Lew recounts the defeat of the America First Bricker Amendment to the Constitution, which would prevent treaties or side agreements from surmounting or being considered U.S. law. Bricker had 2/3 of the Senate supporting such protection, but Ike convinced new Senate Majority Leader Robert Taft to delay the vote, giving him time to force Senators off the proposal. Taft then dies, and Ike prevails the following year, defeating the Bricker Amendment by one vote.
Ike also thwarts the efforts of the Congressional committee led by former RNC Chairman Carroll Reece to investigate the Fabian Socialist/Globalist social engineering projects of the tax-free foundations. The Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, and Guggenheim Foundations, along with a small network of other “charities,” were translating the funds of the superrich into a multi-faceted effort to inject cultural Marxism into America. They subverted the education system and all efforts to protect the Constitution and U.S. sovereignty. The White House worked behind the scenes with the Democrats on the committee, as well as the news media, to prevent any meaningful action from being taken.
You can follow Lew on X @thelewmoore, and watch the show on Rumble, on the NewsForAmerica channel.
00:00:00
Look around you.
00:00:03
Wrong rules the land while waiting justice sleeps.
00:00:06
I saw in the congress
00:00:08
and crossing the country,
00:00:10
campaigning with Ron Paul.
00:00:12
Tyranny
00:00:14
rising,
00:00:15
unspeakable
00:00:16
evil,
00:00:17
manifesting,
00:00:18
devils lying about our heritage who want to
00:00:21
enslave and replace us.
00:00:24
But we are Americans
00:00:26
with a manifest destiny
00:00:28
to bring the new Jerusalem
00:00:30
of endless
00:00:31
possibilities.
00:00:32
But first, this fight
00:00:35
for freedom.
00:00:36
Be a part of it. But don't delay
00:00:40
because this is the hour of decision.
00:00:45
Hour of decision with Lou Moore starts now.
00:00:48
Welcome to the ninety fifth episode of hour
00:00:51
of decision.
00:00:53
My name is Lou Moore. And today,
00:00:56
we're gonna continue our series on Dwight David
00:00:58
Eisenhower.
00:01:00
Number four, this is the fourth episode, the
00:01:03
fourth Eisenhower episode, and it's gonna be called
00:01:06
big battles that defeated patriots.
00:01:10
But before we do this, I need to
00:01:13
explain for those of you who last week
00:01:15
may have listened to the show, and I
00:01:17
had to do a replay. I wasn't expecting
00:01:19
to, but I did. I couldn't couldn't do
00:01:21
my show last week. So I replayed episode
00:01:24
73,
00:01:25
which is called
00:01:27
the establishment killed JFK, and here's why.
00:01:31
So
00:01:32
I don't know if you listen to that
00:01:33
or not or if that interests you. It
00:01:35
might interest you if you haven't heard it
00:01:37
already.
00:01:38
It's kind of a synopsis of my theory
00:01:40
of the Kennedy
00:01:42
assassination
00:01:42
and the real purposes behind it,
00:01:45
but it doesn't finish.
00:01:47
The episode is not the whole story.
00:01:50
It continues into episode number 74.
00:01:53
So I'm just letting you know that if
00:01:55
you heard 73 and you wanna hear the
00:01:58
rest of the story,
00:02:00
it's in episode 74, which you can find
00:02:02
at in my archives at loumoore.com
00:02:06
at
00:02:07
Liberty News Radio dot com,
00:02:10
and I think on my, Rumble channel as
00:02:12
well,
00:02:13
News for America, all one word, News for
00:02:16
America, which is
00:02:18
where you can watch this show.
00:02:20
I might also ask you to follow me
00:02:22
on x now. I'm on x,
00:02:25
and I'm also on Gab.
00:02:28
So
00:02:28
there's that housekeeping.
00:02:31
So,
00:02:33
why Eisenhower? I have to I always feel
00:02:36
like I have to start with that.
00:02:38
But these episodes on Dwight David Eisenhower, who
00:02:40
was the president of The United States
00:02:43
from 1953
00:02:45
until 1961,
00:02:47
he was preceded by Harry Truman,
00:02:49
and he was succeeded by JFK,
00:02:52
the man himself.
00:02:55
So what was going on with Eisenhower
00:02:57
the whole time
00:02:59
was a gatekeeping
00:03:02
exercise
00:03:03
that involved a gaslighting
00:03:04
exercise, but the gatekeeping
00:03:07
part of that exercise was to keep
00:03:10
there from being any backsliding
00:03:13
in terms of the big government project, the
00:03:15
Fabian
00:03:16
socialist project, as I call it for America,
00:03:19
at a time
00:03:20
when there was a brewing
00:03:23
undercurrent.
00:03:24
Not maybe a full populist rebellion during this
00:03:27
time, but a brewing undercurrent
00:03:30
of opposition
00:03:32
to our foreign policy, which seemed to favor
00:03:35
the communist and a one world government vision,
00:03:39
and our domestic policy, which was just more
00:03:41
and more regimentation
00:03:42
and more and more government.
00:03:44
And there was a candidate by the name
00:03:46
of Robert Taft
00:03:48
who should have won the nomination for the
00:03:50
Republicans in 1952
00:03:52
and become our president
00:03:54
who was, by most measures,
00:03:57
a America first
00:03:59
candidate
00:04:00
and,
00:04:01
who had a real shot at the White
00:04:03
House and a real shot at turning the
00:04:05
ship around,
00:04:06
turning around the whole
00:04:08
New Deal project
00:04:10
that was inaugurated
00:04:11
and proceeded
00:04:14
for twelve years over twelve years by Franklin
00:04:17
Delano Roosevelt
00:04:18
and continued,
00:04:20
for another
00:04:21
almost eight years by Harry Truman.
00:04:26
So there was a necessity in '52
00:04:29
for a gatekeeper to be inserted by the
00:04:32
establishment
00:04:32
to prevent
00:04:36
a, loss of progress in their efforts for
00:04:39
total government at home
00:04:41
and way one world government overseas. And the
00:04:44
agent for that
00:04:46
was the white David Eisenhower.
00:04:50
So,
00:04:51
I wanted to talk a little bit about
00:04:53
gatekeeper dynamics in the GOP, and that's why
00:04:56
we've spent so much time talking about a
00:04:58
gatekeeper. What is a gatekeeper?
00:05:01
And about the, election of nineteen fifty two
00:05:05
where Eisenhower was able to defeat despite the
00:05:08
fact by all accounts
00:05:10
and by all measures, he was a liberal
00:05:12
Democrat
00:05:14
until at least 1950,
00:05:16
until at least,
00:05:18
just a couple of years before the election
00:05:21
that he won
00:05:22
as a conservative
00:05:24
Republican,
00:05:25
the nineteen fifty two election.
00:05:27
He was a liberal Democrat, but he was
00:05:29
in fact the inserted gatekeeper
00:05:32
to keep the project moving.
00:05:36
And, like today,
00:05:38
the powers that be when there's a trend
00:05:42
that is moving against them, they tend to
00:05:44
have
00:05:45
a desire and an ability
00:05:48
to wait it out.
00:05:49
They could just wait out
00:05:51
the nineteen fifties, the, you know, 1952
00:05:55
through 1961
00:05:56
that Eisenhower served.
00:05:58
They weren't waiting him out.
00:06:01
He was inserted by them.
00:06:03
But waiting out
00:06:05
the period of time, atrophying the Republican Party,
00:06:08
watching Eisenhower give some platitudes to the conservatives
00:06:12
and all the action to the liberals.
00:06:14
I'm kinda quoting Pat Buchanan there. Sideways quote
00:06:18
of mister Buchanan. Conservatives get the words and
00:06:21
the liberals get the action. This has been
00:06:23
forever.
00:06:25
And waiting him out so they could get
00:06:27
a president into,
00:06:29
once again, fire up the Fabian socialist project
00:06:33
and take another huge leap
00:06:36
toward,
00:06:38
big, big, and bigger government.
00:06:41
Now Kennedy failed as I talked about in
00:06:43
the episode I ran last week. It reran.
00:06:46
But then Lyndon Johnson was the man of
00:06:48
the hour who provided
00:06:50
that next huge leap forward,
00:06:53
a big government. But the fifties was a
00:06:55
period of time the establishment was just waiting
00:06:58
out.
00:06:59
And I would argue that's what they're doing
00:07:00
today, folks. Now the dynamics are totally different.
00:07:04
We have a president.
00:07:06
In this case,
00:07:08
in the fifties, we had members of the
00:07:10
house and senate
00:07:12
that wanted to reverse
00:07:15
the Fabian project
00:07:17
and a,
00:07:18
somebody in the White House who was waiting
00:07:21
it out. Now we have a president today,
00:07:24
Donald Trump, who I would argue
00:07:26
is,
00:07:27
trying to turn the ship around,
00:07:30
turn return us to America first, return us
00:07:33
to our greatness,
00:07:34
get rid of as much superposed government as
00:07:36
possible,
00:07:38
get rid of these overseas entanglements,
00:07:40
make us truly independent in the world again,
00:07:44
but it's
00:07:46
members of the congress
00:07:49
and in other quarters of the establishment that
00:07:51
I believe are just trying to wait this
00:07:53
out. They're trying to minimize the damage
00:07:56
that Trump might cause. And, of course, he's
00:07:58
an executive, so he can,
00:08:01
create more, quote, unquote, damage.
00:08:04
But to wait him out you know, John
00:08:06
Thune, the Republican leader of the senate, he's
00:08:09
not with us, folks. He he just called
00:08:11
Bobby Kennedy a thug.
00:08:13
The other day on CNN, he let that
00:08:15
slip, but, you know, he's saying, oh, rah,
00:08:18
rah for Trump. He's totally against Trump. They
00:08:20
wouldn't even recess
00:08:22
the house and the senate for Trump to
00:08:24
get recess appointments, something every president has been
00:08:27
able to do
00:08:29
within memory.
00:08:30
That wasn't such a radical idea, and the
00:08:33
Democrats are chop blocking a ton
00:08:36
of Trump's appointments.
00:08:38
But these leaders that you see on TV
00:08:40
and particularly those of you who are getting
00:08:42
your news from Fox News
00:08:45
even part of the
00:08:46
time. You you're getting the old okeydoke
00:08:49
from speaker Johnson and leader Thune
00:08:52
about how great Donald Trump is, but they
00:08:55
are thwarting his agenda in any way they
00:08:58
can, considering he is the most popular Republican
00:09:01
by an order of magnitude, and they're Republicans,
00:09:05
they're kinda limited,
00:09:06
but they're doing everything they can
00:09:09
to stop his agenda.
00:09:11
So back now to the fifties that we're
00:09:12
gonna cover today
00:09:14
was kind of the reverse. It was Eisenhower,
00:09:16
the president himself,
00:09:19
trying to hold back,
00:09:21
the public,
00:09:22
members of the public, a large segment of
00:09:25
the public, and hold back
00:09:27
members in the house and the senate
00:09:30
who were trying to change
00:09:32
the ship around.
00:09:34
So we're today, we're gonna talk about three
00:09:36
titanic battles.
00:09:38
We'll see how much time we have. If
00:09:40
we have more time,
00:09:42
then we need to cover those three. And
00:09:43
those three titanic battles are
00:09:47
the,
00:09:48
fight over the Bricker Amendment, the fight over
00:09:51
American sovereignty and a constitutional amendment that would
00:09:55
have protected American sovereignty. That would be number
00:09:57
one.
00:09:58
Number two
00:10:00
was the Reece Committee and the investigations
00:10:03
of tax free foundations,
00:10:06
and the third battle
00:10:08
over that issue
00:10:09
of whether they're gonna really go after,
00:10:12
the tax free foundations,
00:10:14
the ones who were, leading the social engineering
00:10:17
project
00:10:18
for the Fabians.
00:10:20
And then three, the fight
00:10:22
for America, really, the fight over Joe McCarthy.
00:10:26
And all three of these fights,
00:10:30
Eisenhower defeated patriots, and they were all critical
00:10:34
folks, each one of them.
00:10:37
So I'm gonna start, with the Bricker Amendment,
00:10:39
but first, I remember I had one more
00:10:41
housekeeping item, couple more.
00:10:44
I said that Richard Nixon,
00:10:46
it was kinda two sides to him in
00:10:47
the last Eisenhower episode
00:10:50
a few weeks back
00:10:51
that he had huge anti communist credentials. He
00:10:55
brought down Alger
00:10:57
Hiss, the biggest fish you could possibly bring
00:10:59
down just about,
00:11:01
you know, as a com exposing him as
00:11:03
a communist from the his perch at the
00:11:06
house on American activities committee.
00:11:09
But that Nixon had another side to him,
00:11:11
the side that,
00:11:12
caused him to be an ally
00:11:14
of Dwight Eisenhower, which was his internationalist
00:11:17
side. I said he had authored a letter
00:11:21
for The United for the United World Federalist,
00:11:23
but I have to admit I was going
00:11:25
on memory, and my memory has
00:11:28
not always been the greatest here because that's
00:11:30
not what he did. But what he did
00:11:32
was actually worse.
00:11:34
In some ways,
00:11:35
Nixon was a sponsor of the Atlantic
00:11:38
Union Resolution,
00:11:40
which discusses how great it was when we
00:11:43
had a federal
00:11:44
constitution
00:11:45
created and a federal government.
00:11:48
And wouldn't it be just wonderful
00:11:50
if all of the sponsors of the North
00:11:52
Atlantic Treaty,
00:11:55
went as far as they could go
00:11:58
and maybe creating,
00:11:59
having a federal convention and maybe
00:12:02
creating kind of a federal thing
00:12:04
across the waters there, the beginnings
00:12:07
of world government within the framework, and I'm
00:12:10
quoting now,
00:12:11
of the United,
00:12:13
nations
00:12:15
using the principles of a free federal union.
00:12:18
This was in fact legislation.
00:12:21
It was a resolution.
00:12:23
It was introduced,
00:12:24
in both houses of the congress in 1951,
00:12:27
and one of the principal sponsors and almost
00:12:29
the
00:12:32
only Republican to sponsor this bill in the
00:12:34
senate
00:12:36
was freshman senator Richard m Nixon of California.
00:12:39
So that
00:12:41
it's right here, folks. If you're watching
00:12:44
Atlantic resolution, you can't see Nixon's name, but
00:12:46
it's right in here.
00:12:48
And, that's what he did. It really kinda
00:12:51
was a tell
00:12:52
despite his vehement anti communism, etcetera.
00:12:56
So I correct that. I also had I
00:12:57
also said that Estes Kefauver was
00:13:00
Adlai Stevenson's running mate. Stevenson was the hapless
00:13:04
egghead left winger that the Dems threw up,
00:13:08
kind of, as a hail Mary pass as
00:13:10
their candidate against the popular Dwight Eisenhower.
00:13:14
But in fact, the,
00:13:16
he was the 1956
00:13:18
nominee for vice president Estes Kefauber,
00:13:22
but the 1952,
00:13:24
nominee for vice president on the Democrat side
00:13:28
was John Sparkman of Alabama.
00:13:31
Okay.
00:13:34
So Eisenhower wins. He's picked his cabinet. We
00:13:37
talked a little bit about the Dulles brothers
00:13:40
in the last episode.
00:13:42
Couple of key members of his cabinet will
00:13:44
be we're getting be getting back to them
00:13:46
as the story continues.
00:13:48
The Republicans, though, also won the house
00:13:52
and the senate.
00:13:54
And this is where the tensions within the
00:13:56
Republican Party I mean, they exploded
00:13:58
on the floor of the convention in the
00:14:00
Taft versus Eisenhower battle
00:14:03
that Eisenhower won by
00:14:06
stinky, smelly means.
00:14:08
But,
00:14:10
this battle didn't just end.
00:14:12
Even when Taft came over to Eisenhower
00:14:15
and, finally, in September supported his campaign and
00:14:18
a lot of the Taft people swung in
00:14:20
and big victory for the Republicans,
00:14:23
with Ike at the head of the ticket,
00:14:25
but that didn't end
00:14:27
this battle between internationalists
00:14:31
and old guard, what they used to call
00:14:33
old guard or conservatives
00:14:35
in the Republican Party.
00:14:37
And so not only did Ike win,
00:14:39
but the Republicans, once again,
00:14:42
won both the house and the senate. They
00:14:44
hadn't done this
00:14:46
since the election of nineteen forty six. They
00:14:48
only held the house and senate for two
00:14:50
years, and now you have to go back
00:14:52
to
00:14:52
00:14:54
for the last time the Republicans had the
00:14:56
house or the senate. So
00:14:58
they're hungry.
00:14:59
They're hungry, and a lot of them are
00:15:01
patriots.
00:15:02
They're not like Eisenhower,
00:15:04
many of them that were elected in 1952.
00:15:08
And so we find
00:15:10
that Joe McCarthy,
00:15:12
who really was an outsider,
00:15:15
attacking
00:15:16
the Truman administration
00:15:17
about all the communists that were still in
00:15:19
the Truman administration,
00:15:21
when he started his crusade, he was really
00:15:23
an outsider.
00:15:25
He wasn't on the senate internal security committee.
00:15:29
He wasn't he didn't really have a perch
00:15:31
like that.
00:15:33
He was kind of a a backbencher
00:15:35
junior senator just throwing bombs and getting on,
00:15:39
starting at that time on TV and on
00:15:42
radio and in the newspapers a lot.
00:15:44
But in 1953,
00:15:47
after the election,
00:15:48
McCarthy finds himself with a committee.
00:15:51
He's now the chairman of the oversight committee.
00:15:54
And,
00:15:55
that's a pretty big deal. And so he
00:15:57
can really start now directing
00:16:00
his own investigations
00:16:03
of communist.
00:16:05
And, we'll get back to McCarthy in a
00:16:07
minute, but we also have in the house,
00:16:10
an a committee convening,
00:16:12
under Carol Reese,
00:16:14
studying the tax free foundations.
00:16:17
And, we'll get back to that in a
00:16:18
minute. That's the two other battles I wanna
00:16:21
make sure I covered today. But the main
00:16:22
battle I'm gonna start with
00:16:25
is a battle that began as soon as
00:16:28
the senate convened
00:16:30
because,
00:16:33
a very erstwhile individual from Seattle, Washington
00:16:37
who had grew up in Salt Lake City,
00:16:38
Utah, moved to Seattle, Washington, kind of the
00:16:41
reverse of my own story,
00:16:43
by name of Frank Holman who became the
00:16:45
head of the American Bar Association
00:16:49
when he was in Seattle, Washington.
00:16:51
He led a crusade
00:16:53
for a constitutional
00:16:55
amendment to make sure
00:16:57
that no treaties
00:16:59
and no secret side agreements
00:17:02
could ever
00:17:03
supplant
00:17:04
the constitution
00:17:05
of The United States,
00:17:08
and he had two thirds
00:17:11
of the senate
00:17:12
supporting this. You had Democrats who had been
00:17:15
under party discipline, had been under the administration
00:17:18
of Harry Truman,
00:17:19
who really wanted to get out from under
00:17:22
all of the New Deal internationalism,
00:17:24
a lot of these southern Democrats in particular.
00:17:27
And then you had this whole body
00:17:29
of Taft Republicans,
00:17:32
very conservative
00:17:33
Republicans,
00:17:35
who were itching
00:17:37
for this battle to take on in any
00:17:39
way they could,
00:17:41
not just the international establish internationalist
00:17:44
establishment of their own party,
00:17:45
but also
00:17:47
take on the whole internationalist project and dismantle
00:17:50
it
00:17:51
as much as humanly possible.
00:17:54
But,
00:17:55
in the process of the Republicans taking over
00:17:57
the senate,
00:17:59
Taft came in during the election and supported
00:18:02
Eisenhower.
00:18:03
And Eisenhower
00:18:05
and the internationalist
00:18:07
in the senate
00:18:09
turned around and supported Taft
00:18:12
to become the majority leader. So Taft is
00:18:14
now the majority leader of the US senate,
00:18:17
but he's playing ball with Eisenhower.
00:18:19
And Eisenhower had a little request,
00:18:23
for Taft right away. There's
00:18:25
two thirds of the senate
00:18:28
are poised
00:18:29
to start the process for this constitutional
00:18:32
amendment,
00:18:33
the Bricker Amendment sponsored
00:18:35
principally by John Bricker,
00:18:37
a senator from Ohio.
00:18:39
And his request to mister Taft was
00:18:42
delay.
00:18:44
Do not let this come to the floor
00:18:46
of the senate when there's now enough votes
00:18:48
to pass it right off the right out
00:18:50
the gate.
00:18:52
And Taft complied.
00:18:55
So I'm gonna read you just a little
00:18:56
bit from a manuscript that I wrote several
00:18:59
years ago.
00:19:01
It might eventually be in a book if
00:19:02
I ever finish this about the Bricker Amendment.
00:19:07
The treaties forged around the formation of the
00:19:09
United Nations
00:19:11
coincided with the rising
00:19:13
enthusiasm
00:19:14
for one world among the intellectual elite
00:19:17
in America.
00:19:19
But Middle America had just endured tremendous sacrifices
00:19:22
to fight tyranny abroad
00:19:25
only to witness a dramatic success
00:19:28
by communists in Eastern Europe and China
00:19:31
and the revelations of infiltration
00:19:34
by agents of Moscow at the highest levels
00:19:37
of the US government.
00:19:39
A bipartisan
00:19:40
block of senators
00:19:43
was joined by a long list of prominent
00:19:45
organizations
00:19:47
in supporting an amendment to the constitution
00:19:50
that would forbid treaties or executive
00:19:53
agreements with foreign powers
00:19:55
or international
00:19:57
organizations
00:19:58
that infringe upon the sovereignty and independence of
00:20:01
The United States
00:20:03
and diminished the role of elected representatives
00:20:06
exercising oversight over,
00:20:09
US foreign policy. The prime sponsor in the
00:20:12
senate was senator John Bricker,
00:20:14
who had been the GOP's 1948
00:20:17
vice presidential
00:20:18
candidate.
00:20:20
The catalyst for the national support was Seattle
00:20:22
attorney Frank Holman,
00:20:24
a recent president of the American Bar Association.
00:20:28
Interestingly, Holman of Mormon Pioneer Heritage
00:20:31
had been a Rhodes scholar
00:20:33
from Utah.
00:20:35
He cited a number of events to justify
00:20:37
his concerns about treaties
00:20:39
and about international law.
00:20:42
When FDR
00:20:43
moved to recognize the Soviet Union
00:20:46
in 1933,
00:20:48
FDR also made side agreements with the communists
00:20:53
without the knowledge or approval
00:20:56
of the senate.
00:20:57
In the Supreme Court case Missouri versus Holland,
00:21:00
the highest court ruled that a migratory bird
00:21:03
treaty with Canada
00:21:05
took precedence over the concerns of various states.
00:21:09
In California, the state supreme court was citing
00:21:12
the UN Charter
00:21:14
as an authority higher
00:21:16
than the constitution.
00:21:18
In the recently convened UN Genocide
00:21:21
Treaty,
00:21:22
proposals were aired that appeared to infringe upon
00:21:25
national sovereignty.
00:21:27
The stated goal of more than a few
00:21:30
UN officials
00:21:32
and of all the world federalists
00:21:35
lurking around Washington DC and the prominent universities
00:21:39
and newsrooms
00:21:41
of the nation.
00:21:44
You know, Ike had loved
00:21:47
the recent gains of internationalism,
00:21:50
and he absolutely
00:21:51
hated, folks, a faction of Republicans and Democrats
00:21:55
that had concerns about our sovereignty and about
00:21:58
internationalism.
00:22:01
But during the election,
00:22:03
he actually sent John Foster Dulles,
00:22:06
as big a phony as he was, a
00:22:08
totally phony conservative.
00:22:11
Actually sent him to the Bar Association to
00:22:13
say, we're with you all the way. Boy,
00:22:15
we're really worried about these dangers of treaty
00:22:18
law. This is terrible.
00:22:21
And,
00:22:22
but in fact,
00:22:24
Ike's plan wasn't to take this head on
00:22:26
at all before the election or after.
00:22:28
It was just to get,
00:22:32
Taft, the leader of the senate, to delay
00:22:34
bringing it to the floor long enough for
00:22:36
them to pick off
00:22:38
three or four of the week and keep
00:22:41
it
00:22:42
from ever having a successful
00:22:44
vote.
00:22:45
And delay was important because due to the
00:22:47
yeoman efforts of Frank Holman and others,
00:22:51
the Bricker Amendment at first appeared to be
00:22:53
unstoppable.
00:22:55
It had two thirds of the senate cosponsoring
00:22:57
it and the support at this time, wow,
00:22:59
of the American Medical Association,
00:23:03
the, Chamber of Commerce,
00:23:06
the National Association of Life Underwriters,
00:23:08
the Grains, the American Legion,
00:23:10
the Farm Bureau, the Kiwanis,
00:23:13
and the Veterans of Foreign Wars.
00:23:16
Folks,
00:23:17
this thing was on
00:23:18
a fast track
00:23:20
to passing.
00:23:21
When Eisenhower persuaded Taft
00:23:24
to delay bringing it to the floor
00:23:27
in time for the opponents,
00:23:29
the United World Federalists,
00:23:32
the Americans for Democratic Action, if you remember
00:23:34
that group, and the United Nations Association,
00:23:37
and the AFL CIO,
00:23:40
and the whole panoply of lefties and foundations
00:23:44
to, organize their forces and to mount a
00:23:47
major PR campaign with the three
00:23:50
television and four radio networks that they controlled
00:23:53
to stop this thing.
00:23:56
And,
00:23:57
also,
00:23:58
I had
00:24:00
in his corner plotting with him right away
00:24:02
as he would many times.
00:24:05
The minority leader of the US senate
00:24:07
who after,
00:24:09
the election in 1956
00:24:12
would be the or '54, excuse me, would
00:24:14
be the majority leader of the US senate
00:24:16
for the rest of Eisenhower's term,
00:24:19
Lyndon Baines Johnson,
00:24:21
another internationalist,
00:24:24
like Eisenhower.
00:24:26
So Ike is plotting with Johnson.
00:24:28
He's persuading Taft who is weak.
00:24:32
He's weak with Eisenhower, as I said, to
00:24:34
delay this thing. And we're gonna continue talking
00:24:37
about the Bricker Amendment
00:24:38
and about Dwight David Eisenhower's evil reign
00:24:42
right after the news. You're listening to Hour
00:24:44
of Decision
00:24:45
on Liberty News Radio.
00:24:46
Welcome back to Hour of Decision. My name
00:24:49
is Lou Moore, and we are talking about
00:24:51
Dwight David Eisenhower.
00:24:53
And we're talking about some big battles
00:24:56
that were fought right out the gate, in
00:24:58
his administration, battles he was fighting principally against
00:25:02
still members of his own party, members who
00:25:04
were
00:25:05
followers of Robert Taft, who were of America
00:25:08
first, who were conservatives,
00:25:10
and the kind of people that Eisenhower was
00:25:12
inserted into the situation to stop.
00:25:15
So we started out talking about the Bricker
00:25:17
amendment,
00:25:18
an amendment,
00:25:19
put forth by John Bricker, a Republican from
00:25:23
Ohio.
00:25:24
And, the text of the
00:25:27
go to the text of the amendment's pretty
00:25:29
brief
00:25:30
pretty brief and pretty much to the point.
00:25:33
The text of the Bricker Amendment is as
00:25:36
follows.
00:25:38
A provision of treaty law, which conflicts with
00:25:42
this, constitution shall not be of
00:25:45
any force or effect.
00:25:47
Boom.
00:25:48
Section two, a treaty shall become effective as
00:25:51
internal law in The United States only through
00:25:54
legislation,
00:25:55
which would be valid in the absence of
00:25:57
the treaty law. Section three, congress shall have
00:26:00
power to regulate all executive
00:26:03
and other agreements
00:26:04
with any foreign power or international
00:26:07
organization.
00:26:11
All such agreements shall be subject to the
00:26:13
limitations
00:26:14
imposed on treaties
00:26:16
by this article.
00:26:18
That's the Bricker Amendment. Ike,
00:26:20
totally opposed to this. The internationalist,
00:26:23
totally and completely opposed to this.
00:26:26
And, unfortunately,
00:26:28
Lyndon Johnson,
00:26:30
leader of the Democrats, and remember a lot
00:26:32
of these senators supporting this
00:26:35
were Democrats because there was two thirds. The
00:26:37
Republicans didn't have anywhere near that kind of
00:26:39
control.
00:26:40
They just barely had the senate by, I
00:26:42
think, two votes.
00:26:44
But, they had a number of Democrats
00:26:47
supporting, and, of course, there were some re
00:26:48
other Republicans that did not support the Bricker
00:26:51
amendment, but they started out
00:26:53
right out the gate with two thirds of
00:26:55
the senate in support.
00:26:57
But the but Robert Taft meekly
00:27:01
delayed
00:27:02
bringing this to the floor until
00:27:04
the magic of the powers that be of
00:27:06
the corporate masters
00:27:08
could be worked on a few of these
00:27:10
senators.
00:27:12
And the bottom line is here is in
00:27:14
1954,
00:27:15
following year,
00:27:16
it lost
00:27:18
by one vote
00:27:19
one vote,
00:27:21
and it was never brought up again
00:27:24
as the internationalist
00:27:26
really locked down
00:27:28
on some of these senators on both sides
00:27:30
of the aisle,
00:27:32
who had been supporting
00:27:34
this move, this very aggressive move
00:27:38
against the internationalists.
00:27:41
So that was the Bricker Amendment.
00:27:44
So Eisenhower,
00:27:47
after World War two was over, he became
00:27:49
the president of Columbia University,
00:27:52
and he's prowling around with all the biggest
00:27:55
social engineers in the country.
00:27:58
Columbia, the major
00:27:59
teacher's college, if you could even use that
00:28:03
description of Columbia,
00:28:05
the transmission belt for almost everything evil,
00:28:08
and k through 12 public,
00:28:10
education,
00:28:12
came through Columbia University's
00:28:15
created by the tax free foundations
00:28:18
funded by the Morgans, the Rockefellers, the Gardegeys,
00:28:21
the Guggenheims,
00:28:23
and others
00:28:24
of the super rich
00:28:26
are corporate masters.
00:28:29
And,
00:28:30
so Ike was hanging out with all these
00:28:33
people, so it was extremely nervous for him.
00:28:37
It was nervous for him as you'll find
00:28:38
out in a minute
00:28:40
for Joe McCarthy to go sniffing around, about
00:28:43
communist in our government.
00:28:45
And it was very nervous for Eisenhower
00:28:48
to have somebody investigating
00:28:50
the tax free foundations.
00:28:52
Let's see why.
00:28:54
Well, the after Alger Hiss
00:28:57
was made the president of the Carnegie Endowment
00:29:00
for International
00:29:01
Peace,
00:29:02
that Alger Hiss had ended up going to
00:29:04
prison for committing perjury when he said on
00:29:06
the stand he was not a communist
00:29:09
agent.
00:29:10
That Alger Hiss who was
00:29:13
appointed by the chairman of the board of
00:29:15
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
00:29:18
John Foster Dulles,
00:29:20
who, if you might remember, I mentioned him
00:29:22
in the last episode Eisenhower episode.
00:29:25
He's Eisenhower's secretary of state now, folks.
00:29:28
Now that Ike's in the White House,
00:29:31
Dulles Dulles was the president of this foundation.
00:29:35
Ike is on the board.
00:29:37
Ike's buddy Philip Jessup
00:29:40
accused of being a communist
00:29:42
and accused so credibly of being a communist
00:29:45
that the senate refused to con to,
00:29:48
confirm him
00:29:50
as ambassador to the United Nations under Harry
00:29:52
Truman, even Democrats.
00:29:54
We're saying this Philip Jessup should not be
00:29:56
allowed to be our UN ambassador.
00:29:59
He's on the board of this Carnegie Endowment
00:30:02
with Ike,
00:30:03
with Dulles,
00:30:05
when Alger Hiss
00:30:07
is the president
00:30:08
of the Carnegie Endowment. And this is just
00:30:10
folks this is just four years
00:30:13
before Eisenhower wins the White House. And what
00:30:15
are they doing there?
00:30:17
According to the New York Times article I
00:30:18
pulled again just to check on this stuff,
00:30:21
they're focusing
00:30:22
all their efforts on strengthening
00:30:24
the United Nations.
00:30:27
So that's what Ike is, hanging out and
00:30:29
doing when he's not being a general
00:30:32
after World War two.
00:30:34
And then there's one of Ike's three principal
00:30:37
leaders of his political campaign
00:30:40
in, 1952,
00:30:41
Paul Hoffman.
00:30:43
Paul Hoffman is a leader in the Ford
00:30:45
Foundation.
00:30:47
Paul Hoffman's wife,
00:30:49
Anna Rosenberg,
00:30:51
was accused by many patriots
00:30:53
of being a communist, and Anna Rosenberg was
00:30:56
in charge of hiring
00:30:58
of civilian hiring
00:31:00
at the Pentagon
00:31:02
under
00:31:04
general
00:31:05
George Catlett Marshall,
00:31:07
Ike's best friend, who was at that time
00:31:10
not a general, but was the secretary
00:31:12
of defense.
00:31:14
So,
00:31:16
Ike's totally
00:31:17
entangled folks
00:31:19
with this foundation world, this elite corporate world,
00:31:23
and with a few communists
00:31:25
or alleged communists
00:31:27
that were hanging out in this world.
00:31:30
So he did not want
00:31:33
any congressional
00:31:34
investigations
00:31:35
of communists in government, and we're gonna talk
00:31:38
about Joe McCarthy and his sins,
00:31:41
in Eisenhower's opinion, his major sins because he
00:31:44
investigated the army among other organizations.
00:31:47
We'll talk about that in a minute, but
00:31:48
we're gonna before we get to that, we're
00:31:50
gonna talk about
00:31:52
the building pressure
00:31:54
on the part of Americans to investigate these
00:31:57
here tax free
00:31:59
foundations.
00:32:00
The Ford Foundation,
00:32:02
the Fund for the Republic, the twentieth Century
00:32:04
Fund, the Rockefeller
00:32:06
Foundation, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the
00:32:09
Guggenheim Foundation. There's a whole interlock
00:32:13
of these foundations,
00:32:14
30 or 35 of them.
00:32:17
And, you know, now there's thousands of them.
00:32:19
I mean, there's they just they call them
00:32:21
NGOs, and there's so many of them.
00:32:23
It's hard to it would be hard for
00:32:25
anybody, even maybe the IRS,
00:32:28
to keep track of these here tax free
00:32:30
foundations. But at this time, there weren't so
00:32:31
many, but all of them
00:32:34
all of them were working on the same
00:32:37
agenda,
00:32:38
on the agenda of the powers that be.
00:32:40
They were the engine folks
00:32:43
funded by our corporate masters,
00:32:46
funneling
00:32:48
their efforts
00:32:50
down into the Ivy League,
00:32:52
colleges, and from the Ivy League con colleges
00:32:55
out to the other colleges, out to the,
00:32:57
education system, out to the medical system,
00:33:02
into the defense establishment,
00:33:04
into all these areas of our life,
00:33:07
trying to transform our government without changing even
00:33:11
any laws,
00:33:12
but just transforming the culture of all these
00:33:15
institutions
00:33:16
until you have nothing but enemies in these
00:33:18
institutions who want to,
00:33:21
negate the constitution
00:33:22
and comfortably merge us
00:33:25
at this time with the Soviet Union
00:33:28
into a big, beautiful one world government.
00:33:32
This is what these are all these groups
00:33:34
are up to.
00:33:35
And more and more people are figuring this
00:33:37
out.
00:33:38
That the big biggest enemy wasn't Alger Hiss
00:33:41
as
00:33:43
a Soviet agent
00:33:44
working for the GRU, the military intelligence arm
00:33:47
of the Soviet Union, and sending some microfilm
00:33:51
along to Moscow,
00:33:54
the biggest
00:33:55
danger this guy was was an adviser
00:33:58
to Franklin Roosevelt,
00:34:01
an adviser
00:34:02
to Harry Truman,
00:34:03
to the man who was the most responsible
00:34:06
for deciding who would be on the staff
00:34:08
of the United Nations,
00:34:11
the American part of the staff,
00:34:14
and then heading
00:34:15
the Carnegie Endowment of International Peace, which is
00:34:18
just loaded
00:34:20
with people and with work products
00:34:24
to subvert
00:34:25
our country.
00:34:27
I mean, this is bad stuff. And remember,
00:34:30
Nixon exposes his in in '48.
00:34:33
And so
00:34:35
there there's a tie there's usually a tie
00:34:37
made
00:34:38
to what Nixon did
00:34:40
in exposing Alger Hiss as a communist agent
00:34:43
to the McCarthy
00:34:45
era, quote, unquote,
00:34:47
to the McCarthy investigations and the investigations
00:34:50
of others like, the Democrat Pat McCarron, the
00:34:53
great Democrat out of Nevada,
00:34:56
who held,
00:34:57
when he was a chairman when the Democrats
00:34:59
were in control, he was also investigating communist
00:35:02
vigorously.
00:35:03
Others were as well. But the there's a
00:35:06
tie made into those investigations,
00:35:09
but the the tie
00:35:10
is not as clear,
00:35:12
particularly not now when people talk about this
00:35:15
past era from these tax free foundations
00:35:19
to,
00:35:20
people like Alger Hiss, to people like Locke
00:35:23
and Curry and Harry Dexter White, who who
00:35:26
are both communist,
00:35:28
who were agents of influence. These agents of
00:35:30
influence, as I've discussed in earlier episodes,
00:35:33
they're far more dangerous than a guy just
00:35:35
stealing microfilm,
00:35:37
or they're far more dangerous in the role
00:35:41
of influencers than they are
00:35:43
in the role of stealing secrets.
00:35:46
And they're they're joined at the hip
00:35:49
with these foundations. I said, this is the
00:35:51
head of the Carnegie Endowment
00:35:54
when he's indicted,
00:35:56
when Nixon,
00:35:57
took him down.
00:35:59
And, you know, what are they doing over
00:36:01
there at the Carnegie Endowment?
00:36:03
They produced this book in America Dilemma
00:36:07
by Gunnar Meyrdahl. Gunnar Meyrdahl was a communist
00:36:11
from Sweden
00:36:13
who had an open goal of eradicating the
00:36:15
white race, believing
00:36:18
that the Northern European peoples were the biggest
00:36:20
impediment
00:36:22
to really having that big, beautiful one world
00:36:25
government
00:36:26
that all these people wanna have.
00:36:28
And Meyredahl ends up to be
00:36:30
the biggest,
00:36:32
citation
00:36:33
used by the Supreme Court in the Brown
00:36:35
versus Board of Education
00:36:39
decision, which we're gonna talk about in this
00:36:41
series because this is all on Eisenhower's
00:36:44
watch.
00:36:45
But, so we have his fine work.
00:36:48
We got all the Kinsey stuff. That's funded
00:36:51
by the Rockefeller
00:36:52
Foundation, all this stuff that began all the
00:36:55
sexual perversion in this country and calling it
00:36:57
science.
00:36:58
And it wasn't science at all, and there
00:37:00
were so many flaws
00:37:02
in these studies and the pedophiles running around
00:37:04
and the whole thing
00:37:06
sorted to the max,
00:37:08
the whole Kinsey thing sorted, folks,
00:37:11
funded by the Rockefellers.
00:37:13
You don't you don't end up hearing about
00:37:16
studies out there,
00:37:18
not ones that ended up influencing government policy,
00:37:20
not ones that ended up influencing culture
00:37:23
because their conclusions are repeated through the conveyors
00:37:27
of culture and the media
00:37:29
and artists
00:37:30
and movie,
00:37:31
makers and things like this.
00:37:34
You don't even hear about these things.
00:37:36
All in our past history, and they are
00:37:38
not funded
00:37:40
by our corporate masters for the deliberate goal
00:37:44
of bringing total government at home,
00:37:48
tearing down America
00:37:51
culturally,
00:37:52
morally,
00:37:53
socially,
00:37:55
economically,
00:37:56
militarily,
00:37:58
industrially,
00:38:00
so it can be merged comfortably.
00:38:03
And this is a quote now. I'm I'm
00:38:05
using it for the second time. I'm gonna
00:38:07
cite, give the citation of this quote
00:38:10
because this quote is coming from the chairman
00:38:12
of the Ford Foundation
00:38:14
at the time.
00:38:16
This,
00:38:17
committee in congress I'm gonna be talking about
00:38:19
convened to,
00:38:22
comfortably merge
00:38:24
America
00:38:25
into a one world government, comfortably
00:38:28
merge them with the Soviet Union, A term
00:38:30
used all the time, around this as well
00:38:32
was convergence.
00:38:34
Convergence was
00:38:36
a term used all the time in these
00:38:38
higher intellectual
00:38:39
circles.
00:38:40
You don't hear that anymore.
00:38:44
So that's just a couple of of examples.
00:38:46
Another one,
00:38:48
another big one there from Carnegie,
00:38:50
the proper study of mankind.
00:38:53
By our friend, I brought him up in
00:38:55
several episodes. I I I say, this is
00:38:57
a guy that's always popping up
00:38:59
when these establishment things are going on of
00:39:02
significance,
00:39:03
Stuart Chase,
00:39:05
the man who was,
00:39:06
a wingman for Felix Frankfurter
00:39:09
when they were starting the Fabian project at
00:39:11
Harvard,
00:39:12
who later wrote the new deal,
00:39:15
which advocates
00:39:17
and glory
00:39:18
glamorizes
00:39:19
violent revolution, glamorizes what's going on in Bolshevik
00:39:23
Russia, folks,
00:39:24
as he articulates the American Fabian version, the
00:39:27
more gradual version, in his book, A New
00:39:30
Deal,
00:39:31
which, by the way, was written just before
00:39:33
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
00:39:35
inaugurated the New Deal with Stuart Chase being
00:39:38
one of his principal
00:39:39
behind the scenes
00:39:41
advisors.
00:39:42
So he wrote this book,
00:39:44
coming up to the period that we're gonna
00:39:46
talk now, the fifties, called A Proper Study
00:39:48
of Mankind,
00:39:50
glorifying
00:39:52
social engineering,
00:39:53
glorifying the methodology
00:39:55
of these foundations where they say, okay. We
00:39:58
got a major problem here. We will be
00:40:00
solving it.
00:40:01
We will compile all the facts and, of
00:40:04
course, say, selectively compile
00:40:06
just the number of facts and type up,
00:40:09
quote, unquote, facts
00:40:10
that they wanna compile
00:40:12
so they can always come to the same
00:40:13
conclusion that all these studies could come to.
00:40:16
We need a whole lot more government
00:40:18
no matter what the topic is.
00:40:20
So this proper study of mankind by Stuart
00:40:22
Chase, he had some help on that, folks.
00:40:25
Harry Dexter White,
00:40:27
exposed communist,
00:40:29
high treasury department official, and the author of
00:40:31
the Bretton Woods agreement, by the way, our
00:40:34
monetary system,
00:40:35
and Lock and Curry,
00:40:37
a close adviser to Franklin Roosevelt in the
00:40:40
White House who was also exposed as a
00:40:42
Soviet
00:40:43
agent.
00:40:44
Those are two of the helpers on this
00:40:47
monumental
00:40:48
study, which was just a big glorification of
00:40:50
social engineering
00:40:52
by Stuart Chase called the proper study of
00:40:54
mankind. So this is the kind of stuff
00:40:57
going on, folks.
00:40:59
And, and they're really accelerating it after World
00:41:01
War two.
00:41:03
And this is a kind of a thing
00:41:05
that Dwight Eisenhower is very close to
00:41:08
in his role,
00:41:10
somewhat in the military, but primarily in his
00:41:12
role as president
00:41:13
of Columbia
00:41:15
University,
00:41:16
which he assumed after World War, two.
00:41:19
And,
00:41:20
he's up to his neck with these people,
00:41:22
and he doesn't want a bunch of right
00:41:24
wing
00:41:25
congressmen nosing around this stuff.
00:41:28
But there are some. Carol Reese,
00:41:31
congressman from Tennessee,
00:41:33
a a rare Republican congressman in that period
00:41:36
of time from Tennessee, a big Taft supporter,
00:41:38
the former chairman of the RNC.
00:41:41
Pretty big player.
00:41:43
Carol Reese
00:41:44
can be in this committee. The Republicans have
00:41:46
the majority. Now he's the committee chair,
00:41:49
and they won't he's gonna look at these
00:41:51
tax free foundations. The Democrats did some looking,
00:41:53
but they were just talking more about the
00:41:55
tax regulations. And did they count all their
00:41:58
beans correctly? And,
00:41:59
did all the money go where, people said
00:42:02
it went, etcetera?
00:42:03
And they weren't really looking at this issue,
00:42:05
the social engineering.
00:42:07
But,
00:42:08
Reece Committee, big deal. Big deal.
00:42:12
But Eisenhower thwarts it at every turn, and
00:42:15
the news media attack these people at every
00:42:17
turn. And there's even infighting in the committee,
00:42:20
but some pretty amazing things come out, including
00:42:22
the fact that when the chief investigator
00:42:25
went up to New York City to meet
00:42:27
Rowan Gaither, the chairman,
00:42:29
chairman of the Ford Foundation,
00:42:31
Rowan Gaither told him, in no uncertain terms,
00:42:35
that the purpose of their all their efforts
00:42:38
is to the substance of which is that
00:42:40
we shall use our grant making power so
00:42:43
as to alter life in The United States,
00:42:46
that it can be comfortably merged with the
00:42:48
Soviet Union. He said that to the investigator.
00:42:52
This, Norman Dodd and and I linked to
00:42:54
the whole interview, Norman Dodd, the chief investigator
00:42:57
of this race committee,
00:42:58
gave with g Edward Griffin. It it's on
00:43:01
my x account.
00:43:02
If you go to Lou Moore on x,
00:43:05
you can,
00:43:07
scroll a little bit, but you can, see
00:43:09
a YouTube clip. You can just see it.
00:43:11
You can pick it up at Rumble or
00:43:12
on YouTube.
00:43:13
This, fifty five minute interview with Norman Dodd,
00:43:16
chief investigator of the Reece Committee,
00:43:19
and he talks about
00:43:21
sending, one of his assistants up, to,
00:43:24
look at the Carnegie Foundation, and they
00:43:27
invited her right in and let her go
00:43:29
through all their records.
00:43:31
And she just about lost her mind
00:43:33
because she in the minutes of these meetings,
00:43:35
they're talking about starting wars. They're talking about
00:43:38
completely reorganizing
00:43:39
the moral codes of this country. They're talking
00:43:42
about con
00:43:43
comfortably merging us into a one world government.
00:43:46
And remember once again, folks,
00:43:49
the current president of The United States
00:43:51
was a trustee of this foundation until he
00:43:54
was elected.
00:43:55
An identified communist Philip Jessup
00:43:58
was,
00:43:59
identified to be a part of communist front
00:44:01
organizations anyway, was a board member of this
00:44:04
foundation.
00:44:05
The secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, was
00:44:07
the chairman of the board of this foundation,
00:44:10
while Alger Hiss identified communist
00:44:13
spy
00:44:13
was the president
00:44:15
of this foundation. And so he talks about
00:44:17
these things. Unbelievable.
00:44:19
But, anyway,
00:44:20
the committee
00:44:21
doesn't get anywhere.
00:44:23
It doesn't get anywhere because the Democrats use
00:44:26
every stalling tactic, every disruption tactic there is,
00:44:30
Principally, a guy named Wayne Hayes,
00:44:33
who was later identified as the most disgusting
00:44:36
member of the house of representatives,
00:44:39
Wayne Hayes of Ohio, and he was finally
00:44:42
actually, he was
00:44:44
finally racked up, and I think it was
00:44:46
the eighties
00:44:48
when he hired a stripper
00:44:50
to be his executive assistant, and it was
00:44:52
exposed in the news media.
00:44:54
And it should be noted that years later,
00:44:56
congressman Hayes,
00:44:58
who,
00:44:59
former house transportation chair Bud Shuster called the
00:45:02
meanest man in the house, okay, quote, unquote,
00:45:05
became mired in scandal after one Elizabeth Ray,
00:45:08
who Hayes put on his, congressional
00:45:10
payroll,
00:45:11
said she was there for sexual purposes only,
00:45:14
proclaiming,
00:45:15
I can't type.
00:45:17
I can't file.
00:45:18
I can't even answer the telephone.
00:45:22
So it was in the seventies. Hayes had
00:45:24
to resign in '76. Karma got up to
00:45:26
this guy. But, anyway, he said Democrat, but
00:45:29
the Eisenhower people are feeding him negative information,
00:45:33
and
00:45:34
he's literally disrupting the committee as you see
00:45:37
them do now more and more. No no
00:45:39
witnesses can testify. He's objecting to every single
00:45:42
thing
00:45:43
as is the other democrat on the committee,
00:45:45
a real piece of work named Gracie Post.
00:45:48
It was some kind of pistol packing mama
00:45:50
rodeo star or something,
00:45:52
democrat,
00:45:53
colorful
00:45:54
another colorful democrat,
00:45:56
member of congress. And so it was a
00:45:58
committee of five,
00:46:00
three Republicans, two Democrats.
00:46:02
But, anyhow, despite the disruptions which caused
00:46:05
Reese, he knew it wasn't gonna get anywhere.
00:46:07
Eisenhower wasn't gonna allow anything on the floor
00:46:09
of the house or in the senate,
00:46:11
to,
00:46:12
of any meaningful nature with about these foundations,
00:46:17
but they did file a report at the
00:46:19
end of their work
00:46:21
saying, quote, a professional class of administrators of
00:46:24
foundation funds
00:46:26
has already come to exercise a very extensive
00:46:29
practical
00:46:30
control over most research in the social sciences,
00:46:34
most of our educational
00:46:35
process,
00:46:36
and a good part of government administration
00:46:39
in these and related fields.
00:46:42
The aggregate thought power
00:46:44
thought control power, excuse me, of this foundation
00:46:47
and foundation supported bureaucracy
00:46:50
can hardly be exaggerated.
00:46:52
He said that the impact upon the education
00:46:54
system has been, quote, to induce the educator
00:46:58
to become an agent of social change and
00:47:01
a propagandist
00:47:02
for some form of collectivism.
00:47:05
In the international
00:47:07
field foundations
00:47:08
to promote internationalism
00:47:10
in a particular sense,
00:47:13
a form that's directed toward
00:47:15
world government.
00:47:17
They have actively supported attacks upon our social
00:47:20
and governmental system
00:47:22
and financed
00:47:23
the promotion
00:47:25
of socialism.
00:47:27
Folks,
00:47:28
we don't hear a lot about the Reece
00:47:29
Committee. It wasn't that consequential because they didn't
00:47:32
have any real power. It didn't go anywhere,
00:47:35
but they were over the target.
00:47:38
And this is why
00:47:40
the Eisenhower administration,
00:47:42
the Democrats, the establishment
00:47:44
Republicans,
00:47:45
they all came after Reese. They all came
00:47:47
after this commission.
00:47:49
The news media was
00:47:50
unbelievable
00:47:52
in their denunciations
00:47:54
of this group
00:47:55
and saying they were crazy to think that
00:47:57
these wonderful people at the Rockefeller
00:47:59
Foundation and the Ford Foundation and the Carnegie
00:48:03
Foundation were anything but just the most upright
00:48:06
citizens
00:48:07
studying how we can make things better for
00:48:09
everybody.
00:48:10
But, folks, they were over the target.
00:48:13
But, Eisenhower
00:48:14
thwarted this. If we'd had, Taft in there,
00:48:18
things could have been different,
00:48:20
but they weren't different.
00:48:22
So we talked about, we talked about the
00:48:24
Bricker amendment going down the tubes. We talked
00:48:26
about the thwarting of the Reese
00:48:29
Committee,
00:48:30
and we won't, in our next episode, we
00:48:32
will get right to the man himself, Joe
00:48:34
McCarthy,
00:48:35
and his titanic battle
00:48:37
with Dwight David Eisenhower.
00:48:40
My name is Lou Moore, and you are
00:48:42
listening to Hour of Decision
00:48:44
on Liberty News Radio. And may I remind
00:48:46
you, you can go to securevote.news
00:48:50
to get the latest on election integrity and
00:48:53
election integrity
00:48:54
adjacent
00:48:56
materials.
00:48:57
We'll see you next week.