Veritas Vos Liberabit – The Truth Shall Set You Free |EP952

[00:00:00] All men are created equal, but they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. By Liberty and the Beautiful. If Liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.

[00:00:33] America Great Again The Big Mig. Good morning and welcome back to The Big Mig Show. I'm your host, Lance Miliachio, with my co-host, George Balentine. Of course, this is Edge of the Knife, Tip of the Spear. It's all about the truth. As the truth will set you free, that's what we do on this show. We don't play favorites. We'll go after both sides of the aisle.

[00:01:02] And of course, we're always looking for the top stories domestically and internationally so you guys don't have to. And hopefully we vetted it. We run it through AI. George is very good about vetting out the fake stories. He notices them right away because he's got a hell of a memory. And we try to make sure we don't put anything out that isn't true, that we don't know the details of. And if we are, you know, we think it's a great story. It looks like it's likely real. We'll disclaimer it for you guys because we don't want you going out there and disseminating bad information.

[00:01:30] Because, of course, educating and unifying the country one episode at a time is always the plan here. I only want what's good for the American people, for the country itself, for your grandkids, your children. That's what it's all about. George, how are you, brother? I'm good. Good. Working off another fucking two hours of sleep. But otherwise, I'm goddamn peachy. I hate when you can't sleep. Any particular thing, something out of the ordinary or just the normal stuff? Just normal.

[00:01:59] Yeah, I hate to hear that you couldn't sleep, man. I didn't get a fantastic amount of sleep, but I was working kind of late on some AI stuff. I can see you still need to get WD-40 out for your chair there, buddy. You know what's interesting? I've sprayed it now twice. I think I'm going to have to take it apart and maybe use steel wool. I've sprayed it now two times for WD-40, and it doesn't seem to be going away. Mikey Schwartz show rated us. Is he coming on or what? What's he doing? Yeah, he told me he's coming on. He might be right on. I got a little something special.

[00:02:29] He's juggling, juggling, juggling. We're waiting for Mikey Schwartz. Listen, if you love the show, hit the follow a bit and hit the subscribe button. You can do the paid subscription. It's only five bucks a month. It's a great way to thank us. You can give subscriptions. You can turn people onto the show. You can share the live link. But the most important thing is following us here on Rumble. Over on YouTube, Locals, and of course, on every major podcast platform. And if you'd like to sponsor the show, that's easy to do, too. Just hit us up over at info at bigmig.com. Info at the bigmig.com.

[00:02:57] And look, we're looking for great products, great opportunities for our listeners and subscribers. We don't just put anybody on here. We want to put products on that we believe in. And of course, when it comes to alternative health care, that's one of the things we believe in. We want you to look at your options. This is not medical advice, but something truly remarkable is happening in the world of cancer care, just south of the U.S. border. Since 1963, Oasis of Hope Hospitals in Tijuana has been quietly redefining what's possible for patients facing late-stage cancer.

[00:03:26] Of course, their integrative approach treating the body, mind, and spirit has produced survival outcomes that far exceed standard American hospital averages, the medical-industrial complex. And in some cases, more than three times higher. That's a big number. Now, these numbers, they treat all forms of cancer, but these are for stage 4 cancers. The difference is incredible. Listen to the numbers closely.

[00:03:50] The pancreatic, 25% versus 2% for the American medical system. Melanoma, 75% versus 24%. Breast cancer, 75% success rate for Oasis of Hope versus 24% for the American system. And of course, prostate, 50% versus 28%. I think that pattern is very clear, easy to identify. Patients at Oasis of Hope often live longer with better results than expected.

[00:04:18] And of course, at the center of this extraordinary story is Dr. Francisco Contreras. He's a world-renowned oncologist, author of 15 books, which is incredible in itself, and a medical director leading a compassionate team dedicated to giving patients not just treatment but hope. So if you or someone you love is facing cancer in any stage, Oasis of Hope offers, now listen closely, two great offers for free. First of all, they'll give you a free Zoom consultation for anyone who mentions The Big Mig Show.

[00:04:47] So you get the free Zoom consultation, pass it on to your loved ones. And here's the big deal. Dr. Contreras will also send you, when you ask for it, a copy of his most recent book for absolutely free. And that book is a culmination of all the information in the other books, kind of a summary. And it's a great way to improve your health, whether you already have cancer, whether you want to just keep it at bay. Lots of great tips. So free book, free Zoom consultations.

[00:05:16] Just mention The Big Ming Show. Of course, you have nothing to lose by exploring your options. That's what we always tell you to do here on this show. Head over to OasisofHope.com. That's right, OasisofHope.com. Go there right after the show. Grab that phone number. Share it with your loved ones, your family members, anybody you know that needs a little help. OasisofHope.com. All right. Well, it's going to be a big day. Of course, we got Dr. Mike Schwartz, the Schwartz-eroni joining us.

[00:05:46] Schwartz-eroni. Yeah. Oh, I'm on screen. I thought it was just you. I thought you were just talking. Look at you weren't kicking your nose. I thought you said, spider, I was okay, spider. I only see you on the big screen, so I didn't see the big other screen up there. I apologize. George, what's going on? What is this? What's up, Mikey? How you doing? What is all this? What is all what? What? This. You look like a mountain man. What's going on? It's called a beard. Growing a beard. I do that in two days.

[00:06:15] I just have to shave it every other day. It looks so bad. Yeah, I can't. George has got a great beard. I can't grow a great beard. I can grow a great goatee, but I have these two John Wick gaps over here for some reason. Oh. And they don't fill in. So I can't think I can't do it. I tried to grow many years ago when I was a contractor. You know, Lance, they say that has to do. They say that has to do with testosterone, which is why you should pick up a copy of These Nuts. There you go. You're going to have These Nuts. That's your new book. I want to give you a chance for the shameless plug. You just got it out.

[00:06:45] It's doing very well already. It is actually. It's doing better than the other books. Let's go solo. Let's give the shameless plug to Mike Schwartz for his new book, These Nuts. I've been talking about These Nuts all week on my show. But yeah, this is a new book. It's about my dog, Vin and Daryl, his toy squirrel. And I've been telling this story to Kelly and put her to sleep for years. And I said, I got to put this in a book. So we did a children's, non-children's book. You can read this to your five-year-old.

[00:07:14] They won't get the double entendres. You will. And you may laugh a little while you're reading it to them. And they'll love it, though. They'll be telling this story for years. And then 20 years from now, Mom, you remember when you read These Nuts to me to go to sleep? I mean, it's going to be a great little thing. That's right. You can pass it down. You can give it to them. They can read it to their children and their children's children. Yeah, These Nuts available now on Amazon. Yes, Amazon. Just Amazon right now. Just Amazon. And you got to type in. Mike Schwartz did the animation. I'm impressed. He did the animation.

[00:07:43] I haven't seen a copy of it yet, but I need to see it. Well, AI did the animation, but D apostrophe. No, but you still have to do the prompts. And you still have to have the imagination to do it. It came out of my, yes. It was all, These Nuts were all up here. D apostrophe S nuts. Otherwise, you won't find it. These Nuts or These Nuts book. Schwartz, you'll find it on Amazon. I already got two reviews. I'm so excited about it. George is going to pick up. I'm going to bring a copy to George next time I see him. That's it. Bring an autographed copy. Maybe put something in there.

[00:08:11] Speaking of that, when are you supposed to be coming down for our Sunday? I don't know. Kelly tells me the dates. So we haven't gone. I haven't gone up there with her. So I got to figure out when we're going. You haven't gone up there with her? No, it's soon, though. Maybe next week. I don't know. I'll ask her today. Well, we're doing. George and I do lunch once a month in George's neck of the woods. And I like to order the. Wait, wait, wait. Stop, stop. Hold on. Don't even go there. Hold on.

[00:08:39] I just want to bring the title up of the show before we do this, because I want you to understand the truth shall set you free. And let me comment here. No. I know I have to. I have to. No, no, you don't. I spent a lot of time on this. Just give me one second. I last night. So when I did that prompt, I asked it to interpret you guys as personalities based on your social media posting and what it could find for you online. And I want to just comment.

[00:09:06] So, Mike, clearly it's you kind of have a police officer look. Let's put that back up, George, for a second. I used to be a cop. I know. So it kind of gave you kind of a SWAT police officer look. George, as usual, he got the big, happy kind of good guy look with his white and red. And then, of course, I got the dark night. I think I had me somewhat figured out. Why do I have the beard? I would switch beards and you'd be all right. I don't have a reason.

[00:09:33] I got to tell you, though, I mean, you think that looks like Mike? I thought it was me, too. I thought you put two of me in there. I didn't think it was Mike. George and I could be brothers in that show. That's AI's interpretation of the photos I use. I can always use better high-res photos of you guys. And Lance, all you got to do is tell AI, say, don't take the smile off of George's face. Don't take the smile? You prompt it and say, take the smile off my face. Oh, no doubt about it. Yeah, I could do that. I've done that before where I've made you not smile. All right, then. But anyway, so.

[00:10:02] But I asked it to interpret it, and I just think it's interesting the way that it interprets people. All right. So wipe that smile off your face, George. All right. Well, since the show is called The Truths House Set You Free, right? I got something. Uh-oh. I got to just show it. Here it comes. After this, it's end of story. There is no more fucking discussion. It is what it is. According to who? Based on what? Yo, shut up, man. Accept it, everybody. And this is how it goes. This is my world right now. We're so polite to our guests on this show. Yeah, I know.

[00:10:33] It's really directed towards Mike, but here we go. Shut up. She said, we don't call it that. Shook his head. Said, buddy, you're down south.

[00:10:59] I said, just bring me my breakfast before this gets out of hand.

[00:12:34] That's a question. Do I have a chance to respond? Nope. You cannot respond. There's no responding. I just have a question. Is that a George Balentine original or is that actually a song that somebody made? That's a song somebody made. I think I'm going to spend time doing something like that. I know you guys don't do a lot of TV and radio and all that stuff outside of here. But George, I want you to know that a lot of people in the chat have no idea what we're talking about because they're not from where we live.

[00:13:04] So this is a thing in New Jersey. It's called pork roll. And there's a brand of pork roll called Taylor ham. Now, see, typical. That's fine. Am I muted? But let me ask you, now that it's a country Western song, does that validate the disagreement on what Taylor ham versus pork roll? I know because I'm not in this argument, by the way. I'm not in this. No, but I'm going to tell you why, because, you know, there's Kleenex, which is a brand of

[00:13:33] tissue, but everybody calls it a Kleenex because, you know, if you, you know, you just got it in your head. Like when you order a Cola, a lot of people just say Coke, but it could be RC, it could be pep, it could be anything. Here's the same thing. And what I, what I picked up here, the first thing I thought of was George coming on screen saying, well, I've done a bunch of research. George's research was to pull an internet meme. There's, there's more to the story, George. I always ask based on what? You can't just pull an internet meme of somebody, you know, doing a country song of Taylor

[00:14:03] Hand. Let me, let me help you understand some. This is the big, big show. I could do whatever the F I want. All right. Well, you come on my show. I'll come on your show and I'll still do it too. I've done it on your show. It is a catchy little tune though. I think that's going to be a winner. You know what the problem is, everybody? I text that, that, um, already that thing to Mike last week and he never responded. So I was like, huh? Cause I'm busy. I don't give a fuck. I'm busy too. You can't give me 911. I need your help.

[00:14:30] I'd come, I'd come up there, but you can't, you got to explain to people outside of New Jersey what this is. It's, it is a, it is like a, I don't know. It's all I got to do is listen to a little country song and enjoy it. Enjoy it for what it is. Fantastic is what it is. I just had an idea for you, Mike. This could be a big money idea. Maybe you needed to do a country music song about these nuts. Do that. That could be your promotional video. I'm pretty sure they got something. These nuts. You know, what's funny is look at it. I didn't even know.

[00:14:58] Look at the shirt I'm wearing and you had to look these nuts. Yeah. Nut up or shut up. That's it. That's how it is. All right. That's interesting. All right. So we're moving along here, even though we confused our audience. I'm sorry, audience. I had to do that for Mike. You know how it is. What an AI song for George. George. What do you guys think about the voter rolls across the nation? The DOJ stepped up this week, as we know, and they went after California because, you

[00:15:28] know, those guys, those scumbags out there, their voter rolls are just full of dead mocrats, full of illegal voters, full of all kinds of stuff. And now this bombshell Florida election report, 1,827 noncitizens removed from the voter rolls allegedly cast 7,035 ballots. So what is that? That's times. Boy, that's quite the multiplier, right? You're only supposed to have 1,800 votes, even though you're not supposed to have any votes. It's illegal. Thousands more removed as election integrity groups demand answers.

[00:15:56] I had hoped that the voter rolls in Florida were OK. I hope that most of the red states are. But it looks like the voter rolls suck across the entire nation. You guys think that's true? Well, yeah, but they suck because a lot of blue states that have power, we talked about this yesterday on the radio show, but absolute power corrupts. Absolutely. And when you've got a county full of Democrats who are trying to protect their jobs, their money, their contract, if they have the opportunity to cheat, they'll use it. Because you're talking about a lot of money and a lot of jobs here at stake for these people.

[00:16:25] And that's not an excuse. But I'm telling you what their motive is to try to do that. When you look across where I live in New Jersey, you can see dead people. You see people who have never existed. You see when they do the mail-in ballots that an apartment will get five, eight ballots mailed to it. They're not real voters. You can't have somebody in an apartment building in J6 on Main Street getting eight ballots and deciding, well, they're a Biden person.

[00:16:53] And half these ballots, I should say majority of these ballots, Lance, come in with just one candidate checked off. They didn't even take the time to go down the line. It's ridiculous when you watch this. We were talking about yesterday, should we go, as Hastusa says, to a blockchain technology where you use your phone? I know people push against that. I like a mail-in. I'm not a mail-in, but a one-day in-person paper ballot. We got to fix this problem. This is the most sacred thing in our country. And we keep letting it go.

[00:17:23] George? I mean, so we could do our banking on our phone, crypto on our phone. And for better or worse, it's mostly secure. All depends on who's hosting. But I mean, we could eventually, first of all, our voting has to go. If we put it on the blockchain, we'll be golden in that sense. And then either way, there's got to be a way to secure it if we want to do it through the apps or make it easier in that sense.

[00:17:50] But we're going to go back to our old Pass to Save America Act, which is not going to happen because we can't even get the Sunshine Act passed. But we're fighting with the voter rolls with these states. Who brought up California? You did, Lance, right? Yeah. California. Yeah.

[00:18:13] Because California is refusing to, I think, review or remove over 20,000 suspected non-citizens that got actually sent mail-in ballots already. To the guy in the front row, would you like to share what you're texting there, Mike Schwartz? What I'm texting? No, you look like you were texting when you looked at it. No, no, no. I'm sorry. I just have a million messages going on. All right. He's probably doing it because I said you didn't text me back for like a week. If I don't keep, let me look at your stupid mail. If I don't keep up with things in time.

[00:18:43] You're not looking at none. All right. So, you know, there's a simple way to fix these voter rolls. Public hangings. Executions. Public executions. You see, they canceled the other one. They canceled Hassan's execution. You saw that? They just aren't going to televise. Well, they're not going to televise it. They canceled the public portion of it. But does anybody think that was a good idea to cancel it? Wait a minute. Yeah. So they're not going to televise it. Why? Correct. Because we screened video executions already. Pushback.

[00:19:12] The administration doesn't want. Yeah. No, no. But we streamed video executions on video. It's been on news. The only time they don't want it, they're crying about it. It's because it's when it's justice. It's actually this is justice and they don't want it. But when you have it on the streets, there's people killing people. You see it shooting, knifing, whatever. It's OK. Yeah. That's Democrats for you.

[00:19:38] They don't want to expose how many people, you know, suffered at the hands of this person. Wait, what would you think they would react if that was, let's say, a big Republican name that was going to be executed? They would want that on TV. Yeah. Well, here's my thing. Regular American citizens, they don't televise the executions, but there's all kinds of executions across the nation. We know that people are sitting on death row.

[00:20:05] When it comes to the federal system, the DOJ is very, very on top of using press releases to undermine the person's possibility of getting a fair trial. The press releases are standard in the DOJ. They're all over the place. They hammer people with those. Here's my thing. I think we need some of this. I think a public execution. You guys in the audience, you can tell me if you agree with this.

[00:20:34] You don't have to let your kids watch it. I think we have to put some fear in people. It's just like these voter rolls with no consequences. Of course they're going to cheat. Just like Mike just said a minute ago, ultimate power. They're going to cheat because that's what cheaters do. And there's no consequences. Nobody's going to jail over it. Start hammering these people with some big sentences. Start publicly snatching them up. You know, they televised Roger Stone's arrest. Right?

[00:21:01] By the way, has anybody realized that Ilyin Omar appears to be on the run? She hasn't returned to her house since the raid. She's got the flu. Anybody find that curious? She's got the flu. Yeah. Yeah. Her and Tala Freaco, huh? You know, maybe they got the flu together. She hasn't returned to her D.C. house? Nope. She hasn't gone back to the house that got raided, and I believe that was the D.C. property. Her husband was very offended when people approached him near his house. He got very angry.

[00:21:31] It didn't go very well. But my point is, if you don't have consequences for your actions, well, then fuck it. Here's my take. Let's throw the statutes out the window, and let's just go wild, wild west, mofos. I'm in. I want to be able to insider trade. I want to be able to do some corrupt criminal shit if I'm not going to have any consequences. Let me steal some money from the American taxpayers through USAID. You know, I'll open a leering center. I'll open the big ming show leering center with George.

[00:22:00] We'll open some autism centers. We'll do some insider trading. I'll even do insider trading where I'm telling the audience, and we can kind of just jack with the stock market. We'll use all the power of our influence. Because if they're not going to get any consequences or indictments for their actions, well, I don't want it either. I want to just take the statutes. I want to put the whole legal system through the shredder. We can get rid of the judiciary. We'll save that money. We can get rid of all the DOJ prosecutors. We'll just shut down the Department of Justice because they're not doing their jobs anyway.

[00:22:29] We don't have any deep state arrests. Let's just shut it all down. We'll save that money. And then crime is legal. We can all just become gangster criminals, make as much money as we can, slacking and jacking and stealing and doing whatever is necessary. Because that seems to be the system that the government officials get. Mike? There's a bigger story here, and I don't know if you want to break it. We'll talk about it for two seconds because I want you to take credit for it. And you could say we talked about it on the Big Meg.

[00:22:57] And you can replay this back from October 16th of 2026 after the midterms. There's talk in Washington that the president wants to get rid of Pete Hegseth. And that after the midterms, when this whole thing with Iran has not quite settled out because if we – the gas prices don't come down and we're still in that war. And it does cost us the midterms. I'm hoping it doesn't. Don't jump down my throat. But here's the talk that the president is going to get rid of Pete Hegseth.

[00:23:23] Now, when you brought up this story about the execution and we start talking about they're not going to televise this or live stream it, this was Pete Hegseth's big idea. And then when the media started pushing back, the administration, Donald Trump, said, okay, all right, we're going to pull back from it. This is going against Pete Hegseth. Pete Hegseth then came out today or yesterday and said, no, no, no, we're all on the same page. They want to show they're cohesive. But I want you to see how this is going to play out in the next couple weeks after the midterms.

[00:23:53] You're probably going to see – and I think it's a mistake, but you're probably going to see a change at the Department of War with a new war secretary. Just mark my words. I'm going to put another one out. You guys may not know this. And I have this from a confirmed source. It sounds like Susie Wiles is out. Sounds like Donald Trump is done with her for a number of reasons. I don't know if it's the – I hate to break it to you, Lance, but that's been in the news story a few days ago.

[00:24:20] No, I know, but a lot of people are saying, ah, it's not going to happen. I've had some people tell me now that she's absolutely going to get the boot, that Susie Wiles is going to get the boot also. You know why, though? Well, because she's probably thinking they're going to lose control of the House or Senate, and they're going to start coming after Trump and administration. So she's like, I'm going to get my ass out of here. And I think that is part of it. Getting rid of Hegseth, I think, is a dumb move. Dumb move to get rid of Pete Hegseth.

[00:24:51] I agree. But there's another side to this, too, with Susie Wiles. And most people will leave the administration at the midterms because that's their opportunity to go out and make a lot of money. When you have control and you can leave and you can do a little lobbying and you can start a group, and you can see that now with the Trump people like Caroline Leavitt. They're all going over to Trump's other groups outside to make a lot of money. And that's what you're going to see. Susie Wiles would have a great reason to leave just on her own. But now there's tension in the White House between her and him.

[00:25:17] And this came to a head with the Katie Zachariah thing because Susie Wiles did not want Katie Zachariah there because she is one of the Nome people who is associated with Nome and Corey Lewandowski. So she already made a stink with the president about this, ordered that vet at the last second. When that vet hit, they at the White House knew what was going on with Katie Zachariah, but it did not make it to the president's desk in time. And at that point in time, Katie Zachariah leaked it out to the New York Times.

[00:25:46] And at that moment, Donald Trump said, well, all right, screw it. It's out there. You want to explain that to the audience? They may not know about the whole I'm a lawyer, I'm not a lawyer routine. You can't say you're a lawyer. You can't. And she would know this from going to law school. You can't hold yourself out to be a profession where a reasonable person would think that you are that type of professional. If George said, I'm a cop, people would reasonably think he was a police officer and then he had arrest authority in a certain jurisdiction. You can't say that.

[00:26:13] When you have a law degree, I mean, that's good enough for me. Go out and say, I have a law degree. I have a JD. If I understand you went to law school for three or four years and you graduated law school, you understand jurisprudence, you can argue these facts. But you can't come out and say, I'm a lawyer. That would imply your license to practice law. She said it multiple times on national television since 2011 and props for her for graduating Pepperdine Law School. But she was holding herself out as someone who was licensed to practice law. Who's this, the new press secretary you're talking about? Yeah, Katie Zachariah.

[00:26:43] It's a misdemeanor in California. She took the bar there and she failed. Okay, great. Take it again. A lot of people fail on the first try. It's not a big deal. But you can't then go on TV and say you're a lawyer. I heard she failed once, but I don't know. I thought it was two or three times. I don't know. I heard once. I don't know. So you have El Saeed in Michigan who's running for Senate. He went to medical school, but he never took his test to get licensed as a doctor.

[00:27:12] But he goes around and calls himself a doctor. But he is a doctor. Once you graduate medical school, you have a doctorate in medicine. You have an MD. If you didn't take boards, you can't practice. Once you graduate and it's conferred upon you a doctorate from anything, Dr. Martin Luther King, a doctor of theology, a Jill Biden. I know it's an education doctorate and we kind of look at those a little bit differently. But once you have a doctorate, your title then becomes doctors. A lot of people walking around the world who have doctorates. He is a doctor.

[00:27:42] He's just not a physician. She graduated law school. It's a little different with law school because you can't use the terms lawyer. It's just like using physician. He can't use physician. She can't use lawyer or attorney. It's confusing to the public and they don't understand it. Well, let's talk about Hegseth for a second. I think he's been doing an amazing job. I think that he probably would have been more effective in Iran if he wasn't constantly getting stopped. I think that the political environment, the midterms being right here has been detrimental

[00:28:12] to the operation in Iran. And of course, Congress not wanting to give Donald Trump any kind of a win, a lack of support out of both sides of the aisle when it comes to the war in Iran. Look, it is what it is. At the end of the day, I think getting rid of Hegseth would be a major mistake. Getting rid of Susie Wiles, big win. There are a lot of people that should have had access to the White House that are Trump loyalists. And Susie Wiles has done everything she can to obstruct them. She's not a good person. I think she's always got a nefarious plan behind the scenes.

[00:28:41] I didn't like her from the very get-go. So here we are. George, how do you feel about Susie Wiles maybe being out? It'll be great to see her out. I mean, I've been saying this from freaking the very beginning, day one, that she's the bad apple. Even before when Trump said her name, that she's going to be the White House chief of staff. But, you know, question is, who's going to replace her?

[00:29:07] It seems like certain positions Trump always gets screwed on. I'm still waiting for big things to come from the attorney general. And this one, he's what? The fourth one Trump's ever picked, I think? Fourth or fifth? So for all of them, big disappointments. Todd Blanche sucks. You really think so? I think he's doing an okay job. He's doing okay. He's doing a lot better and a lot more than any other Trump AGs.

[00:29:37] That's a fact. But you were comparing it to Pam Bondi and Bill Barr. That's a very low bar, no pun intended. But, you know, when you compare him to those two, yeah, great. He's doing a good job. But when you look at the government gangster, deep state arrest, J6, Fed Surrection, and all the other criminals that are in D.C. that don't be seen. Look at Adam Schiff. Where's his mortgage fraud prosecution? I mean, there's no doubt from the paperwork. It's an allegation as far as the law is concerned. But sure as hell, it looks like he committed mortgage fraud.

[00:30:06] I don't see him getting indicted. Yeah, they're going after Ilian Omar. That should have happened years ago. Should have happened during Biden. I mean, clearly they even knew about it. But OK, what about Donald Trump? I mean, I don't understand why we're two years in and we just don't have the accountability that we were promised. I think there was a lot of people that have committed violations of the law. And I don't see him getting indicted. So speaking of that, let's usually no administration.

[00:30:35] They won't go after any political opponent within two months within an election. It's just they don't do it because we can see as election interference. I hear what you're saying. But for me. Let me finish then. Let me finish. But yet they just they went after Ilan Omar this week and stuff. So are they dropping this rule? They're going to start going after everybody else. We don't know. I mean, we keep talking about the other stuff, but we know the grand jury's out in Florida. And, you know, 138 subpoenas.

[00:31:05] How long does it take to go to get those all on the books? It's going to take a long time. It's going to take too long and it's already taken too long. In my opinion, for whatever it's worth, I'd take 50 percent less drug prosecutions and assign those Department of Justice prosecutors to deep state government gangster arrests. That's me. I just feel like we have to start at the top down. I wouldn't I wouldn't doubt that if we took out all the bad apples out of Washington, D.C., the drug trade would even go down because I think there's there's lots of reasons

[00:31:34] that those people have gotten money from our members. But this all comes out to when I have this a story number four. So we're just going to bring it up. Trump was doing an interview. I think it was Newsmax. Right. And he just and he confirmed again. And he says he confirmed that he blocked criminal targeting. And reputation destroying of Barack Hussein Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary, yada, yada, yada. So. Why?

[00:32:03] If you're going to take if you want to block going after the top dog, but you want to go after the people underneath. I mean, really, in a sense, it's bullshit. But isn't it bullshit if you block criminal prosecutions for violating the violations of the U.S. statutes, whether it's Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton or anyone else blocking actual indictments where the DOJ believes they've got a case.

[00:32:30] If that's, in fact, what Donald Trump did, that would be considered mispresidents of a felony because they don't they shouldn't get an exclusion. I don't get I got to be honest. I don't give a flying F that that Obama was president. I don't care if he violated the law. I want to see him indicted. I don't give a shit about Hillary Clinton. She's just a nasty bitch that I don't care about. And I want to see her indicted. Mike, a question for you. Don't don't don't usually presidents, whoever they are, always say that they don't get involved with the DOJ. They don't tell them what to do.

[00:33:01] Yeah, I mean, you kind of want a little bit of separation there just so it seems like. But you got to remember the president's picking somebody in the president. In this case, with Todd Blanche, pick somebody he trusted. He made that huge mistake with Bill Barr, who didn't care about anything. And then that's when you saw that separation over there. I'd rather have somebody on our side. Look, we voted for this president to do a lot of things, to Lance's point. The problem is, Lance, if any of the three of us were ever elected president or senator,

[00:33:28] we'd have somebody on TV that's not us, another Lance Miliaccio, complaining that we're not being able to get the job done because there's so much minutia. There's no magic wand. And despite what all the Democrats think, he's not a dictator. You can't just wave a magic wand and make stuff happen. You got a lot of pushback from Congress, as you see. That's why Congress has like a 12 percent approval rating. But there's a lot of deep staters in there, too, who just like the status quo. There's too much money. And that's not an excuse. But that's kind of the way it is. They wouldn't be able to do it with me.

[00:33:58] You guys can speak for yourself. But if I was president, I would absolutely be a dictator when it came to the criminals in Washington, D.C., when it came to people like George Soros. And I would take my chances that I would be impeached and executed. But I can tell you this, if I was in charge, none of those people would be coming back. They'd be gone for good. I wouldn't take a chance. I would make sure that they were gone. Well, if that's if that's the case, then, Lance, answer me this, because Donald Trump was the guy who couldn't be bought.

[00:34:26] Donald Trump's the guy who is, you know, the business guy, not a politician, wanted to do a lot of great things. What pressure you have to somebody's keyword there? My keyword was. But go ahead. OK, well, then what pressure was exerted on him and from who and from where that he's not following through on all these things that could make him a god in MAGA eyes? I'm going to say it's somebody within the CIA or three letter agencies.

[00:34:55] Either they maybe Trump has got some dirt. There's dirt on him or they're manufactured stuff to set him up, you know, putting dirt on him. That's the only thing I can think of. Does it come down to the Epstein? I hate to say that, but the Epstein file seems to be that one that always hovers over. Absolutely. I listen at the end of the day, the laws of the United States are clear. Equal application of the law for me personally and for the American public. And I think both sides of the aisles feel like this.

[00:35:24] And they can tell us in the chat. Do you guys feel like anybody that violates the law? Because if you guys in the audience do it or any of us, the three of us do it, we're definitely getting indicted. We get caught insider trading. They're coming after where the gun's blazing. We get caught stealing money from USAID, like the Chelsea Clintons of the world that got $84 million. We're getting indicted. Guaranteed. No hesitation. Donald Trump's not going to come to our rescue, even though we've supported him. You're not going to say, well, Lance and Mike and George, they're good guys.

[00:35:52] Let's not do the indictments on them. Let's just let it go. They stole the money. And see, and that's the problem I have. So as president, you can't always be popular. And I would bet that if I was president, I wouldn't be able to do public appearances because they would want to assassinate me. I'd have to do my best because I would go after these people so viciously and they wouldn't come back. And then I'd go to the American public. I'd tell them what I did. I said, if you guys want to, you know, if you want to impeach me, if you want to take me out of office, if you want to execute me.

[00:36:22] But here's why I did what I did. And here's why these people are not coming back. I'm not saying it's a popular opinion. I'm not saying it's democracy. I'm saying that we're in an awful situation where we've got a lot of criminals in D.C. And they are doing everything they can to steal American taxpayer dollars to enrich themselves on the backs of the American public. And that's on both sides of the aisle. All right. So it's just disgusting. There's a handful of people, maybe 10 percent of Congress that can be trusted. All right. So on that note, maybe Susie Wiles does need to go.

[00:36:52] Susie Wiles pulls a lot of strings in the White House. And you know what? Replacing her with Stephen Miller. Stephen Miller sounds and thinks a lot more like we do. If you had to tell me who in the White House thinks like Lance does, I'd probably say Stephen Miller is number one. Yeah. But, you know, it seems like all those people, all those, all the talk, all talk, talk, talk. They have all that talk on shows and this and that. But when it gets time to implement that talk and I say walk that talk, we get guts.

[00:37:21] We can give you a lot of examples. I can throw out Dan Bajino, Cash Patel. Yeah. I mean, sure, there's a bunch of others, too. Janine Pirro. Another one. Yeah. I agree with you. I agree with George. But let's move on here. I want to make sure we get some of these stories in because we've got some good ones. I thought this was AIBS when I first pulled it up. I know it's all over the place this morning. Flying cars appear to be real.

[00:37:47] Elon Musk says the Tesla roaster suction system can pull up to two Gs. I would say that if that is true, it would do some serious damage in everything from NASCAR to formula. And it will crush every track record that has ever existed. This thing did a sub one second zero to 60. Sub one second zero to 60. That is friggin' unbelievable. And then this video, I saw it at first.

[00:38:16] I thought, oh, boy, look at this AI slop. That's what was in my head. Of course, I was absolutely wrong. You guys, let's play the clip. And I need comments because, man, this is like Dick Tracy time, right? We have everybody talked about the watches. We already have those. Dick Tracy? More like George Jetson? Yeah, it's George Jetson. Dick Tracy had the watches. And, of course, the Apple Watch came out. And then there it was. All right. Let's play the clip. You guys tell us. Like I said, I thought this was fake. But it is real.

[00:40:21] Cars are real. Yeah. Peter Thiel once said that the future promised us flying cars, but instead we got 140 characters. Well, not anymore. Exactly. That's not the last thing you'll see, by the way.

[00:40:44] To do that, we have a fan suction system on the bottom of the car that can pull up to two Gs in order to make the car go upside down. And then we borrowed some technology from SpaceX to do the rest. Yeah. I mean, this car really sucks. This car could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch. It could suck a tennis ball through a hose pipe. So, and it could stick upside down.

[00:41:11] Now, you might say, like, how often do you want to stick upside down in a car? Maybe not that often. But it actually has this, an actual benefit on the track or just driving where the downforce of the car means you can corner incredibly well. Like, you can corner like it looks like you're breaking physics because the car sticks to the ground so hard.

[00:41:37] So, acceleration, cornering, it's going to crush every track record that has ever existed. So, I just want to know how much those things drain the batteries on that thing. How long do the batteries last on it? I don't know. My wife was talking about this this morning and she's like, oh, flying car.

[00:42:02] And I'm like, well, I mean, as a pilot, you consider flying sustained flight, you know. And that car couldn't sustain flight. Although, I don't know. I mean, it did for a couple seconds there. It was hovering. So, I might backtrack on that a little bit, you know, the definition of flying. Because when I think flying, I think, you know, propulsion and sustained flight and Bernoulli's principle and, you know, higher pressure under the wing, lower pressure on top of the wing kind of thing like that.

[00:42:31] But, I mean, to see that, it's pretty impressive. I watched that video of them going from zero to 60 in like 0.81 seconds or something. It's nuts. So, I mean, Elon Musk again showing that he is the Tony Stark of our days. It's kind of crazy. I mean, so with those. Is that the fastest car in existence now? A sub one second 60? I believe so. So, can that car, if it's on a flat road, flat street, can it go off the road and just hover?

[00:43:00] I don't know the answer to that. Because it doesn't seem like it could propel itself like to fly. It just, because it did the ramp. And then those things prevent it from like pre-fall. And those are all drive by wire too. They have steering by wire, brake by wire. Everything's by wire. So, it's all computerized. It's not like somebody, if you're stuck up on, I can see George doing the, you know, the Spider-Man driving up on a building. And then he's like, how do I get this thing? It's, you hit a button in it. It all does that computerized.

[00:43:25] So, it knows when to fire those air compressors and the fans to make sure that you have enough, you know, you can land like a cat. George trying to, if you try to do it or I try to do it, George, and you're trying, you know, there's no way. Be able to manually be able to do that. But I have no idea if it can hover up in the air. I mean, I imagine it probably could if you programmed it to do that and jump up and hover for a couple seconds with the technology it has on it. Interesting stuff. I got to tell you, I was impressed.

[00:43:54] And it looks like Elon Musk was having a good time. I got to give him credit. And you're right. He is the Tony Stark of our age at this moment. All right. U.S. voters rank government corruption as a top concern, just like we do on this show. And they put it above inflation and health care, just like we do on this show. I think it's the most dangerous thing. I think it's more dangerous than the enemies we face.

[00:44:21] If you consider Russia or the CCP or North Korea enemies of the United States, I don't know that I do, but okay, let's just say that you do. Then here we are. I think that our government corruption participants are the biggest danger to the American people and the country. Now, George, I guess we've got a chart here, and this is a poll that was taken. Let's throw that up. You give me your guys' comments.

[00:44:50] Do you think this is the most dangerous thing that the U.S. is facing currently? Not according to Trump because he wants to let the freaking head of the people give him a pass. So, yeah, this just shows you disconnect with politicians, presidents, even Trump when it comes to the will of the American people. I ran a poll on that, by the way. Should Donald Trump use the full force and effect of the Department of Justice to go after Obama, Clinton, and Biden? And the poll came back at 90% and 6% yes by the people that are talking. This poll was asked of what?

[00:45:20] Of likely voters or what? I just put it up on X and I put it up on True Social. It's your poll. Yeah, it was a poll I put up. This poll was- No, this poll is not my poll. This poll was from Fox News. Yeah. They're ranking government corruption as the top concern. If you put your poll next to these nuts, you'd have more people voting because- How many people responded, Lance? I think the one on True Social that had 40 or 50.

[00:45:49] It wasn't a tremendous response, but it just shows that in general, people think that Obama and Biden and Clinton ought to face the consequences for any crimes they committed. And I bet that if we could get Elon Musk to put the poll up, do you think that the administration should use the full force and effect to go after anybody in the administration that's committed a crime, just like regular Americans? I would bet that you would get millions of votes saying yes. I think people are tired of it. Listen, we're paying our bills. We're trying not to commit crimes.

[00:46:19] We're not doing it intentionally anyway. At the end of the day, here there's people doing it intentionally. And now the president of the United States says, Oh no, we're not going to go after poor Hillary. Let's just leave poor Hillary alone. I don't agree with that. There could be a much better Trump impersonation than I do, Mike. Yeah. I was on Rudy Giuliani the other day and he was talking about Cornell University. And he's like, how do you expect Cornell University to police itself? So I kind of bring that to here.

[00:46:47] How do you expect the government, and don't get me wrong, I'm with you on this, but you're asking the government to police itself. Watch his guard in the hen house. Yeah. And then of course, you wonder what Hillary Clinton, and don't forget, Bill Clinton was in office for eight years. She ran for president. They were part of this whole thing. They've been part of the whole thing for most of our lives. Yeah. So you start to wonder what they have in their back pocket. I think there's a lot of pressure being exerted from a lot of different forces and why you don't see things going full force.

[00:47:17] I think you're going to see a lot of low-level people. I hate to say low-level and say that for Congress, but like an Ilhan Omar hasn't been around that long. She's a thorn in everybody's side. And if they want to prosecute her, go nuts. What does she really know? But what the Clintons know, what the Bushes know, and now with Trump in office and what they know, and then you tie in that whole Epstein thing we were talking about, I think there's a lot of pressure from a lot of different angles on a lot of these people to just keep the status quo going. So they'll make it look good for everybody by saying we're going to do certain things.

[00:47:45] But I don't think you're going to see a lot of prosecutions come out of this, at least not to satisfy you. I'll tell you this. Here's what I'll do. I'll drop this topic. I'll never bring it up again. You just give our audience, George Ballantyne, Mike Schwartz, and myself, 84 million like Chelsea Clinton got. And I'll never bring it up again. I won't ask for accountability. I'll go off into the sunset with my 84 million. George will do the same thing. You'll never have to hear from us again. And everybody in the audience that watches this show and subscribes to us and follows us, they get 84 million each.

[00:48:14] So none of us will ever bring it up again. Just give me the 84 million just like Chelsea Clinton. No accountability, no consequences. I want to make sure I get in writing that I'm never going to be prosecuted from the theft of the 84 million I was given. And see, that's my issue. If they're going to have 14 magic money computers, then I want the Big Ming show to have the 15th magic money computer. If they're going to get to go to USAID and take whatever they want, if I can be George Soros and I can set up 64 NGOs

[00:48:42] and have the open society have 64 NGOs funneling money to myself, my family members, and nothing's going to happen, well, then I just want the same thing. I'll go ahead and open up 64 NGOs. I think if you asked anybody in the chat, and I hate to say this, but human nature is predictable. And if you ask everybody in the chat who's lived long enough, and if you're young and idealistic, great. But if you've lived long enough to realize that our lifespans are finite and anybody in this chat got offered 84 million bucks and they said, just zip it and go live your life happy, they'd go, you know what?

[00:49:11] I'm going to set up my family for the rest of my life. I'm just trying to put you in the mindset of how these people think. You can bitch about it. We'll talk about it. We'll bring it up to stir everybody up, but nothing's ever going to happen. Just shut up. Here's 84 million or whatever it is, and go away. You're set up. Lifetime, you know, generational wealth for your family. Never has to worry again. I think people might take that deal. Listen, I know they would. I would take it. I would take it at the end of the day, but that's my point. If they're not going to give it to me,

[00:49:40] if I'm not going to get the 84 million, then I want the other version of it. I want the maximum statute application. I want the acts of justice to swing both ways. I want government gangsters and deep staters, and I want the people that he talked about when he said, we caught them all. We caught them all. Okay, well then, when are they going to jail? I guess we got this clip, George, from Donald Trump. You want to play it? Sure. So you'd never ask.

[00:50:09] And I'd become good at anti-impeachment. I'd go out the anti-impeachment movement. Right. But for them to do that is, it cheapens our country so much. It's really very terrible. You know, and honestly, I could have done numbers on Hillary Clinton. I could have done numbers on Bill Clinton. I do like Bill Clinton. I could have done numbers on Barack Hussein Obama. Still could. I still could. I could do big numbers if I wanted to. I've turned down going after Hillary Clinton. What do you mean big numbers?

[00:50:38] I'm talking about go after them criminally. I could have done something having to do with their reputations, destroyed their reputations. We have a lot of information about Hillary. We have a lot of information about Barack Hussein Obama. We have a lot of information on Sleepy Joe Biden. Are you going to do anything? Well, I mean, I guess not. Probably not. But I think if they impeach me again, you know, again. Oh, that's interesting. Things could get ugly. Well, let me explain something to you.

[00:51:07] They had a congressman the other day on television, a Democrat. I won't mention his name. He's not a bad person. But they asked whether or not you're going to impeach Trump. He said, well, the party wants to. And they said, well, what would they impeach him on? And he said, well, he thought. He said, I don't really know. But I'm sure the party will find something. That's never happened before, by the way, sir. There's never been anything like it. Nobody's ever talked about impeaching somebody for something they'll figure out. They have no idea.

[00:51:37] If they do take power. He actually said, we don't know, but the party will certainly figure out something. I want to ask you about Iran. So you would think, right? That he would expose Hillary, Barack, Biden, and whoever to show the country how wicked and evil Democrats are. And then maybe get people to stop voting Democrat, vote Republican. You would think Trump would do that. But no.

[00:52:07] We're going to give him a pass. I just don't get it. Well, if you suspend logic, I'm telling you, go back to that pressure. Somebody's exerting pressure from somewhere. And we don't know what it is. And we probably never will know. We're just going to be arguing about it. But they live on that, George. You know that. I mean, us doing this and then them doing this. And then, look, Fox's ratings go up when there's a Democratic president in office because they want to know. Everybody gets mad at the man, no matter who the man is at that point, who's got the power.

[00:52:35] Because they're never doing enough or they're doing something to piss you off. They live off this. This dichotomy that we see in politics, it feeds it. Mike, you know, maybe we're looking at this in the wrong way. We keep looking at, like, what sort of dirt is it, you know, is it Epstein? Maybe it's not that. Maybe it's what sort of money has Trump or the Trump organization made. Maybe it's got something to do with that. I don't know. Maybe it's your kids. I mean, look at Mike Flynn. They were going to go after his son.

[00:53:06] You know, you got something. Everybody's got something somewhere. You know, I mean, look at Hunter Biden and the laptop. My God. But once that was out of the bag, it was like they just kind of glazed over and said it didn't exist. Trump can just write pardons right now on all those kids, and that'd be good. Yeah, but maybe it's not about pardoning, you know. And I go back to that Hunter Biden thing for a reason. You look at how the media covered that. Look at the exercise they did to try to silence the Hunter Biden laptop. You had 50, what was it, 50 plus 8 or 51 plus 8. 51 plus 8, yeah.

[00:53:35] You had all these people from high-ranking positions that you would think, well, if they're all saying this, it must be fake. I mean, they went to an extreme to try to silence that. And they spent so much time on it that everybody kind of got Biden malaise and didn't really care anymore. And then it was a done deal. You know, maybe there's stuff like that. We just don't know. You're never going to get government, unfortunately, run the way we want it to run logically because there's a lot we don't see.

[00:54:03] And there's these deep letter three agency folks out there that have more dirt on just about everybody, either you or somebody you're connected to, that might influence the way you handle politics. You know, Alexander Putin, I mean, Vladimir Putin said something that I think is interesting. He had a quote that he said 50 years ago, the streets of Leningrad taught me one thing. If a fight is inevitable, well, you must strike first. And I think that's the situation Donald Trump's in. I think he's naive.

[00:54:32] The people that are advising him that are saying, oh, leave poor Hillary alone or don't go after Barack or don't go after the congressional members and don't do this because of the midterms and don't do that. Whoever is advising him is part of the problem in Washington, D.C. The statutes are clear. Donald Trump could easily say it's not me. It's the Department of Justice. The statutes are very clear. Barack did this. Hillary did this. Adam Schiff did this. There's nothing I can do about it. This isn't politically motivated. The statutes are clear. Equal application.

[00:55:01] The law would require the Department of Justice to prosecute these individuals for the times they committed. He doesn't need to take responsibility for what's happened. He just needs to step out of the way. And if he's actively stopping indictments from going forward, then Donald Trump's part of the problem. And there's no doubt in my mind. That if people have him compromised or if people are doing what they did to Michael Flynn and they're threatening, hey, we're going to go after your wife. We're going to go after your kids. We're going to go after this. We're going to go after that.

[00:55:29] That is a standard operating protocol that they use against regular American citizens every single day. The Department of Justice threatens defendants with massive sentences, with superseding indictments and the threats of going after your loved ones because you committed a crime because they benefited in the proceeds, meaning that you spent the money you made in your criminal enterprise to buy a house, to buy a car, to pay for their education. That is the nexus and the conduit. The Department of Justice does this every single day to regular fucking Americans.

[00:55:58] And why aren't we doing it to the – listen, I agree with that. If in fact these people committed crimes, if they're guilty, and I believe many of them are. Because they believe it sets a new precedent. And you look at the Senate. They didn't want to do the filibuster because they figured, oh, the Democrats will do it to us if we do it to them. They're going to do it anyway, most likely. But you look at all these people. They have these codes.

[00:56:20] I forget it was Chuck Grassley talking about the blue code or whatever the hell it was and they had in the Senate where they just had this gentleman's agreement where they wouldn't do this because then they would expect it back. So they try to keep it kosher for everybody. Same thing happens in the White House. Same thing happens on the federal level. They figure if they go – the status quo, believe it or not, they worry about on one hand destroying the country. If everybody knew what we knew or if they let it all out, that it would destroy the fabric of this country.

[00:56:50] We've heard that a million times. I'm so sick of that. Well, I'm sick of it too. I think the fabric of the country has been destroyed. But they have enough people though, Lance, that don't listen to shows like ours who are woke. They just go along with the nonsense. And if they know that they have enough of them to go along with the nonsense, why do they need to go to the rail for us? Well, the message to those people is you are doing a tremendous amount of damage to your loved ones.

[00:57:14] You are doing things to your children and your grandchildren because you're blindly allowing these people in D.C. And I don't care what you're – you know, I don't believe in this whole political party thing. It's total garbage. It's a uniparty. It's put in place to keep you compliant because they act like they're giving you a choice. These are installed politicians that are stealing from you every single day. They're manipulating the system and they're writing laws on the books that aren't good for you. It doesn't matter what the law is.

[00:57:44] They're not doing it because the American public wants to fix daylight savings. All of us do. We're all sick of that daylight savings. They just aren't going to do it. Just like the Clarity Act. The bankers are so deep into these congressional members that they don't want the Clarity Act to pass in its form because they don't want real-world assets to be able to use. Because they're worried about – they want to continue to charge you 30% on credit cards and they want to give you 1% on your savings. That's how they want to do business. Not because they're going to provide good service. Not because they want to help you build your business.

[00:58:13] And crypto operates in a different manner. They want to give you high rates of interest on your assets and your money. They want to allow you a stake. And they don't want that because the banking knows that there's no doubt if somebody can get 7, 8, 9, 10% in a secured asset that doesn't have any risk instead of keeping their money in some crappy CD that gives them 3% and your money is locked up. Well, then you know it's going to happen. People are smart. They're going to move on. But that's the banking system. The banking system needs to mature. And that's why we don't have the Clarity Act.

[00:58:41] All right, let's talk about Talafrico. He wants mass amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. Can somebody do me a favor and slap this guy across the face? This is everything that's wrong with American politicians. Talafrico is an idiot. And I – am I right? The mental health clinic, does everybody understand that this guy lied and said, oh, I had the flu, but he was at a mental health clinic because clearly he couldn't take the pressure?

[00:59:07] Anybody want anybody in a member – in a position of power that can't take the pressure? Because I don't. This guy's a whiny little bitch, and now he wants to give these illegal aliens. Because what does he want? He wants a massive pool of ghost voters. You know, Greg Bovino left because people didn't want him to put the information out that there's 100 million-plus illegal immigrants in this country. The administration is trying to contend that it's only 20 or 30 million. But Bovino has gone on the record over and over again.

[00:59:36] He says, no, that number's incorrect. It's over 100 million. What do you guys think about it? I mean, that's what he says. But I like to see the proof on that before I believe something like that. Well, that's a lot. I mean, let's – Bovino's trying to sell his book. So, you know, they're going to say whatever they can to fucking sell a book sometimes. Whether it was – whether, George, though, it was 100 million or one, we should be doing the right thing to try to get people out. We've got to send a message and there has to be a precedent.

[01:00:04] People need to understand if you're going to come into this country, do it legally or there's going to be consequences. And again, we would go back to the consequences with Nidal Hassan or what we're talking about here in politics. If you glaze over it, you kind of understand it. It's just like New Jersey and where we live. Governor Mikey Sherrill wants to keep this a sanctuary state, sanctuary cities. They want to glaze over the federal law. They pick and choose what laws they want to enforce. So what good is the law? I mean, if you're sending that message to people, they don't care.

[01:00:31] And as far as Tallarico is concerned, look, I still think he was in a mental facility regardless. And if he wasn't and he really had the flu, number one, he's an idiot for not campaigning from his sickbed because he should have been doing that and stop wasting time. And number two, he should be in a mental facility anyway because to caucus with the Democrats means you have to have a clinically diagnosable mental ailment somewhere or you're just the biggest moron. And Democrats pander to dumb people.

[01:00:57] And it amazes me that half the people in Texas, Texas, a red state, want to vote with this moron. Well, you know, I was just thinking about that. And, you know, first of all, how often do we take polls for what they're worth? You know, they're always wrong. Texas, I mean, if you look at the last few Senate elections, it's almost the same pattern where the Democrats leading and this and that, but yet they lose. They don't lose, but it's not like close, close.

[01:01:28] I don't know. Are Republicans not participating in the polls? Are they just like hiding in the shadows and they'll just come out and vote when it's time? I got a theory on this. And I think because Congress's approval rating is so low, right? Whenever you announce a new person, you announce that new person and they go, yeah, put the new person in because we hate the old people. They hate all the old people. And I get that because we hate them too.

[01:01:52] And then the more they find out about the new person and how bad it is, they go, oh, God, well, at least the guy there isn't as bad as that, you know? And then they start to kind of figure out. That's why you see the polls closing a little bit. But I also think the polls are slanted a bit. You know, Barry Cunningham was talking about this last night saying he's never got a call for a poll. I get them all the time. And I take them when I get them because I'm like, oh, I'd love my information to be in there. But sometimes as a Republican, sometimes I should say I'm more of a constitutional conservative.

[01:02:18] Sometimes I will try to skew the polls because sometimes I like to let the Democrats think that they're in the lead so that they don't need to go out and vote. They try to do that to us all the time. And we play the same games. I had a guy once, and this is a great story, but the Republican chairperson in Ocean County, his name is George Gilmore. He's one of the most famous guys in the state when it comes to politics. There's been books written about this guy. There was a Democratic candidate who was out walking one day in Toms River, New Jersey, and he was walking around knocking on doors.

[01:02:48] And he mistakenly went to George's house. And George kept him there for about two hours asking him every question he could until it got dark. And the guy couldn't really go knock on doors anymore. And he's like, well, he goes, I appreciate all your time. And George said to him, he goes, but honestly, I can't vote for you. And he said, why not? He said, because I'm the Republican county chair. We do the same tactics. We try to steal from them a little bit. We try to take away.

[01:03:13] If we could go out and flatten everybody's tires on election day, we would because we know what's at stake. They're a little different. They'll go out and try to kill us. But we try to do it once in a while to even out the numbers a little bit ourselves as well. That's a lot of tires. Yeah. They're flat. Well, let's go. Let's get working. That might not be a bad idea. We'll flatten their tires. I'm just saying. You could have guys with tow trucks just take wrecked cars and just park them in the driveways.

[01:03:43] Yeah. Lock them in. Oh, sorry. What's this? Why is this wrecked car in my driveway? I don't know. I don't know how it got there. All right. AI. Now, this is what I said. I would like to do this with the judiciary and all the rulings and the DOJ. I'd like to do it with both of them. Artificial intelligence. And listen closely. Oh, well, well, no. You're a bad person. You said artificial is supposed to be. Oh, I know. Son of a bitch. Bad Lance. I mean, we're going to get banned. Probably Donald Trump will have a shutdown. It'll close.

[01:04:13] We're going to get suspended everywhere now. Just take out Lance. I'll keep going. I didn't say it. All right. Well, you left it in the story. So I read the story from R.A. That's your fault. No, I want to see where you're going to go with it. If you're going to, you know. All right. Super intelligence finds that a quarter million cancer research papers have been faked. So a 2026 study trained on AI. They took 2,202 papers, 2,202 cancer papers that had been identified as fake.

[01:04:43] Used that same system, training it on that. Then applied the model to look into 2.65 million original cancer research papers published between 1999 and 2024. And it flagged 261,245 papers as fake. Wow. Over 178,000 flagged papers had Chinese institutional affiliations. Shocker.

[01:05:10] Roughly 36% of the Chinese cancer research output in the data set was fake. Iran was next at around 20%. Every fabricated study sitting in a real journal is competing for attention with studies actually pointing towards a legit cure, which means the more fake noise there is, the longer it takes for the real breakthroughs to surface.

[01:05:34] And somewhere in that pile, maybe a real cure is buried under a fake AI-generated pile. Hmm. What do you guys think about that? It doesn't surprise me. Kelly's been saying for the longest time, I mean, the money, the amount of money that people make off cancer treatment is incredible. And if you're not, you know, if you're a general practitioner, there's no money in medicine. You've got to specialize. And cancer is one of those fields where there's so much money. It's huge. It's bigly done.

[01:06:03] So, I mean, it wouldn't surprise me. You know, it's funny now that AI, we have this technology now. And people think that we're going to use it to fake papers moving forward, but we're using it to find fake papers that were written. That's a lot of studies, though, Lance. That's like mind-blowing. That's massive. And the ugly part about it to me is, number one, was it financially driven? Was it intentional? Was the CCP doing it because they wanted to undermine the health of the American public, as an example? Is it competitors putting these fake papers out?

[01:06:33] And my thing is, if you knowingly put out a fake paper, again, it has to be knowingly, should you be prosecuted for it? Should these 261,000 people that submitted these fake papers with fake data and fake studies and the rest of it, should they be criminally prosecuted for this? Because think about the cost to submit all these papers and what it does to the system by bogging it down. You need more people to review the papers. You've got to have this. You've got to have that. Incredible. It's kind of like Medicare and Medicaid fraud.

[01:07:03] I wish they'd use Solum Global. Yeah, sure, we own part of Solum Global. Am I being disingenuous? No. It's because they've got an AI solution to identify fraud in the healthcare industry that probably far exceeds anybody else out there right now. They're way ahead of it. They didn't do it because the fraud of Nick Shirley and the rest that came out. They were already doing it because they recognized the fact that there was a tremendous amount of fraud, and they created a product that can identify it. Let's play this clip, George, and then I want to hear what you have to say.

[01:07:30] So AI didn't cure cancer this year. Bummer. But it exposed a quarter million scientists who faked their cancer research instead. And here's how it happened, right? There are companies called paper mills. They write fake studies and sell the authorship to researchers who need to publish. That's the whole business. So a team of researchers said, okay, if these fake papers all use similar templates, an AI should be able to spot other ones.

[01:08:00] Kind of like how your email catches spam. So they trained a model on over 2,000 papers that had already been caught and retracted for fraud. Then they ran it against 2.6 million real cancer papers published between 1999 and 2024. And that number's been climbing for two decades now, from 1% in the early 2000s to over 16% by 2022. And that's before generative AI got crazy integrated into our lives. Now think about where that number goes from here, right?

[01:08:30] The researchers who built this tool are already warning that Gen.AI is going to make fabricated papers even harder to catch. At a scale that humans could never produce alone. So this problem isn't slowing down, right? It's already accelerating. And a lot of this is important research that tells your doctor how to treat cancer. Every fabricated study sitting in a real journal is competing for attention, with studies actually pointing towards a legit cure.

[01:08:59] Which means the more fake noise there is, the longer it takes for the real breakthroughs to surface. And somewhere in that pile, maybe a real cure is buried under a fake AI generated one. Well, unfortunately, it looks like this is all true. They analyzed 2.65 million original cancer research papers. What it found was 261,000 were likely fake. If we look at where the majority of these fake papers came from,

[01:09:26] it looked like about 178,000 of them came from Chinese institutional affiliations. Roughly 36% of it was Chinese cancer research. And Iran was next at 20%. So the big question you're likely asking yourself is, did anyone actually go to jail for this? Because I would think that fabricating cancer research papers would be a pretty big deal. I mean, people go to jail for like stealing a candy bar.

[01:09:53] So surely fabricating cancer research papers would get you arrested, right? Well, unfortunately, no. There is no well-documented cases where a doctor or researcher has gone to jail for this paper mill fake research. The next question I would ask is, what about losing their medical license? This is surely something you would lose your medical license for at least. Rarely. Almost certainly only in China does this happen.

[01:10:21] So it looks like China, they do hold you responsible for fabricating medical research. What about America and outside of China? There are essentially no reported cases of a physician losing their medical licenses solely for buying, authoring, or creating medical mill papers. So it looks like in the United States, you can do this without much punishment. Nobody goes to jail. Nobody loses their license. It's just business as usual.

[01:10:51] What do you think, George? You have to think of what to believe anymore. I mean, this is just how many more other fake research papers are there on other stuff besides cancer? I mean, I've said it. When SI first came out, I was saying if we use that, put all our medical stuff in the database, all cures, everything, let SI figure it out.

[01:11:17] I'm pretty sure I'll come up with a lot better medicine or natural stuff to use and all the shit that big farmers given us. I mean, it's just a matter of time. Same thing with applying it to the law. We should have SI judges. No more people. Put it in the Constitution and every ruling in law and let it rule like that. As somebody whose family is involved in the medical industry, how do you feel about this? Because I think it's horrible.

[01:11:44] Because how many times has somebody been giving a, you know, they're at a conference and they're a speaker at a conference and they refer to some recent paper because they think the paper's been vetted. And maybe it's one of these 260,000 papers that were created fraudulently. Well, my first instinct is follow the money, right? So if you're trying to keep the noise, you know, as ambient as possible so that it distracts you from other cures, you got to look at who's making money off the cures that are out there.

[01:12:12] Probably, and I haven't done any research on this, let's take a guess and say it's China. And then you watch more of that story and you find out, well, they're prosecuting people in China. Well, but in China, nothing gets done unless the CCCP knows about it because it's all government run. So if you had a research facility in China who was manufacturing a paper and then you found out it was fraudulent, you could make up a guy in China. China could literally say there's a, you know, Ming Ho Win lives on 123 Main Street that doesn't exist.

[01:12:39] But they made him up just to say, yep, we prosecuted him and now he's in jail or he's dead. How are we going to verify that? So when I see that there's a, you know, that certain things are coming out of a certain area, I would automatically, my brain goes to, well, the money must be there if they're trying to fabricate stories to keep the money flowing because it's all about money and power. And then when I find out, and Blanche, you got a fly on your arm. Look at that. Right there live. Right there on his right arm. Oh, you're like. Shit, Mike. Oh, that was like a Mike Pence moment right there.

[01:13:07] We caught it right here live on the Big Big. But then I start to think about. The guy who did announce they arrested a guy. These nuts hang low. He just, yeah, these nuts hang low. And he was eating Mugu guy pan. And he, but the strip low main, by the way, is excellent. If you come here to Tom's River, New Jersey or a wall. But when I, when I start hearing these stories, my brain goes in a million different directions because how do you know what's real and what's not? I would love to find a cure for cancer. I would love to get people off radiation and, and chemo for cancer.

[01:13:36] Kelly will tell you that kills more people of that have cancer than the actual cancer does, which is why a lot of people elect not to do the treatment. And there's things out there like broccoli sprout powder. And now we're hearing, I just did a thing with Nick Holscher on my show. He was on Wake Up Patriots this morning talking about dandelion root extract where it shrunk tumors in mice by like 90%. I mean, there's a lot of stuff out there. Dandelions? Dandelion root extract. And it's not the one you can get on the shelf. Every day.

[01:14:05] I use the extract, the drops, and I just take some. Yeah. Dandelion root. Dandelion root. But it's not, you can't, I looked at my questions again because, you know, I do this for a living where, you know, how much was given over what period of time? Because when you look at the stuff that's on the, on the shelf, it's definitely not the potency that they were using in the lab for the rats where they shrunk the tumors. But I don't have any tumors. My thing is I always believe in preemptive strikes. You take it prophylactically. But then I worry about that.

[01:14:32] I take the broccoli sprout powder prophylactically because that's just a mixture basically of what you would get eating a lot of carnivorous greens, which creates a cellophorephane and there's a glucophorphene. Is it cruciferous or carnivorous? Carnivorous. Did I say that? You said carnivorous. What did you say? I thought it was cruciferous, but maybe I'm wrong. I thought it was carnivorous. I don't know. Let's look it up. Let's look it up. I have no idea. I thought it was cruciferous vegetables. We'll do it. We'll do it. We'll do it live. And yeah, do it live. And, you know, the kale, there's a bunch of them.

[01:15:02] And I try to eat cruciferous vegetables. I try to steam them. I don't ever steam them. I leave them somewhat crisp because you don't want to leach the nutrients out of them. I try to intake cruciferous vegetables, you know, every other day if I can. I don't do it every day. But, you know, it's one of those interesting. It's kind of like I'm trying to get into this where they do the it's not pickled. It's the other version of vegetables you can eat that are supposed to be good for you. Yeah, coniferous. Is it coniferous? Well, there's coniferous. Let's see. What about cruciferous?

[01:15:32] I thought it was cruciferous also. Maybe I'm wrong. I don't know. Who knows? Maybe I applied my Bronx boy accent or I created a word. Okay. Maybe you're right. There's coniferous and cruciferous. It sounds similar, but they refer completely different things. One is type of, another is type of. Oh, you're correct. It's cruciferous. I've been saying it wrong. Look at that. It's cruciferous greens. Well, there's conifers. I got one right. We'll chalk that up to get you. You did. Look at that. You taught me something. You taught me something today so I can correct myself on air.

[01:16:01] It's cruciferous greens. Look at you. Look at you. Wow. And the fly didn't affect any of that. It was amazing. I just thought Jeff Goldblum's not there, you know, turn into the fly. I want to switch gears here. I just want to put this up. This clip's a little long, George. We can cut it wherever you want. But did you see that the discombobulator might have been exposed? Not exposed. I'm sure, but this was a Wall Street Journal interview. And they got a clip and they showed some of the pieces.

[01:16:30] Now, a lot of people are saying that this discombobulator might be multiple pieces that kind of work together, not anything one item. So basically, this is a radio noise jammer they use on enemy satellites. It also can allegedly affect humans. This is what they used at Maduro raid with the helicopters.

[01:16:55] They also said that this has been deployed into Iran, that it's sitting there on ships being wait to be used. Is it going to be used? I don't know. Let's play the clip and then you guys can kind of give me your input on this. These are Space Force weapons that the U.S. doesn't typically show off. And over the past year, they've been crucial to U.S. military operations. This is one of our ground-based jammers. We can deploy these systems around the world.

[01:17:23] This one, known as Meadowlands, is offensive and can jam enemy satellites to block their communications. It often operates alongside the more defensive bounty hunter, which scans the electromagnetic spectrum to detect and locate threats to U.S. forces.

[01:17:38] We are here at the U.S. Space Force's electromagnetic warfare compound, and we are getting exclusive insight into what it was like for Space Force guardians to pack up space weapons like these, put them on an airplane, and deploy into theater to support operations in both Venezuela and Iran. What was it like to be under that kind of pressure? The threat is real. For decades, America's dominance of space has given the U.S. a major military advantage.

[01:18:08] But with adversaries racing to catch up and target U.S. capabilities, military leaders are speaking openly for the first time about the Pentagon's array of space weapons. Today, guardians operate on-orbit weapons that can defend the joint force against space-enabled attacks. To understand why these ground-based weapons are critical in combat, you first have to understand the electromagnetic spectrum.

[01:18:33] Electromagnetic waves of energy are all around us, traveling at different wavelengths or frequencies. They're what's used in x-rays, they let you turn your TV on with a remote control, and they connect your cell phone to a tower. They also serve as the foundation for modern warfare, connecting everything from submarines and drones to radars and ground stations. That's why a key mission for the U.S. Space Force's Combat Forces Command, led by Lieutenant General Gregory Gagnon, is to dominate the electromagnetic spectrum.

[01:19:02] That thing that you never see is incredibly important in warfare. That's the invisible part of warfare. Because if we can dominate the spectrum, we can keep our systems, our satellites, our ships, our planes, all connected and working most effectively. But we can also disrupt the adversary's ability to do it.

[01:19:25] Weapons like Meadowlands are used to disrupt the adversary by interfering with their satellites, satellites that do surveillance, enable communication or navigation. The system works by surging radio frequency signals at the satellite, overwhelming it with noise and interfering with its ability to communicate with a ground station. This is called a non-kinetic effect, meaning the satellite can return to normal once the attack is over.

[01:19:51] The Space Force recently expedited the use of a new and more nimble jammer, seen in this photo, known as the remote modular terminal. We weren't allowed to film it, but this shows how it can be packed into a container and moved around the world. They are used in combat and are emplaced actually globally. Do enemies know where they are? No. Intentionally? Yes. Intentionally? These offensive systems sometimes work alongside Bounty Hunter in a spotter-shooter capacity.

[01:20:21] Bounty Hunter scans the electromagnetic spectrum and listens for disruptions. It can pinpoint signals that could jam or compromise American satellites in the same way Meadowlands disrupts enemy satellites. Once those signals are geolocated, a commander could order a strike against that threat.

[01:20:37] The protection of U.S. space technology is becoming more and more important since satellites help the U.S. detect missile launches, guide weapons, and get a clear picture of the battlefield, taking high-resolution imagery from above. In a sign of how important space systems are, Iran repeatedly targeted U.S. space capabilities, including satellite communications terminals, to try and degrade those advantages.

[01:21:05] That's why our adversaries are weaponizing outer space, because they want to take these advantages of the high ground away from the U.S. military. Your United States Space Force is uniquely tasked to protect our assets in space so that adversaries don't have advantages over our military forces. Loot's clear. Technical Sergeant Joshua Lomax is one of the Guardians who deployed with these weapons over the past year.

[01:21:34] Hours after his team jammed satellites to create a protective bubble around U.S. forces capturing Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, he was told to rapidly deploy to the Middle East, where the U.S. would soon launch its war against Iran. So that's 72 hours to pack the equipment, inspect the equipment, get it loaded on aircraft, and then head out. And then once we're wheels on the ground, it's 96 hours to set up and execute. He couldn't reveal his exact location, but while in the Middle East, Lomax became one of the first Guardians to ever come under enemy fire.

[01:22:03] What was it like to be under that kind of pressure? The threat is real. Everybody was head on a swivel, ensure that we can get through the day, look out for our brothers and sisters of arms. Doesn't matter if it's a Guardian or an airman or a soldier or a Marine. We're all in that environment together to ensure that we can take care of each other. Captain Sophia Parlock also supported the war against Iran, deploying with another electromagnetic warfare system.

[01:22:27] We are looking out for what are the changes going on in the spectrum, and we are noting those, and we're passing along that information to our tasking authority. So potential threats? Are you scanning for potential threats? Yes, exactly. Lomax and Parlock are part of a Space Force organization known as Mission Delta III, based at Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado. First to 10. Hold on. Count it out. Ready? Go.

[01:22:53] The unit, led by Colonel Angelo Fernandez, is responsible for all space electromagnetic warfare. We make sure that we're always ready and fit to fight anywhere around the globe because that's what we do. We have used these systems and others across operations around the globe.

[01:23:13] So if you think of Operation Midnight Hammer, Operation Absolute Resolve, Operation Epic Fury, our Guardians deployed forward, operated in those environments, and they did it with distinction. Is that the first time they have deployed for major combat operations as Space Force Guardians? As Space Force Guardians, this was a very intense year that demanded a lot out of our formations.

[01:23:39] In Epic Fury, our Guardians were in one of our most highly contested environments we've been in in our history, both on the spectrum side and also under direct fires. There's no question in my mind what Guardians bring to the table for the Joint Force.

[01:24:28] All right. Michael Schwartz show at 10 a.m. Monday through Friday. And then you roll right into the big MIG show, 11 a.m. Monday through Friday. That's Eastern Standard for both of those shows. Easy enough. Great way to support. Mike, you can find his books like These Nuts and others on Amazon. Get over there. Grab a copy of These Nuts when you can. You can also grab my books on Amazon, AI Side Hustles 2026. And, of course, Blood in the Streets available on Amazon.

[01:24:58] It's a great way to support us, and it's good information, of course. And with Mike's books, you get a little fun also besides the education. All right. Mike, last words for the audience. George, last words for the audience. Go out and grab These Nuts this weekend and have a good weekend, everybody. I'll see you Monday. All right. George. Y'all have a blessed weekend. Stay safe. Prayers for the people in Oregon for that little, not little, but the school shooting where we had a couple children died and I think a teacher. Horrible.

[01:25:28] So prayers to them. Hope they pull together. Stay frosty out there. Peace. Something truly remarkable is happening in the world of cancer care, just south of the U.S. border. Since 1963, Oasis of Hope Hospital in Tijuana has been quietly redefining what is possible

[01:25:58] for patients facing late-stage cancer. Their integrative approach, treating the body, mind, and spirit, has produced survival outcomes that far exceed standard American hospital averages. In some cases, more than three times higher. The pattern is clear. Patients at Oasis of Hope often live longer than expected. At the center of this extraordinary story is Dr. Francisco Contreras, world-renowned oncologist,

[01:26:26] author of 15 books, and medical director leading a compassionate team dedicated to giving patients not just treatment, but hope. If you or someone you love is facing cancer, Oasis of Hope offers free Zoom consultations for anyone who mentions the Big MIG show. You have nothing to lose by exploring your options. Visit www.oasisophope.com right now.

[01:26:55] Forged through rigorous training and honed by the finest instructors on Earth, these canine units serve beside our nation's warriors as they fight to preserve what we cherish. When these warriors complete their duty, the Warrior Dog Foundation provides them with the home deserving of the service they've given us all. At our state-of-the-art kennels, they receive rehabilitation and care suitable for heroes, because that's what they are.

[01:27:24] Be a part of giving them a future today. Visit www.warriordogfoundation.org. This is the STAB Sawman Tactical Advantage Blade, built by former Marine and Navy SEAL Craig Sawman Sawyer. In the teams, every ounce had to earn its place. No extras, no excuses. That is why he built the stab. 17 practical tools, no moving parts to fail.

[01:27:55] CPM D2 tool steel, hardened to 60 Rockwell. Tungsten carbide glass punch on the pommel. It clips on a belt. It mounts on a plate carrier. Reverse grip or conventional. It stays cooked. Built for the work. Rain, night, salt, mud. Created for adverse conditions. The one he can use. Yours at sawmantacticalblades.com. It was a pretty decent way to go. Noろaval Tatian Hu pharmaceuticals, it can't take 만약 and nitro AGTech. Welcome home, you're gonna be now,