in 1964. And then two years later, in California, they elected Ronald Reagan the governor. So there was this huge outpouring for Kennedy, and there was this huge propaganda blitz against Barry Goldwater and against conservatism and against patriotism and against patriotism and against anybody who was against the, Fabian socialist consensus. But in fact, folks, the process continued anyway, but it certainly was a setback because they killed Kennedy. That is why it was a setback. My name is Lou Moore, and you are listening to the Hour of Decision on Liberty News Radio, and we'll be right back with our Easter message after the news. Against tyranny and corruption for Christ and constitution. The hour of decision with Lou Moore starts now. Welcome back to Hour of Decision. My name is Lou Moore. So the same people who gave us Western civilization, who gave us the constitution of The United States through God's inspiration, the people who could comprehend limited government and live it to a degree, at least, are from the same European peoples who are also the ones who embrace Christianity, who understood it, who felt it in their spirit, and in their bones. And folks, in this hour of decision, where you have to decide if you're going to participate in the saving of this nation, to look to the future, to do your part in America fulfilling its manifest destiny, to become the new Jerusalem our forefathers saw in vision as they sacrificed to come to this land. You need to get right with God. We all do. And to learn something of his ways as enunciated in holy scripture. And so this Easter weekend, to help us with this sacred task, to help us frame the past as we look to the future, I wanna bring back doctor Justin Prock. He is a professor of English at a university in South Korea. He has twenty years of practical business experience in retail and restaurant management, but he also has a PhD in biblical studies and eschatology and a master's of divinity. He has several additional certificates from various theological institutions. And in 2023, he was ordained a minister of the general Presbyterian assembly. He's written five books, including the blockbuster folks, one I highly recommend, biblical eschatology, which he completed in 2021. And he's currently working on number six with the title of all roads lead to Babylon. Isn't that a fact, folks? He has a unbelievable website loaded with resources, including all of the material that he studied to get to the understanding that he has now. And name of that website, the, URL is doctorjustinprock.com. Justin, welcome back to Hour of Decision. Speaker 1: Well, thank you again for having me on, Lou. I sure do appreciate it. Speaker 0: Oh, you betcha. So our savior is risen Yes. And our savior lives Speaker 1: Yes. Indeed. Speaker 0: Despite the devil. So tell us about it a little bit. Speaker 1: Well, despite the, apparently, there's an expert just came out and said that Jesus' body is underneath the, is in a tomb in the pyramid. So remember what Jesus said. He said there'll be people saying, look here, look there, but don't look there or there. Right? So but yeah. So this is the, weekend that we celebrate resurrection Sunday. And it follows in with Passover, which is a Israelite holiday, not a Jewish holiday. And so he was risen on the third day, and he lives. Out of all the so called men of all these different religions, he's the only one that's risen. So Speaker 0: Sure. And, he's he is risen despite the fact that there was a concerted effort to keep him from rising, the ones who killed him. So, Yes. Speaker 1: Yes. Those, same people who are the who were the religious lead of his day, and we know them as Pharisees, scribes, and Sadducees, and the elders, and the high priest. And so they basically paid the Roman soldiers to say that his disciples had stolen the body. And we all know the biblical account that Jesus obviously rose from the grave. And in 2024, there was a new study by, I forgot who the gentleman was with regard to the Shroud Of Turin, but he basically said that it it was like a nuclear explosion that had left the imprint of his body on the shroud, and we have evidence conclusive that, you know, it is him. Speaker 0: Sure. Sure. And go ahead. Speaker 1: Oh, and there's also a, secular letter from Pilate to his father-in-law, Tiberius Caesar, that's actually in the Library of Congress, and it describes that Jesus Christ is being blonde with the golden beard and the appearance of a god. So Speaker 0: Well, a god, he certainly was. Speaker 1: Yes. Indeed. Speaker 0: So, we we know that he rose. Is he gonna return to us? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. And And have her Speaker 0: Well, and, I know no no man knows the hour of my coming, but, nonetheless, I'm putting you on the spot here a little bit. Speaker 1: Well, that's fine. The, regardless of whether you follow the timeline of the Septuagint or the Mazarite text, Jesus said in Matthew twenty four and twenty five, Mark 13, he said, learn the parable of the fig tree. That's the only parable he said. And so coupled with that, obviously, that represent the so called house of Judah, which was taken over by the Jews. Because remember, historically, 200 walled cities in June were taken out. So the majority all of the house of Israel and the majority of the house of Judah were taken by June. Fast forward to the today, the parable of the fig tree. So Jesus said learn that. And with coupled that with, Psalm 90, where Moses says that a generation is 70 and it's eighty years with pain, basically, if you count down 1947, '40 '8, where do you come to? 2027, possibly 2028. Correct? I'm not putting dates out there, but it is interesting to see what's coming down the pike. Okay? Speaker 0: Yeah. Wow. Speaker 1: And even Henry Kissinger said that Israel wouldn't be a nation in twenty years, and that was twenty years ago. So what did what did he know and when did he know it? Speaker 0: That is interesting. I wonder what he was thinking about there. But, anyway, hard to say. He was a Yeah. He was a committed internationalist, and, despite his ethnicity, even a lot of those folks don't seem to be, necessarily in line with the Zionist there in Israel. But who knows? Who knows what Speaker 1: he means? Speaker 0: But, so, when, so we're not sure when he returns, but we know he will. And then what about the resurrection? He's resurrected. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And What about remember what about some of us or all of us? Speaker 1: Well, remember first John says that when he returns, we will see him as he is. So we will be transfigured, not so much raptured, but we will be transfigured as he is, as he was on the on the mount. Remember? Speaker 0: Can you explain that a little bit? You know, I've always been a little bit confused about being transfigured, and some people, I think, actually confuse it with, with, multiple lives. And, I mean, you get some weird stuff out there too, in in that area. But when when you say that, Justin, well, well, what in your judicious way, what do you mean? Speaker 1: I mean, I'm referring to Paul in first Corinthians chapter 15 toward the end of the chapter, first Thessalonians, second Thessalonians as well, you know, where, you know, there's a four step process, you know, and even Jesus talks about this in discourses, you know, that there'll be a shout, there'll be a trump. He'll send his angels out, gather his elect from the four corners of the earth. But when you piece it all together and it happening it's happening on the last day, as Jesus said in, John chapter six, four times, and also in, John chapter 11 twice. It happens on last day. There's a last day on the, festival, the very last festival. It's on God's calendar of, oh, hold on a second. I always forget the, the the the tabernacles. And so on the last, day of tabernacles, there is an eighth great day. And so some people think that's gonna happen then. To answer your question, we will be transfigured. We will be putting off the old body and putting on the new body as Paul talks about in first Corinthians. We will be getting rid of the sinful body and putting on the enlightened body, the body that is glorified just as Jesus Christ was glorified. Right? So we are justified, and then we are sanctified all through our life, and then we are glorified with him. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: And so it happens in the blink of an eye. You know, everybody talks about the so called rapture. Well, we go to meet him in the sky as if we were bringing the king into his kingdom. Right? And so that is the other thing that people tend to, forget about with regard to that whole process. They think that, oh, we get raptured, we go to heaven. But why is Jesus saying the book of Revelation, no man has been to heaven? Right? Speaker 0: Interesting. Well, you know, I'm glad you mentioned the rapture. I was just about to ask you. So, was it Schofield that came up with this idea, highly politicized idea that is just death to our people right now, that that, oh, don't worry about what's going on in the world. Don't worry about anything. Christ is gonna bring you up in a rapture, while all the evil people stay on the earth, and you don't have to worry about it, and they're all gonna get wiped out or whatever. But that's not what you mean. Am I correct? Speaker 1: Yeah. Correct. And when you take a look at who, produced, published his, work, you know, he got his ideas going all the way back to the Jesuits. And then you got Darby, who was a necromancer, and I'm fairly certain that Scofield was as well. K. Speaker 0: And I was happy right there, Justin, only because I wanna make sure everybody knows what a necromancer is. Speaker 1: Basically, somebody that worships the dead or speaks to the dead or does something, you know, seances. And that was a big thing back in the eighteen hundreds. Right? Mhmm. That's true. Yeah. And Darby, apparently owned a, some sort of satanic castle and, you know, had seances there. I mean, so it's Speaker 0: Moe, so are you you're serious about this? Oh, you did? Yeah. Because I know. Oh, look. I know a number of, I guess, I'd call them fundamentalist or evangelicals. I mean, they're all about Darby, and they're super all in all of Scofield. Holy smokes. Speaker 1: Know. That's the problem. And remember, Scofield had a, membership at the Lotus Club in New York City. How could he afford to pay for that? There was a gentleman by the name of Untermyer. Oops. How are you? Speaker 0: Untermyer. Uh-oh. Speaker 1: Yes. And so we see his name pop up a few times afterwards, but he is responsible for getting the Scofield Bible, published through Oxford. Who who on earth is Scofield to get a so called Bible that he did not write? Somebody gave him the notes, and then off it went, and then it went into all the seminaries in the West. Speaker 0: And, and I'm also correct. Am I not that, you know, his financial ties or whatever was Samuel Hunter Meyer, who was a leading figure, in organized jewelry. But, Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Am I also correct that Scofield is really the one that puts such an emphasis on the Jews, the Jews and people we know today as Jews where, you know, I had one person tell me, matter of fact, I've got a I've got a, for the folks that are only listening to this, I have Matthew Henry's commentary here. Speaker 1: Ah, yes. Speaker 0: And he's in the eighteenth century. This this thing's 1,700 pages. He hardly mentions the Jews. It's he's hardly they're hardly mentioned in here. And and it's just one one commentator who's considered at the top of top of his game and that kind of thing. But then when Scofield cut you know, so several of them had that kind of a treatment. But then when Scofield comes along, suddenly, this is like you know, they're the chosen people. This is the most important thing in the world and the whole political angle with Israel. And, am I in the am I, sniffing in the right direction here, Justin? Speaker 1: Yeah. Remember the first Zionist Congress took place in Basel, Switzerland, probably 1897, right, with Theodore Herzl. And then fast forward to nineteen o seven, '19 o '9 with the, publishing of the Scofield Bible, and then the whole Zionist movement went from there. And so, you know, we could get into World War one, World War two, you know, everything ending in sevens all the way up to 2017 with president Trump recognizing Jerusalem as capital of the so called Israeli state. Right? Mhmm. So Sure. Speaker 0: Sure. So so what, so we go up to meet Christ. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And, then what happens? Speaker 1: Well, and then we bring him back into his kingdom just like in the ancient days. Remember, a victorious king, what did the people do? They went out to greet the king and brought him into his kingdom. Right? And so we too shall be ushering in Jesus Christ to this physical kingdom on this earth. He is the king of Israel, and he he owns the world. These people don't understand what the, parable of the pearl of great price is. He paid for the pearl, but in doing so, he also paid for the world. And so all these people are gonna be under judgment because remember what Peter said, and it's also, I think, King David said it too, if, or Solomon, King Solomon, if scarcely the righteous get through, what's to say about the one who does not believe in the gospel and the sinner? Right? So if we barely get through and think about what Zechariah 13 says, two thirds of our people get wiped out and one third goes through the through the, fire. And it'll be just like going, you know, the, fire with gold. Right? Makes it more pure. Speaker 0: So so is that scripture, every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess that Jesus is the Christ? Is that is that That's zone wherein Speaker 1: that's in the New Testament. Yes. And and that's true. I mean, everybody will. And, you know, remember, Obadiah says that there you know, Joseph will be a flame, Jacob will be a fire, and the house of Esau will be stubble. And so who is stubble in the New Testament? Well, it's the tares. And Jesus clearly just defines who the tares and the wheat are. Right? And so the wheat get saved, and then the tares get bundled up and burned. And so going back to Obadiah, there shall no longer be a light bearer to the house of Esau. And then when you read Zechariah fourteen twenty one, says that there shall no longer be a Canaanite in the house of God. So all the people that Israel couldn't kill back in the Old Testament have gone forth and there are Canaanites in the world today and they worship. Remember, you know, their main god is Baal or Moloch or Murdoch, and so what is abortion? Well, you're basically giving your baby over to those gods today just like they went past them through the fire back then. So there are so called Canaanites among us. Speaker 0: So, Justin, I wanna segue over a little bit because, particularly for people that are not nearly as well versed as you are. You know, we're talking about the, Scofield Bible, the King James Bible. If you go to your megachurch today, you're probably gonna get some other Bible. So Speaker 1: Not inspired version. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, there are a few out there. But but, anyway, talk to us a little bit about all these Bibles and and and which ones you rely on. Do you cross reference? Do you just use one? How does that work for you? Speaker 1: For me, I came across the Septuagint, and I realized that that matches with any, Greek New Testament. So, for example, the Masoretic text, Doug Woodward did a series on rebooting the Bible, and he talks about the, Septuagint Bible and how important it is and how it matches up. So, for example, I don't know if you can see this, but I have the, Charles Thompson Septuagint translation of the Bible, and he was the, secretary of the Continental Congress seventeen seventy four, seventeen eighty nine. And he spent the last twenty years of his life translating the Bible from Greek into English. And so he also has a New Testament. And so those that was eighteen o eight, and so I use that as the basis for my all my studies. The Masoretic text was corrupted by Rabbi Akiva, who thought that Bar Koba was the Messiah in January. And, of course, he got overthrown by the Romans, and there was no such thing called Israel ever again. And so they destroyed the abomination of desolation. However, we have a new one standing where it ought not. Right? Let the reader know. And so Speaker 0: Well, let me just clarify one thing. The Septuagint, isn't that just the Old Testament? Speaker 1: Yes. It is. It's the Old Testament. It was the, based on the original Hebrew Vorlage that we don't have today, but it was written by 72 Israelites in Egypt under Ptolemy Philadelphias the second. Okay? Probably about February. And so that is the Bible that corresponds that Jesus Christ and his disciples used, and that has all the messianic prophecies. That's how people came to him as, you know, lord and savior. But all these other New Testament or these Old Testament Bibles are based on the Masoretic text. So all these protestants out there, the the Old Testament doesn't match the Greek. Speaker 0: So yeah. You but so what was the Bible or the version that you match up with the to get the New Testament? Speaker 1: I just use the Septuagint. We don't have the, original Hebrew. Speaker 0: Okay? No. But I mean for the New Testament. Speaker 1: For this New Testament, I use the Septuagint Bible. And Oh, Speaker 0: it's just gonna so it is so I'm I was confused. So it is both the Old Testament and the New Testament. Speaker 1: This is the Old Testament, and there is a New Testament Greek. Speaker 0: That's that's what I was asking you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. There's also a New Testament Greek, Bible right here. Speaker 0: Okay. He's holding up. And so that's just called the Greek New Testament, man? Speaker 1: New Testament. Yes. And it's by the same, translator, Charles Thompson. So I have both, in the hard copy, and then there's also on my website for free, the four four volume set. So Speaker 0: Okay. So so, Justin, what we've got now, about a minute, maybe a little bit more. So let's talk about your website before I I want I want you to talk about it to us a little bit because, folks, you need to go to his website. If you have any interest in the Bible, the last days, Christ, Justin, please. Speaker 1: Yes. It's, drjustinpr0ck.com, and it's basically everything that I have studied, since I've been in Korea. And, Nadine is my webmaster, and she has built it and put everything on there. I've sent her everything to put on there. It's by category. All my sermons are on there that I do weekly. Also, it's got all my books for free in PDF. There's a new one, called, geocentrism, versus heliocentrism. And so I go down Yeah. Speaker 0: I even keep up with you, Justin, on the on the book writing here. Okay. Well Speaker 1: Well, I'm turning them into books or little booklets. And so but with the sermon, I also have the sermon notes for those who are hearing impaired or for those who don't understand English, they can copy it and see for themselves and then go do their own studies. So that's why I encourage all my students and everybody else, go look for yourself and then come to your own conclusions. But here's what I did, and here's the way I got there. And so that's the way the website's laid out. Speaker 0: Fantastic, Justin. Justin, thank you so much for being with us on this Easter weekend. Folks, get right with God. That's my message. Amen. Speaker 1: Yes. And, He is the way, the truth, and the life, and there is no other way to the father except through him. Speaker 0: Amen, brother. Justin, thank you again. We'll have you back when you're available. This is Lou Moore, and you've been listening to the hour of decision on Liberty News Radio. And you can learn more about me at Lou Moore, l e w m, double o, r e, dot com. Thank you so much. Thank you. Folks, this is Lou Moore, and I just wanted to let you know that next week on hour of decision, we are gonna be giving the Trump administration their first report card. It will roughly be one hundred days of their administration. And I'm gonna tell you right now, folks, they're not all gonna get an a over there in the Trump on the Trump train, but, some of them will. So please, stick around next week or come back next week for that on hour of decision. I wanna also remind you that Tulsi Gabbard, our director of national intelligence, is telling us there may be some problems with those voting machines. This has never been a better time, folks, to keep track of things at securevote.news. That's securevote.news. Thanks so much.