Radio Show Hour 2 – 2026/10/03

[00:00:01] You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is The Political Cesspool. The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program. And here to guide you through the murky waters of The Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.

[00:00:31] Welcome back. I have a somewhat disturbing fascination with the two stories we're going to be covering this hour. One after the other, the story of the alleged group rape of a sorority girl at Cornell University, the Cornell 7. That's now come to widespread public attention two years after the fact. Why and how? We'll talk to Richard Parker about that.

[00:01:00] But Richard Parker is another guy who I think made his first appearance on the program late last year, but he has fast become one of my favorite writers. You can read the writings of Richard Parker at The Raven's Call, a reactionary perspective at theravenscall.substack.com. Raven's plural there with an S, theravenscall.substack.com. There, Richard Parker offers a unique hard-right perspective on matters of culture, politics, and European identity.

[00:01:28] That are generally considered taboo. He always seems to be hitting on stories that interest me, which is, I guess, why I enjoy his sub-stack so much. But he has a new headline piece up there, appropriately titled, Concerning a Rape Allegation Scandal at Cornell. Now, this is Ivy League. This is a cut above, what do we have here, LeMondon College here in Memphis. This is an interesting story. So, Richard, welcome back to the program.

[00:01:54] For those who are not aware, quickly walk us through the facts of this case and why it is of interest to us tonight. Good evening. Jane Doe, many people have claimed to have identified her, but it's not been confirmed yet. On, I think it was October 19th is the date, she started drinking at her sorority house and went to a bar, then went to another place, and then walked to the fraternity house of a young man she had a romantic or sexual interest in.

[00:02:22] At that time, she characterized her state of inebriation in a written statement as a five, which means that she's not incapacitated or incapable of giving consent under New York law. Five out of ten. Yes. They started, she started dancing with this guy that she had a thing for, affection, attraction to, and he propositioned her to have a threesome with one of his fraternity brothers. She consented.

[00:02:51] Her statements indicate that she consented, as all the statements indicated that she consented to the two other threesomes she had. She had three different threesome sexual acts with four different fraternity men, Ingalls and Newell in the first one, Newell and Lopes, I think, in the second one,

[00:03:15] and then Ingalls and Winston Lee in the third one that ended at 545 in the morning. She had gone home to her sorority home, I think, at 10 in the morning, and then the very next day she was learning that she had been made an object of ridicule on campus. Her sorority sisters started trying to tell her, no, you didn't consent. It was rape. It was sexual assault. She texted both Newell and Ingalls indicating that she consented, saying that nothing illegal happened,

[00:03:45] that she enjoyed being with Ingle and Newell. She expressed some regret or less than, you know, satisfaction with other things, but she didn't say that she didn't consent to it. And she bragged about how people have to get used to this kind of hardcore sexual depravity. That's not the phrase that she uses. And that she is very open-minded and said, I love you, King. Then when the president disinvited her to the Halloween party, which is like the Super Bowl for sorority sluts, it's bigger than Christmas, bigger than everything.

[00:04:15] When she was disinvited from the fraternity Halloween party, that's when she became angry. And three days later, she decided that this is sexual assault and she filed a police report. And so that's basically... Okay, now, Richard, that was, by the way, that was such a succinct and perfect setup for the topic of conversation this hour. I just wanted to offer a point of clarification. You're talking about October 19th and the Halloween party. You are talking about October 19th and the Halloween party of 2024. Correct.

[00:04:44] Which was when this happened. So people are wondering about the timeline. And what this sounds like is the Queen of Hearts telling you, what do words mean? Means words mean exactly what I intend them to mean. Nothing more, nothing less. New York law is very clear that if someone voluntarily consumes alcohol or drugs, they can't then use that to say that they didn't consent. It's the same thing if you get in a car and driving drunk

[00:05:11] and you get in a fatal car accident and kill somebody drunk driving, you can't say that it's something that you didn't intend to do because you voluntarily chose to consume to excess. And she also wasn't... There's no indication that she was incapacitated, which is the other way that you could get someone for sexual assault. In fact, Ingalls did pass out and she tried to perform oral sex on him. So if anybody could allege sexual assault under the New York Criminal Code,

[00:05:39] it would be Ingalls, not Jane Doe. But we know how things... Well, you know, I've got to say another thing because I'm listening to how you are describing these names, which is exactly how the establishment media is describing them and how they have been printed and spoken about on television and radio broadcast. And now all... The New York Times did an extensive deep dive into this story. She's still referred to as Jane Doe. All of the male people who were allegedly involved in this are outed and known by their first and last names,

[00:06:09] which I find incredibly inconsistent. One time. It's a now after... Like an hour after I made my final revision on this essay, Hochul made an announcement that she's appointing Letitia James, a special prosecutor. They had that ridiculous press conference the next day and Letitia James put a Facebook post stating, basically concluding that the men are guilty and that she stands with the victim as a survivor and all survivors, which should immediately force her to recuse herself.

[00:06:38] There's no way that she can fulfill her ethical obligations as a prosecutor with those sorts of statements, but it's not going to work that way. You can read all of Richard's take on this at theravenscall.substack.com. And it is a great, long article that really details this thing. But what you just mentioned, Richard, was actually, to me, the most interesting thing about this. So, as you said, and I think it's important to reiterate this, you had this sorority student.

[00:07:06] She was a tri-delta, delta-delta-delta-tri-delt. And she went to this fraternity house where she engaged in all the acts that you mentioned. She said immediately after, it got a little crazy, but it was consensual. And she wanted to go back to the, now as we understand it, the lair of her rapist. She wanted to go back there for the Halloween party. But after they disinvited her, then she began to think a little more about it. Now she's scorned. Now she's a little bit embarrassed. Hell has no fury like a woman scorned. And then she figured it out. You know, I was actually raped.

[00:07:36] Now I see it clearly now. And so she claims she was raped in early November, right after Halloween of 2024. Three weeks after, right. It was looked into by the district attorney at the time, and he dismissed it. Now two years later, and we saw this with the McMichaels case in Georgia, where the people that were found guilty of murdering Ahmaud Arbery in the original sequence of those events,

[00:08:02] that was also looked into and dismissed as being self-defense. And a justified shooting after there was a political outcry, which is what we're seeing here now, a different district attorney, somebody else was appointed to re-look into the case. And of course, once you have that political pressure, you know how you're supposed to decide it. And that's what's happening here. And of all people, Hochul, as you mentioned, the governor of New York, has appointed Letitia James to be the one to oversee this.

[00:08:30] Ask Peter Brimelow and Lydia Brimelow about Letitia James. I mean, so you've got a hardcore leftist partisan. There's no way these boys who are part of this fraternity are not going to have all matters of hell come down on them. Their goose is cooked if it's up to Letitia James. Well, they're going to be indicted. The question is whether they can get an acquittal in Ithaca, New York. But they're going to be indicted as sure as anything. It's an absolute metaphysical certitude. They will be indicted.

[00:08:59] Well, again, and you see this, where years after the fact, only because it's become an issue in the news that these cases get another look, and then the DA looking into it knows immediately how he or she is supposed to rule. But this is all over the national press. Now, even in our bottom of the hour breaks, or top of the hour breaks here on Liberty News Radio tonight, you had some news about it. Reuters, what we know about the Cornell University rape investigation. New York Times, how a Cornell student went from shame to action.

[00:09:29] CBS News, Jane Doe's account of what happened at the Cornell fraternity. And then, again, what's going on here? Richard has covered it well and set it up well, but you've got a special prosecutor appointed. That is Letitia James, of all people. And, yeah, these people are cooked. It's just going to be a matter of now how it plays out in court. But why has this become such a cultural touchstone? I mean, this whole Me Too thing,

[00:09:58] I mean, this definitely ties back into the Me Too era where no matter how promiscuous a girl is, no matter if she's on drugs or whatever else, you have to believe them no matter what. Now, as a result of Me Too, I learned the exact opposite lesson. The lesson of Me Too was supposed to be if a girl says something, a woman says something, you believe them no matter what. I always, by default, do not believe things like this when they're alleged by women. You can't believe someone if the person makes contradictory statements at different points in time

[00:10:27] because the thing she says with, you know, alleging these things is in direct contradictions with the statements she made on October 23rd, for example, with that CBS screenshot with, you know, talking about how people have to get used to, you know, this sort of sex and sexuality and this thing is going to become more common and that she's very open-minded, I love you, King. You can't reconcile the two different sets of statements. It's like matter and anti-matter.

[00:10:57] You can't reconcile them. So if someone is saying two different things and they obviously have a motivation, the woman obviously has a motivation, namely that she was snubbed with the Halloween party, then no sane person can believe her because she has a motivation to do this. Well, apparently you're intended to believe just what her latest pronouncement on the issue is, which is even more dangerous.

[00:11:25] But that's, this seems to be the trend if you follow feminist thinking, like, you know, you have to believe women. That was what the Me Too... What I object to is there are all sorts of things on social media and whatnot that denounce what these men do. So it's a very tenuous thing for me because I harbor a pretty strong animus towards Greek life for many different reasons. But, you know, yeah, you can announce fraternity men who womanize and do these things

[00:11:55] that are depraved, but none of... Well, except for in circles like ours, none of these people who point their fingers at men for doing this, none of them bat an eye at all these things that this woman did. I mean, she had an orgy at a fraternity with three different pairings with four different men, sniffed ketamine off their genitalia, all these things. And to them, it's just, you know, like a mainstream sort of normal progression

[00:12:24] of a college girl's sex life. And they don't bat an eye on it, but they point the eye at men. So what we see is we see an asymmetrical perversion of sexual mores where women are not only tolerated to indulge in all sorts of unspeakable depravity, but that the parameters of consent are getting narrower and narrower, but those parameters of consent that are getting narrower only apply to men. They don't apply to women.

[00:12:52] So you have this situation where women are just doing things that would have made, you know, like a promiscuous cad 50 years ago just blush and astonishment and revulsion. And at the same time, with this sort of hyper-sexual society that we are crafting for ourselves, the risk to men keeps going up and up and up, but only to men. And that is unconscionable. Well, you know, three orgies apparently for Jane Doe is all right, but the fourth one is a bridge too far.

[00:13:23] You know, and try wrapping your head around that type of logic. Well, she had three. She had three rounds with four different men. But yeah, you know, it's very few people have made that point. And Coulter did a little bit more genteel. Nick Fuentes, even though I'm not really fond of him, he had a great take that, you know, he called it out for what it is. He didn't coach it in any genteel or polite language. He used strong, even vulgar language

[00:13:52] to denounce what this woman did. And that's what needs to happen because if you don't introduce so-called slut shaming and bring some sort of stigma to harmful, destructive behavior, society will continue to encourage it. And it's destructive behavior that's bad for everybody. It's bad for women. It's bad for men. And it's bad for society. It's making marriage and family more and more possible. It's a vector to a seemingly unending parade of social harms and ills.

[00:14:22] Now, of course, the establishment media, I'm scrolling through just untold numbers of articles covering this from all of the major players in the establishment press as we are talking real time here on the live radio program this evening. And of course, all of them are basically treating her allegations as they are entirely unimpeachable. And what a horrible thing this is. The facts don't seem to add up with that, but this is what's being alleged.

[00:14:51] And of course, you have to trust a woman at all times when they allege rape, not the fact that they sometimes can withdraw consent retroactively after they get upset or mad. After they get slut shamed by their sorority sisters. But this is the question that I've got, Richard, and I'd like your take on this, is this sort of behavior is certainly not newsworthy. I would even say that this sort of behavior happens on just about every college campus every weekend. why has this case become such a fixation

[00:15:20] by the national media and politicians? I mean, yeah, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is running her mouth about it. I mean, of course, she's a congresswoman up there in the area in New York. But I mean, why has this one just taken off? I mean, people alleging rape and having the allegations dismissed or even if it was, I mean, why has this one become such a big national news story? Well, there are a number of factors. The biggest one is that the midterms are in a few weeks

[00:15:48] and this energizes the left, TikTok, other leftist-oriented social media. They are apocalyptic about this. They are just out of their mind with just, yes, they're just, I mean, it's insane. They're saying things like, even if she consented, they should still be found guilty because what they did was despicable, but not that what she did is despicable. I mean, it's just, their reaction is just insane and there's no pretense

[00:16:17] of any sort of due process or any sort of presumption of innocence or even a desire to find the facts as they actually happened. It's a lynch mob on the left and that energizes the base for the midterm elections. That's one reason. But I disagree. I think these things are newsworthy and I think that's one of the reasons why we're in the situation we are is because of the consenting adults paradigm. It's because this stuff happens on college every week

[00:16:44] that our society is so depraved and falling apart. We need to start talking about these things. We need to somehow get some sort of moral barometer back in place and return to some sort of normalcy. I'm not a prude. I have lewd, salacious thoughts about an attractive woman. I'm not a Catholic priest or anything like that, but there's a difference between normal sort of lewd thoughts about carnal delights and this sort of thing

[00:17:13] which is just disgusting. I mean, it... Well, we need to have a consensus of opinion on what was lewd and what was not and that seems to be the primary enemy of feminism. I mean, this stuff is just... It's so unspeakably depraved that we can barely describe what it is because we're on the radio. So it's just... But this is... These are the social mores that we have and if you look at the rhetoric from Kohl, even the prosecutor himself, you know, he was sure to condemn the boys

[00:17:41] in his written statement but he didn't say a thing about the woman's own actions and aside from the sexual stuff, you have them engaging in an illicit drug, ketamine, which is illegal for a reason. It's a very harmful substance but people think that, you know, at least for the woman that it's, you know, nothing wrong with it and that women should have the perfect right to engage in this sort of destructive behavior. Somebody said that a woman can use any drug she wants. Well, that was actually

[00:18:11] a pretty famous comment in response to this. It was some radical feminist saying that I can use any drug I want and it'd still be rape. Well, again, the accused defense is alleging that the fraternity members have denied wrongdoing with some maintaining that the interaction was entirely consensual and others denying participation at all. The incident goes back to October 2024. Jane Doe alleges that she was drugged with ketamine. Now, you know, some people have suggested that she took it voluntarily

[00:18:40] and assaulted by multiple men at a fraternity house. Text messages over the weeks that followed showed the victim processing the trauma, initially experiencing patchy memories before concluding that she had indeed been raped. And of course, you know, this goes back to the timeline that has also been alleged that she wanted to go back to another party at the very next party. And then once she got denied access to that, she reconsidered what had happened that original night. And then legal experts

[00:19:09] interviewed by CNN have noted that New York's rigid criminal standards for rape, which require proof of forcible compulsion or incapacity to consent, which create hurdles in cases involving drug-facilitated sexual assault. But yeah, I would say, Richard, again, I would not want to be in the shoes of these defendants. I doubt that they, I seriously, seriously, just by everything I know about interactions and the human nature,

[00:19:38] I very seriously doubt that it was rape as we understand rape to be, forcibly and without consent and with her saying no or with her entirely passed out. I do not believe that, but I will see. Absent some new information that hasn't been revealed, they did not commit rape. I mean, absent that, to me, I'm convinced it's 100 percent they're innocent. But as we've seen with McMichael's case, Derek Chauvin, that's no guarantee. And with Letitia James, a special prosecutor, having it tried

[00:20:08] in, you know, in Ithaca, New York, I mean, maybe some of the jury comes from places other than Ithaca that aren't quite so liberal. You might have a shot, but they're going to be indicted. The only question is whether they get an acquittal or not, and I hope that they do. Well, up in New York, I would say that's a pretty iffy proposition. What, if any effect, does feminism play in this particular episode of, you know, in the cultural?

[00:20:37] It's the asymmetry of these perverse sexual mores where they're not only tolerating extreme sexual depravity among young women, they're encouraging it. And as they're encouraging it, they're limiting the constraints of consent, but only for men. And they're always pointing the figure at disgusting behavior that men allegedly engaged in, but never at the women. And it's because they don't have any intellectual consistency. It's always about the moment, whatever advances

[00:21:07] their cause in the moment devoid of any other context, devoid of any intellectual consistency, which is why the ideology is not only intellectually bankrupt, but evil and must be resisted and destroyed. Well, sexuality is a, you know, like a ticking time bomb for men now. You can't ever rely on a woman's consent apparently in having sex because, you know,

[00:21:37] if this, if the position that is being taken on behalf of Jane Doe by the authorities in New York, Kathy Hochul and Letitia James and whatnot, is the standard, basically, no man can ever assume that he has the consent of a woman to have sex. Oh, and there's now a push to rewrite and revise the criminal statute in New York so that the abbreviation is a way, even if it's voluntary, to sustain an indictment

[00:22:06] and conviction for sexual assault. And you know that it's going to be sloppily written and you know it's going to be in a way that men are going to assume the risk of a sexual insult, indictment, and conviction for any time they make an advance towards a woman who's had even a single drink. And they're going to do that and it's going to pose all sorts of risk. Hold on, Keith. No, no, I'm sorry. No, Richard, again, you're on to something. I just want to read something from the New York Times before we transition to the situation in Tennessee

[00:22:35] with this incredible botched execution. This is from the New York Times. I'll read it very quickly, gentlemen. Jane Doe had delivered strict instructions to one of her roommates. Quote, if anybody asks about this, according to the roommate's testimony, say it didn't happen. The roommate was plainly concerned. Initially, she said Jane Doe was kind of recounting it as a story of a crazy thing that she had done. As the days went on, though, the roommate continued, I think she came to the realization that something bad had happened and that she didn't really enjoy her time. On October 25th,

[00:23:05] again of 2004, Mr. Ingalls, who's one of the defendants, texted Jane Doe, are you good? Jane Doe replied that Mr. Newell had, quote, definitely told people. She went on, the roommate did. I'd have conversations and she would describe a part of what happened and I would tell her that that is what could be classified as rape. So her roommate's helping her, you know, really remember what happened here. Yeah, it's very clear. It's conforming to their consensus of opinion.

[00:23:34] It's very clear the sorority sister caught wind of the rumors and everything, saw that she was distressed, that her name had become Mudd and became an object to ridicule on campus. Not being a lawyer, not even knowing the criminal statute and relying on feminist rhetoric about consent and inebriation and this sort of thing, just came to that conclusion. You can come to a conclusion that she was raped, but that's just a conclusion. It isn't even a legal conclusion unless if you can cite the facts that satisfy the criminal statute, the elements of the criminal statute,

[00:24:04] which she has not done and which that sorority girl, sister, feminist woman did not do, certainly. Here's another big sticking point in the whole allegation. The fraternity, as you mentioned, was preparing for a Halloween party and Jane Doe was eager to attend even though she had, according now to her testimony, had just been raped the week before. Text messages indicated in the investigation show Mr. Ingalls, who's one of the fraternity brothers, assuring Jane Doe that he and other fraternity members wanted her to be there.

[00:24:36] And she replied, thank you, I really appreciate that, I'll bring my cigarettes. And then she received a phone call from the president of the fraternity disinviting her from the party and then, well, we know what happened next. We'll be right back with Richard Parker. The Ravens call. Using the Constitution as our guide. You're listening to Liberty News Radio. News this hour from Town Hall. I'm John Scott. The Ravens call. President Trump

[00:25:06] says Iran has virtually given up any plans for a nuclear weapon before departing the White House for Ohio. He spoke about the ongoing conflict with Iran. We have a decision that I'll make about Iran. Iran's been decimated, so the only question is it'll either be the easy way or the hard way. The president spending a lot of time on the road. He's in Ohio today rallying support for Republican candidates ahead of the midterm, speaking at a high school north of Dayton. The president

[00:25:35] will be in Texas and New York next week. The U.S. Supreme Court expected to hear several high-profile cases in its new term. The high court will reconvene for a new nine-month term and is expected to consider whether laws that ban semi-automatic rifles violate the Second Amendment as well as the legality of voting laws that require proof of citizenship. The justices will also decide how much authority parents have over children who identify as transgender, if immigrants must remain in detention

[00:26:05] while they await deportation, and if lawmakers can sue oil companies for their role in climate change. I'm Lisa Carton. There are reports that say the Dubai co-pilot accused of stabbing the captain of a passenger jet in mid-flight was previously banned from flying. That's over fears he had adopted radical ideological views. Liz Warner reports. The pilot was grounded by Oman Air in 2024 after the airline found out he had been visiting

[00:26:33] radical Islamic websites and he was assigned to a desk job. The reports indicate officials are now investigating how the Omani national was cleared to be in the cockpit of a fly Dubai plane headed for Israel. Passengers and crew were able to subdue the suspect before the plane carrying 174 people landed safely in Saudi Arabia. In New York, I'm Liz Warner. More on these stories from Townhall.com. When it comes to supplements, two things matter most. That it works

[00:27:02] and you can trust it. Larry Elder here. Rather than just tell you about Relief Factor, we'll let our customers do it. We hear from people every day whose lives have changed. We'd like you to hear their stories. Rebecca was hesitant at first, but she discovered how easy Relief Factor makes it to adjust or cancel any time. Now she says her knee pain is better, she doesn't rely on other pain relievers, and she tells everyone it's worth it. Rebecca is just one of many. I take it every single morning for my own back issues. I stop taking it,

[00:27:33] the issues come back. Now they make it easy to find out if you'll be the next person telling us Relief Factor is absolutely worth it. Three weeks for just $17.76. Go to ReliefFactor.com, that's ReliefFactor.com, or call 800-4-RELIEF, 800-4-RELIEF. We'll connect you with our friendly local team and they'll do everything they can to help. We hope you'll soon be sharing your story with us as well. 800-4-RELIEF, ReliefFactor.com.

[00:28:02] Find your inner rebel at Dixie Republic, the world's largest Confederate store, located in Traveler's Rest, South Carolina. The anti-white, anti-Christ, anti-Southern world ends at the asphalt. Welcome to God's country. Log on to DixieRepublic.com to view our Southern merchandise from flags to T-shirts to artwork. At the store, browse through our extensive collection of belt buckles and have a custom-made leather belt handcrafted in our Johnny Rebs Gun and Leather Shop. That's

[00:28:31] DixieRepublic.com where you can meet all of your Southern needs. While you're waiting, drop by our Confederate Corner for a free cup of coffee and good conversation. Remember, there are no strangers here, just friends who haven't met yet. DixieRepublic, we're not just a roadside attraction, we're a destination for our people. For more information, visit DixieRepublic.com. It is common for politicians,

[00:29:01] major media outlets, and non-profits to hype white on black murders aggressively. Or even claim that blacks are living in fear of white people. Lends for simply being black. Hard to believe, but that's what was done. And some people still want to do that. This is why National Conservative launched the Interracial Homicide Tracking Project. We have now documented well over 2,000 confirmed interracial homicides since January 2023, and created the most comprehensive

[00:29:30] overview of these killings anyone has ever made. We plug the gaping holes in data left by other homicide trackers and government crime stats. Rather than engaging in hyperbole and vitriolic rhetoric like everyone else, we are simply creating a massive sample size of empirical evidence so people can form rational and informed opinions about a sensitive and politically charged issue. Visit natcon.life N-A-T-C-O-N dot L-I-F-E

[00:29:59] Ladies and gentlemen, we're going to quickly wrap up our conversation about the supposed rape at Cornell University with Richard Parker, but I just want to be sure to remind you again to check out The Raven's Call, R-A-V-E-N-S The Raven's Call dot Substack dot com. He's a great writer, which is how he came to our attention, but he's an excellent radio

[00:30:29] guest as well, Keith Alexander. Well, what The Raven's Call does that no one else does, he deals with topics that even taboo breakers like ourselves basically consider to be taboo, and if you don't take my word for it, check out The Raven's Call and look at the sample of discussions that they have in there and what the topics are. You know, when they say fools rush in where wise men fear to go, well, Richard is no fool,

[00:30:58] but he certainly does rush in where a lot of people are, you know, will take a pass, and as a result it's one of the most thought provoking websites on the internet, and I would recommend it to anyone. Thank you so much, those are really kind words, I really appreciate it. And I enjoyed also, Richard, your take on your film review of the movie Obsession, which I watched recently. I had even thought about having you on for that, but I just figured too few people in our audience would

[00:31:28] know what we're talking about, but that was very interesting as well. I want to wrap this up. It's on our list of daily reads, and as a result, it's easy to access. Go to our website, go down in alphabetical order, look for the Raven's Call, click onto it, and take our word for it, read it yourself. Please be sure to subscribe and share and like. Independent writing requires the support of its readers, and those who can afford to do so, a paid subscription is both appreciated and necessary

[00:31:58] for the long-term success of this publication. A closing thought is that this kind of sexual depravity harms the individual and society. There's an excerpt that people can read after the quote about how a good way not to be talked about as a whore is to simply not be one. I would encourage people to find that passage in particular. It's very simple. The idea of what consenting adults do is none of our business, is preposterous and it's a fraud.

[00:32:28] This sort of behavior is destructive, it's harmful in any number of different ways. With this woman it happened, with the fact that she thought that she would be looked upon as some sort of progressive, open-minded heroine for the latest iteration of the sexual revolution and she was in fact made an object of ridicule and gossip on campus and eventually disinvited from the fraternity party. That's just one of the

[00:32:58] social costs. It degrades pair bonding. When a man or a woman has a body count, a number of sexual partners above a certain threshold, the chances of getting married and then sustaining that marriage and not having divorce and infidelity. Birthrights. Yes. It unleashes this explosion of unending social ills and harms that some people think are secondary effects, but if you're the son of a single mother who

[00:33:29] has wreaked a broken home on that son, that's not a secondary effect. That's your life. That's something that's going to dominate your destiny for the entire time that you're on this earth. People need to stop having the simplistic view about what consenting adults do is no one else's concern. They have to discern and understand that this kind of sexual depravity is destructive in any number of ways. That means not just pointing at the fraternity men, that also

[00:33:58] means pointing at the women and rebutting this feminist lunacy that women are not only tolerated to engage in this sort of thing, but are encouraged to do so with no accountability whatsoever. No one dares say anything negative about it. Right. So that would be my closing thought on this matter. Well, and again, I come back to, if you want to read Richard's very in-depth article, the title of it there at

[00:34:27] the Ravens Call is Concerning a Rape Allegation Scandal at Cornell. But just again, I have to go back to the fact that this woman who is now claiming rape, Jane Doe, wanted to go to the Halloween party. It was only after she was embarrassed by being disinvited. She said, and I quote, I knew this was going to happen. The woman always gets the short end of the stick. And then by November 3rd, four days after Halloween of 2024, she concluded that she was indeed raped. And she

[00:34:59] on November the 7th, according to documents, went to the emergency room in Ithaca. Now, this is a month after the fact and requested a rape kit. So, you know, there's a similarity there, but we'll see. It's all too real for the defendants now as they're going to go to court and fight for their lives. So, this is where we're at. Now, another person who took a life but is now fighting for her own and a really bizarre, almost dark comedy here in Tennessee. For the first time in 200 years,

[00:35:29] a woman was going to be executed by the state of Tennessee. She was a death row inmate. Krista Pike is her name. We had an email come in, Richard, which I forwarded to you from a listener in North White Plains, New York, who wrote that he was struck by the sad development in Nashville of the pending execution. So, this was before what happened a couple of days ago happened, of the pending execution of Krista Pike and of the heinous crime for which she and her black

[00:35:58] Satanist boyfriend, Krista Pike is white, she and her black Satanist boyfriend were convicted. The status of white society, which existed in the 1990s when the murder occurred and which has continued to decline, was discussed in Charles Murray's book Coming Apart, The State of White America 1960-2010, in which he discusses white social erosion. He argues that working class communities have suffered severe erosions in family stability, marriage rates, and local civic participation. After listening

[00:36:28] to Pike's recollections during which she described her youth and her early life at the Job Corps campus, which she referred to as a gangland, our listener in New York was beginning to leave comments on social media, and he asked, if Krista Pike were black, would she still be facing execution? The forced racial integration of the Job Corps and other educational programs for young people

[00:36:58] may lie at the root of many interracial crimes, and here evidently contributed to jealousy between two white girls, Krista Pike, and the other young lady, Colleen, who was murdered between two white girls and their jealousy over a black male. Now, the victim and her mother thought she would travel from Florida to Tennessee to learn about computers, when instead she foolishly became attracted to Krista's Satanist black boyfriend, Tadaryl is his name, who responded

[00:37:27] to Colleen's affection by cutting a pentagram into her chest with a box cutter. So what happened here is he had this young girl, Colleen, she comes up to study in the Job Corps here in Tennessee. She ends up being interested in this black man, Tadaryl, who was dating Krista Pike. They take her out to the woods. They stab her 300 times, put a six-inch gash into her neck, and then carve a pentagram into her. That is what landed

[00:37:56] Krista Pike on death row in Tennessee. Here in Tennessee, last week, she was scheduled to be executed. The Supreme Court authorized that execution to continue. So a couple of days ago, if you're listening live, she went into the room where executions take place. They gave her a lethal injection of pentobarbital, and

[00:38:25] she didn't die. She asked, is my arm supposed to feel this way? And the executioners were kind of looking around, flummoxed, and they gave her a second dose, a second lethal injection. injection. And she fell asleep and began to snore loudly. And after about 45 minutes of snoring, and after two doses of lethal injection, they called the ambulance, and now Krista Pike is in the

[00:38:54] hospital in Nashville on a ventilator. Now, what happened here? What happened here? Well, what happened here, best I can tell, is that the state granted her request to have a team of all-female executioners. You have these women coming in, and the first, best we can tell, the first lethal injection did not go into the vein, but rather her tissue. And to her muscles.

[00:39:23] And then the second one, I believe that they may have bent the needle, and it went into her bone. And then, nevertheless, it's the first time in the history of the death penalty that anything like this has happened. And so you just, you tie it all into the interracial murder and the social mixing that led to this death. I wonder what ever happened to Daryl. Well, Daryl is up for probation. Daryl did not get the death penalty. Daryl is up for, he may be getting out pretty soon.

[00:39:53] But, so this, all of that, Richard, I appreciate you giving me a wide runway there to set this up. But all of that, you have the interracial angle, the societal mixing of the races that led to this death. And now, I mean, there's a federal program that led to it. Exactly, Keith. And then now this incredible, unbelievable situation where you have an all, the team of all female executioners coming in and botching a lethal injection twice. Accidentally on purpose.

[00:40:22] Yeah, there is some, there is some concern that they may have botched it on purpose. But nevertheless, Krista is in a coma and on a ventilator. And who knows if she's going to live or not. And if she does, what will happen to her next? So all of that having been said, Richard, please, my friend, take it away. Well, I have two observations. One is, is that this happened in the 90s. And I point out in an essay called On the Scourge of White Women and Race Mixing, the taboo against miscegenation and miscegenation

[00:40:51] really went into overdrive in the 90s with rap music, with Uma Thurman's portrayal, Emile Wallace in Pulp Fiction, Carmen Electra, and so on and so forth. And people can talk about family, and family is important, but family is not an absolute protection against the cultural milieu that envelops us all. I mean, it's ingrained in us as much as English is our mother tongue. It's impossible. If somebody in the 90s has a teenage daughter, the only way

[00:41:19] to remove her from rap music, for example, would be to kidnap her and chain her up in a basement, which is obviously not a viable solution for any number of different reasons. So this is an extreme result of the cultural elements that had gone into overdrive in the 90s as I set forth in the essay On the Scourge of White Women and Race Mixing. The other comment is I'm somewhat revolutionary, if it

[00:41:48] were possible, and that I don't worship the Constitution. I think the Constitution has some good things about it, but I think there are many things that are arcane and obsolete, and it's like that meme from No Country for Old Men. You know, it said if this is the rule that brought you here of what good was the rule, if the Constitution brought us to this point of what use was the Constitution, the legal profession

[00:42:17] and how the Constitution has been interpreted, as well as certain just objective elements of the Constitution itself, are irredeemable. And I don't know how you do it, but you have to find a way to jettison this government and this style of government and come up with something new, because that the government, that the state cannot exact justice with swift carriage in a heinous case like this is a mockery. I mean, you could just execute this woman with, you know, a cop

[00:42:46] shoes in the back of the head and be done with it. But because of this obscene, unworkable government and system that we have, we're wasting our time with this. And so where does all that come from, Richard? It comes obviously from, you know, we had a pretty well-functioning legal section of department of our government until the end of World War Two when Jewish power and influence started. It was before that. It was before that. I know, but really it started with

[00:43:15] the Civil Rights Movement and things like that, that's when they, and the advent of lawfare, that's when it really hit. And that's, you know, again, everything tracks back to who we euphemistically call the usual suspects. Well, the problem is, is that there's that famous quote by Adam Smith that compassion for the guilty is cruelty to the innocent. And that's what is missed in all of this sort of thing, is that it, just that.

[00:43:43] Compassion for this Crystal Pike, I think her name is, is cruelty to the woman that she sadistically murdered with her blackie boyfriend and their relatives. I don't know. I suppose that some of the relatives have been contaminated by this delirium of, you know, like Reginald Denny saying that they should let the assailants to try to kill him go and that kind of thing. But I presume that the survivors of the victim would want some sort of justice. And the unwieldy legal system that we

[00:44:12] have in this nonsense about due process and an obscene interpretation of the Eighth Amendment and so on and so forth prevents that. Compassion for the guilty is cruelty to the innocent. Well, who do you think overpopulates the death penalty project and all the people that fight? Jewish lawyers and leftist, you know, whites who are in collusion with them. Absolutely. Well, you know, Richard, you just came, you just said something a moment ago. I mean, the fact that it took 30 years for Krista Pike to ever even get into

[00:44:41] the executioner's chair is is is 30 years too long when you're talking about a satanic, ritualistic, brutalistic murder. But I'll tell you, it's like Christmas has come early for all of the women who were supporting Lindsay Clancy. They don't know whether to defecate or go blind. Now they have two new heroines, Jane Doe at Cornell and Krista Pike. So this is a. They're going to have a Hall of Fame enshrined to them up there in the blue space somewhere. Who they're not championing, though,

[00:45:11] Richard, is Colleen, the murdered, the victim and her mother. You know, those are two women that would I'm sure like some support from other females, but they don't seem to be getting it. Well, one thing I've thought about in trying to think about how you could formulate a new criminal justice system is in the modern age, you have technology where you could devise a standard of proof that's above beyond a reasonable doubt because the concern with executing

[00:45:41] somebody or something like that is always the chance that somehow someone is convicted, you know, who is actually innocent. But with DNA evidence, when someone is caught red handed on video and there's no possible way that they could have faked that video and so on and so forth, it is possible to enunciate an even higher standard where it's not just guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It's beyond an even higher doubt, like except for Cartesian doubt, that kind of thing. This person is absolutely positively

[00:46:10] beyond all doubt, reasonable and otherwise guilty. If you could enunciate and devise that type of standard, you could streamline the meeting out of justice with swift carriage. And that's one way that you could solve this problem is by where things where, you know, yeah, the person's convicted beyond a reasonable doubt, but there's, you know, it's not at that higher standard. Then maybe, you know, be a little bit more careful with, you know,

[00:46:39] putting someone on death row or whatever. But when it reaches this level where unless if it's we're living in a simulation or something like that, there is no doubt reasonable or otherwise that this woman did this. It should happen, you know, basically after she's convicted, just, you know, very, very quickly within a matter of days at the most, it should be done and over with. So that's that. That's my thought on how I would reform things if I were dictator or whatever.

[00:47:07] Well, I am happy to have had you riding shotgun with us for these two stories. We're not quite out of rounds in the chamber yet, but I have thoroughly enjoyed this. I want to quickly remind everybody again, the Ravens called out substack.com. There, the course, the story we've been covering for the majority of this hour at Cornell is featured on the scourge of white women and race mixing, which if you hadn't have

[00:47:35] had that interest, you would certainly have so many more lives that would have been spared, including the one we're talking about now. And Krista Pike wouldn't be on death row and you wouldn't have had this execution. But, you know, go ahead, Richard. Even if you could solve the problem with black criminality and everything, it destroys the European phenotype. And the European phenotype is central to European identity and civilization. So I don't care if somehow blacks could be reformed from this sort of animalistic violence.

[00:48:04] Miscegenation and race mixing needs to be opposed as the existential threat to our identity and our civilization as defined by our race and by the collection of your phenotypes that define European peoples in the occident and the Anglosphere. No, I agree 100 percent. Now, yeah, that should go without saying, but I'm glad you mentioned it just in case anybody was misunderstanding. And you were on with us just a couple of weeks ago. Well, I guess earlier in September to on the anniversary of 9-11 for

[00:48:33] your another excellent piece, The Waving Woman in So Many of Us. And talking about the eerie specter as we're into the Halloween season now, this woman who stood there and waved until the building came down. We had a great conversation with you last week. 25 years of hard times. Well, it's been some. Yeah, it's been some. Keith, I just want to ask you, you're an attorney, you've been an attorney, a practicing attorney your entire adult life. I mean, what do you think about what happened up there at the prison when

[00:49:03] this execution was, how could they get it that wrong? I mean, a lot of heads are rolling now. Well, you know, they're rolling, but the more things change, the more they'll stay the same. What we need to understand is that one of the solutions to the racial warfare that we seem to be engaged in now was the criminal justice system. That was the way you divided the good blacks from the bad blacks.

[00:49:31] That's how, for example, if somebody, you know, did not commit crimes, they would not be molested or harassed. On the other hand, you had an objective standard, the criminal law, by which to judge people and determine whether they were a problem to society that needed to be corrected and put away, locked away in jail, or if they were not.

[00:49:59] And see, by subverting things like the criminal justice system and the legal system generally, the left has basically made us where we don't have any type of objective standard to resort to because they have now rewritten the criminal code in their favor. You have groups like the Death Penalty Project that work assiduously to prevent justice from being done.

[00:50:28] You know, and then getting back to our previous story, you have feminists and their legal cohort trying to tell us that standards of objectivity no longer apply when you're dealing with, you know, what is rape and what is not. So, see, that's what you basically have, you know, people warming their way into the criminal justice systems to the point that now people want to throw up their hands about the

[00:50:58] criminal justice system when basically that was supposed to be our safeguard for all of this. Well, and the left, if you had, I mean, if you look at how the uproar about this Krista Pike thing and you compare it with the inconsistency with the Black Jordan, the Lindsey Clancy thing, the only reason why this is embraced the way that it is is because of the identity of the convicted in this case being a woman who had some sort of sordid

[00:51:27] relationship with the black man. If someone on the right, supposed right, take the guy in New York with the subway. I mean, he was defending somebody who was being attacked and there was a lynch mob after him. No, not Bernard Goetz, the money fellow. I can't remember his name. Happened a year or two ago. They tried him for murder when he was defending somebody. He put someone in a chokehold because he doesn't serve the leftist agenda.

[00:51:56] They were out for blood for him. They were not talking about criminal rights and so on and so forth. So for the left, there's no intellectual consistency. There's no real reason to try to rationalize or discuss these things with them because they will do whatever advances and consolidates their power and advances their cause. They will inject racial partisanship into everything. Right. And sexual partisanship as well. As we see with the... We might need to do the former. Yeah.

[00:52:25] Actually, we should probably learn from him on at least one of those regards. Well, Richard, listen, it has been another fast hour with you and I so appreciate your well-informed commentary and your incredible delivery on these issues as a guest here on Talk Radio. Thank you so much. How about you? Oh, well, one other thing is my Twitter account is growing. It's at AsTheRavenCalls. At AsTheRavenCalls.

[00:52:54] Please follow me on Twitter. I was suspended for 12 hours for sharing a meme of somebody wiping his rear end with the Israeli flag. I don't make any apologies. But so, yeah, follow me on Twitter until I'm suspended for good. Hopefully that won't happen. But yeah, I'm on Twitter. I have some other writing ideas I'm really excited about. And I'm really glad that I had the chance to talk about this Jane Doe thing because too many on the so-called right, the conservative mainstream wing, have been too

[00:53:22] genteel about this sort of thing. And they haven't called a spade a spade. And they haven't denounced this unspeakable sexual depravity for what it is. And that's why they lose. And I'm not like that. I'm not conservative. I am hardcore reactionary. I'm a real right winger. I will call this Jane Doe woman for what she is. And I'll denounce it. And I don't care if anyone says that I'm victim blaming. And that's the difference between real hardcore right wingers like me and the milquetoast normie cons that are part of the mainstream.

[00:53:51] And if we had a just society, both the men and the women involved in this would be subject to punishment. Yep, absolutely. Ladies and gentlemen, Richard Parker. Richard, we will talk to you again, and I hope before the end of the year. The Ravens called on Substack.com. Great hour. Richard, thank you for taking the time to join us once again on a Saturday night. And we'll wrap up tonight's show. What a busy show it's been with Patrick Martin touching the global hotspots in

[00:54:22] France and Russia, Ukraine, Iran, and elsewhere in the first hour. Now Richard Parker with these two stories involving these women. And in the third hour, we're going to go to, I guess, making a first time appearance tonight. Doug Harrington and a controversy involving our friends at Amelope Publishing. What's going on there? You're going to have to stay tuned to find out. Thank you, Richard. We'll talk to you again soon. Stay tuned to everybody else for the next hour. Hit. Thank you.