Point of View November 4, 2024 – Hour 1 : Tomorrow’s Election

[00:00:04] Across America, live, this is Point of View, Kirby Anderson.

[00:00:20] Thank you for joining me. It is the Monday edition of Point of View and of course it's the day before the election.

[00:00:25] And if you receive emails from you, from me actually, you will see that I send you one that says election day is tomorrow.

[00:00:32] And if you haven't already voted or if your area does not allow early voting, let me encourage you to make arrangements to get to the polls tomorrow on November 5th.

[00:00:41] The right to vote in the United States is a blessing. It is also a duty. And I think we would all agree.

[00:00:47] I would wonder, I wish I could take some kind of snap poll on how many people listening to Point of View right now have already voted.

[00:00:55] Because my experience has been when we were in Georgia and South Carolina last week doing live broadcasts from both those radio stations.

[00:01:02] Again, thank those of you that were involved in that process that when I'd ask people if they voted, almost everybody had.

[00:01:09] Come back to Dallas yesterday in our church. Jack Graham asked how many people had voted.

[00:01:15] He had just been praying with former President Donald Trump.

[00:01:19] And it looked like when he asked how many people have voted, every hand went up.

[00:01:23] So I don't know if that is the case.

[00:01:25] There are certainly a lot of things we'll talk about today in terms of the Republican Party primarily has encouraged more people to go out and vote.

[00:01:33] It has been tradition and also pretty accurately that more Democrats have voted early than Republicans usually, especially if we've been watching some of those swing states.

[00:01:44] This time it is reversed.

[00:01:46] And I know there are reasons for that.

[00:01:49] One is that there's always been the desire, the belief that could we go back to a time when we have not a voting month, but a voting day.

[00:01:58] We have an election day, not an election month.

[00:02:01] And we all vote on paper ballots.

[00:02:04] That's not going to happen anytime soon.

[00:02:06] And eventually the Republican Party said, you know what?

[00:02:09] Probably we need to encourage people to go and vote early.

[00:02:13] And so this time it does appear that in many of these places Republicans have voted more than Democrats.

[00:02:19] And of course, sometimes when Democrats vote very early, that back in 2016 was a sign that Hillary Clinton was going to win because there was a massive turnout for Democrats.

[00:02:31] But then Republicans outvoted them when it came, especially into some of those swing states on election day.

[00:02:38] We'll see how this plays out this time.

[00:02:40] But nevertheless, if you have not voted, this email is intended for you because we remind you that we have voter guides material there as well.

[00:02:49] And also remind you that if you are one of those individuals, which I'll talk about in just a few minutes, that are still deciding whether or not you're going to vote.

[00:02:57] I hope you're not one of the 41 million self-described born again Christians or I think that number is too high because it counts anybody that calls themselves born again.

[00:03:07] But there are about 32 million that are born again Christians who attend church on a regular basis that said they have not voted or will not vote.

[00:03:16] So we'll see where that goes.

[00:03:17] But we did want to encourage you to do that.

[00:03:20] Let me give an overview.

[00:03:22] First of all, let me thank again, Hannah Dexter and Dr. Barrow Matthews.

[00:03:26] We did live broadcast from Augusta, Georgia and Buford, South Carolina Monday and Tuesday.

[00:03:31] Then I covered the program Wednesday.

[00:03:33] Thursday, we played a repeat program.

[00:03:35] And Friday, Dr.

[00:03:36] Merle Matthews covered the Friday program, which I could have joined.

[00:03:40] But because of some other things going on, decided to give him the opportunity to cover that.

[00:03:45] But I don't have many other trips planned.

[00:03:49] I do have one short trip, but nothing major.

[00:03:50] So you're put up with me for the next few weeks and months because who knows what tomorrow will bring.

[00:03:57] And so we'll be talking about that for some time.

[00:04:00] Next hour, we will just get off of elections for a little bit because yesterday was the International Day of Prayer for the persecuted church.

[00:04:08] So we have Weibo, who is with us.

[00:04:11] He's been on the program with us before.

[00:04:12] He'll be in studio.

[00:04:13] We'll talk about the persecuted church and some other issues that you need to know about.

[00:04:18] I think you will find that to be very helpful as well.

[00:04:21] But if you go to our website, you notice that I have posted a couple of articles.

[00:04:26] One of those is to maybe not trust the polls.

[00:04:29] Well, you've heard me say that many times before.

[00:04:32] But Nate Silver is an individual who I think can accurately be described and described himself as leftist center.

[00:04:39] And yet he has been very critical of his fellow posters.

[00:04:43] He is the founder of what's called FiveThirtyEight.

[00:04:46] I have some of his books on my shelf because even though I may theologically and politically disagree with him, he really does a very good job of analyzing statistics and polls.

[00:04:56] He has been very accurate in the past in trying to sense what is happening in a particular election.

[00:05:03] He's also good at really being able to separate noise from signal in some very important statistics.

[00:05:10] So I commend you his books, even though I think on most issues we would probably disagree with one another.

[00:05:16] And he has said that he thinks many of these pollsters are doing what he calls herding their numbers.

[00:05:23] Herding, H-E-R-D-I-N-G.

[00:05:25] He says, I kind of trust pollsters less.

[00:05:28] He was kind of picking out one of those, the Emerson College.

[00:05:32] He says, they all, every time a pollster says, oh, every state is just plus one or every state is a tie.

[00:05:38] He says, you are.

[00:05:39] And he uses, again, words I would not use.

[00:05:41] But nevertheless, you're cheating, you're cheating.

[00:05:43] And he was very angry about that.

[00:05:45] He goes on to say, your numbers aren't all going to come out exactly as one point leads.

[00:05:51] When you're sampling 800 people over dozens of surveys, you're putting, and again, he uses some words I wouldn't use, but basically saying you're putting your finger on the scale.

[00:06:01] And he blasted a lot of these polls that are repeated without any kind of disclaimer in the news right now.

[00:06:09] The one he still thinks is probably more accurate, other than, of course, his own, is the New York Times.

[00:06:14] Of course, the New York Times has Donald Trump winning.

[00:06:16] But nevertheless, I think it is helpful when you have an individual who is in the business who says some of these polls mean nothing.

[00:06:26] They're taking essentially old numbers, what turned out that happened, say, four years ago, and applying it to today when all sorts of reasons to reject it are on the table.

[00:06:40] And a good example of that is the other day I saw this one where it was reported that actually Donald Trump was losing in the state of Iowa.

[00:06:51] I believe Iowa is one of the few states Point of View doesn't broadcast in, although sometimes I'm on Iowa radio stations because I have some very good friends there that do interviews with me.

[00:07:01] But actually, what was it, back in September, I believe, there was Donald Trump was listed as having an 18-point lead over Joe Biden.

[00:07:12] And now it's listed Kamala Harris having a four-point lead over Donald Trump.

[00:07:19] And as a lot of people have said, you cannot believe that.

[00:07:23] A 22-point shift is a seismic shift that does not happen overnight.

[00:07:30] And there are some people in the business, again, that are accusing some of those people doing polls in Iowa of partaking in some of the material that's dispensed in the cannabis dispensaries because this makes no sense at all.

[00:07:46] And so it illustrates, again, why you should only trust what happens on election night.

[00:07:51] Because I suspect sometimes these polls, if they actually help promote a candidate, are used not to report but actually to move the needle.

[00:08:02] But as we go to a break, let me just mention – maybe I'll mention it after the break because I think it's just a good illustration of the fact that you have some wide springs in these polls.

[00:08:12] But if you've heard me say it once, you've heard me say it, I know, dozens and dozens of times.

[00:08:17] The only poll that really matches and matters at all is on November 5th.

[00:08:23] But I do believe that there should be some accounting after this election to really begin to say some of these polls were telling us it was close in some of the states where it was not close.

[00:08:35] Or if it is close, then some of the other people I'm going to quote in just a minute are way off.

[00:08:40] And that, I think, is a reason to always approach all of these polls with at least a bag of salt, a grain of salt.

[00:08:47] We'll be right back.

[00:08:58] This is Viewpoints with Kirby Anderson.

[00:09:04] Environmental, social, and governance investment practices have been in the news for some time.

[00:09:09] But there's growing evidence that the popularity of ESG mandates is fading.

[00:09:13] Allison Schrager writes that the ESG bubble is bursting.

[00:09:17] Sure, individuals would like to invest in corporations that reflect their values.

[00:09:21] But she says what counts as virtuous is rarely cut and dried.

[00:09:25] Vivek Ramashwamy warns how woke capital politicizes your retirement.

[00:09:29] He explains that politics have quickly come to dominate index funds.

[00:09:33] When you buy an index fund that is managed by these big fund managers, you're promoting ESG objectives whether you want to or not.

[00:09:40] Mark Jaffe argues in an op-ed that ESG investment practices distract investors and corporate management from maximizing long-term profitability.

[00:09:50] It diverts them from priorities that align with increased productivity and focus on a shifting array of inconsistently defined social impact criteria.

[00:10:00] That is why he concludes that ESG is bad for the economy.

[00:10:03] Yale law professor Jed Rubenfeld and former U.S. Attorney General William Barr argues that ESG can't square with fiduciary duty.

[00:10:11] They cite a letter written by 19 state attorneys general warning that the ESG used by one of the fund managers appear to involve rampant violations of the sole interest rule, a well-established legal principle.

[00:10:24] You know, focusing our attention and investments on companies that are concerned about the environment and their social responsibility may sound like a good idea.

[00:10:32] But the number of articles coming out are a reminder to all of us that often the details in a policy matter.

[00:10:38] I'm Kirby Anderson, and that's my point of view.

[00:10:47] Go deeper on topics like you just heard by visiting pointofview.net.

[00:10:53] That's pointofview.net.

[00:10:57] You're listening to Point of View, your listener-supported source for truth.

[00:11:03] Back once again, bottom of the hour, we're going to be talking with our good friend Gary Bauer, of course, served in President Ronald Reagan's administration for eight years

[00:11:10] and certainly has his pulse and his finger on the pulse, I guess I should say, on what is happening, and I'd love to get some of his thoughts.

[00:11:17] We have posted his end-of-day report from Friday, and I would love to post his one for Monday because I'm sure he has some new material,

[00:11:25] but I'm sure we'll cover enough of that with him in the half an hour that we have.

[00:11:29] But let me just also mention that a minute ago we were talking about these polls,

[00:11:34] and Nate Silver, let's give him credit where credit is due,

[00:11:37] certainly points out that there are people saying that many of these particular races are ties or only one point difference.

[00:11:45] And that, I think, is something to remind ourselves that people that we would respect, like Nate Silver saying,

[00:11:53] that doesn't even make any sense from what we know.

[00:11:56] On the other extreme, let me just report this as well.

[00:12:00] One of the polls that we used to use so often, especially with the USA Radio Network, was Rasmussen.

[00:12:05] I've had Mr. Rasmussen on this program a number of times.

[00:12:09] In an interview one of his associates did, Mark Mitchell, he actually is going the other direction and saying,

[00:12:18] I'll just quote him, he says,

[00:12:20] What you're hearing out there is that the polls are close, and I think that's wrong.

[00:12:25] He has independent polling, and Rasmussen, looking at it more from a conservative point of view,

[00:12:32] Rasmussen, I think you'd honestly say, is right of center, Nate Silver left of center, I think that's fair to say,

[00:12:38] claimed that their independent polling suggests that Trump is leading strongly in the so-called battleground states,

[00:12:46] and actually is doing well in some of the traditional strongholds like Virginia,

[00:12:52] you heard us talk about that the other day, and New Hampshire.

[00:12:55] Even the other pollsters are starting to put New Hampshire in a category of toss-up,

[00:13:01] which, oftentimes, when it's a toss-up, you know that there's a little bit still of Trump hesitancy

[00:13:07] to say I'm voting for Trump when a pollster asks so, so those could flip in his behavior.

[00:13:13] His argument, in his favor, I should say, but other states, and they're looking at now Minnesota,

[00:13:20] and New Mexico could follow suit, because a lot of people were saying,

[00:13:24] well, New Mexico may now go to Kamala Harris, Iowa may go to Kamala Harris,

[00:13:28] doesn't necessarily look like that.

[00:13:31] So we have some that are saying it's almost too close to call,

[00:13:35] and at least one pollster saying, no, it's going to look like a landslide

[00:13:40] if we begin to calculate what this might be.

[00:13:44] Somebody's going to be wrong, but I just thought, since you're not hearing that from the mainstream media,

[00:13:49] I thought it'd be worth mentioning that as well.

[00:13:51] And, of course, there are some unique things that have happened over the last couple of years in terms of voting.

[00:13:57] One of those is that you have these drop boxes.

[00:14:01] The problem with the drop boxes, if you've been paying attention,

[00:14:04] is there have been some arsons that have thrown some kind of explosive material into those official ballot boxes,

[00:14:14] and as a result, pretty clear that anybody who voted and dropped their ballot

[00:14:20] or had somebody else drop that ballot in the official ballot drop box,

[00:14:25] that's not going to be counted.

[00:14:28] So that has become a big issue.

[00:14:30] For those of you watching online, I'll show you a picture here.

[00:14:33] This is a picture of a police car parked right next to the official ballot drop box,

[00:14:40] because this one happens to be in the state of Washington,

[00:14:43] because they can't be assured that this won't happen again.

[00:14:48] Don't have any idea who's doing this, why they're doing it.

[00:14:52] Could be a disgruntled individual that actually doesn't like the way people vote this way.

[00:14:57] Could be an individual trying to reduce the number of votes.

[00:15:02] Could be somebody who has no political motivation at all,

[00:15:05] maybe even a homeless person.

[00:15:07] But that's kind of an interesting connection.

[00:15:10] And, of course, you've had some that have violated the rules.

[00:15:13] We're talking about some individuals being allowed to turn in absentee ballots

[00:15:17] after the time they're supposed to be turned in.

[00:15:20] And, of course, you've always had some questions about whether or not there's enough voter integrity.

[00:15:26] Now, again, I think the argument that you can make is

[00:15:30] more people are watching this election than ever before.

[00:15:33] It's all, you know, fool me once, shame on you.

[00:15:37] Fool me twice, shame on me.

[00:15:38] And there are just a lot of poll watchers.

[00:15:40] Even when I went to vote the other day, I was amazed at how many eyes were watching all the things taking place.

[00:15:48] That being said, what you get every once in a while is, well, there's no evidence of any kind of voter fraud.

[00:15:55] Okay, let me give you three real quickly.

[00:15:58] Michigan.

[00:15:58] We have listeners in Michigan.

[00:16:00] And right there in Ann Arbor, turns out that a Chinese citizen who studied at the University of Michigan there in Ann Arbor voted.

[00:16:08] And they know that this individual voted illegally.

[00:16:11] But, of course, they can't pull the ballot back out.

[00:16:15] Because guess what?

[00:16:16] Once you put the ballot in there, the connection to you is eliminated.

[00:16:21] Let's just hope that in the city of Ann Arbor, or even in the state of Michigan, it doesn't come down to one vote.

[00:16:29] Because even the people that are running the elections admit that vote was voted illegally.

[00:16:36] Which also brings us back to one of the things we've been doing for the last couple of weeks.

[00:16:40] And that is talking about non-citizen voting.

[00:16:43] Of course, that one happens in the District of Columbia.

[00:16:46] So that's Michigan.

[00:16:47] Let's take Minnesota.

[00:16:48] You have a woman there.

[00:16:50] Fortunately, they caught her.

[00:16:51] She was trying to vote twice.

[00:16:53] Because she actually was signing.

[00:16:57] And they flagged it because she was signing the signatures of a deceased person.

[00:17:02] So the ballots were for the mother and another individual.

[00:17:06] So, again, vote early, vote often.

[00:17:09] Fortunately, that one got caught.

[00:17:11] And then, of course, in the state of Texas, I've talked about this one before.

[00:17:14] So I just wanted to give you a couple of examples.

[00:17:16] This is where a judge has actually ordered a new election due to the fact that there were so many illegal votes.

[00:17:23] Are you ready for this?

[00:17:24] 1,430 illegal votes.

[00:17:28] And the Republican candidate, Tammy Pierce, lost by 449 votes to the judge, Deshaun Jones.

[00:17:37] So that one has to be redone again.

[00:17:39] But I think the point I'm making is we all know that some of these elections are very close.

[00:17:45] And we now, I think, also have some pretty good evidence that there has been some voter fraud.

[00:17:51] And so the good news is we will be, after the election, no matter who wins, covering a little bit more on this issue of voter integrity and election integrity with a couple of key individuals.

[00:18:03] One this week and one next week.

[00:18:05] Because I think we will learn some lessons that we need to apply next time, even for the midterm elections that will be taking place in 2026.

[00:18:15] Just before we take a break and then go and spend some time with Gary Bauer, I posted a piece by Karl Rove in which he's using the numbers, which we have a little more confidence in, from 538.

[00:18:28] That would be Nate Silver, that it shows Kamala Harris at 48.4 percent, Donald Trump at 45.8 percent.

[00:18:36] But then he asked the question, what about the other 5.2 percent?

[00:18:41] And he said, aside from a smattering of a few third-party voters, because there are third-party voters, there are a number of third-party candidates out there.

[00:18:49] These other individuals that are undecided basically fall into one of three positions or categories.

[00:18:58] The first is what he calls low-information voters who are only now realizing there's an election.

[00:19:04] Who are these people?

[00:19:05] Okay, that's first number.

[00:19:07] Just now realizing, oh, there's an election.

[00:19:09] I need to vote tomorrow.

[00:19:11] Okay, the second group are those who most likely appreciate the results of Donald Trump's presidency, but they dislike Donald Trump.

[00:19:21] And so he talks about the fact that maybe they felt that America was more prosperous, safer, stronger, and all that, but they have problems with his personality.

[00:19:31] And then the third group are those who are open to Kamala Harris, but question if she's up to the job.

[00:19:37] And I think there are some questions that have surfaced over even the last couple of weeks about that as well.

[00:19:43] And he points out that you basically have these three groups in every battleground state, and their decisions to vote or not vote, and their choices, if they do, he says, will settle the contest.

[00:19:55] The one place I would disagree with Karl Rove, and I do this with a great deal of careful timidity, because this man knows a lot more about elections than most of us, is that when you see people that are undecided, most of the time they're not going to vote.

[00:20:10] If you have not made up your mind about whether you're going to vote for Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, and it is today on Monday, November 4th, I don't think you're voting tomorrow, especially if there are long lines.

[00:20:23] But we'll see.

[00:20:24] And, of course, we won't know much of that until Tuesday night, maybe some of it not until Wednesday, but I just wanted to cover some of that as well.

[00:20:32] Well, our good friend Gary Bauer is going to join us, and he's served, of course, in President Ronald Reagan's administration for eight years, first as Undersecretary of Education and Chief Domestic Policy Advisor.

[00:20:43] And we have posted his Friday, November 1st end-of-day report, so you can read that.

[00:20:51] It's something I would encourage you to subscribe to.

[00:20:53] We're going to get his perspective on many of these issues, and I think you will appreciate his conversation.

[00:20:59] And as we talk with him, I'd be glad to talk with you as well.

[00:21:03] 1-800-351-1212.

[00:21:07] 1-800-351-1212.

[00:21:09] Let's give Gary a chance to make a few comments, but then if you want to agree or disagree, we'll give you that opportunity as well.

[00:21:16] All the articles we're talking about today are on the website at pointofview.net.

[00:21:21] And so take the time to go there, and we'll be back right after this.

[00:21:29] It almost seems like we live in a different world from many people in positions of authority.

[00:21:35] They say men can be women, and women men.

[00:21:39] People are prosecuted differently, or not at all, depending on their politics.

[00:21:44] Criminals are more valued and rewarded than law-abiding citizens.

[00:21:49] It's so overwhelming, so demoralizing.

[00:21:52] You feel like giving up, but we can't.

[00:21:55] We shouldn't.

[00:21:56] We must not.

[00:21:57] As Winston Churchill said to Britain in the darkest days of World War II,

[00:22:02] Never give in.

[00:22:03] Never give in.

[00:22:04] Never, never, never.

[00:22:06] Never yield to force.

[00:22:07] Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.

[00:22:12] And that's what we say to you today.

[00:22:14] This is not a time to give in, but to step up and join Point of View in providing clarity in the chaos.

[00:22:22] We can't do it alone, but together, with God's help, we will overcome the darkness.

[00:22:29] Invest in biblical clarity today at pointofview.net, or call 1-800-347-5151.

[00:22:38] Pointofview.net, and 800-347-5151.

[00:22:47] Point of View will continue after this.

[00:22:56] You are listening to Point of View.

[00:23:01] The opinions expressed on Point of View do not necessarily reflect the views of the management or staff of this station.

[00:23:09] And now, here again, is Kirby Anderson.

[00:23:12] Election Day is tomorrow.

[00:23:13] Couldn't think of a better person to talk to than our good friend Gary Bauer.

[00:23:16] Again, an individual that has served as the chief domestic policy advisor under Ronald Reagan.

[00:23:22] Served there for eight years.

[00:23:24] He's also now, of course, the president of American Values, the chairman of the Campaign for Working Families PAC.

[00:23:30] And we've also posted his Friday, November 1st, end-of-day report.

[00:23:35] Gary, thank you for joining us today.

[00:23:38] Wait a minute.

[00:23:39] The election is tomorrow?

[00:23:41] You're just like some of those people I was just quoting from that are just finding out.

[00:23:46] You know, Karl Rove talked about there's three kind of people.

[00:23:48] Some people have just now recognized, and there's an election tomorrow.

[00:23:51] Those are the undecided, and I don't think they're going to vote.

[00:23:53] But nevertheless, isn't that hilarious?

[00:23:55] Yes.

[00:23:56] Okay.

[00:23:56] It's hilarious.

[00:23:57] You've been a presidential candidate.

[00:23:59] You've been involved in more campaigns than probably anybody we interview.

[00:24:02] And yet, again, what are your thoughts about where we stand today, not only for the presidential election,

[00:24:07] but we spent a fair amount of time talking about why we think these elections for U.S. senators are very important.

[00:24:13] What's your thinking?

[00:24:16] Well, you know, Kirby, I mean, would-haves, could-haves, and should-haves, right?

[00:24:19] I keep thinking back to when Joe Biden was showing this virtually every day that his mental decline was significant

[00:24:29] and making him almost unelectable as far as getting reelected.

[00:24:36] And it looked like, you know, not only would Donald Trump win the election,

[00:24:40] but it might be a clear enough victory that we wouldn't have all the drama and divisions,

[00:24:47] which, you know, are always possible.

[00:24:51] That's ancient history, however.

[00:24:54] They threw him overboard unceremoniously and put Kamala Harris in there,

[00:24:59] who's never had anybody vote for her in this cycle to be the presidential candidate.

[00:25:05] And it looks like we've got a very, very, very tight race that I'm afraid,

[00:25:10] no matter which side looks like they've won,

[00:25:14] is going to lead to the other side having many reasons to say there's been fraud.

[00:25:23] And I don't think I'm a partisan about this.

[00:25:27] You know, I don't see anything that would let somebody think that Trump had somehow stole the election.

[00:25:33] There's no reports of weird things happening in places that Republicans control,

[00:25:39] but there's all kinds of things happening in the areas where Democrats control.

[00:25:44] Yes.

[00:25:45] On the Senate, you're absolutely right.

[00:25:47] If it's a tied Senate and the vice president breaks the tie,

[00:25:52] if it's, you know, if the Republicans have a three, four, five per vote margin in the Senate,

[00:25:59] they might, they'll not only control the Senate,

[00:26:01] but they might be able to keep control of it two years from now,

[00:26:06] where it's going to be a very tough map for Republicans.

[00:26:09] There'll be a lot of Republican senators two years from now up for re-election.

[00:26:14] Sure.

[00:26:14] Well, again, we will cover that later in the week.

[00:26:17] We have John Lott on to talk about any kind of electoral malfeasance,

[00:26:21] and then Hans von Spakowski next week.

[00:26:23] So whatever happens, no matter who wins, I suspect we'll be talking about that.

[00:26:27] But maybe you can help us out here for just a minute,

[00:26:30] because the other day I saw Donald Trump get off an airplane and get on a garbage truck,

[00:26:34] and then I've got the lieutenant governor here in the state of Texas

[00:26:37] who is sitting next to a garbage can surrounded by garbage bags,

[00:26:41] and then I even saw some people in Bucks County, Pennsylvania,

[00:26:45] wearing garbage bags to go vote, all because of this claim of garbage.

[00:26:49] But then you have the governor of the state of New York saying that

[00:26:53] if you don't vote the way she thinks you should vote, you're un-American.

[00:26:56] And is this like reverse psychology?

[00:27:00] It seems to me that if you wanted people to vote for your candidate or accept your policies,

[00:27:05] you wouldn't call them names, but that seems to be what's flourishing over these last couple of days.

[00:27:13] You're right, Kirby.

[00:27:14] I'll tell you, your analysis is also right.

[00:27:17] Why would you do that?

[00:27:19] You know, you want to bring some of these people over to your side.

[00:27:23] And the only explanation I can come up with is they really do hate us.

[00:27:29] When I say us, I mean broadly speaking, people that are pro-life, pro-family,

[00:27:34] believe in religious liberty and think our liberty comes from God, not government.

[00:27:39] Because we've got a string of these.

[00:27:41] It goes all the way back to Obama referring to people that believe in faith, family, and freedom

[00:27:48] as clinging to their Bible and guns.

[00:27:51] You know, Hillary Clinton not only called us irredeemable,

[00:27:57] a basket full of people that are irredeemable,

[00:28:00] but also said not too long ago that we needed to be put through some sort of re-education camps

[00:28:10] in order to get rid of our indoctrination.

[00:28:12] In fact, I don't know, Kirby, that doesn't sound good to me.

[00:28:15] Doesn't sound good to me.

[00:28:18] And then lately, you know, all these other things we're hearing,

[00:28:22] and, you know, we're Nazis, we're fascists, we're bigots, we're racists.

[00:28:28] And now this globalist governor of New York saying that we're anti or un-American,

[00:28:38] they got a lot of nerve, first of all.

[00:28:41] But second of all, it really does, I think, show that the hatred here is not by us.

[00:28:48] It's not by conservatives.

[00:28:51] I mean, you know, a lot of conservatives are Christians.

[00:28:53] We don't hate anybody.

[00:28:54] We might hate their ideas or their actions, but we don't hate them.

[00:29:00] They're made in the image of God, and they have some dignity and value and worth

[00:29:05] unless they blow it by what they do.

[00:29:08] But these folks really seem to hate us.

[00:29:12] That's why they call us Christian nationalists.

[00:29:14] Yes.

[00:29:15] And I think it helps them justify their cheating.

[00:29:17] All right, yes.

[00:29:18] Well, one other one that I want to pull out of your end-of-day report,

[00:29:22] because this is another one of those claims.

[00:29:24] You say, why was that made?

[00:29:26] I love to go to watch the Dallas Mavericks.

[00:29:29] As a matter of fact, it's just down the road from where we're broadcasting today.

[00:29:31] And sometimes when I'm there, I get to see Mark Cuban in the distance.

[00:29:35] Sometimes instead of being in the cheap seats, I get some good ones,

[00:29:37] and I've sat almost next to him.

[00:29:39] But the other day saying that Donald Trump has no strong and intelligent women,

[00:29:43] and you go on for about two pages on this, because if nothing else,

[00:29:48] you can speak to this more than most.

[00:29:50] There are a lot of strong, very independent women that are in the Republican Party

[00:29:54] and part of the campaign, aren't there?

[00:29:57] Oh, my goodness.

[00:29:58] I mean, everywhere.

[00:30:01] And, you know, I mean, people have seen them with their own eyes, right?

[00:30:06] Some of Trump's best lawyers are women,

[00:30:08] and the people that have handled press for him and his polling.

[00:30:13] And Kellyanne Conway was actually made campaign chairman in, I believe, 2020.

[00:30:21] I don't know.

[00:30:23] I haven't spent a lot of time with Melania,

[00:30:25] but she doesn't seem like a weak woman to me.

[00:30:29] I've seen him kind of cower a few times when Melania gives him a look about something.

[00:30:36] You know, it's just insane.

[00:30:38] But the other thing that jumped out at me, Kirby, was just like you,

[00:30:42] I've spent a lot of time over the years because of the work I do with conservative,

[00:30:50] often Christian women.

[00:30:52] And I've got to tell you, the word weak is not a word that jumps to my mind.

[00:30:59] I mean, these are prayer warriors.

[00:31:01] These are women that, you know, have strong opinions,

[00:31:04] and they are bold because of their faith.

[00:31:09] But, look, the left looks down, as we've known for years,

[00:31:14] at women that want to be mothers

[00:31:16] or women that think that, you know, keeping a good home for their family

[00:31:21] and tucking in their children at night

[00:31:23] and packing lunches for them

[00:31:25] and leading the family in prayer,

[00:31:28] that somehow those women are less than the women that want to get four degrees

[00:31:33] and be a CEO of some globalist country, you know, or company.

[00:31:41] So I thought that he really stepped in it.

[00:31:46] But I do think, again,

[00:31:49] it's the evidence that, if we needed any,

[00:31:53] that they really looked down their nose.

[00:31:56] Remember the FBI guy that had,

[00:31:59] he was involved in the whole conspiracy theory about the dossier and all that?

[00:32:07] Right.

[00:32:08] I'm drawing a blank on his name.

[00:32:10] But he went to a Walmart down in Southern Virginia

[00:32:13] and sent a text message to the woman he was having an affair with.

[00:32:18] I remember.

[00:32:19] It said, I can smell the Trump voters.

[00:32:24] Pretty bad.

[00:32:25] Well, let's take a break.

[00:32:26] And when we come back,

[00:32:27] I do want to get your thoughts about some of these endorsements

[00:32:30] because on the one hand,

[00:32:31] you have the Washington Post saying,

[00:32:33] well, we really aren't going to endorse a candidate

[00:32:35] when you always assume they would endorse Kamala Harris.

[00:32:38] You have, of course, Joe Manchin, as you mentioned the other day,

[00:32:40] not endorsing Kamala Harris.

[00:32:42] On the other hand,

[00:32:43] if I'd asked you six months ago

[00:32:45] whether or not Tulsi Gabbard would endorse him,

[00:32:49] you might say maybe.

[00:32:50] If I told you that she was going to become a Republican,

[00:32:53] I think you would begin to think I was smoking something.

[00:32:55] I shouldn't be smoking.

[00:32:56] And Elon Musk would be out there on the campaign trail.

[00:33:00] Some of this I have never seen before.

[00:33:02] And so when we come back from the break,

[00:33:04] I want to talk about that

[00:33:05] because you and I both have been around for a while

[00:33:08] and there is always a realignment.

[00:33:10] We saw that under your boss, Ronald Reagan,

[00:33:14] the so-called Reagan Democrats.

[00:33:15] But there is a very striking realignment.

[00:33:19] Of course, I haven't even mentioned the African-American men.

[00:33:21] So I want to get your thoughts about that

[00:33:23] because if indeed that realignment takes place,

[00:33:25] what does that mean for the future?

[00:33:28] Since already you're talking about

[00:33:30] what could happen in the 2026 election

[00:33:32] because after all,

[00:33:35] that begins probably on Thursday,

[00:33:38] maybe even on Wednesday.

[00:33:39] Anyway, we'll be back right after this.

[00:33:54] You're listening to Point of View,

[00:33:57] your listener-supported source for truth.

[00:34:00] Back once again talking with our good friend Gary Bauer

[00:34:02] for a few more minutes.

[00:34:03] Next hour, we'll have Weibo with us in studio

[00:34:06] because as you might even notice

[00:34:08] in Gary Bauer's end-of-day report,

[00:34:10] yesterday was the International Day of Prayer

[00:34:12] for the Persecuted Church.

[00:34:14] So we'll be talking about persecuted Christians

[00:34:16] and take a little bit of a break from the election

[00:34:18] because we'll certainly be talking about that

[00:34:19] for the rest of the week.

[00:34:21] But Gary, what about this idea of political realignment?

[00:34:24] You lived through that in the 1980s

[00:34:27] under Ronald Reagan.

[00:34:29] I do sense that as well.

[00:34:30] Tulsi Gabbard, she was a Democrat

[00:34:34] elected to Congress.

[00:34:35] She ran for the presidency

[00:34:37] under the Democratic Party.

[00:34:39] Now, most people don't know

[00:34:40] that she and her father,

[00:34:41] who was, I guess, Mike Gabbard,

[00:34:43] actually founded the Alliance

[00:34:45] for Traditional Marriage and Values.

[00:34:47] So even though she was a Democrat,

[00:34:48] she wasn't a wild, radical leftist Democrat.

[00:34:52] But who would have predicted

[00:34:53] a couple of months ago

[00:34:54] that she would not only leave

[00:34:55] the Democratic Party,

[00:34:56] but she would join the Republican Party.

[00:34:58] And then you have Elon Musk

[00:35:00] and you have Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

[00:35:03] Something's going on.

[00:35:04] What about that?

[00:35:06] It is an amazing thing, Kirby.

[00:35:09] And I mean, there's been

[00:35:11] some chatter about it,

[00:35:12] but I don't think anybody

[00:35:14] has really zeroed in on it

[00:35:16] the way you just did.

[00:35:19] You know, every once in a while,

[00:35:21] if you're a sports fan,

[00:35:23] the manager of a team will pull off,

[00:35:25] or the owner of a team

[00:35:26] will pull off some trade,

[00:35:28] and you think to yourself,

[00:35:30] how did that manager do that?

[00:35:32] I mean, we've got these

[00:35:33] three great players,

[00:35:35] and we were able to send them

[00:35:37] a couple of losers.

[00:35:38] Well, somehow Trump pulled off

[00:35:40] the most incredible trade

[00:35:41] ever in politics.

[00:35:43] He gave the Democrats

[00:35:45] the Cheney family,

[00:35:46] and we got Elon Musk,

[00:35:49] Palsy Gabbard, and RFK Jr.

[00:35:51] I mean, that is some trade.

[00:35:55] And again, I think it might

[00:35:57] bode well for the future,

[00:35:58] because if you think about this,

[00:36:00] again, we recognize

[00:36:01] that there are certain things

[00:36:02] we would disagree with

[00:36:03] of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,

[00:36:05] but if you wanted to get

[00:36:06] America healthy

[00:36:08] and address some of the

[00:36:10] kinds of chemicals

[00:36:11] that are on our food

[00:36:12] in America

[00:36:13] that are not found

[00:36:14] in the foods in Europe,

[00:36:16] and if you are concerned

[00:36:17] about maybe appealing

[00:36:19] to women,

[00:36:21] even though Mark Cuban

[00:36:22] is convinced

[00:36:23] that there are no

[00:36:24] strong, intelligent women

[00:36:25] that surround

[00:36:26] the Trump administration,

[00:36:28] you, I think,

[00:36:29] have a real opportunity.

[00:36:31] And then the other day

[00:36:32] when Elon Musk

[00:36:33] is asked,

[00:36:34] well, what do you think

[00:36:35] you might be able to do

[00:36:37] if you really bring

[00:36:38] some of these ideas

[00:36:39] from the free market

[00:36:40] and your experience

[00:36:42] with efficiency,

[00:36:43] how much do you think

[00:36:44] you could reduce

[00:36:45] the federal budget?

[00:36:46] And he pops off

[00:36:47] with a number,

[00:36:48] $2 trillion,

[00:36:49] and I thought,

[00:36:50] even if he's in the

[00:36:51] right order of magnitude,

[00:36:53] we've never seen

[00:36:54] anything like that.

[00:36:55] Maybe going all the way

[00:36:56] back to,

[00:36:56] you might remember,

[00:36:57] the Grace Commission

[00:36:58] under Ronald Reagan,

[00:36:59] but talk about that

[00:37:00] if you might.

[00:37:01] Yeah, no,

[00:37:02] you're absolutely right.

[00:37:03] And look,

[00:37:05] I think the fact

[00:37:06] that you've got

[00:37:07] these,

[00:37:07] the people that we

[00:37:08] were talking about,

[00:37:10] Musk and Gabbard

[00:37:12] and RFK Jr.,

[00:37:15] they are all

[00:37:16] in their own area

[00:37:19] extraordinary people.

[00:37:21] I mean,

[00:37:21] she cares a great deal

[00:37:23] about national strength,

[00:37:24] military strength,

[00:37:25] you know,

[00:37:27] but avoiding

[00:37:28] unnecessary wars

[00:37:30] and RFK is,

[00:37:31] I mean,

[00:37:32] the Kennedy family,

[00:37:33] I mean,

[00:37:33] that is the heart

[00:37:35] of the Democrat Party.

[00:37:37] And in Elon Musk,

[00:37:38] is there a tech person

[00:37:40] in the world

[00:37:41] that has been able

[00:37:42] to do more

[00:37:43] than he

[00:37:44] has been able

[00:37:45] to do?

[00:37:46] And the fact

[00:37:47] that those three people,

[00:37:48] and you're right,

[00:37:49] we don't agree

[00:37:50] with them

[00:37:50] on everything,

[00:37:52] but on the big things,

[00:37:55] that America's

[00:37:55] in trouble,

[00:37:56] that America

[00:37:57] has to be strong,

[00:37:58] that we're being,

[00:38:00] hurt by a combination

[00:38:01] of big government

[00:38:02] and often

[00:38:03] big multinational

[00:38:05] corporations,

[00:38:08] that technology

[00:38:09] and American

[00:38:11] achievement

[00:38:12] are something

[00:38:13] that we've got

[00:38:14] to encourage,

[00:38:15] not discourage.

[00:38:16] Freedom of speech,

[00:38:17] all three of them

[00:38:18] are aggressive

[00:38:20] advocates

[00:38:21] for freedom

[00:38:22] of speech,

[00:38:22] without which

[00:38:23] there can't be

[00:38:24] freedom of religion.

[00:38:25] So,

[00:38:26] I think

[00:38:27] this realignment

[00:38:28] is very telling,

[00:38:30] and if

[00:38:32] Donald Trump

[00:38:33] wins,

[00:38:33] and I think

[00:38:34] it's significant

[00:38:34] that these are

[00:38:35] the kind of people

[00:38:36] he can attract,

[00:38:37] if he wins,

[00:38:38] I think we could

[00:38:40] see one of the

[00:38:40] most incredible

[00:38:41] four years

[00:38:43] we've ever seen

[00:38:44] in modern

[00:38:44] American history.

[00:38:45] I want to ask

[00:38:46] about one other

[00:38:47] person on the team,

[00:38:48] and that is

[00:38:48] J.D. Vance.

[00:38:49] To be honest

[00:38:50] with you,

[00:38:50] Kelly and I,

[00:38:51] Kelly Shockford

[00:38:52] and I talked

[00:38:52] about off air

[00:38:53] at first,

[00:38:53] I said,

[00:38:54] well,

[00:38:54] I don't know,

[00:38:55] what do we

[00:38:55] think about this?

[00:38:56] You know,

[00:38:56] you and I,

[00:38:57] we have children

[00:38:58] older than him,

[00:38:59] and you're going,

[00:39:01] okay,

[00:39:01] first term senator,

[00:39:03] of course,

[00:39:03] I remember the book,

[00:39:05] again,

[00:39:06] Hillbilly Elegy,

[00:39:07] and yet,

[00:39:08] I have been,

[00:39:09] and finally,

[00:39:09] Kelly and I both

[00:39:10] on the air

[00:39:10] have said,

[00:39:11] we've been very

[00:39:11] impressed with the way

[00:39:13] he's handled himself

[00:39:14] in front of the press,

[00:39:15] and as an individual

[00:39:16] who has spent

[00:39:17] a lifetime

[00:39:18] handling yourself

[00:39:19] in front of the

[00:39:20] very hostile press

[00:39:22] there in Washington,

[00:39:23] D.C.,

[00:39:24] I think you have to say

[00:39:25] he's done a pretty good

[00:39:26] job,

[00:39:26] hasn't he?

[00:39:28] It's really been amazing.

[00:39:30] The guy is very bright,

[00:39:33] and he's quick

[00:39:34] on his feet.

[00:39:36] I have not seen

[00:39:37] an interview yet

[00:39:39] where he did not

[00:39:40] best the aggressive

[00:39:44] interviewer,

[00:39:45] and he won't let

[00:39:46] them get away

[00:39:47] with these kinds

[00:39:48] of false choices

[00:39:51] the left likes

[00:39:52] to put up,

[00:39:52] the media left

[00:39:53] likes to put up

[00:39:54] in front of our

[00:39:55] people.

[00:39:56] I don't think he

[00:39:57] ever comes across

[00:39:58] as being mean

[00:39:59] or yelling

[00:40:01] or whatever.

[00:40:01] He just

[00:40:03] zeroes right in.

[00:40:04] I did fairly good

[00:40:06] in the presidential

[00:40:07] debates,

[00:40:08] Kirby,

[00:40:08] but I have to be

[00:40:09] honest with you.

[00:40:10] I came up with

[00:40:10] my best lines

[00:40:11] usually about

[00:40:12] two hours later

[00:40:13] back in the hotel

[00:40:14] room.

[00:40:15] Why didn't I say

[00:40:16] that?

[00:40:17] J.D. Vance

[00:40:18] seems to be able

[00:40:19] to come up

[00:40:19] with those best

[00:40:20] lines right at

[00:40:21] the moment

[00:40:21] when they're

[00:40:22] needed.

[00:40:23] And again,

[00:40:23] I think some

[00:40:24] people are saying,

[00:40:25] well,

[00:40:25] what's the future?

[00:40:26] And I've said

[00:40:26] before,

[00:40:27] okay,

[00:40:27] recognize that

[00:40:28] we talked

[00:40:28] before,

[00:40:29] people may not

[00:40:30] like the

[00:40:30] personality

[00:40:31] sometimes of

[00:40:31] Donald Trump,

[00:40:32] but you're

[00:40:32] talking about

[00:40:32] somebody that

[00:40:33] appoints 4,000

[00:40:34] to 5,000

[00:40:35] people,

[00:40:36] as you well

[00:40:37] know,

[00:40:37] everybody in the

[00:40:38] cabinet,

[00:40:39] U.S.

[00:40:39] Marshals,

[00:40:40] U.S.

[00:40:41] we're talking

[00:40:42] about the

[00:40:42] SEC,

[00:40:43] the FCC,

[00:40:44] the FTC,

[00:40:45] on and on

[00:40:45] and on and

[00:40:46] on and on.

[00:40:47] And then,

[00:40:47] of course,

[00:40:47] you sometimes

[00:40:48] can get a

[00:40:49] sense of who

[00:40:50] they would put

[00:40:51] in office by

[00:40:51] who they pick

[00:40:52] as their VP.

[00:40:53] And I think

[00:40:54] that also works

[00:40:55] the other way.

[00:40:55] We saw who

[00:40:56] Kamala Harris

[00:40:57] could have

[00:40:58] picked,

[00:40:58] and if it

[00:40:59] was Josh

[00:40:59] Shapiro,

[00:41:00] I think we'd

[00:41:01] be talking

[00:41:01] about a

[00:41:02] different kind

[00:41:02] of race

[00:41:02] than Tim

[00:41:03] Walsh.

[00:41:03] So in

[00:41:04] some respects,

[00:41:06] J.D. Vance

[00:41:06] helps us understand

[00:41:07] that these

[00:41:08] kind of people,

[00:41:09] and you've

[00:41:10] got to believe

[00:41:10] that some

[00:41:10] of the names

[00:41:11] we just

[00:41:11] mentioned,

[00:41:12] I can mention

[00:41:14] Ramashwamy,

[00:41:15] you know,

[00:41:15] and some

[00:41:15] others that

[00:41:16] probably will

[00:41:17] be in that

[00:41:18] group,

[00:41:18] and those

[00:41:19] are the kind

[00:41:19] of people

[00:41:20] you probably

[00:41:20] want to run

[00:41:21] the government

[00:41:22] because you

[00:41:22] want serious

[00:41:23] people in

[00:41:24] serious positions

[00:41:25] in government,

[00:41:25] don't you?

[00:41:28] You're exactly

[00:41:28] right.

[00:41:29] When you go

[00:41:30] into that

[00:41:30] voting booth,

[00:41:31] you're going

[00:41:31] to see one

[00:41:32] name on each

[00:41:34] party line,

[00:41:35] and then the

[00:41:35] name of the

[00:41:37] people,

[00:41:38] but you're

[00:41:38] really voting

[00:41:39] for 6,000,

[00:41:40] 7,000,

[00:41:40] 8,000 people

[00:41:41] that they

[00:41:42] will put in

[00:41:43] various jobs,

[00:41:44] and each

[00:41:45] of those

[00:41:45] jobs,

[00:41:46] as people

[00:41:46] get,

[00:41:47] will have

[00:41:48] under them

[00:41:49] many,

[00:41:49] many bureaucrats

[00:41:50] that they'll

[00:41:51] be able to

[00:41:51] order to

[00:41:53] do one

[00:41:54] thing or

[00:41:55] another.

[00:41:55] So it

[00:41:56] makes a

[00:41:57] huge difference.

[00:41:58] Some people

[00:41:59] are telling

[00:42:00] themselves,

[00:42:01] and I

[00:42:01] include

[00:42:01] Christians in

[00:42:02] this,

[00:42:03] I don't like

[00:42:03] either one

[00:42:04] of them,

[00:42:04] I'm going

[00:42:05] to set it

[00:42:06] out,

[00:42:06] and in

[00:42:08] four years

[00:42:08] from now

[00:42:09] there'll be

[00:42:09] a better

[00:42:10] choice.

[00:42:10] Folks,

[00:42:11] I'm telling

[00:42:12] you,

[00:42:12] if you

[00:42:13] have four

[00:42:13] more years

[00:42:14] of this

[00:42:15] kind of

[00:42:16] neo-Marxist

[00:42:17] government

[00:42:18] that we've

[00:42:19] been experiencing,

[00:42:20] Kirby,

[00:42:21] I'm serious,

[00:42:21] I don't

[00:42:23] believe there

[00:42:24] will be

[00:42:24] another

[00:42:25] free election

[00:42:26] after this

[00:42:27] just based

[00:42:29] on the

[00:42:29] judicial

[00:42:30] appointments

[00:42:30] and the

[00:42:31] increasing

[00:42:32] power

[00:42:33] concentrated

[00:42:34] in Washington,

[00:42:35] D.C.

[00:42:35] Well,

[00:42:36] again,

[00:42:36] if you

[00:42:36] would like

[00:42:37] to know

[00:42:37] more about

[00:42:37] Gary Bauer,

[00:42:38] we have

[00:42:38] an opportunity

[00:42:39] for you

[00:42:40] to click

[00:42:40] on that

[00:42:41] and it

[00:42:41] will take

[00:42:41] you to,

[00:42:42] again,

[00:42:43] some great

[00:42:44] material,

[00:42:45] including the

[00:42:45] campaign for

[00:42:46] working families

[00:42:47] and,

[00:42:47] of course,

[00:42:47] our American

[00:42:48] values.

[00:42:48] We have

[00:42:49] the end

[00:42:49] of day

[00:42:50] report.

[00:42:50] I do

[00:42:51] encourage

[00:42:51] you to

[00:42:52] subscribe

[00:42:52] to that.

[00:42:53] And,

[00:42:53] Gary,

[00:42:53] we'll find

[00:42:54] out how

[00:42:54] it went,

[00:42:55] but thank

[00:42:55] you for

[00:42:55] giving us

[00:42:55] some time

[00:42:56] today here

[00:42:56] on Point

[00:42:56] of View.

[00:42:58] Always

[00:42:58] great to

[00:42:59] be with

[00:42:59] you,

[00:42:59] Kirby.

[00:43:00] Please vote,

[00:43:01] folks.

[00:43:01] If you

[00:43:02] haven't

[00:43:02] voted,

[00:43:02] please vote

[00:43:03] and continue

[00:43:04] to pray.

[00:43:04] We will

[00:43:05] take a break

[00:43:06] and be back

[00:43:06] with more

[00:43:07] right after

[00:43:07] this.

[00:43:10] There is an

[00:43:11] old military

[00:43:11] saying,

[00:43:12] if you don't

[00:43:13] have communications,

[00:43:14] you don't

[00:43:14] have anything.

[00:43:16] Good information

[00:43:17] is the key

[00:43:18] to success,

[00:43:19] not only for

[00:43:20] those in the

[00:43:20] military,

[00:43:21] but for all

[00:43:22] of us.

[00:43:23] You can't

[00:43:23] take positive,

[00:43:24] productive,

[00:43:25] and helpful

[00:43:26] action if

[00:43:27] you don't

[00:43:27] have good

[00:43:28] information.

[00:43:29] Point of View

[00:43:29] Radio's main

[00:43:30] role is to

[00:43:31] provide good

[00:43:32] information,

[00:43:33] and we

[00:43:34] distribute that

[00:43:34] information not

[00:43:36] only here

[00:43:36] through our

[00:43:36] radio program,

[00:43:38] but online

[00:43:39] and through

[00:43:39] our various

[00:43:40] social media

[00:43:41] channels.

[00:43:41] You know

[00:43:42] that Big Tech

[00:43:43] isn't exactly

[00:43:44] a supporter

[00:43:44] of what we

[00:43:45] do,

[00:43:45] so you need

[00:43:46] to take

[00:43:47] intentional

[00:43:48] steps to

[00:43:48] keep in

[00:43:49] touch with

[00:43:49] us.

[00:43:50] Make sure

[00:43:51] you follow

[00:43:51] us on

[00:43:51] Twitter,

[00:43:52] at

[00:43:52] Point of

[00:43:53] View

[00:43:53] RTS,

[00:43:55] which of

[00:43:55] course stands

[00:43:55] for Point

[00:43:56] of View

[00:43:57] Radio

[00:43:57] Talk Show,

[00:43:58] at

[00:44:04] Point of

[00:44:05] View Radio

[00:44:05] Talk Show,

[00:44:06] we won't

[00:44:07] overwhelm you,

[00:44:08] usually just

[00:44:09] one post a

[00:44:10] day with

[00:44:10] information on

[00:44:11] our guests

[00:44:11] and what's

[00:44:12] important,

[00:44:13] the information

[00:44:14] you need

[00:44:15] when you

[00:44:15] need it.

[00:44:16] Point of

[00:44:17] View Radio

[00:44:17] Talk Show

[00:44:18] on Facebook

[00:44:19] and at

[00:44:20] Point of

[00:44:21] View RTS

[00:44:22] on Twitter.

[00:44:27] Point of

[00:44:28] View will

[00:44:29] continue

[00:44:30] after this.