Episode 65 Hour of Decision: Election Integrity This Is No Time To Let Up (SEGMENT TWO)
Hour Of DecisionFebruary 16, 20250:24:4022.66 MB

Episode 65 Hour of Decision: Election Integrity This Is No Time To Let Up (SEGMENT TWO)

Lew discusses many of the problems that exist with our election system, and how we got here. From lack of a photo ID requirement to the chain-of-custody problem with mail-in and early-voted ballots, election systems around the country have issues. Hand-counting paper ballots voted on election day in your neighborhood is absolutely the best system to avoid fraud.


Learn more at SecureVote.News

Speaker 0: Against tyranny and corruption for Christ and constitution. The hour of decision with Lou Moore starts now. Welcome back to Hour of Decision. My name is Lou Moore. And before we get back to our story about what goes on with our elections, I have to remember to do a commercial. I usually forget to do the commercials. I have to do a commercial for securevote.news because SecureVote.news has everything to do with our elections, with the latest news and information aggregated from all over the country about what's going on in the various states and what's going on nationally with election integrity and election integrity adjacent news. We also have a resources section on the website, very thorough. It has a large number of national organizations you can check-in on, national organizations that focus on election integrity. It also has organizations in all 50 states you can take a look at, and it has books, books about, recent elections, election integrity issues. Several documentaries are linked to securevote.news of that should be of interest to you. And then a large number of documents related to what went on in Arizona to the, the state senate investigation of the, two thousand twenty two elections in Arizona, Peter Navarro's thorough, investigation of the twenty twenty election, and many, many, many other documents of significance, of relevance, of usefulness for election integrity advocates. Folks, that's all at securevote.news. That's securevote.news. Check it out. So we've been talking about elections, and we've been talking about some problems with our elections, the evolution of problems, you know, from what was a very safe system to a system not so safe. So let's let's go back through the system when it was a very safe system. You wanted to register to vote. Generally, you had to register thirty days before the election and show ID in person at an election office. Once you were registered, you had to go to the polls on election day and show ID, and make sure you're in the poll book, and show ID, and receive a ballot, which you would vote right there on the spot, and which would frequently be counted right there either on the spot or later that day with a large number of witnesses observing the count, and then, an aggregation of the polling places around the, area is undertaken. And then you get the totals for the various elections, the local elections, and then the totals are sent up the line for, like, the governor's race or for a presidential race. And that was a system that was very, very hard to beat. Now there were absentee ballots involved with that system with mail in ballots, but those mail in ballots were almost exclusively for members of the military, for seniors, for people with a medical condition, and you had to provide some documentation as to why you were on the list of people that could get an absentee ballot, and then they didn't run more than four or 5% in most cases of the, the vote total. So all the issues of lack of, custody, chain of custody, problems of having to go through the mail, These kind of things were minimized by the smaller numbers of people even participating in that part of the system. And then the counts were done on election night because accounts were going on all over. And in the cities, they had voting machines, notoriously crooked, they had mechanical voting machines. And, they they slowly got more into the computer age. They went into punch cards, things like this in the nineteen sixties. And, but, that system generally but in the more rural areas, suburban areas, that system generally almost exclusively was hand counted paper ballots in your neighborhood, counted by your neighbors with lots of witnesses with the results available in that precinct immediately, pretty much, and with the results on election night everywhere around the country with just a few exceptions if something very unusual happened. I mean, I watched some of my first memories, definitely my first political memories, were staying up pretty much all night to about three, 04:00 in the morning, a five year old that I was, staying up, almost all night as the count was going on between Nixon and Kennedy for the presidency in 1960. Folks, this was the closest presidential election ever to date ever, and they still had the whole thing counted by three, 03:30 in the morning Pacific time. I mean, they don't have any elections counted the same night and into the next morning with this system that we have now. Anyway, that was my first experience, and that was highly unusual that that there weren't pretty much complete vote totals by 10:30, eleven PM or so in the evening, that it went that it went into the night and into the next morning. That was highly unusual in 1960. Not unusual now with the system now. So, you know, that's what we had then, and we had crookedness then, and I think there was crookedness in that election. The one I was watching is an erstwhile five year old, between, Kennedy and Nixon. I think Sam Giancana, was not lying and told the truth when he said the Chicago mob stole the election in Illinois through their contacts in Chicago. They stole, Illinois for Kennedy and those electoral votes, and that Lyndon Johnson used the incredibly corrupt Democratic machinery, particularly in the border counties of Texas, to steal Texas for JFK. Those two states giving JFK, the victory through the electoral in the electoral college in 1960. But whether that's what happened or not, at least they had all the numbers in by three, 04:00 in the morning, at least for those who lived on the West Coast. It was, a little later, you know, if you were back east using the time zones there. So, anyway, that's that's how elections used to run. But now people are registering online in a lot of cases, or they're registering at the DMV in a lot of cases. In many cases, they do not have to show picture ID, and you have a large number of left wing organizations with George sir George Soros money in their pockets and other organizations like the ones that Soros funds, pushing large number of registrations, many of which might be kinda shaky. I don't know if you remember up in Michigan. I mean, like, that's still an open case where the gal walked into the, in a midsize town with 10,000 voter registrations, 10,000 that she had, somehow gathered, as a volunteer in one of these earthswell organizations running around town getting people registered or getting some some kind of registrations going. And, that organization very shifty and, working in several states. And so right right on the spot, once you taint the registration process, the whole system's tainted. If you have phony registrations, it's a piece of cake to turn those phony registrations in a mail in ballot system, anyway, into votes, even though they're not legitimate votes. So then, in the ideal modern system, then you have universal mail in ballots. And when the ballots show up, like, three weeks from the election, they pile up on the door. And people for the last 10 people that live there, if you're in an apartment, their their ballots just pile up at the door. And, even people who, have lived for a fairly long time in their residence, residence, that they have now, a lot of them complain about getting other people's ballots as well. So you got, with this mail in ballot system, a whole lot of ballots floating around that different things could happen to those ballots. And, even if everybody knows who the ballots are, the husband says, honey, who you gonna vote for? You're not gonna vote for that Kamala Harris, are you? Why don't you come over here and let me help you with that ballot? See, that's not supposed to happen in our system, even between husband and wife. When you went into the privacy of the voting booth, even, you know, I did that because I'm old enough that, I was in the old system. Nobody was allowed to come into the booth with you to tell you who to vote for. It was one of the most sacred and singular acts, private acts, that a person could do in our society. But when it's sitting there on the old coffee table, anybody that has access to that coffee table, even if they don't vote, steal your ballot and vote it, they may be pressuring somebody or you or whoever to vote the way they want people voting. That's not the way it's supposed to work. And then so how do we know who actually voted the ballot? Well, it's supposed to be from the signature on the ballot, and so the all this stuff is sent in. Well, first, it's sent into the mail system. That sounds just a little frightening to me on a good day. Or it's dropped in a drop box, which can be just fine, or it can be a big, big, big problem as we know. I won't go into all that now. They've tightened things up in a lot of states with drop boxes, put them inside put them inside government buildings, have cameras on them, stuff like that. I I think drop boxes are more secure than they used to be, but they are not secure. I would say mail in ballots are relatively secure, but not secure. And then you have hijinks like 2,000 or 3,000 ballots from an area where a non establishment candidate was running at over 70%, where about 3,000 of those ballots that were in the state of Utah and voted in the state of Utah ended up in Las Vegas. And then the postmaster said that they were all late because nobody ever put a postmark on them. Even though they came from Utah, they're sitting for days in Vegas and still no postmark. And why are they in Las Vegas? And I was told in 2020, there were Utah ballots that were found in Atlanta, Georgia at the post office. I mean, some of this could be totally random and accidental. Some of it might not be accidental. Not when we're in a society where we're segmenting more and more, where one area is 75% for one candidate, and another area, another part of town is 80% for the other candidate. If you do some hanky panky in an area like that, yeah, you don't have to know about who anybody voted for. You know if you sabotage the ballots in an area where, let's say, the Democrat is getting 90% of the votes, you know, you could be sabotaging up to 90% of the Democrat votes when you sabotage votes in that area. Duh. Common sense. I think it's a big problem. I think it can be a big problem, but let's assume it's not a problem. So the they either went to the Dropbox or the mail system, and now we get our mail in ballot to the courthouse to where they're counting the ballots. Then you have this preparation thing that has to go on, verifying the signatures, verifying the envelope, and if signed, and everything was is every everything is hunky dory, and the the people, put the marks in the right place on the ballot, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. And it's an arbitrary process. People pull a ballot out and say, no. No. That that was not getting good. And then the ballot has to be cured. It has to be cured with whatever problem it's supposed to have. It's an arbitrary process, folks. And this whole signature thing, in some areas, well, I mean, there was a video in Phoenix where they had two people side by side using some machine to check the signatures, and the one person is approving a signature, like, every second every second. And the other person's, like, ten seconds, fifteen seconds. Okay. Okay. But the other one's going, ching ching ching ching ching. You know? Ridiculous. I mean, they're not checking signatures there. And that's a crux of the security of that process. One of them, that's a major focal point of security, is whether those signatures match. And people, you know, I was told by a senior election official in Utah, I won't use his name right now, he told me that there wasn't any real training or any real good training for, for election workers to to become experts at checking these signatures. And when they use machines, they have their own problems. They turn them up too high, and they reject too many signatures. They turn them down too low, and they miss fraudulent signatures. There's a problem with that. Big problem. Big a much bigger problem than when you go to your neighborhood and present your ID to one of your neighbors, usually, and look down and, oh, there you are on the poll book, and then you vote right there on the spot. You know, that is so much more secure than what we're talking about here. So this preparation process for these ballots takes a long time, and that's why now to have, a ton of ballots out two weeks after the election oh, no big deal. That's no big deal. What are you upset about? Yeah. So we counted some of them. And that is ridiculous, folks. Just ridiculous. And, again, every day these ballots are being stored somewhere. Brings a whole another security issue to the fore. So it's a long process. And then because we're trying to do everything we can to make it easier to vote, and too many places that, with the mail in ballots are not due till election night. Well, automatically, you're and because people procrastinate, you would think, oh, they have the ballot for three weeks. They probably have most of those ballots in by election day. No. They don't. 40%, sometimes 50% of the ballots come in on election day. Now states have gotten wiser here, and some say you have to have them in, by election day, not just have them postmarked on election day. Some say you have to have them in even now, you know, the Friday before, whatever. They're trying to deal with this, but I still see all over the country that people don't have don't have the results of their elections on election night. It's not right. From from from a from a number of standpoints, it is not right. So then let's look at these machines. And people who have looked at the machines all say they have a lot of problems. You know, this case has gone on and on in, Georgia that was actually not put in by the Trump people, that was actually started by the Stacey Abrams crowd, accuse accusing Brian Kemp, the governor down there, of, maybe committing a little hanky panky and a little election fraud. They've been going after these Dominion voting machines that they have in the entire state of Georgia down there. And, you know, they've had a number of top experts come in and say, these machines are vulnerable to, vote changes. That they had, testimony down there where right in front of the judge, the jury, and god himself, one of these scientists took a ballpoint pen and changed the results on a ballot. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. And there's continual testimony that, you know, in a world where we hear about hacking every day, very secure areas supposedly in our society, retirement, the Pentagon, criminal records, things like this. That, in a society where even those kinds of things are getting hacked all the time, we hear that these contractors, for election equipment are not using the latest equipment. That that that that it's really pretty simple and in some cases, antiquated technologies that are being used, to, tabulate our votes. Unbelievable. And that we really haven't gotten to the bottom of that yet because, you know, it's too political. It's too political. It's a side that lost, that is hell bent to get to the bottom of it. You know, it was the Democrats that started this. Because of Trump's win in 02/2016, it was the Democrats who were screaming bloody murder about Dominion voting machines, not the Republicans. And after 02/2016, it was Kamala Harris. It was Amy Klobuchar. You know, we have a link to the movie, Kill Chain. Watch that movie. These are all Democrats, folks. Every single one of them are Democrats. But it doesn't mean that they're not bringing up valid points about the technology of these machines. I think they're they bring up excellent points about the technology in these machines. Anyway, folks, we have we have got to do a lot better job of chain of custody, of identifying people, and keep cleaning our voter rolls because everything we got. You know, they they they want kids to vote. The left wants kids to vote down to 16 years old, and they're doing everything they can to make it happen. They want aliens to be able to vote. And we are constantly finding various election administrators who are going, oops. We had 2,000 aliens last year got to vote. We didn't mean to do that or or they're just saying to hell with you. We'll we you know, we put them in there. You you figure out who they are to take them out. And, that is a problem. That is a problem. You know, pay paying people to register people, shaky, shady organizations. And, of course, Biden used millions and millions of tax dollars last time to make up for the fact that Mark Zuckerberg was not spending his 405 hundred million dollars to rig the election last time. So a lot of problems, folks. A lot of problems in the registration process still with voter ID, with the chain of custody issues, the fact that they're getting rid of our precincts, which has a number of other negative aspects to it, And the fact that they're just making it easier and easier and easier and easier to vote is not gonna make it better, folks. And the next thing, where they want this to head, trust me, We have a ton of documentation on this at securevote.news. They want us to be voting on our cell phones. They want us to be doing ranked choice voting on our cell phones and having a few centralized locations around the country where all these electronic votes are being tabulated. And you don't think that's a problem? I'm gonna tell you that's a real big problem. Now Republicans kinda got onto this rank choice voting, and they're opposing it now. They have it in Maine. They have it in Alaska. That that's why Murkowski's sitting there. That's why Sarah Palin is not in the senate right now. But, anyway, terrible. I wanted to also talk about juries, and I didn't even get to that today. So we were gonna have a whole show about the importance of the jury in protecting our constitutional liberties. There's constitutional sheriffs, local office holders. There is election integrity issues, and then there are issues with juries. All of these things will be what save us folks. Trump will just buy us time. Look at the enemies that are already circling around him right now. Trump is not gonna be able to wave a wand and turn our establishment into just a little poodle and a little puppy. That's not what's gonna happen. We have a vicious, establishment, a vicious ruling class that wants to turn us into a total government of Marxist evil. That's what they want, and nothing has changed about that. You have been listening to Hour of Decision. My name is Lou Moore, and you can find out more about me at Lou Moore, l e w m, double o, r e, dot com. Thank you so much. See you later.