Episode 122 Hour of Decision: American Tyranny (5) Rigging Our Elections

Speaker 0: Look around you. Wrong rules the land while waiting justice sleeps. I saw in the congress and crossing the country, campaigning with Ron Paul. Tyranny rising, unspeakable evil, manifesting, devils lying about our heritage who want to enslave and replace us. But we are Americans with a manifest destiny to bring the a manifest destiny to bring the new Jerusalem of endless possibilities. But first, this fight for freedom. Be a part of it. But don't delay because this is the hour of decision. Speaker 1: Hour of decision with Lou Moore starts now. Welcome to the January episode of hour of decision. My name is Lou Moore. And today, we're gonna have an American sit rep and talk about what is to be done. Looking at it from the perspective of June 2026, Welcome to the one hundred and twenty second episode of Hour of Decision. My name is Lou Moore, and today we're gonna continue our series on American tyranny. We're gonna talk about elections, folks. We're gonna talk a little bit about those voting machines, about all those great ideas for mail in ballots and big voting centers and all the things that just make your election a little bit insecure, but they're all convenient and they're all wonderful. And we've been assured by secretaries of state all over the country using the same talking points that their system and whichever state you're in is the gold standard for elections in the country, and so you can go back to sleep because there's really nothing to worry about with your elections. So So we're gonna talk about that. And, if we have time, we're gonna move into another tyranny, a tyranny that we all suffered not very long ago, a tyranny that can't ever be forgotten, the COVID tyranny, which is part of a bigger aspect of tyrannical governance and the taking of your rights and the taking away of a quality of life for you that you could be enjoying if it wasn't for the powers that be in the area of your health. And, folks, as you get older, you understand there's very little in life that is more important and more personal than your health. I mean, it's common sense, but the youth don't see still don't seem to totally gravitate to that kinda thinking, but as you get older, you do. So, hopefully, we'll be able to get into that one in this episode as well. But before we do that, I just want to remind you that it is midnight in America. This isn't in a this isn't an amusement or entertainment show. I don't do it for your amusement. I don't do it for my financial aggrandizement. Let me assure you of that. I do it because I feel I have a few things to offer in a moment of history, a pivotal moment in our history, an hour of decision, an hour where the human agency of those who are inspired by God to take the lead. And I don't mean the necessary the leadership of an organization or, even in your community in terms of some hierarchy, but just leading by doing and by, naturally gravitating to others who wanna do something about the awful situation we're in, that human agency needs to be called on, and we need to tap our brothers and sisters on the shoulder today, folks, in this country and say, if there's gonna be a time, now is the time. This is the hour of decision for you to make a decision if you are going to dedicate your time to saving your country or if you're just gonna catch it all on the couch in between, forms of empty amusement and the emptiness of godless materialistic modern life provided to you by our corporate masters as a prerequisite, as a predicate to you being completely enslaved in a total government. And when I think of human agency and people who were who called upon god to use to help him use help this person use everything god gave them as part of their human agency to make a difference and to try to save this country. I think of an individual by the name of Larry Stickney who lived up in Washington state. And, for those of you in this audience who knew him and don't already know this, his, wife, Polly, informed me that Larry passed away last Saturday, and it's a shocker because Larry was such a vigorous, not just advocate for our country and our way of life and our culture and Christ and the constitution. But, Larry was the doer. He was the one that would roll up his sleeves and start doing and leading by example in that area. And it was such a shocker that he passed because it was just a few months ago that I was informed by, sheriff Mack and Sam Bushman of the CSPOE CSPOA, the constitutional sheriffs and police officers association, of which I am a proud supporter and occasional volunteer laborer myself. I was informed by them, and they knew that I had done politics for years in Washington state that they wanted to hold a CSPOA conference, a conference of sheriffs and bring sheriffs in from all over the country to meet in Washington state. Because in Washington state folks, where the Bolsheviks are in charge at the state level, they're trying to eliminate the elected sheriff. They've already done it. In King County, the largest county in the state where Seattle and Bellevue are or Redmond is, where Microsoft is, and Costco's headquarters is, and Nintendo and all these other companies, in that area, they have eliminated their elected sheriff, and there was a sheriff in the county just South of Seattle in the county where Tacoma is. You I'm sure you've heard of Tacoma, Washington. There was a sheriff there standing up standing up, for his constitutional rights, for the rights of his citizenry, and also specifically tangling, with the attorney general in the state who told him under no uncertain terms that he was not to allow his deputies to cooperate with ICE in the deportation of illegal aliens. A usurpation, in my opinion, of the sheriff's right to defend the citizens in his county and to uphold the law, all of it. And so, his name is Swank, sheriff Swank. So, anyway, all this was going on up there, and so they asked me about, setting up a meeting, a conference up there. And the first person I thought of, because I now live in Utah, the first person I thought of was my good friend and comrade in these type of fights for thirty five years, Larry Stickney. And so, you know, I had I I, made some suggestions. I helped with flyers. I, talked with Larry three or four times, but Larry put this conference together for sheriff Mack, brought in, general Flynn. It's a tremendous success behind enemy lines just outside of Tacoma, Washington, and Western Washington, folks, where there are a ton of patriots just as there is in California, just as there is in Oregon, just as there is in New Mexico and Colorado and all these states that we now call blue states that some people want to separate from The United States, a stupid idea, but I won't go down that rabbit hole today. But, ton of patriots showed up to support, their sheriff, sheriff Swank, and to support constitutional sheriffs because, folks, I've told you many times on this show, one of the keys to saving our republic and saving our civilization is to back support and elect and then to continue to support constitutional sheriffs who are empowered to form posses, who are empowered to legally, lawfully, carefully organize citizens in their county for their protection and to protect their constitutional right, constitutional rights from all of the plotting that's going on outside of our counties, coming from Washington DC, coming from New York City, coming from Europe, coming from the World Economic Forum, coming from all of these places where our enemies are that want to bring us total government and take down the system of constitutional sheriffs that really goes back before the constitution goes all the way back into England, folks, where sheriffs protected the people. Sheriff Mack has some excellent books on this subject, and sheriff Mack is gonna be on this show within a few weeks. He's got a new one out, folks. It's a blockbuster a blockbuster book out from sheriff Mack. But, anyway, so Larry put this conference on, and, you know, there's all kinds of things that happen, and there's people who have issues and whatnot before the these events. Many times, you're trying to bring a lot of different organizations together, and he did a fabulous job as he always did. Total self totally self effacing. Very few people, maybe even up in the Northwest, even know that he was the one responsible for this fantastic rally that had over 500 people that was put on that featured, sheriff Mack and general Flynn. So Larry was a total example, and, I refer you now to the eleventh episode I did of this show to episode 11. It's in my archives at libertynewsradio.com. Refer you to my archives for this show, hour of decision. It's an interview I conducted with Larry, and I'm so grateful that we had the opportunity to do this, in light of his sudden passing. So Larry Stickney watching over us now, but no longer with us, and what an example of a warrior of a warrior literally behind enemy lines. He was working, when he passed, at the Pierce County Council for one of the couple of patriots that are on that council, in the Tacoma area. And, left it all on the field, folks. Larry Stickney, my friend, and a grassroots warrior. Again, I recommend, you look at it episode 11, but he is an example. There are examples all over the country. He just happens to be a very good example and one that I know and one that many leaders around the country. I just talked to president of the John Birch Society. He certainly knew who Larry was and some of the work he did down in Texas. And, again, not not glorifying himself, and the whole family is that way. His wife, Polly, survives him, and she is a northwest coordinator of Washington State for, in Washington State for the Birch Society. Our heart goes and our prayer goes out to Polly Stickney. Anyway, elections. Folks, if you can't select your leaders anymore, you are living in a tyranny, and you are living in one. It's not total yet, but we're moving that way. We are moving that way. And the rigging of elections in this country from every angle, from this the the psychological angle before we even get into the mechanics of the elections when you rig the playing field with a two party system that is too often, a control mechanism of our corporate masters where both candidates are your enemy, where you rig the playing field by not getting information to the public. You know, Thomas Jefferson said an educated citizenry was the key to preserving the liberty that they fought and achieved in the revolution. Well, you can't be well educated if you're trusting a system that is lying to you day after day after day. But this corporate this wretched corporate media that we've now somewhat gotten out from under with the Internet, but with plenty of problems there too and, paid influencers that are lying and, you know, we've talked about many of those things. I won't go down that rabbit hole either, but that sets the stage where you have an uninformed electorate and an uninspired electorate because many of them instinctually or act intellectually know that there is rigging going on, that there is a bigger game, a grand design that is not honest in the way it presents itself, and that's ultimate goal is not for your benefit. And, I mean, there's nothing and I I've said this in recent episodes. There's nothing that kills enthusiasm for an election, like the corporate run campaign. The corporate campaign, which is, you know, that's not what Trump did to get elected, but that's what the Trump political operation is reverting to in these midterm elections. And all over the country, there is a depression of the base as a result of this. Because people don't get excited about somebody just spewing at them that they either instinctually or as I said, instinctually or factually know is crap. So that is a rigging of a type of our election system right there, but then we can't easily get into the mechanics, and we are going to do some of that today. So as the corporate model campaign model settled in on this country, the rate of, voting, the the percentage of eligible citizens to vote went down and down and down and down. I mean, I've made this argument to people many times in the election integrity, efforts I've been involved with. Then in the eighteen eighties, they didn't have a month of voting. They didn't have mail in ballots. They didn't have all of these, you know, easy registration. They didn't have, all of these ways that were supposed to make voting a whole lot easier and a whole lot better that were sold to us partially as a way to increase the turnout. Now first of all, just having everybody turn out to vote isn't even a good thing. If they don't know the issues, if they are brainwashed I mean, at minimum, without saying, well, we just want our people to vote. We don't want your people to vote. But without even, you know, going there, we want people who really want to vote to vote. We don't want people that will casually sit in the bathtub and click a box on their cell phone to vote if you make it that easy for them. But, otherwise, they won't vote. Well, that's not a voter I want to see, have his, or her vote tabulated in election. But back in the eighteen eighties where sometimes they had to because America was rural, it was mostly people on farms. No cars. And like I said, no, no, thirty day voting, no vote by mail, none of that kind of stuff. Turnout was 90% in election after election after election. And why was that, folks? Is it because our ancestors were just of such higher character than we are? I mean, that might be part of it. But the biggest reason is back the dynamic politically back in that time was pretty simple. The two parties were very distinctive in their beliefs, and candidates were held to account as to what they believed. And people and and political communications were, to a great degree, very sincere and very pointed. I tell a story, in in my actually, it's in my master's thesis of a man running into a bar in Everett, Washington in the eighteen nineties. He's running into the bar. He's got a piece of paper in his hand, and everybody in the bar gathers around him. I got this from somebody's diary that saw this. What was on this piece of paper? It was the latest argument for a silver standard and for a accounting, of international banking and international bankers, an accountability that was demanded and a demand for a change in the currency system. This was a level of engagement back then. People were not all on the same side, not hardly, of course. They were on different sides, and there were different views of the silver standard or different view views of using greenbacks and gold standard, etcetera, etcetera. But people were excited about the fact that they were participating in a pretty upfront process where the candidates had distinct views and were talking It appeared they were talking straight to these people. And that's the kind of political communication people wanted back then, and they were voting at 80 to 90%. But you look at the whole history, and I go through this in my book, forerunner. I have a whole chapter on this. The homogenization. You know, first, there was a progressive movement. It took over both parties. That changed the dynamic right there. Suddenly, everybody has a different shade of wanting a whole lot more government for many, many years in this country. And, you know, the radio ads and the jingles and the the, you know, selling a candidate like they're selling soap, which kinda started with William McKinley. I won't go into all the details here, but anyway and it just got worse and worse and worse till you get into the nineteen nineties. And a lot of people didn't see much different between difference between the parties, and and the parties were united around things like they all wanted free trade. They all wanted more immigration. They all wanted participation overseas in what we now call endless wars. And a lot of people didn't see the differences between these parties and and then the communications were just all slicked down, poll driven. Not straight across what people believed. And, and voter participation dropped and dropped and dropped and dropped in the down into the fifties, of, eligible voters. And I got a whole chart. You can go to securevote.news, and you have the secure vote petition, which is no longer being circulated, but it has some documentation with it, which includes some documentation that shows. It isn't the ease of voting, how easy it is for you to vote that causes people to vote. It cause people are people vote when they're motivated. There's a small percentage that vote just because it's so easy to vote and they otherwise wouldn't, but it's motivation on the issues. And that's why there's been a rise and an increase in voting because of the Trump era sharpening the issues between the parties, sharpening the issues, and having a real conversation about issues like immigration and, issues like free trade and endless wars. That is why, overwhelmingly why, there is an increase in voter participation. But as it was getting lower and lower and lower, previously, all these people are saying, we've gotta make it easier for people to vote. We've gotta come up with ways to make it easier to vote. At the same time, you you the computers are on the scene now, and, boy, we can figure out ways that just make it so much easier not just to vote, but make it easier to count these ballots. And the temptation has always been there in these county clerks, county government, not to have to administer an election in, 300 neighborhoods with a lot of volunteers. They would rather have them in small voting centers or, a small number of voting centers with their own employees. It's easier. It's easier for them. Doesn't make it better, folks. We're gonna continue talking about, the rigging of elections as part of our American Tyranny series on Hour of Decision. That's this show. It's on Liberty News Radio, and we'll be right back after the news. Welcome back to Hour of Decision. My name is Lou Moore, and we are talking about elections and rigged voting as part of our series on American tyranny. And, folks, the ideal the ideal for voting and this is one where president Trump has it nailed. He's been right about this from the beginning. He's still right about it. A secure election, as people know in countries all over the world, has a few elements to it. One, voting in your neighborhood. Small precincts, not a boat center with ten, twenty five thousand people that have to line up all the way down half a mile to get a boat, and a ton of people running around with all kind of chicanery happening and a great big building. Small precincts, paper ballots, poll books in the precinct, where people are pretty much your neighbors that are coming in to vote and showing identification to verify they are your neighbors in there for the purpose of voting. Paper ballots counted in that precinct. Not not not moving ballots across town, not starting all of these chain of custody issues that we have with our current system. Now the before we even get into the chicanery of the computers and of, the Internet, which we're gonna talk about in just a minute, the paper ballots counted in your neighborhood in a precinct with observers right there, who are also your neighbors or representatives of campaigns, news media, whoever, and the count in each precinct is sent to what to the vote tabulation center at the county, the state, where you know, however they wanna do it, but it's also announced out of each precinct. So that can be checked against any chicanery that might happen in the final tabulations that occur at a larger scale at the county or at the state level. Everyone that's registered to vote has to prove their citizenship, and that's such an a critical issue now because they've let 100,000,000 illegal aliens in our country. So only citizens voting, showing ID when they vote, voting in their neighborhood, voting on a paper ballot that is hand counted in the neighborhood, in that precinct, with results announced to the public in that precinct, as well as sent up the line to tabulate the overall vote for whatever office it is, whether it's statewide office, presidential, county commissioner, whatever, sheriff, whatever the office is. That is a system, folks, that works that you don't have two weeks of figuring out who the hell won the election. You don't have scurvy organizations coming up with more and more and more and more ballots. You don't have the chain of custody issues with, three fourths of the ballots in the mail or sitting in drop boxes, and you don't have the huge vulnerability. We're gonna talk about in just a minute of voting into a cyber space where electronically and magically, everything just comes out perfect in terms of winners and losers in elections. And that's how it was done in this country. I keep talking and and, you know, the they it it wasn't done that way everywhere in this country, for a long time because they started introducing mechanical voting machines in the cities. It gets more complicated, and they had nothing but problems with that. There's always been absentee voting because some people can't come to the polls on election day. Some people are overseas serving our country. They're, overseas for other reasons. They're having to be in another state. They're ill. There were always people that were allowed to vote absentee. That's reasonable. But even those ballots, if you go back and look at press clippings as they used to call them, there has been problems with absentee ballots going as far back as they had absentee ballots because of the problem of chain of custody. So you sure as hell don't want everybody voting that way. You have to allow for absentee ballots. You have to. You can't deny our service people the opportunity to vote. You can't deny people who can't get out of the house the opportunity to vote. They're otherwise able and capable of making those selections. You can't do that. But it is a a problem, and and the the solution there is also is also getting those absentee ballots to the precinct as it's being counted on election day, not having them come in days and weeks later. You can't ever allow this, folks. Look at California. What a complete and utter disaster. So that's the that's the gold that's the real gold standard. That's the real gold standard for our elections. And states, many of them make provisions like in the state of Utah. Every employer in the state of Utah must give you two hours on the clock for you to go vote, as well as the fact that the polls have all they always opened early, and they always close somewhere around, in most states, it's around 08:00 at night. So if you take off, work two hours early, you should be able to vote in your neighborhood with the few exceptions I just mentioned. So that that's a good law, and they have these laws in other states. And, that system work, folks. I talk about this all the time. One of my first memories of politics, I'm five years old, and my mom is letting me stay up, on election night because of the exciting race between John f Kennedy and Richard and Nixon in 1960, where there were voting machines, mechanical voting machines in some cities, but most of the country was on the system I just told you about. And they were mortified that they couldn't come up with election returns by 11PM that night. They went on two, three in the morning. But by the morning, the next day, millions and millions and millions and millions of ballots had been counted. A little tucanery in that situation too, but we'll talk about that. Maybe again, I've talked about it before, but at another time. Anyway, that election was decided, folks, that night and early into the morning, not a month later. And that was up until that time the closest national election in the history of The United States Of America. No computers. No computers. It was it was not that difficult. In France, they count all the ballots and every and the results are in that night. It's a national election. As fracas, as fractured as France is, with all the problems they have with these strong opinions they've always had in their politics between the parties, with all these immigrants they got over there, they could still do their whole national election the same day, folks. And the people come and vote on paper ballots in their neighborhood. That's how they do it. That's how they avoid fraud. Because fraud comes when there is a problem with chain of custody and there are not people watching every moment in that precinct. You vote on a piece of paper. They put it in a receptacle. It goes a few feet into another room or whatever, and it's counted right there. And there's people watching. It's a public transparent process. When you go and observe an election now, as I have done, and they take you in a room with a bunch of whirling machines, and they assure you that none of them are on the Internet even though every one of them has a modem in it that allows them to be on the Internet. And they tell you how great the system is, how wonderful it is, and the two weeks they spent preparing the ballots that have been coming in, the mail in ballots, before they put them in the big machine, all a centralized process, you can't see a damn thing. You can't see a damn thing. It it it makes a mockery out of observing the vote count. It is awful. And this is our system that has encroached and encroached and encroached all over the country. As I said, the first argument was, well, there's not enough people voting. It's too difficult for them to vote, which again, as I said, was a lie. They were not inspired to vote in the main. And then, you know, right along technology, I told you about these mechanical voting machines and the problems with mechanical voting machines. I told you that there had already been mail in ballots, and they called them absentee ballots, and they always had problems of some kind with the absentee ballots because of chain of custody, because you can't see the whole process is not completely observable, whether you have a mechanical machine or you have mail flying all over the mail system or being dropped into drop boxes. So all of those systems bring problems, but nothing has brought problems like the, electronic voting and electronic tabulation of votes, which increasingly is how it's done throughout the country. You may have a paper ballot. You may have a mail in ballot like most people have had in Utah. They're just now starting to move a little bit away from that. Thank god. A little bit. But you've got, mail in ballot or you go into a vote center, and then you put your ballot in a machine like they were doing in Arizona. Boy, that worked out fantastic. We have a movie called selection code at securevote.news, and I'm just gonna stop stop myself and plug securevote.news. At securevote.news, folks, that's a website. We cover and aggregate the latest in, in election integrity news and information. We have videos. We have audio. We have, long reports. We have a list of, election integrity groups at every state and national organizations that we find credible. We have a whole list of books that you can find if you want more information. Books like this one right here. It's called whoops. It's It's called vote scam. Vote scam. This is this one was 1992, folks. They were calling it. What was starting to happen with electronic voting machines and voting tabulation. I've got two other books behind me, Stolen Elections. That's all about the Venezuela connection with Smartmatic and Dominion. And the one next with their black box voting, that's an older book, Bev Harris, who was an activist from Seattle coming from the left, but, was exposing Diebold machines. And, of course, Diebold was purchased by Dominion. Anyhow, so you can find all of that at securevote.news. I also have a commentary every Tuesday morning at 09:15AM mountain, 11:15AM eastern. You can do there's a click box. You can just click on it. It's part of Lowell Nelson's show, the path to state and local sovereignty, which is on terrestrial radio in Salt Lake City as is my segment. But that segment is on at 09:15, and we talk about some of these stories every week. So do that if you'd like. Anyway, back to the business at hand. So the biggest problem by far, all these other problems, they all have chain of custody related issues, with the exception of the registration issue and the voter roll issue. That's off to the side. And, you know, motor voter, my old boss, Jack Metcalfe, actually ran against the author of motor voter. He lost that election, but Al Swift from Washington State, from Bellingham, Washington, he passed a national law. It's called motor voter. Every DMV in the country is supposed to be encouraging you to register to vote, and that has started one hell of a lot of problems. It's registered a ton of aliens. It's been nothing but a problem. And, I won't go any farther with that one. But anyway, so, generations of electronic voting problems in the nineties covered in that book I just held up, boat scam, and problems that have continued to this day, which now I'm gonna read from a report I wrote three years ago that you can find at another website. It's utah news dot org. Utahnews.org. It's about Utah's election system, but it is applicable to the country as a as a whole. So I will now read which brings us to a detailed report by one of the top experts on voting machines and tabulators in America. It was submitted to a judge in Georgia as part of a lawsuit against the state for their use of Dominion voting machines. This this report has had the unique distinction of being put under seal. That means, until recently, it was withheld from the public. Why is that? It was authored by professor j Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan, a known progressive Democrat, not a passenger on the Trump train. He assembled the report for a lawsuit filed by supporters of Democrat Stacey Abrams before the election, the election that she ran for governor the first time against Brian Kemp, and they had anticipated voter fraud since Brian Kemp had just put Dominion voting machines throughout the entire state of Georgia. Oh, and by the way, he was running the elections as secretary of state when he ran for governor against Kemp. She was felt she felt she was cheated out of that governorship by Brian Kemp, the man who was in charge of Georgia Georgia elections, and this is 2018. Obama appointed judge Amy Totenberg, sister of, NPR commentator Nina Totenberg, was the judge, which, on the case, which continues in it. It is now finally not still continuing. This was three years. I wrote this three years ago. She complied with the request to keep the report secret that came from the cybersecurity and in infrastructure security agency, also known as SAISA. The federal cyber watchdog cited, oh, you guessed it, folks, national security concerns. SAISA is the same agency whose top official told the world that the twenty twenty election was the most secure ever. The judge agreed that the depiction of the flaws in the Dominion Image Cast x voting system was a national security threat if disseminated in graphic detail to the public. As pressure built for a release of Haldeman's findings about this system, SAIS has sent an advisory to election officials throughout the country about the potential vulnerabilities while the judge continued to keep the full report under seal. But the reports, recent release, Dominion attempted a rebuttal. But even NBC News tells us that Halderman's findings, which were finally unsealed and available for public examination, were validated by 20 fellow cybersecurity experts as well as by that SAISA advisory. You can see a summary of the numerous problems Haldeman discovered on pages four to seven of the document. These things are all linked in this utahnews.org report, folks. There's a lot of links there. They included vulnerability to the insertion of malware, false user credentials, manipulation of QR codes, and means to thwart vote audits. He points out malware can be inserted to one machine and that can infect an entire county system, including vote tabulators. Georgia's peach of a secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, also attempted a rebuttal stating that Haldeman was given insider information that members of the public don't have to find these vulnerabilities. So there's really nothing to worry about. He's planning to replace the machines, and I don't think that ever happened. That was supposed to be in 2024, but that's just replacing them with other machines. But there, meanwhile, is hacker threats all over the world, including from China, from Russia, from Israel, and other countries. Doctor Haldeman's conclusions about Georgia's Dominion Voting machines generally aren't new conclusions. They've been reached many times by many experts, and they're not confined to one product or one company. Haldeman and many of his colleagues have sounded the alarm for years about electronic voting machines and tabulators, like the ones Utah is totally dependent on from ES and S as well as from Dominion. And, anyway so big problem with these machines, folks. I'm not gonna have time to read any more from there. But, the game is this is the game. They want to move you psychologically away from paper ballots and from your neighborhood. And here is a report by a bunch of big shots in Utah. Some of them connected with Zuckerberg. Some of them connected with other national actors. And they said that, they wanted to enact a policy that encourages a broader use of boat centers and voting by mail to ease the transition to Internet voting, which is what they want. Transitioning voters to a mail ballot will help shift the idea that voting must take place at an external location and move the voting experience into a voter's personal space at a date and time of their choosing. Voting by mail will ease the cultural shift to Internet voting. This is what I wanna get at, and, obviously, I won't have time for COVID today. We are being told we need to have digital ID, and the same report says that digital ID is the prerequisite to voting on the Internet, and there's companies selling this, BOATS. There's other companies selling this idea of voting on your cell phone with cybersecurity experts as recently as February, 20 more of them. MIT did a report. There's been a lot of reports as late as February. Go to secureboat.news. Look up Natalie Winter's story. I posted it last week. 20 experts again are saying this is complete and total insecurity for an election to have it going over the Internet in any way, particularly to a cell phone. But that's what they want because they want all the voting to be digital. They want all voting to be centralized. And once they have that, it's goodbye. Election process of any validity for you. Digital ID, digital currency, digital voting, It's over with, folks. That's the completion of the American Tyranny project. That's the completion of that project. And I didn't have time to get into, more of the background and what's happened over the years, but, folks, people have known forever that the electronic tabulation of elections is always going to be rigable. It's always going to be hackable. And it is part of this entire thrust for total government that I've been trying to break down in this series on American tyranny. And when you cannot trust your elections, when you're Spencer Pratt sitting there and watching your whole election vanish, when you're Dino Rossi, my friend from Washington state, the first year they had, complete mail in voting and electronic tabulation and watch your total go down day by day by day by day for a month until you lose the governorship of the state of Washington. I was there, folks. This is what you get. This is what you are vulnerable to anywhere in the country. My name is Lou Moore, and you have been listening to the Hour of Decision on Liberty News Radio. And we're gonna continue our series on American tyranny next week.