[00:00:01] You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network and this is the Political Cesspool.
[00:00:13] The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist
[00:00:20] conservative radio program.
[00:00:22] And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host,
[00:00:27] James Edwards.
[00:00:28] Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to another live broadcast of TPC.
[00:00:34] I'm your host, James Edwards, along with Keith Alexander.
[00:00:37] It is Saturday evening, May the 4th.
[00:00:39] How quickly did the first four months of this year just fly by for us here?
[00:00:45] I can tell you after presenting back to back special series in March and April respectively,
[00:00:52] March Around the World, a Confederate History Month, it's back to business as usual
[00:00:56] tonight on TPC.
[00:00:58] It was very busy and exceedingly rewarding, Keith.
[00:01:01] The last two months of programming and now we'll be able to slip back into our standard
[00:01:06] fare although there's nothing standard about our average broadcasts.
[00:01:10] They're all exceptional and tonight will be no different because we've got a great
[00:01:13] lineup of guests beginning right now with David Zutty.
[00:01:16] He is back with us for the second time this year, the executive director of the
[00:01:20] Homeland Institute.
[00:01:22] And we're going to take a look at that fantastic organization's most recent poll.
[00:01:27] David, how are you tonight?
[00:01:30] I'm doing great.
[00:01:31] How are you?
[00:01:32] I am doing fine, my friend.
[00:01:33] I am happy to have you back on the program tonight to talk about the very unique and
[00:01:38] valuable work of the Homeland Institute.
[00:01:40] Now this is an organization that just got put together last year.
[00:01:45] The purpose of the Homeland Institute is to explore the negative effects of globalization
[00:01:49] and multiculturalism on historic homelands and to propose workable and humane alternatives.
[00:01:56] Now it's primarily an educational organization but the Homeland Institute is taking these
[00:02:01] findings, this scientific polling data that they are compiling and using it to propose
[00:02:06] alternative policies and legislation helping our cause better sharpen and present its
[00:02:11] message.
[00:02:12] Am I right about that, David?
[00:02:13] You're absolutely correct and the vision that I have for the Homeland Institute
[00:02:16] is that we are an alternate institution but we are doing mainstream things.
[00:02:20] That way we can take them to the mainstream, get respect and hopefully our findings will
[00:02:24] make their ways to the desks of several policy makers and make a difference.
[00:02:30] I want to talk a little bit more about that later this hour as we have this hour with
[00:02:36] you and after we sort through the findings of this most recent poll, how you intend
[00:02:41] to apply those findings but we'll first let Keith Alexander say hello as we're
[00:02:46] getting all settled in and saddled up tonight.
[00:02:48] Well David, I'm really looking forward to this show because natalism which I
[00:02:53] think is generally speaking the subject that we're going to discuss is the key
[00:02:59] to everything.
[00:03:00] We can get everything else that we want but if we don't increase white birth rates,
[00:03:06] stick a fork in us and we're done.
[00:03:07] And before David responds to that I would just say there's so many things going on
[00:03:11] in the world and we've been of course I don't want to say locked into certain
[00:03:16] topics over the last two months but as we have been conducting special series we
[00:03:20] certainly focus heavily on what's going on internationally with our international
[00:03:23] guests in March and taking to account our southern heritage and patrimony in April
[00:03:29] but and with everything going on, the secession of Baton Rouge, the campus
[00:03:35] riots, the anti-Semitism so-called anti-Semitism awareness act, Trump
[00:03:39] talking about the anti-white animus here in this country,
[00:03:43] Marjorie Taylor Greene, Mike Johnson.
[00:03:47] We're going to get to all of it tonight but really David you can talk
[00:03:50] about all of these issues you can even come up with workable solutions
[00:03:52] but if you don't have that foundational building block of
[00:03:55] civilization, if you don't have families, if you don't have a population to carry
[00:03:59] it on what's it matter?
[00:04:00] So I think-
[00:04:01] Well everything we've been talking about that you were just listing under
[00:04:04] James is anti-white in its basic animus.
[00:04:07] Well that's fine but at the same time again you can talk about all of
[00:04:12] these issues but if you're not going back to the cornerstone,
[00:04:17] if you don't have the people none of it matters so let's just start
[00:04:19] there David take it away and take your time.
[00:04:21] Right so history is not like a job.
[00:04:24] A lot of the job is just showing up.
[00:04:25] Well the same is for history.
[00:04:26] You need to actually show up which means you need to actually have people
[00:04:30] and so this whole poll was sparked originally by a article written
[00:04:36] by the BBC, yes their leftist but they had a very interesting
[00:04:39] article about South Korea of all places.
[00:04:42] Their birth rate is an atrocious 0.7 and what happened is that this
[00:04:48] sparked a huge discussion on the broader online right about why that is,
[00:04:53] what that means for us because this is kind of a comparison.
[00:04:56] South Korea is modern but they're not white,
[00:04:58] they're not west- well they've been westernized.
[00:05:01] They don't really seem to have a hostile elite like we do as
[00:05:04] we have in America but their birth rates are worse than ours.
[00:05:08] So that's disturbing.
[00:05:10] So I decided to- this is what the Holman Institute does.
[00:05:14] What we're going to do going forward is that we're going to try to match
[00:05:17] up our polls to current events so that they're more topical.
[00:05:20] We do have some perennial things we want to of course explore but we're-
[00:05:24] especially with this election season if we have the money,
[00:05:27] we want to poll on current events.
[00:05:29] For example our next poll is most likely this is not a promise but
[00:05:32] it's very likely it will be on specific policies to reduce
[00:05:36] immigration and maybe do some repatriation.
[00:05:39] Now of course we need money for that so if you'd like to go to our website
[00:05:43] and learn about how you can donate that's great.
[00:05:45] It is theholmaninstitute.org.
[00:05:48] My personal Twitter account is David Zutty.
[00:05:50] It's Z-S-U-T-T-Y.
[00:05:52] It's a very unusual name so it's easy to find me on Twitter if you get the
[00:05:55] spelling right but aside from that we're really matching this up to real
[00:05:59] life events and South Korea was disturbing, it was fascinating.
[00:06:03] And before I go any further I want to emphasize that this is not a case of
[00:06:08] friendly Southern California veteran attorney finds a way to save the west
[00:06:13] with this one easy solution.
[00:06:14] That's not what I found.
[00:06:16] So I think natalist policies are a way to mitigate, albeit not fix,
[00:06:21] low birth rates and it's important that we mitigate them at least.
[00:06:25] Because here's the big question.
[00:06:27] Yes, you need for a population to remain stable is 2.1 births per woman.
[00:06:33] Any less than that is going to shrink a little bit.
[00:06:35] Now is it shrinking a lot?
[00:06:36] A little, that depends but keep in mind Einstein he was right about one
[00:06:40] thing, compound interest is the strongest force in the universe.
[00:06:44] That includes populations too, not just interest on money.
[00:06:48] So these numbers compound over time like a 0.7 birth rate over two
[00:06:52] generations will completely destroy the population.
[00:06:54] It's like a bio weapon, it's truly disturbing.
[00:06:58] And so we need to mitigate this because what happens is that with
[00:07:01] highly low birth rates you get stuck into a vacuum what I call the
[00:07:04] demographic catastrophe where you have a basically a dictatorship of
[00:07:09] elderly, nothing against old people but if all the society is retiree,
[00:07:15] they're going to be focused on retirement not on the future.
[00:07:19] Especially if they don't have kids that connect them to the future.
[00:07:22] For example, AARP is one of the strongest lobbies in America right
[00:07:26] up there with APAC of all people.
[00:07:28] Now yes we want to take care of our elders but
[00:07:30] we need to also plan for the future.
[00:07:32] You also have low birth rates, always a call for migrant labor.
[00:07:36] Sometimes this is the point all along and it was very subversive.
[00:07:40] But even without say subversive forces who kind of wanted to tear down
[00:07:43] society from this get go with trying to reduce the birth rate.
[00:07:48] There's going to be a call for more workers just as a quick fix to get
[00:07:51] the GDP up and pay into the system and be caretakers.
[00:07:56] Even though in the long term and
[00:07:57] Ann Coulter makes a very strong argument about this in the long term,
[00:08:01] this is all bad.
[00:08:02] Immigration will cost more in the long term due to crime, social services,
[00:08:07] like the simulation in her book, Adios America.
[00:08:10] Which is very important so this is a quick fix and
[00:08:12] really you're just taxing the future, you're passing this on to your kids.
[00:08:16] So my question is if we can't get up to 2.1, can we get up to something?
[00:08:21] Can we get a little cushion so that we don't collapse into flight?
[00:08:24] South Korea which at this point is going to be I think just conquered by
[00:08:27] North Korea because they won't have enough warm bodies.
[00:08:30] Japan is very low too.
[00:08:32] I believe they're at, if I recall correctly, Japan is 1.1 or 1.2.
[00:08:36] My friend Christian Seekor, he's a January 6th patriot.
[00:08:39] He wrote an article on counter currents exploring it.
[00:08:41] Japan is also highly disturbing so I don't know what the magic number is where
[00:08:46] you're declining in your numbers but you're not headed towards a catastrophe.
[00:08:52] I want to have the biggest buffer as possible because if you get into
[00:08:55] that catastrophe it's hard to get out.
[00:08:58] Hungry is at 1.55, I'll talk about hungry later probably but
[00:09:02] you need something and we have to take action but-
[00:09:06] Well you know that's very interesting that you brought up hungry because they
[00:09:10] are supposedly doing everything right.
[00:09:12] They're basically giving couples a bounty for
[00:09:15] having more than two children for example.
[00:09:18] They're doing everything they can to increase the birth rate
[00:09:22] through government policy but it's not working.
[00:09:27] I am a boomer.
[00:09:30] Well see I've lived through all this.
[00:09:33] I'm a boomer.
[00:09:34] I grew up in the 50s then the 60s and I saw things tail off.
[00:09:39] I've got my own theories about why that is but you were talking about
[00:09:45] South Korea and their catastrophe.
[00:09:47] They're below one birth per couple.
[00:09:52] So what is the-
[00:09:56] What is the similarity between us and South Korea and what are the differences
[00:10:01] and how does that shed light on our dilemma in Western Europe and in America?
[00:10:08] Absolutely.
[00:10:09] In the rest of the Anglosphere.
[00:10:10] That's a good question.
[00:10:11] So first of all, Imperium Press did an article in response to
[00:10:15] the South Korea crisis too and their point was that what happened
[00:10:19] in South Korea is that liberalism came in and they had no cultural
[00:10:22] anti-biotics.
[00:10:24] Liberalism swept aside the old Confucius system and created
[00:10:28] an inverted system of values and we Westerners, for better or worse,
[00:10:32] we have been marinating in various forms of liberalism since
[00:10:35] the French Revolution.
[00:10:36] That was really when suffering began to go downhill according
[00:10:39] to Julius Evola and other thinkers.
[00:10:42] But we've been exposed to this.
[00:10:43] So it's like a population gets exposed to a disease.
[00:10:47] Well, we've been exposed to a mind virus.
[00:10:49] We no more anti-biotics.
[00:10:51] And then another big unknown of a quick point is human biodiversity.
[00:10:55] Asians might have a different genetic makeup so that might affect this too.
[00:10:59] Hold on right there, David.
[00:11:00] Pardon the interruption.
[00:11:01] We have to take a quick break.
[00:11:02] Hey there, TPC family.
[00:11:03] This is James Edwards, your host of the Political Sass Pull.
[00:11:07] Folks, I want you to subscribe to the American Free Press,
[00:11:11] America's last real newspaper against all odds AFP has and
[00:11:16] continues to publish a populist independent print newspaper with an
[00:11:20] unparalleled track record.
[00:11:21] Founded by a dedicated group of experienced patriots, AFP pulls no
[00:11:26] punches and tackles the most controversial and pressing issues
[00:11:29] facing America from an America first perspective.
[00:11:33] I've worked with the American Free Press since even before
[00:11:36] the beginning of TPC.
[00:11:37] Now that's something.
[00:11:39] You can subscribe to the print edition by visiting
[00:11:41] americanfreepress.net today or simply pick up a handy digital
[00:11:46] edition subscription.
[00:11:47] However you do it, subscribe to the American Free Press,
[00:11:50] America's last real newspaper by visiting americanfreepress.net
[00:11:55] or by calling 1-886-99-NEWS, americanfreepress.net.
[00:12:01] The spirit of the American West is alive and well in Range magazine.
[00:12:05] The award winning quarterly devoted to the issues of the American West.
[00:12:10] Each issue contains informative articles, breathtaking imagery,
[00:12:14] as well as the culture of cowboy spirit today and gift ideas like
[00:12:19] this year's buckaroo calendar.
[00:12:21] Order online from rangemagazine.com.
[00:12:24] Loving Liberty Network salutes the spirit of the American West
[00:12:29] at rangemagazine.com.
[00:12:31] I think that my family has always had a big influence on me for
[00:12:34] not smoking because since I was little I was taught that
[00:12:37] smoking was wrong.
[00:12:38] Recent studies indicate that smoking among teens often leads to
[00:12:42] the use of alcohol and other drugs.
[00:12:44] I think having faith in God is a big part in it because the way
[00:12:49] I was raised has helped to avoid smoking.
[00:12:52] Smoking, if you think you're old enough to start,
[00:12:55] you're smart enough to stop.
[00:12:56] A public service message from this station and the Church of
[00:12:59] Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
[00:13:17] Back now we are with David Zutty of the Homeland Institute.
[00:13:20] I'm very high on the Homeland Institute and I'm very high on
[00:13:23] their executive director, Mr. Zutty, who I had the
[00:13:25] opportunity to spend a couple of days with last year and get to
[00:13:29] know him better.
[00:13:29] And you can get to know the organization better at
[00:13:32] homelandinstitute.org.
[00:13:34] The work they're doing, nobody else is doing.
[00:13:36] Keith, you asked a great question.
[00:13:38] David gave an equally fine answer that he slipped in
[00:13:40] right before the break.
[00:13:41] I would mention I heard an American Free Press ad in the
[00:13:44] package there that first segment.
[00:13:45] I had done an interview not too long ago with Virginia
[00:13:48] Abernathy about the topic of immigration for the American
[00:13:51] Free Press and of course the topic of cheap labor came up
[00:13:56] because there's a labor shortage, of course, to which
[00:13:59] she quite rightly pointed out.
[00:14:00] There's not a labor shortage.
[00:14:01] There's a shortage of slave labor or cheap labor.
[00:14:05] And I said, you know, wouldn't it just be less
[00:14:09] expensive to incentivize existing American families to
[00:14:15] have more children than to bring in?
[00:14:17] And of course, David, that was something you were
[00:14:19] touching on.
[00:14:19] And I know that that's something that your poll
[00:14:22] touched on as well very quickly, Keith.
[00:14:24] You got to turn that mic on though.
[00:14:26] What we're missing, though, with that type of analysis is
[00:14:29] the 800 pound gorilla on these living room sofa, which
[00:14:32] is that we want to increase white birth rates.
[00:14:36] They already have plenty of incentives out there to
[00:14:38] increase black and other non-white birth rates.
[00:14:43] But the problem in America is that if we want to have
[00:14:46] that leave it to be the world of the 50s that was so
[00:14:51] competent and so functioning.
[00:14:54] The housing days.
[00:14:55] Yeah, the housing days.
[00:14:57] We're going to have to find something to kickstart white
[00:15:00] birth rates specifically.
[00:15:02] Well, and I think David touched on it
[00:15:03] right before the break.
[00:15:04] And that is, of course, when you upset people's
[00:15:07] nesting grounds and you fill them with contempt for
[00:15:11] themselves, I mean, that's going to play a
[00:15:12] role in it as well.
[00:15:14] Right.
[00:15:14] It's not just like policies or money.
[00:15:16] I think money was a huge driving force here.
[00:15:20] For example, the inability to afford a family on a single
[00:15:23] income was a huge issue for our pollsters.
[00:15:25] But this is very, very true.
[00:15:27] There's a lot of other issues like feminism,
[00:15:30] immigration, urbanization.
[00:15:32] Urbanization is another thing.
[00:15:34] It's something we have in common with South Korea.
[00:15:35] South Korea is highly, highly urbanized.
[00:15:37] They're all packed into seal, which makes them a good
[00:15:40] target for artillery.
[00:15:41] I wouldn't do that.
[00:15:43] But it's another thing, too.
[00:15:45] This always happens in every society.
[00:15:47] It isn't just modern.
[00:15:48] It happened in ancient Rome, ancient China.
[00:15:51] This is something that Oswald Spengler observed in his
[00:15:54] Decline the West.
[00:15:54] Urbanization tends to drive this.
[00:15:57] And he also had other ideas about low birth rates being
[00:16:00] driven by civilization and injury and winter.
[00:16:02] Now those are huge global perennial topics.
[00:16:06] They're outside of discrete policies.
[00:16:08] But yes, there is these awkward questions also about
[00:16:12] who does this affect?
[00:16:12] So I'm going to start with the first question I asked, which
[00:16:15] is about, now I only polled white Americans.
[00:16:19] However, I did break it down my party line.
[00:16:22] And what's interesting amongst white
[00:16:25] respondents, Republicans are going to have a lot of kids
[00:16:28] already.
[00:16:29] Ask them, how many children do you already have or plan
[00:16:31] on having?
[00:16:32] Along with, how many would you have if you could have
[00:16:34] as many as you could?
[00:16:35] Republicans are going to have the most kids overall.
[00:16:38] And they also would have even way more kids if they
[00:16:41] could have as many as they could.
[00:16:43] And this kind of ties into how Edward Dutton has discussed
[00:16:46] that there is a very strong biological component
[00:16:48] to politics.
[00:16:50] People who are naturally pro-Natal
[00:16:51] are going to outbid those who are not, I think,
[00:16:53] in the long term.
[00:16:54] But we cannot rely upon that.
[00:16:55] I'll probably touch on that later just because the stakes
[00:16:58] are so high.
[00:16:58] But that's why I'm going to skip ahead
[00:17:02] to some of the later questions about these specific
[00:17:05] policies.
[00:17:06] So the policy that was a cornerstone of Hungary was a
[00:17:09] You have a lump sum, that's correct.
[00:17:12] And I did ask about a lump sum of $10,000.
[00:17:14] But the most popular policy when I asked,
[00:17:17] what is the single most policy that would most likely induce
[00:17:21] you to have children?
[00:17:22] It was across the board an income tax break,
[00:17:26] which is good because this will really only benefit
[00:17:29] people who are already productive
[00:17:31] and they'll tend to be white.
[00:17:32] We cannot explicitly target white people
[00:17:34] unless, say, we have a national divorce that leads
[00:17:37] to a new constitutional convention or a case law
[00:17:39] is burned up, overturned.
[00:17:40] That's not going to happen anytime soon.
[00:17:42] So we have to work with the system,
[00:17:44] whether we like it or not.
[00:17:46] And an income tax break would probably,
[00:17:48] by helping productive people, you're basically
[00:17:50] helping whites.
[00:17:52] Black people, if you look at the average financial impact
[00:17:57] of whites, Hispanics, and blacks
[00:18:00] on the budget over their lifetime,
[00:18:03] Hispanics are a net negative, blacks
[00:18:05] are a huge net negative, and whites are a positive.
[00:18:08] So who's paying income taxes?
[00:18:09] It's going to be white families.
[00:18:11] I'm not sure if maybe our respondents are thinking about,
[00:18:13] I don't want to start another welfare program.
[00:18:16] For example, a lump sum of $10,000,
[00:18:18] that might work in Hungary because you only have,
[00:18:23] it's a very homogeneous society.
[00:18:25] Not an issue in Poland.
[00:18:27] They tried $150 a month.
[00:18:28] That actually didn't work.
[00:18:29] I don't recommend it, although it
[00:18:31] was good for fighting childhood poverty in Poland.
[00:18:35] But also, it would just be abusing America
[00:18:37] as another welfare system.
[00:18:38] But the graduated income tax break,
[00:18:40] where the income tax break I proposed
[00:18:43] was 50% for parents to have two children, 100% income tax
[00:18:47] break for their whole life worth three or more.
[00:18:49] Of course, we won't put a ceiling on that.
[00:18:51] We're not going to allow a someone who
[00:18:54] makes a billion dollars a year get to write all that off
[00:18:56] just because they have three kids.
[00:18:57] But for a middle class family,
[00:18:59] they'd be like upper ceiling of $100,000 or something.
[00:19:02] And that's what they wanted, and it worked in Hungary.
[00:19:05] This was a flagship policy in 2011
[00:19:08] as part of a suite of other policies.
[00:19:12] And their birthrate rose by over 0.3.
[00:19:16] That is huge because they were at 1.2, I believe,
[00:19:19] or something.
[00:19:20] They were going to go extinct.
[00:19:21] They were like Japan.
[00:19:22] Are they at replacement level?
[00:19:23] No, but they're at a decline that I think can be managed.
[00:19:27] And anyone who's gone to Eastern Europe
[00:19:29] sees that these policies work.
[00:19:30] I've kind of went on vacation there
[00:19:32] and it looks beautiful.
[00:19:33] You see happy, normal families like we used to have
[00:19:36] in America in the 90s and night and day.
[00:19:37] These policies do work.
[00:19:39] And Hungary proves that it can't be done.
[00:19:41] And this is another huge thing that Hungary proves too.
[00:19:45] The abortion rate between 2011 when these policies were first
[00:19:48] enacted in 2021 dropped precipitously by 41%.
[00:19:54] And this is hugely important because for any
[00:19:56] of these policies, we might say, well,
[00:19:58] this work in theory.
[00:20:00] If it can't be passed, it's not important.
[00:20:03] So we have to look at elictroviability.
[00:20:05] And I asked about that too in the poll.
[00:20:07] And this is huge because after the Supreme Court overturned
[00:20:10] Roe versus Wade in the summer of 2022,
[00:20:13] abortion became a hot topic again.
[00:20:16] And I do not like abortion personally,
[00:20:19] even though it tends to be only disgenic people who
[00:20:21] use it.
[00:20:22] But it's one of those things where
[00:20:24] it tends to galvanize the left.
[00:20:25] And so this might be a creative solution
[00:20:28] where we can be pro-life without necessarily triggering
[00:20:32] the liberals.
[00:20:32] They're not going to like this policy at all.
[00:20:34] There's something about Democrats about natalism
[00:20:36] that just triggers them.
[00:20:37] They don't like babies or something.
[00:20:39] The Democrats were very much negative nancies
[00:20:43] about all this in the poll.
[00:20:44] Yeah, David, this is Keith.
[00:20:46] Let me jump in at this point.
[00:20:50] Having lived through the 50s where families with six children
[00:20:54] were not unusual at all, and if you didn't have at least
[00:20:58] two children, people wanted to know what was wrong with you.
[00:21:00] You had to be married and you had
[00:21:02] to have at least two children to just fit in in society.
[00:21:07] I think that it gets down to this basic question.
[00:21:12] If people, if the parents of people having children,
[00:21:14] think that their children will have a better future
[00:21:19] than they have or at least as good, they have children.
[00:21:23] If they think there's declining prospects
[00:21:26] for their children to either do better than them
[00:21:29] or even do as well as that, if they think that basically
[00:21:31] their standard of living is going down,
[00:21:33] they don't have children.
[00:21:35] Now, black people see their prospects going up,
[00:21:39] so they're having plenty of children.
[00:21:41] People that come into the country.
[00:21:44] Yeah, sorry to interrupt you.
[00:21:46] It's also, caverses are a reproductive strategy
[00:21:48] where whites are more quality over quantity,
[00:21:51] blacks are more quantity over quality,
[00:21:53] and therefore they're going to reproduce more regardless.
[00:21:57] Whites are much more sensitive.
[00:21:58] Well, same thing for the illegal immigrants.
[00:22:01] They think that their children are
[00:22:03] going to have it better by living in America
[00:22:05] than they were, so they're having plenty of children.
[00:22:08] The people that are not having plenty of children
[00:22:10] are the whites who see, it's
[00:22:13] been ever since Brown versus Board of Education,
[00:22:15] when they put that tremendous expense on white families
[00:22:18] of having to either throw their children
[00:22:21] into the black hole of Calcutta,
[00:22:23] which is what the public schools had become after Brown,
[00:22:26] or paying for private school.
[00:22:30] They just result that what they did was
[00:22:33] they had fewer children and furthermore,
[00:22:36] don't just say that the abortionists
[00:22:39] or the people that had abortions were dysgenic.
[00:22:43] Basically, I'm sure there are a lot of parents
[00:22:45] that said, you know, I can afford to send
[00:22:46] three children to private school,
[00:22:48] but fourth will capsize the boat.
[00:22:50] So I just can't have another child.
[00:22:52] I think that the economic reality certainly factored in.
[00:22:55] I'm sure David wouldn't disagree with that.
[00:22:57] And then also, as David mentioned before,
[00:22:59] so many whites have become drunk
[00:23:01] on this liberal mind virus,
[00:23:02] whereas blacks have been affirmed
[00:23:04] as a culture worthy of preservation
[00:23:07] and so on and so forth.
[00:23:08] They're getting all the government jobs,
[00:23:09] which are, you know, you're not troubled
[00:23:12] with pesky concepts like productivity and profitability.
[00:23:15] You've just got a job and a paycheck
[00:23:17] and just about, if you're in an all
[00:23:20] or a majority black city, almost every government job
[00:23:23] is going to black people.
[00:23:24] So, you know, they don't have to worry
[00:23:27] about productivity and profitability,
[00:23:29] but they are getting good jobs
[00:23:30] so they see their prospects improving
[00:23:34] there for more children.
[00:23:35] I'm sure without question,
[00:23:36] it's all of that and more.
[00:23:37] But David, we have about a minute
[00:23:39] before our next break and it's yours.
[00:23:41] Yeah, so one of the other things you found
[00:23:43] was that a minor factor was the ripple,
[00:23:46] there is a ripple effect
[00:23:47] because one of the factors I asked about
[00:23:49] was what would happen if your friends had more children.
[00:23:53] And going back to what you said about the 50s
[00:23:55] and how it was affected by six,
[00:23:56] two to six was like the norm.
[00:23:58] There was not a huge amount,
[00:24:01] but there was an amount that said
[00:24:02] that that would actually influence them to have children.
[00:24:05] Was that their first,
[00:24:06] I also asked what was the first most likely,
[00:24:07] second most likely, third most likely?
[00:24:10] No, but before that I asked them
[00:24:11] to rate on a scale of one to five.
[00:24:14] And a lot of people picked four to five for that.
[00:24:18] It wasn't a lot, it wasn't compared to the other ones,
[00:24:20] it wasn't a lot, but it was overall a lot.
[00:24:22] And that shows that there is,
[00:24:24] they admitted that they're open to peer pressure
[00:24:27] and the ones who actually are open to peer pressure
[00:24:29] it's probably more than the ones
[00:24:30] who think that they are.
[00:24:31] So that's very optimistic if we can jumpstart this.
[00:24:34] Coming up on a break,
[00:24:36] we're gonna pick up right there
[00:24:37] and I'm gonna reiterate the importance
[00:24:39] of this interview and of this poll
[00:24:41] conducted by the Homeland Institute.
[00:24:43] With David Zeddi right after this,
[00:24:45] stay tuned, don't forget.
[00:24:52] Proclaiming liberty across the land.
[00:24:55] You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
[00:25:03] USA News, I'm Jen Gelber.
[00:25:05] Donald Trump has criticized
[00:25:07] the New York District Attorney
[00:25:08] for focusing on his hush money criminal trial,
[00:25:10] calling it a waste of time.
[00:25:12] Trump spoke after the trial recessed on Friday,
[00:25:14] stating that while crime is rampant in the city,
[00:25:17] the DA has chosen to target him
[00:25:19] and his company instead.
[00:25:21] They shouldn't be wasting time on this.
[00:25:23] Look what they did to so many people.
[00:25:25] They're all lawyered up, that's all they do, lawyer up.
[00:25:29] In the meantime, you can't do anything in the country.
[00:25:31] The country's going to hell.
[00:25:33] During Friday's testimony,
[00:25:34] his former press secretary revealed
[00:25:36] that the 2016 campaign team entered crisis mode
[00:25:40] following the release of the infamous Access Hollywood tape
[00:25:43] in which Trump boasted about grabbing women's genitals.
[00:25:46] On the witness stand,
[00:25:47] Opex stated that Trump initially told her
[00:25:50] that doesn't sound like something I would say.
[00:25:52] The Justice Department has indicted Texas Democrat
[00:25:55] Henry Cuellar and his wife charging the pair
[00:25:58] with bribery and money laundering
[00:26:00] related to their ties with a bank in Mexico
[00:26:02] and an oil and gas company controlled by Azerbaijan.
[00:26:06] If convicted, they could spend years
[00:26:07] or even decades in prison.
[00:26:09] Cuellar denied any wrongdoing
[00:26:11] and vowed to run for reelection
[00:26:13] for his Texas seat in November.
[00:26:16] The nation's employers pulled back on their hiring
[00:26:19] but still added a decent 175,000 jobs
[00:26:22] in a sign that persistently high interest rates
[00:26:25] may be starting to slow the robust US job market.
[00:26:28] Friday's government report showed
[00:26:29] that last month's hiring gain was down sharply
[00:26:32] from the blockbuster increase of 315,000 in March
[00:26:36] and it was well below the 233,000 gain
[00:26:40] that economists had predicted for April.
[00:26:42] The state of the economy is weighing on voters' minds
[00:26:45] as the November presidential campaign intensifies.
[00:26:48] Despite the strength of the job market,
[00:26:49] Americans remain generally exasperated by high prices
[00:26:53] and many of them assign blame to President Joe Biden.
[00:26:57] This is USA News.
[00:27:00] You've been working hard,
[00:27:01] doing the right thing and paying your taxes
[00:27:03] and putting your hard-earned money
[00:27:05] in the Medicare piggy bank all your life.
[00:27:08] And now it's time to break the piggy bank
[00:27:10] and get something back.
[00:27:12] Medicare.
[00:27:13] If you didn't know it,
[00:27:13] Medicare is health insurance for people over 65
[00:27:17] and you paid for it with your tax dollars.
[00:27:19] Medicare plans now have more benefits than ever.
[00:27:22] That's good news,
[00:27:23] especially if you're like me
[00:27:25] and looking forward to paying as little as possible
[00:27:27] for good health insurance.
[00:27:29] Call and find out what Medicare plan is best for you.
[00:27:32] Save your time.
[00:27:33] It's valuable.
[00:27:33] We've already done the research for you
[00:27:35] and in one quick phone call,
[00:27:37] you can learn how to get the best Medicare plan
[00:27:39] designed exactly for you.
[00:27:41] Hey, it's one of the most important decisions
[00:27:43] in your life.
[00:27:44] Let us help you through it.
[00:27:45] Here's our number.
[00:27:46] Call 65 plus Medicare now.
[00:27:47] 800-778-8214.
[00:27:52] 800-778-8214.
[00:27:55] That's 800-778-8214.
[00:28:01] Hello TPC family, it's James
[00:28:02] and I've got to tell you that I sleep better at night
[00:28:04] knowing that there are organizations
[00:28:06] like the Conservative Citizens Foundation.
[00:28:09] The purpose of the Conservative Citizens Foundation
[00:28:11] is to promote the principles of limited government,
[00:28:13] individual liberty, equality before the law,
[00:28:16] property rights, law and order,
[00:28:17] judicial restraint and state's rights
[00:28:20] while at the same time,
[00:28:21] exploring the dangers posed by liberalism
[00:28:24] to our national interests and cultural institutions.
[00:28:27] The Conservative Citizens Foundation
[00:28:29] also seeks to educate the public
[00:28:31] on the dangers of extremist ideologies
[00:28:33] like critical race theory and cultural Marxism.
[00:28:36] I've worked with the good people
[00:28:38] at the Conservative Citizens Foundation for many years
[00:28:41] and their work comes with my complete endorsement.
[00:28:43] For more information and to keep up
[00:28:45] with all the latest conservative news headlines,
[00:28:48] please check out their website, AmericaFirst.com.
[00:28:51] That's M-E-R-I-C-A-1-S-T.com, AmericaFirst.com.
[00:29:00] Hey friends, James Edwards here again
[00:29:01] to remind you that Antelope Hill Publishing
[00:29:03] is America's premier provider of dissident literature.
[00:29:07] They print books that mainstream publishers
[00:29:08] are too afraid to touch,
[00:29:10] providing you with information you need
[00:29:12] to challenge the status quo.
[00:29:14] Whether your interest includes
[00:29:15] contemporary dissident politics,
[00:29:17] history that would otherwise be censored or slandered,
[00:29:20] philosophy or exciting and thought provoking fiction,
[00:29:23] you'll find plenty to love in the Antelope Hill catalog
[00:29:26] which includes books such as Generation 68,
[00:29:29] The Elite Revolution and its legacy
[00:29:31] about the elite driven cultural revolution of the 1960s
[00:29:34] which transformed America.
[00:29:36] Why the on the moon about the demise
[00:29:38] of the space program due to diversity,
[00:29:40] The Sword of Christ which argues for restoring Christianity
[00:29:43] as the foundation of the West
[00:29:45] and combating heresies like Christian Zionism,
[00:29:47] speeches by Mussolini and other historical figures
[00:29:50] and much more.
[00:29:51] With new titles added every month,
[00:29:53] there's no doubt that they have something for everyone
[00:29:55] so check out their catalog today
[00:29:57] at AntelopeHillPublishing.com.
[00:30:16] Ladies and gentlemen, continuing to sort through
[00:30:18] the findings of the Homeland Institute's most recent poll
[00:30:22] with its executive director, David Zutty
[00:30:25] as we just tonight for the first time
[00:30:27] since February the 26th slip back into a typical show.
[00:30:33] One not part of a special series
[00:30:37] and again I'll reiterate the point,
[00:30:40] there's so much that we could be talking about
[00:30:43] this hour and so much we will talk about.
[00:30:45] We're gonna cover everything in the news
[00:30:47] and in the headlines and in the current events,
[00:30:49] everything that you want us to talk about tonight
[00:30:52] over the course of the next two hours.
[00:30:53] At least I think we're gonna cover it all.
[00:30:55] But again, if you don't have a strong
[00:30:58] and healthy civilization that is replicating itself,
[00:31:01] what's it matter?
[00:31:02] If you keep that in mind.
[00:31:03] In other words, if you just don't have it,
[00:31:05] if you don't have white people reproducing
[00:31:07] in sufficient numbers,
[00:31:09] it doesn't matter what the laws are,
[00:31:11] what the policies of the government are,
[00:31:13] you're still going down the tubes.
[00:31:13] And that's why this poll is important
[00:31:16] because again these are scientific polls
[00:31:20] pulling hard data.
[00:31:21] This isn't David satisfying his confirmation bias.
[00:31:24] And you need to poll to better understand,
[00:31:27] first of all why our birth rates are where they are
[00:31:31] and what policies could be implemented
[00:31:34] that could reverse these destructive trends.
[00:31:36] That's exactly the purpose of the Homeland Institute
[00:31:38] to better understand these questions
[00:31:40] so we can better provide solutions.
[00:31:42] And I'm just gonna read very quickly David
[00:31:44] from the preface of this poll.
[00:31:46] You can read along folks
[00:31:48] and check out the questions and the data for yourself
[00:31:51] at homelandinstitute.org.
[00:31:53] Just go to their poll page, their poll tab.
[00:31:57] But I'll just read very quickly the preface.
[00:31:58] In February of 2024, a BBC article
[00:32:01] about South Korea's catastrophically low birth rate
[00:32:03] sparked a broad discussion about what exactly
[00:32:06] is driving low birth rates across so many countries.
[00:32:09] Birth rates substantially lower
[00:32:10] than 2.1 births per woman are dangerous
[00:32:13] because a rapidly dwindling population often leads
[00:32:17] to calls for immigration as a quick fix
[00:32:19] instead of addressing the underlying problems.
[00:32:21] This is a perilous because immigration oftentimes escalate
[00:32:25] to such an extent that it begins
[00:32:27] to replace the native population,
[00:32:29] which is of course what's happening here.
[00:32:30] And by design I might add however,
[00:32:32] while ironically exacerbating many of the issues
[00:32:35] that led to low birth rates to begin with.
[00:32:37] And when these immigrants come in,
[00:32:40] they see better prospects for their children
[00:32:42] so they have a very high birth rate
[00:32:45] compared to whites who comparatively speaking
[00:32:47] see their children with fewer and less prospects
[00:32:53] than they have.
[00:32:54] And to that point, such a high cost of...
[00:32:57] I'm sorry, Andrew.
[00:32:58] If we also did it, when you said like intentionally,
[00:33:00] we also, one of our earliest polls from last year
[00:33:02] was on the Great Replacement.
[00:33:03] So if you go to our website, click on the polls
[00:33:06] and scroll down, you'll find that poll
[00:33:08] on the Great Replacement
[00:33:09] and we will most likely be repeating that poll this year
[00:33:12] to track progress in the public mind on that issue.
[00:33:16] A follow up, now that is very interesting
[00:33:18] to follow up on a poll that you've already done.
[00:33:21] We will certainly talk more about that
[00:33:23] when that time comes,
[00:33:24] but just to very quickly wrap up this
[00:33:26] from the preface,
[00:33:27] talking about why the birth rates are where they are,
[00:33:30] high cost of living, especially for housing
[00:33:32] combined with lower wages
[00:33:33] and a hyper-competitive labor market
[00:33:35] that prompted the Homeland Institute to explore
[00:33:37] which pro-natalist policies,
[00:33:39] this is what we're talking about this hour,
[00:33:40] would best ameliorate America's low birth rates
[00:33:43] along with which ones would be the most electrically viable
[00:33:46] and more importantly, to what extent can low birth rates
[00:33:49] be solved by state intervention at all?
[00:33:51] So these are all the questions that is difficult
[00:33:54] to get into something so in depth
[00:33:56] in an hour of commercial talk radio,
[00:33:58] even with the full hour.
[00:33:59] But the Homeland Institute polled 779 respondents
[00:34:04] characteristic of white Americans aged 18 through 35,
[00:34:08] 5.6 of the respondents were registered voters,
[00:34:11] 14.4% were unregistered,
[00:34:12] the poll has a margin of error of plus minus 3%
[00:34:15] and it was conducted in the first two weeks of April.
[00:34:18] So that's the foundation,
[00:34:20] that's what we're talking about this hour,
[00:34:21] that resets everything for the last half
[00:34:24] of this interview, David, it's back to you.
[00:34:27] Right, so this is important because we need to solve this
[00:34:31] and if you look at the birth rates right now,
[00:34:34] they are projected to be extremely low,
[00:34:39] but if the people I polled could have
[00:34:40] as many children as they could,
[00:34:42] the birth rate would be at 2.0 for all white America,
[00:34:45] almost at replacement level.
[00:34:47] For white Republicans it would be over that at 2.3
[00:34:51] or 2.5 something which is huge.
[00:34:53] So this isn't just a lack of interest,
[00:34:56] that's mostly driven by Democrats
[00:34:58] who just have very, very strong anti-Nielsen tendencies
[00:35:01] and it came out when I explored electoral viability,
[00:35:04] Democrats are just vehemently opposed to this
[00:35:06] for whatever reason and that does kind of go
[00:35:08] to Edward Dutton's ideas about politics being biological,
[00:35:13] I don't get it, it's like, you dislike babies,
[00:35:15] that's like you dislike sunshine and puppies
[00:35:17] or something wrong with you.
[00:35:19] But, independents and Republicans,
[00:35:22] so I asked them to say if they were strongly opposed,
[00:35:26] a little opposed in the middle,
[00:35:27] didn't care, in favor of strongly,
[00:35:30] a little bit in strongly and there were more people
[00:35:32] among independents and Republicans
[00:35:35] who were more, at least a little bit more in favor
[00:35:38] to some degree of NATO's policies and opposed.
[00:35:41] So that's big because these nasty angry Democrat voters
[00:35:44] who don't like kids and scowl and wear masks probably,
[00:35:47] their votes aren't in the cards to begin with
[00:35:48] for a populist Republican candidate.
[00:35:51] But Republicans, absolutely yes, even more independents,
[00:35:54] that's good to get independence
[00:35:55] and I also usually I stick to pulling registered voters
[00:35:59] but this time I included some unregistered ones
[00:36:01] to check out how they're doing
[00:36:02] and what's interesting is yes,
[00:36:04] they also were like the Democrats,
[00:36:06] very hostile towards supporting NATO's policies
[00:36:10] but they can't vote any less than they already do.
[00:36:13] They already stay home and you might say
[00:36:15] this might trigger them to get involved
[00:36:17] and vote against a candidate, that's not likely
[00:36:19] simply because there are so many hot topics out there
[00:36:22] that could trigger them into registering Democrat
[00:36:25] and voting that hasn't happened yet.
[00:36:27] If orange man can't trigger them
[00:36:29] to get off the sofa and vote, I don't know what will.
[00:36:31] Let me say this, David.
[00:36:34] David, let me just say this in regard to
[00:36:36] how the Democrats got to have
[00:36:38] the anti-NATOist position they did.
[00:36:41] It's called the sexual revolution, happened in the 60s.
[00:36:45] Sex was no longer for the purpose
[00:36:47] of creating a new generation, it was fun.
[00:36:49] It was no longer procreation, it was recreation
[00:36:53] and that's how and they came up with all these ways
[00:36:56] to prevent having sex to result in a child's being born.
[00:37:06] They bought into that, I don't think that a lot
[00:37:08] of the rest of the white population,
[00:37:10] the conservative population ever did.
[00:37:12] Well, this isn't a side but I've wondered
[00:37:16] if when extrapolated this culture of death
[00:37:19] that has been adopted by the left,
[00:37:21] if at some point in the future the tides don't turn
[00:37:24] where fundamentalists re-inherit the earth
[00:37:26] and I'm talking about not only Christian fundamentalists
[00:37:28] but Muslims as well.
[00:37:29] I mean, that's something to think about
[00:37:30] but that's not necessarily,
[00:37:31] well, I guess it's tangential
[00:37:32] to the conversation right now, David.
[00:37:34] Well, Keith, actually Keith Woods today
[00:37:36] actually he posted an article on Telegram
[00:37:39] in his sub stack about that very issue
[00:37:40] about what will happen with birth rates
[00:37:42] kind of spring boarding off of Ever Dutton's opinion
[00:37:45] that it's biological.
[00:37:47] That's, I think that could happen, that's good
[00:37:50] but I don't wanna rely upon it happening naturally
[00:37:52] and I wanna have pro-NATOist policies
[00:37:54] to give us a cushion so that we don't go
[00:37:55] into that death spiral I talked about earlier
[00:37:57] where you just go into this demographic catastrophe
[00:38:01] of dictatorship of the elderly,
[00:38:04] calls for mass immigration as a quick fix
[00:38:06] which is actually just gonna make it worse
[00:38:08] in the longterm and Japan is very scuffed.
[00:38:12] Like Christian Seacroft's article
[00:38:13] talked about this otaku issue in Japan.
[00:38:15] We have like adult man children living
[00:38:17] with their elderly parents
[00:38:18] and it's just, we wanna avoid that.
[00:38:20] We wanna like Hungary might've been headed that way
[00:38:22] when they got up to 1.5, 1.55 I believe or 1.6.
[00:38:27] But it's true, I think there will be a huge turnaround
[00:38:32] because if people could have as many children
[00:38:34] as they could in the poll, it was 2.0
[00:38:37] and Republicans were going to replace the liberals
[00:38:40] slightly over time generally.
[00:38:42] So that would be good, I hate to say this
[00:38:44] but white genocide at some extent
[00:38:46] it's also liberal genocide.
[00:38:48] They're destroying themselves, this is like,
[00:38:50] I know it's a little odd reference
[00:38:52] if people don't know but it's like the Cthulhu cult.
[00:38:55] Cthulhu is this monster that devours
[00:38:57] his most loyal followers first.
[00:38:59] That's like liberalism,
[00:39:00] the people who really drink this Kool-Aid and chug it
[00:39:02] they go extinct.
[00:39:05] Well see that's what we were talking about David
[00:39:07] with the- Very interesting and a great point.
[00:39:10] The situation is that we do not have less sex now
[00:39:14] than we had in the 50s, if anything we have more
[00:39:16] but we are having less reproductive sex.
[00:39:20] And also regarding the age issue,
[00:39:23] I think that something you ought to consider is that
[00:39:25] menopause is a misnomer.
[00:39:28] It ought to be called womenopause
[00:39:29] because women are the ones that can't reproduce
[00:39:32] as they get older.
[00:39:34] Men can reproduce as long as they're otherwise healthy
[00:39:37] up to the end.
[00:39:39] So consequently we ought to look into the possibility
[00:39:43] of men who have lost their wives
[00:39:46] one reason or another older
[00:39:48] but they have the income and the prospects
[00:39:51] for having more children.
[00:39:52] Our good friend exhibit A Peter Bremolo
[00:39:55] with two fantastic families one after the other
[00:39:57] because of the situation in his life.
[00:40:00] Good point.
[00:40:01] Yeah we need those old timers having children too
[00:40:04] if they can sustain them.
[00:40:06] We're gonna throw the kitchen sink at this thing.
[00:40:08] Yeah I do agree that I think we do need to try
[00:40:11] all sorts of stuff this isn't just like
[00:40:13] I really prefer the income tax break
[00:40:15] but also yes do that attack feminism
[00:40:18] and the big thorny issues like single family income
[00:40:23] school desegregation
[00:40:25] but really it's this corporate greed
[00:40:27] that's made it hard to support a family.
[00:40:28] A lot of businessmen are not gonna like that
[00:40:30] but they need to watch out
[00:40:32] because they are not immune to demographic collapse.
[00:40:35] They might think they are
[00:40:36] but that's an assumption
[00:40:37] that they should not make if they're wise.
[00:40:40] David don't go
[00:40:40] You gotta wake up and find out they don't have a job.
[00:40:42] Don't go anywhere David
[00:40:44] I wanna keep you for the last segment of this hour.
[00:40:46] I wanna get to the summary
[00:40:47] to the conclusion of these polls
[00:40:50] but folks don't just read the Cliffs Notes
[00:40:52] read and study and ingest the entire thing
[00:40:57] at homelandinstitute.org.
[00:40:59] We'll be back for that summation though
[00:41:00] with David Zutty right up.
[00:41:04] Find your inner rebel at Dixie Republic
[00:41:07] the world's largest confederate store
[00:41:09] located in Travelers Rest South Carolina.
[00:41:12] The anti-white, anti-Christ, anti-southern world
[00:41:15] ends at the asphalt.
[00:41:16] Welcome to God's country.
[00:41:18] Log on to DixieRepublic.com
[00:41:20] to view our southern merchandise
[00:41:22] from flags to t-shirts to artwork.
[00:41:25] At the store browse through our extensive collection
[00:41:27] of belt buckles
[00:41:28] and have a custom made leather belt
[00:41:30] handcrafted in our Johnny Rebs Gun and Leather Shop.
[00:41:33] That's DixieRepublic.com
[00:41:35] where you can meet all of your southern needs.
[00:41:38] While you're waiting
[00:41:39] drop by our Confederate Corner
[00:41:40] for a free cup of coffee and good conversation.
[00:41:43] Remember, there are no strangers here
[00:41:45] just friends who haven't met yet.
[00:41:47] DixieRepublic, we're not just a roadside attraction
[00:41:51] we're a destination for our people.
[00:41:54] For more information visit DixieRepublic.com.
[00:41:59] The spirit of the American West
[00:42:00] is Alive and Well and Range Magazine.
[00:42:03] The award winning quarterly
[00:42:05] devoted to the issues of the American West.
[00:42:07] Each issue contains informative articles
[00:42:10] breathtaking imagery
[00:42:11] as well as the culture of cowboy spirit today
[00:42:15] and gift ideas like this year's buckaroo calendar.
[00:42:18] Order online from RangeMagazine.com.
[00:42:21] Loving Liberty Network
[00:42:23] salutes the spirit of the American West
[00:42:26] at RangeMagazine.com.
[00:42:28] This is a battle,
[00:42:30] a battle between truth and deceit.
[00:42:33] A battle between forces
[00:42:34] that would enslave this country in darkness
[00:42:37] and between a media
[00:42:38] that wants to present you with the truth.
[00:42:40] We are being censored.
[00:42:42] America's news outlets
[00:42:43] no longer provide the truth.
[00:42:45] 90% of news outlets in the United States
[00:42:48] are controlled by six corporations.
[00:42:51] The mission of the Epic Times
[00:42:53] is to chase the truth
[00:42:54] to ground all statements and facts.
[00:42:56] TheEpicTimes.com.
[00:43:13] Ladies and gentlemen,
[00:43:13] David Zutty, fantastic stuff,
[00:43:16] fantastic work being done by the Homeland Institute
[00:43:18] particularly with these polling.
[00:43:19] We don't have any other institutions on our side.
[00:43:24] The focus on polling
[00:43:26] and polling is so important
[00:43:27] because think of all these US Supreme Court decisions
[00:43:31] that have been decided on the basis of polling.
[00:43:35] Now, well, that's right.
[00:43:36] Well, we need people doing it on our side,
[00:43:38] doing it right, always right,
[00:43:40] but in order to better crystallize our message.
[00:43:45] Now I gotta say this though,
[00:43:46] you need to read the whole thing.
[00:43:47] All right, the whole thing is fascinating.
[00:43:50] The entire poll, all the results, all the data.
[00:43:51] If you're one of those people that just like Brad Griffin
[00:43:53] who just dives into statistics
[00:43:56] and never comes back up for air,
[00:43:58] but the conclusion, the CliffsNotes.
[00:44:01] Now I have to come clean.
[00:44:03] I know you probably never did this, Keith,
[00:44:05] but if my seventh grade English teacher
[00:44:07] is listening right now,
[00:44:09] that was back in 93, 94 I think.
[00:44:13] Mrs. Craft,
[00:44:15] I might've used the CliffsNotes
[00:44:16] on Old Man in the City.
[00:44:17] I've been waiting to come clean on that,
[00:44:20] but you shouldn't do that, folks,
[00:44:21] but you can get some stuff from a summarization
[00:44:25] and a conclusion and some key takeaways
[00:44:27] and David does provide that
[00:44:28] for people who need it boiled down.
[00:44:30] Okay, and here are the findings of the poll
[00:44:33] when summarized.
[00:44:34] If we do nothing about this,
[00:44:35] America will face a demographic collapse,
[00:44:37] particularly white America,
[00:44:38] which is what we're concerned about.
[00:44:40] Fortunately, we can do something about this.
[00:44:42] Again, these are reading from the summarization.
[00:44:46] White Americans, especially Republicans,
[00:44:48] would have more children if they could afford to do so.
[00:44:50] That is the result.
[00:44:52] And if they had better prospects.
[00:44:53] The financial cost of raising children overall
[00:44:56] was the top barrier to having more children
[00:44:58] for respondents of all party affiliations.
[00:45:01] The number of women who just don't want to have children
[00:45:03] is almost the same as that of men, okay?
[00:45:05] However, more Republican men than Republican women
[00:45:08] report the difficulty of finding a suitable partner
[00:45:10] being a barrier to having more children.
[00:45:12] That's another whole topic, but that's important.
[00:45:15] Pro-natalist policies, I got four more.
[00:45:19] Pro-natalist policies are electorally viable
[00:45:21] for populist candidates.
[00:45:23] It may attract independents,
[00:45:24] previously unregistered voters, and even some Democrats.
[00:45:27] And that was something that a friend just texted me
[00:45:29] as she listens live tonight saying,
[00:45:31] you know, I don't like all of this left white stuff.
[00:45:33] That's left right stuff.
[00:45:35] That's a Jewish category.
[00:45:38] And to an extent, she's right about that.
[00:45:41] Pro-natalist policies may be a creative way
[00:45:43] for candidates to be pro-life
[00:45:45] without galvanizing as much opposition from the left
[00:45:47] as restricting abortion does.
[00:45:49] This is a key one, David, and I want everybody to listen.
[00:45:51] An income tax break for parents
[00:45:53] followed up by a lump sum of $10,000
[00:45:56] would be the most effective
[00:45:58] of all the pro-natalist policies.
[00:46:00] While a monthly stipend for parents
[00:46:01] would probably decrease child poverty,
[00:46:04] it would probably have a very limited effect
[00:46:07] on the birth rate.
[00:46:07] And finally, the difficulty of raising a family.
[00:46:10] And we've got to find something like you said
[00:46:12] that will impact white reproductive rights
[00:46:15] without encouraging non-white race.
[00:46:19] Right, Pete, this is something.
[00:46:20] Because if you want America, America is white.
[00:46:25] What draws people to America is the white civilization.
[00:46:28] They're not coming here to go to Harlem
[00:46:30] or live there.
[00:46:31] I grew up in a single income family.
[00:46:35] My dad worked two jobs, okay?
[00:46:37] That was in the 80s.
[00:46:38] It was certainly a little more atypical
[00:46:40] even in the 80s and early 90s
[00:46:42] when I was a child, a boy,
[00:46:44] than it was when you were growing up, Keith.
[00:46:46] But the final finding here in the summation
[00:46:47] is the difficulty of raising a family
[00:46:49] on a single income is probably,
[00:46:51] is a problem which policy makers may have to address
[00:46:54] if they're serious about fixing the birth rate
[00:46:55] even if this clashes with powerful interest.
[00:46:58] David, those are the summaries.
[00:47:00] That's the conclusion.
[00:47:01] Back to you, what did we miss?
[00:47:04] You summarized it extremely well.
[00:47:07] I just want to foot stomp the thing
[00:47:08] about how women are not that more antinatal than men.
[00:47:11] Sometimes in the electoral viability they were,
[00:47:14] for example, they were more opposed to the policies.
[00:47:16] But I really want to challenge this meme
[00:47:20] which I think is very subversive of,
[00:47:22] you see all these women, usually white women
[00:47:24] on TikTok or Instagram,
[00:47:26] all these silly social media things that,
[00:47:28] I do social media because I have to for my job.
[00:47:30] I'm not really into it.
[00:47:32] But they're always like,
[00:47:33] I'm on vacation, I'm with kids, it's fun,
[00:47:34] blah, blah, blah.
[00:47:35] And what I discovered here is that
[00:47:38] maybe they're being more ostentatious about it
[00:47:40] but for every decadent, silly girl running around
[00:47:45] to Morocco and hopefully not being brutalized
[00:47:48] by the locals, there's probably a soy boy
[00:47:51] playing with his punko pops that you don't see
[00:47:53] because they're more quiet.
[00:47:55] And that's the thing.
[00:47:56] I've raised this from some of the other polls
[00:47:59] that I'm seeing a general trend.
[00:48:00] It's not that scientific yet
[00:48:02] but left-wing women tend to be very loud
[00:48:05] or left-wing men very quiet.
[00:48:08] Right-wing men tend to be loud
[00:48:10] and right-wing women tend to be quiet.
[00:48:11] So what happens that this gets on social media
[00:48:14] and it creates these echo chambers and bubbles
[00:48:17] and it sometimes what we call black pills
[00:48:19] or demoralizes people because they're like,
[00:48:22] women are so horrible.
[00:48:23] What's all these loud liberal ones?
[00:48:24] The nice ones aren't there.
[00:48:26] They're probably at church or whatever
[00:48:29] and not bragging about how-
[00:48:31] Rising their children.
[00:48:33] Yeah.
[00:48:34] And so that's important.
[00:48:36] There was kind of like a difficulty
[00:48:37] in Republican men finding mates.
[00:48:39] That's important.
[00:48:41] But it isn't, white women are not this disaster
[00:48:47] that people make them out to be.
[00:48:49] Liberal white women are, but so are liberal white men.
[00:48:53] It's like, yeah, the Instagram celebrity also
[00:48:57] there's all these Funko pop playing soy boys.
[00:48:59] So that's what I'm seeing here.
[00:49:01] So I think that should give people hope
[00:49:03] because from one of the other polls I did,
[00:49:06] people asked about, well, what about women?
[00:49:08] And so they're very concerned about that
[00:49:10] about finding a mate.
[00:49:11] So I broke down the information by gender
[00:49:13] and we found interesting stuff there.
[00:49:16] And that's the thing here.
[00:49:18] People who push this thing as of white women are horrible.
[00:49:21] I think that is subversive propaganda meant
[00:49:23] to divide and conquer our race.
[00:49:26] But then on the other hand, David, let me say this.
[00:49:30] There is a cause for this feminist baloney
[00:49:35] about women leapfrogging men in job prospects and whatnot
[00:49:41] because women tend to go for an alpha man
[00:49:45] and for an alpha man
[00:49:47] in a civilized first world economy
[00:49:50] that has to do with earnings as much as anything else.
[00:49:53] Not going out and whipping somebody in a bar fight
[00:49:55] but bringing home the bacon
[00:49:57] so that you can afford to send the children
[00:49:59] to private schools or to otherwise provide
[00:50:03] the resources necessary to have a successful family.
[00:50:07] And feminism has hurt that.
[00:50:11] Basically women getting preference for managerial jobs,
[00:50:15] those are jobs that used to go to men.
[00:50:17] And when in the 50s, it was a lot easier
[00:50:21] for a woman to stay home and take care of the children
[00:50:25] without losing social status.
[00:50:27] I totally agree.
[00:50:28] And I have two points about that to piggyback off of it.
[00:50:31] That's a military term,
[00:50:32] we like to piggyback off stuff.
[00:50:33] And I was a former NCO,
[00:50:35] but AI is going to possibly change that
[00:50:37] because AI is going to eliminate,
[00:50:41] it's not real AI, but what we call AI,
[00:50:44] it's just advanced computing.
[00:50:46] It's going to eliminate a lot of these
[00:50:48] kind of like womenly office jobs.
[00:50:50] And at that point, are we gonna go to UBI?
[00:50:54] Are people who do work, who will mostly be men
[00:50:56] are gonna be paid a comparable salary?
[00:50:59] And that's the huge issue that we had
[00:51:00] this computer revolution in the country and across the West,
[00:51:03] but we never saw the benefits of that.
[00:51:06] It all went to the rich people.
[00:51:08] The wealth gap got even more extreme
[00:51:11] despite how there is more wealth from computers.
[00:51:13] Computers were a huge revolution.
[00:51:15] Now we're in the incipient stages
[00:51:18] of a so-called AI revolution.
[00:51:21] And where's the wealth gonna go?
[00:51:22] It cannot be gobbled up by these mega-corps.
[00:51:24] It has to come back to the people
[00:51:25] where we can actually have families.
[00:51:27] And an honest day's work should get an honest day's wage.
[00:51:31] And that is gonna clash the powerful interests.
[00:51:33] Like those powerful interests
[00:51:34] the two are already identified with feminism,
[00:51:36] which lauds women in the workplace
[00:51:38] even if it makes them miserable and it's not efficient.
[00:51:40] And also this basic vanilla corporate greed
[00:51:44] of just wanting to squeeze every nickel out of the people
[00:51:47] unlike Henry Ford, who actually paid his people well
[00:51:50] so that they would buy his products and be happy
[00:51:52] and he could pick the best laborers.
[00:51:54] So of course, Henry Ford was a very
[00:51:56] European minded person.
[00:51:58] He was well-constructed in questions
[00:52:00] as opposed to the more vulture capitalist stuff.
[00:52:02] And next Adolf Hitler,
[00:52:03] he's probably the most vilified white man
[00:52:05] of the early 20th century.
[00:52:06] If you read what they have on
[00:52:11] in Wikipedia and things like this about him.
[00:52:14] He was this racist and he was this anti-Semite
[00:52:16] and this that the other, but guess what?
[00:52:20] His policies worked and worked to create
[00:52:24] widespread prosperity among American whites.
[00:52:27] Another hour come and gone, one minute remaining.
[00:52:30] David Zutty, thank you for your time tonight.
[00:52:32] Thank you for your work.
[00:52:33] Ladies and gentlemen, I can't reiterate this enough.
[00:52:36] Homelandinstitute.org.
[00:52:38] This is a new organization
[00:52:40] just not yet to its first birthday if I'm not mistaken.
[00:52:44] And David Zutty leading the charge there
[00:52:47] and manning the helm.
[00:52:48] And David with just seconds remaining
[00:52:50] I wanna thank you again
[00:52:52] and give it to you for anything we've left out.
[00:52:55] Anything you would want to part the audience with
[00:52:57] before we talk to you again.
[00:52:59] I just wanna say real quickly
[00:53:00] that we do polls that other people don't do
[00:53:02] or they do not report upon.
[00:53:04] I've had a lot of feedback from poll takers
[00:53:06] and a lot of them will say, this poll is unique.
[00:53:09] I haven't taken one like it.
[00:53:10] So either people,
[00:53:12] it's not just that they aren't sharing the data.
[00:53:13] They may not be asking for it at all.
[00:53:15] So this really is groundbreaking work.
[00:53:17] We're asking polls and questions that nobody else does
[00:53:20] or if they do it's under lock and key.
[00:53:23] That is important because knowledge is power.
[00:53:24] And hopefully this will get on policy makers desks
[00:53:27] and we, despite it being an alternate institution
[00:53:29] we'll do mainstream things and make a better America.
[00:53:33] Here here and thank you for your work.
[00:53:35] And yes, again, this isn't just to satisfy
[00:53:39] our own curiosity about the current decline.
[00:53:42] It is to come up with workable solutions
[00:53:45] and to get these findings as David just mentioned
[00:53:47] working on polls and conducting polls
[00:53:49] that nobody else was doing
[00:53:51] to get this on the desks of policy makers.
[00:53:55] And well, I mean, you know, that's a worthy cause
[00:53:58] and it's a cause worthy of support.
[00:53:59] Homelandinstitute.org.
[00:54:00] David, thank you again.
[00:54:02] We will talk to you again soon.
[00:54:03] Keep in touch.
[00:54:04] And I know you're working on something with us.
[00:54:06] You emailed me about it or rather I should say,
[00:54:09] yes, you emailed me about it.
[00:54:10] Good stuff is in the works.
[00:54:11] Yes, keep me posted on that.
[00:54:13] That'll be very interesting if it pans out
[00:54:14] ladies and gentlemen.
[00:54:15] And in any event we'll stay in close contact
[00:54:18] with David and get all of the latest information
[00:54:23] from the Homeland Institute as they make it available.
[00:54:24] Thank you again, David.
[00:54:25] We'll be back to get into all the news that is news,
[00:54:28] the current headlines, the breaking news,
[00:54:30] the trends and all of that stuff.
[00:54:34] There's a lot to talk about.
[00:54:35] We rattled it off earlier in the hour.
[00:54:37] We'll get to it here as soon as we come back.
[00:54:39] Stay tuned to be back.