[00:00:05] When you realize that mainstream media has sold you a box of rocks, it's time to tune into the Kate Dalley Show, America's Newest Addiction. The show starts now. Where does the real power lie? The power behind the power. Because it's no longer about who lives in the White House. It's about who owns the White House.
[00:00:31] This is the presidency. How much higher can a politician go? The real power isn't here. It's beyond here. It's above it, but still working in conjunction with it. All right. Yes, that was creepy Kevin Spacey. Sorry. The House of Cards. Well, he's not wrong in that clip. That was part of a show called House of Cards. Anyway, welcome back, Kate Dalley Show. And I've got so much still to say.
[00:01:00] And then I kind of want to introduce something that, if you look at it a different way, just might be very scammy. So I've got a couple of things in this hour, but I want to finish up on the public-private partnership. Now, it just is very striking, the mission of the deep state, because I think actually it's pretty brilliant of them to do it this way,
[00:01:24] because people would never suspect that they are driving in communism the way they are, and in a vehicle that doesn't look like communism. It's true. And if you go into office and you're selected for office, no matter what party, I think we're up against this love for World Economic Forum's greatest goal,
[00:01:48] and that is Klaus Schwab's greatest goal was to reinvent capitalism and destroy it and bring in communism through public-private partnerships. And I'll talk a little bit more about this, because there's some key kind of insights to take away with what's going on. There's been a lot of chatter about privatizing Social Security as the way to fix it. I don't know that that's the way to fix it.
[00:02:15] I think that you're going to leave a lot of people really vulnerable, because if they tank the economy, the deep state tanks the economy to bring in digital, a lot of people are going to lose. They're going to lose their homes. They're going to lose their land. They're going to lose their assets. They won't be able to pay for them. And if they privatize Social Security, then it leaves them open for that vulnerability, because then it's on what the stock market does. And the problem with that is we all know what the stock market can do. So that's a problem.
[00:02:46] So, you know, there's a lot of examples I could give, but even the chemical sector, they basically sold it, 1996, to an Israel corporation, which was acquired in 1909 by the Ofer family, which is the country's richest family. And that's the Dead Sea and the chemicals extracted from the Dead Sea. A lot of people have been complaining that, wait a second,
[00:03:13] if we do this with all these investment firms, you have your BlackRock, your Vanguard, all these investment firms, then they're stealing our resources, and they're aided and abetted by all the governments in the world to do this. And why are we allowing this? It's a very important question to ask. And so, you know, how is it going to be achieved in the coming years?
[00:03:35] Well, back in 2013, Netanyahu's finance guy, Yogev, he said this. He approached with this new approach, introduced this new approach to privatization. It was partial government divestment and minority private holdings. Before this, privatization meant a complete transfer of ownership and management from state to the private sector.
[00:04:01] Now, keep in mind what he's not saying is that those entities are usually controlled by government, but they don't look like government, kind of like BlackRock. Okay? So you have that. So he said that a large measure of ownership, you know, that they were looking at this and kind of figuring out a different way because they were getting a lot of blowback for this. People didn't want their minerals. They didn't want all of these entities controlling what makes the world go round, right? In trade and everything else.
[00:04:28] And so they said, look, you know, there's the natural monopolies. Okay? And that there would be this idea to hold 51% controlling stake. Okay? Minority stake would be sold and governments would still stay on board, but they wouldn't have the accountability per se. Okay?
[00:04:54] So you're moving accountability for government doing what they're doing to these entities, and it's going to look like the entities are running them, but actually the government's still having a controlling stake. Okay? They've just alleviated their accountability mechanism. Okay? So he kind of went on to say the partial sale approach also has a built-in flaw. Well, what's that? A company is wholly owned by government.
[00:05:23] It's possible for the government to restructure it if it's sold in entirety, but the new owners can do what they want with it. But if government sells part of the company to private investors, then it becomes almost impossible to implement a restructuring that will satisfy the very different needs of all the owners. So the companies that need to be restructured has to be done prior to this privatization, this partial privatization, and it's going to make it more attractive and sellable. Okay?
[00:05:50] So they're really getting into spreading this so that basically look at the green movement. The green movement isn't just carried out by government. It's carried out by all these different entities, including all the way down to your cities and counties. All these entities push it because they all have a stake in it. Right? They all have something to gain. So you're trying to fight.
[00:06:17] You know, we always say the government, but then the government becomes, it's got its hooks in everybody. It's really, really kind of sickening. And the WEF has just, they're so excited about this. I mean, they don't even know what to do. They're giddy. They're giddy over this. This was their goal. And so if you go look at the WEF and Klaus Schwab resigning yesterday, very, very weird. Okay? So very sudden. Timing was weird.
[00:06:44] Um, but let me just say this. Uh, there's a lot of people that go, well, who, who we're going to get is going to be worse because we're walking into territory that something very big is coming. Very big. Because they're, they're reaching their goals with this and no one's really talking about that. A lot of people on our Liberty side are going, well, this is a win for the deep state because
[00:07:11] this is not, not for the deep state against the deep state because we're winning because he's resigning. And I don't think that at all. Actually, I don't think it's a win for us at all. I think it's actually sort of a nod to something very big is coming and digital tyranny is coming and you better be ready for that. So if you look it up, it's like how to harness the potential. This is WF, how to harness the potential of public private partnerships, how to scale them for global progress.
[00:07:39] Um, these are the, uh, public private collaboration is the key to building resilience, the power of partnerships. I mean, on and on, I could go on and on. There's just a million, million things. Uh, philanthropic partnerships. How amazing. Um, I mean, gosh, it's the key to everything in their eyes, right? Because they say in their own words, public private partnerships are the smart way to go. So the green movement is they're utilizing the public private partnership to kick it to, to really kick it in gear.
[00:08:09] And then of course, I think tie up our natural assets and, and water and all kinds of things, um, to push the green movement, but it won't just be the government doing it. Even at the federal level, it will be the deep state having their, their, these ghouls, having their hooks in everybody to push it along. It is going to be hard to fight that. Um, no doubt. And so just be aware.
[00:08:35] And, um, and I think, you know, people are going to think that this is good because people are going to join in with the government. This is never good when they're stealing our money to do it. And they have to continuously steal more to do it and invent more money to do it, which isn't going to be good for us. And so of course, some of the comments were ownership will be eliminated. It won't be eliminated. It'll be simply transferred to groups that are in public private partnerships.
[00:09:05] So instead of you owning it, someone else owns it. And you, is that the end game? You basically enter into a public private partnership to keep your house and you don't really fully own it in your land and you don't really fully own it in your farm and everything else. Life by subscription simply means renting back your stuff from the new owners because it
[00:09:33] won't be your, it's not going to be eliminated. So people are going to go, we're okay. Hey, it's saving us from, from what government's doing. No, no, no, no. Government gets their hooks in these public private partnerships and they just do it through the back door. They're just doing it through a back door. That's all there is. And it's, it's so insane to me.
[00:09:56] When was the last time you had a, uh, selected, um, elected person talk about this and bring this up and say they were squarely against where this lands, where it ends. When was the last time you even heard that from anybody? It's because you haven't, they won't, they're not going to say it because either they're too dense to know where it lands because they're getting something out of it right now.
[00:10:22] And they, they can, they can say to the public when they stand up at a podium and do their yearly speech, look at what we've accomplished. Look at what we're doing. They don't talk about the public private partnership, do they? But they talk about, Oh, see, this is the money we have. And this is the enlarged budget. And this is, look at what we're doing for you. And it's all gauged on the future. Not knowing that where the hooks land is private public partnership for everybody.
[00:10:50] As I was kind of going through this, I was thinking, Oh my gosh, this isn't just a couple of rich people. Now that the leftists love that narrative. It's just the rich people. That's the problem. No, it's not just them. Okay. It's a lot of entities are coming in a lot of entities to buy up all the assets. And some of those assets are yours.
[00:11:16] And then they destabilize the economy enough to where you can't afford to stand it. This is your only option. And you have to be a public private partnership in order to survive. Is there anything we can do? I'm not sure, but I'm not hearing anyone talk about this. And I think this is a kind of an eye opener, eye opening insight to the future, to where they're headed with this, because it was a brilliant plan. You got to give it up for the deep state. Brilliant.
[00:11:47] You can't have the government. If the, if every, if people have realized what the government's all about by now, okay, you can't anything they push, they're going to get pushback. But if they can get everybody to do it, if they can get everybody on board and crash the economy and get themselves in a position where the public private partnerships, the only option you can kind of see where they're going, but we don't think it's going to extend down to us. That's the problem. We're not seeing it. I don't think I could be wrong. I could be wrong.
[00:12:17] I'll give you that. But the more I'm sensing that if in order to be in office, this is your thing, this is what you have to be for. And look at all the articles, all the articles like, uh, Catherine Austin Fitz said, they're, they're wanting to pry really privatize. Now we've seen privatization, but I mean, on a whole different scale. That's what's so scary about that. It's just a whole different way of absorbing it into every facet. Be right back.
[00:12:47] Kate Daly show. This is the Kate Daly show.
[00:13:19] The Daly show. I'll be talking about a school choice with Chrisanne hall on Thursday. A lot of people are unclear on that one and I've been getting a lot of emails and messages. So we'll talk about that. And I also have a caller. So I want to go there too. And, uh, this is, you know, it's, it's, we better realize what's coming. Um, okay. Caller go right ahead. You're, you're live. Oh, Mike from Colts with Alaska. Yeah. I'm an expert on land grabbing. I've been in mining my whole life.
[00:13:47] We've been fighting in Alaska and, uh, Arizona, Nevada, California. Uh, basically the Western States. We've been fighting the department of interior and environmentalists, so-called environmentalists our whole life to keep our land open. And it doesn't seem like anybody listened to us until their land started to be taken like the hunters. The hunters were a little, um, oh my gosh, they were so sympathetic with the environmentalists
[00:14:14] until their hunting ground got taken away and their bullets got taken away and their guns got taken away. Finally, they woke up. Finally, the fishermen woke up and they, you know, next we need the golfers, golfers to wake up and get out of their daydream. We're losing everything. Right. They want to take our land. It started with Alan Cranston. Mm-hmm. And when he died of a terrible death in California, he was a senator. Mm-hmm. A land grabber, the original. Mm-hmm. And, uh, not the original. Teddy Roosevelt was. But anyway, Dianne Feinstein took over. Barbara Boxer took over.
[00:14:44] They flew over all these areas and they said, oh, isn't that beautiful? Let's make that a wilderness. And they flew to the next zone, Golden Valley, out in the desert. And they said, oh my gosh, aren't those mountains stunning? Look at the color. Let's make those a wilderness. They flew up north, uh, beyond Death Valley. Mm-hmm. And they said, you know what? We should extend Death Valley out here. This is so gorgeous. Mm-hmm. And then they went to the El Pasos. Let's make the El Paso a wilderness. It's so beautiful and it's close.
[00:15:14] It's only 200 miles from Los Angeles. Well, the El Pasos were in my backyard. We fought her. We fought her with tooth and nail. She came out and she was booed. Dianne Feinstein says, well, we'll just get an executive order from Obama. The bum. Mm-hmm. So now they made all these monuments, all these wildernesses. They're trying to get rid of the Mining Act of 1872. It's a congressional act that gives us the right, due diligence, find a mineral, stake a claim.
[00:15:41] If everybody went out and staked one claim, 20 acres, cost 100 bucks, big deal. Mm-hmm. Put four posts in the ground. If you find a mineral. Yeah. That would tie the government up forever. A hard rock miner finds gold on the surface. He gets the law of apex. If that vein goes underground for 100 miles, that's his vein. That ties up all the land. The Department of Interior are out to take our land. Mm-hmm. They've locked up wilderness areas that have historic trails on them.
[00:16:10] They've destroyed every mining head frame in America. Right. They're trying to take down all the head frames because why? It destroys the viewshed. Yes. Oh, yeah? What do the windmills do, you bums? Yep, yep, yep, yep. What do the solar mowers do, you bums? Yes. They're all corrupt. Yes. There's no such thing. There's a good environmentalist. The World Wildlife Federation Fund, they poach animals. Yeah. And you see them on TV. They see them on TV all the time. Right. But anyway, they're trying to get our land to go out and stake a claim.
[00:16:39] And that's how you stop them. I love that you're bringing that up because we're never really proactive in trying to do the same thing they're doing and fighting back. We're not on the other side of this, and we need to be. And so you're right. The more of us that do that, we could actually save it from them tying everything up in public-private partnerships and also for resources that they say we can't touch. Because there will be a time from the 2010 Rockefeller report.
[00:17:06] They were very busy telling us in 2010 that they were going to tie up lakes and water and then just say, well, it needs to mend for 20 years. So sorry. We're going to put a fence around it. Oh, no. B.S. Do you know all the fires, Kate? Yeah. All the fires that are burned down. Well, they're doing it on purpose. So what they do, they put out straw waddles at the base of the burned out areas with red ribbon, no trespassing, no motorized vehicles, no pedestrian ribbon signs.
[00:17:34] And they're off limits for 30 years. And they do it to all the mineralized zones. Out in the Mojave Desert, they're putting out thousands of red ribbon, no motorized vehicles. They don't care about the handicap. So you know what we do when we go down there? We break them. When there's a cloud cover, we bend them over flat, lay them on the ground flat while you're holding the top up, and you back up in a circle, and they'll snap off, and then we throw them down a mine shaft. That's what we do, the BLM and the Department of Interior. That's how we take care of those problems.
[00:18:04] All right. Hey, thank you for your call. I really appreciate you calling in. You're welcome. Look, there was a lot there. And he's right about going out and staking these claims because they don't want you to know that. They don't want you to do that, right? They want to just gobble everything up, and then you're fighting just to save the parcel that you own right now. And I'm telling you, there's a real big picture to what he's saying right now. It's going on globally.
[00:18:33] And it's the thing that everything else is kind of the distraction to that. Be right back, Kate Daly Show. This is the Kate Daly Show. Fifty ways to leave your lover. You just slip out the backjack.
[00:19:02] Make a new plan, stand. You don't need to be coy, Roy. Just get yourself free. Hop on the bus, Gus. You don't need to discuss much. Get yourself free from the lover called government. Because government's spreading its wings. It's been the mission. It's been the mission of Klausi Boy and the WEF.
[00:19:31] And we better get really wise to how they're doing it and what they're doing. And how they're pushing these positives. It's insidious. The deep state's very busy right now. And they haven't gone away. And they are present and accounted for. And that's what makes me sad. And I do think the 2014 Conservation Act, where they said to families, hey, if you can't afford your taxes, you can just donate it.
[00:20:00] We'll be a partner with you to the Conservation Act. And then in the contract, as I've said many times on the show, it says in perpetuity forever. And your land is given over to the successor of the United States. Who's the successor of the United States? That's in the contract that we know for a fact. One of my co-hosts saw the contract. So I think that was a trial run.
[00:20:28] I think they were just trying to see, you know, how this would work. And hey, can't pay your taxes. Here's your alternative. You can put a sign on it that says it's your family farm. But we're going to own it. And we're going to tell you what to do with it. But you can still kind of own it. Oh, nightmare. Nightmare. And then, of course, you have to kind of look at Klaus leaving like, my work here is done, you know, in a very creepy German voice. Because I think what's coming is something very big.
[00:20:57] And we've sort of been, this has been foretold. I don't know why we want to act like, oh, the deep stay. They're leaving. This is awesome. Really? Why would they? It doesn't even make sense. But I'm hearing it from a lot of people in our liberty movement is they're leaving. We're good. Everything's fine. And oh, my gosh, they're not succeeding. I think of it more as my work here is done. We're rocking and rolling and ready to go than winning.
[00:21:26] And I do want to say, you know, Klaus was very busy doing the cyber attack, the cyber attack, the cyber attack, right? And what are we going to do in a cyber attack? And that's one of the looming threats, right? We have EMP as a looming threat. We have cyber attack as a looming threat. And I don't mean to be so doom and gloom today. I really don't. It's just I'm sharing with you research and rabbit holes and pieces and just going, wow,
[00:21:52] this is this is much deeper than I think we even realize in what their plans are to absorb everything. OK, but not have it be government. We won't think it's government doing it. So the cyber attack thing is is bizarre because there is a thought out there. Now, let me. So Klaus has his cyber attack initiative meetings where if this happens, we're going to do X, Y, Z, but I want to explore.
[00:22:22] And this comes from Jiminy Cricket. He's a researcher. And it was kind of a decent piece because I was looking at it and going, I've never really thought about it that way, because usually what you envision is a shadowy group of people, this shadowy group that is ready to steal and they're robbers, but it's cyber. OK. And so you kind of think of it in that way. But what is a racket? He asks, you know, a service that calls forth its own demand and would not have been needed otherwise.
[00:22:53] OK, a service that calls forth its own demand and would not have been needed otherwise. Is it a racket? So most major industries can be rackets today or are rackets today, including health care, insurance, national defense, public safety, higher education. OK, so all of these things. So what is AI tell us? Because, of course, they want us to go to AI now for everything, right? Cyber security industry is experiencing substantial growth driven by an increasing cyber cyber threats
[00:23:22] and the need for robust security solutions with a global market projected to reach 578 billion by 2033. That's an interesting number. And so why did they pick that particular year to base their projections on? And point being cyber security means big money. And in today's world, nothing gets to be big money by accident. I'll agree.
[00:23:44] So the economy is just a giant cart pulling the horse with these investment firms, the elite, the deep state, the billionaires, the trillionaires hiding behind private equity and investment groups, creating and inflating new markets with monopoly money. OK, and so you've seen smart cameras pop up. You've seen the public squares, the school campuses, cameras everywhere. Right. It's we're NSA to death.
[00:24:11] And of course, there's a lot of fake events that happen that they're not fake. They happen ish, but they're controlled and they happen for a reason. Right. With people that are chosen to make that happen. So you have all of these events and you have this digital world coming in a bigger, faster form. OK, so right now there's there's a claim on the Internet that 55 percent of data breaches are caused by organized crime.
[00:24:41] OK, so this is kind of interesting because the assertion is this. Is it are the cyber threats really coming from shadowy groups or are they perpetrated by government? That's an interesting question. OK, and so there's a lot of money to shore this up. There's like, you know how all the money goes into housing and then, you know, really, really know where it's going. Or the World Food Bank, seven point two billion every year from us.
[00:25:11] And we don't know where it's going because they never say they just go. They give us a nice round number and they go, oh, we fed this round number of people and we gave them money. Don't ask any more questions. So nothing's ever spelled out. Right. So there there's a lot of rackets. OK, we don't know where the money is going. And so not all cyber attacks are perpetrated by government. But are the major ones and are the hackers out there in the employ?
[00:25:39] Are they employed by national intelligence to then serve up their answers? Because Microsoft is a CIA front and we've known that I've done shows on it. There's so much evidence. It's just scary. There's so much evidence. So with Microsoft, they built the back doors on purpose. Right. And then they come out and they say, well, there's these back doors. So we have to come in with all of this to help.
[00:26:04] And so one of the largest cybersecurity firms in the world is Palo Alto Networks. Yeah. Palo Alto. Right up there where all Silicon Valley, everything is right. So they serve 70 organizations in 150 countries. And the WF is not a business of protecting personal rights or privacy. So why would they partner with Palo Alto Networks? And this is what kind of drove me to do this piece next was interesting.
[00:26:33] And I just I just find it really fascinating, actually. Even the head of Social Security has this background in cybersecurity. It's very weird. And so are they engineering? Is the WF really about engineering the global economy for the trillionaires, for the families that really run the world, the 13 families that really run the run run run things for maximum profit? And is cybersecurity one of their latest high margin market rackets?
[00:27:02] That's hey, it's an interesting question. Is it not? You got to kind of think about this for a second. It was founded in 2005 by Nir Zook, who is a former engineer on checkpoint and net screen technologies and began. He's actually an Israeli native and he began working with computers during his mandatory military service. And he's the head of software development. And so this is the Palo Alto group. That's like the top cybersecurity group.
[00:27:29] And this is all coming out of military intelligence and American military intelligence because they work sort of hand in hand. Then you've got In-Q-Tel CIA's investment arm. But there's many In-Q-Tels. And and then, of course, the entire Internet being a DARPA project. That's true. It was. And so all of these people still at the forefront. And I actually have so much on that, by the way, so many so many things on digital and we'll go there.
[00:27:57] But eventually on the show this week or next. But another big cybersecurity firm is CrowdStrike. And it was found in a partnership with a big equity firm called Warbug Pincus. And they come from the Warbug banking family. Hmm. That's interesting. And then, of course, you've got their top executives, which are former FBI officials. I'm just saying it's a question, a question to peruse. That's all I'm saying.
[00:28:27] Wow. That is the whole cybersecurity thing. It's just a racket that you can't believe. Well, be right back. Kate Daly show. Interesting stuff. Be right back. Lionsgate.
[00:28:45] This is the Kate Daly show. Welcome back.
[00:29:14] Kate Daly show. Hmm. Getting interesting in here. You know, it makes you wonder just about so many things, right? By the way, Ron Paul next week and this Friday doubleheader. You're going to want to tune in for that. A lot of good information from Greg Manorino and Anna Dentist. It's going to explain your teeth. And it's going to be fascinating. I promise. There's just so many things we don't know. And that's what makes this.
[00:29:43] There's just so many things I could tackle. Seriously. It's endless on how much truth we don't get told all the time. It's endless. And I still have to get to the stuff on nicotine, too, because there's some great stuff on that. And it got such a bad rap because it was in cigarettes. And the pyrazines are what makes it addictive and horrible. And cigarettes are horrible because they have 600 chemicals. But there's so much on that that I still want to explain on the show.
[00:30:13] But there's just all of these pressing matters. So make sure and go to the sponsors and help the show stay on. And if you're going to do Mother's Day, get the gifts through the show. And if you are Father's Day, get the gifts through the show. And like MyPillow has these fantastic slippers that are amazing. So there's all kinds of things that you can do to help us continue to go down these rabbit holes. Okay. So the racket of cybersecurity. Is it a racket?
[00:30:42] Is it just yet another thing, right? And so McAfee. I had McAfee on the show. You know, you probably always have that window pop up on your computer, right? For systems, right? And there's just so much there that says that he was part of the club. And a lot of people think, you know, he faked his death. His own girlfriend says, ex-girlfriend says he faked his death back in 2021 when he allegedly died. But I did have him on the show before that.
[00:31:12] I think I had him on in 2016. And he worked for NASA, Lockheed, Booz Allen, Hamilton. And just before starting his antivirus software company. So that's kind of a major red flag, to tell you the truth. And there's just always red flags. Do you ever get tired of the red flags? I do.
[00:31:32] So did it act more like a virus than an antivirus, slowing your computer way down and bugging out constantly where you constantly needed more antivirus? Well, it's something to think about. Yeah. So the move from defense contracting to antivirus software makes a lot of sense until you kind of start to think, well, maybe he was part of the club. Right.
[00:31:58] And I think that assertion's been made on the show before, but this is just a little more context to that. We had the WannaCry ransom attack, worldwide cyber attack in May 2017, which targeted computers running the Microsoft Windows, of course, operating system. Do people still think Bill Gates invented that? Anyway, it was already done. It was already done. It's well documented out there.
[00:32:24] It was already done by Air Force Intelligence before he came along. It was already invented. They just put his name on it. And then through history, they tried to say that he did it, and he never did. He was at Harvard when it was started. Okay. So Microsoft Windows operating system. Remember Windows, a window into every home, window into every life. Okay.
[00:32:46] So the operating system, by encrypting data and demanding ransom payments in the Bitcoin cryptocurrency, and then it was propagated by using Eternal Blue, an exploit developed by the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, for Windows systems. And so Eternal Blue was stolen and leaked by a group called the Shadow Brokers a month prior to the attack.
[00:33:09] And then, of course, it was one of the biggest cyber attacks, and it was used as an exploit created by the NSA. Yet we're supposed to believe that the NSA had nothing to do with the attack. But wait, why would Microsoft allow the NSA to create its own private backdoor into its operating system? And that's explicitly what Wikipedia tells us. The obvious answer is that both Microsoft and NSA are simply different departments of the same company.
[00:33:37] And how on the nose is a group calling themselves the Shadow Brokers? Hmm. Always in the shadows. It's always got to be hidden, right? Because they can't do anything face value. Right? It's never honest. Always a lie. It's always a bait and switch. And so I say this because I don't think we look at things the way we should. I don't think we ask enough questions.
[00:34:05] And I want to ask more and better questions, don't you? Because this brings up some compelling information, does it not? I mean, the merry-go-round is what's being created here. WannaCry used an NSA exploit leaked by the Shadow Brokers who actually leaked it to the Equation Group, who is actually the NSA.
[00:34:25] And then it gets better because even Wikipedia, which is not the best source, but it tells us that the Lazarus Group, who is suspected of being behind WannaCry, and they're the ones, the WannaCry cyber attack, and they're the ones who actually use the leaked exploit to perpetrate the attack. And the leaked internal NSA memo tells us that Lazarus comes out of North Korea. Hmm. North Korea. And all the pictures they show us are 1985 computers.
[00:34:54] And it's so shammy because I think the whole North Korea story is very peculiar and very shammy. And we know that he was trained in Europe and then sent as the leader and got in as the leader and placed in as the leader of North Korea. But it always comes back to North Korea because it can always take a placeholder as the boogeyman.
[00:35:20] And for 15 years, right, before Trump made this sort of peace agreement with them, right, that the fear was they were always going to nuke us. Really? And we believed it. People believed it. They were like, North Korea's going to nuke us. We could squash North Korea like a bug in about two seconds. Why would they nuke us? But it's amazing that we keep going and going and going with the propaganda mode, right?
[00:35:46] And so are they admitting the NSA was truly behind it? That is kind of interesting when you really kind of get down to it. It is a merry-go-round possibly. And is this for certain? I can't say this is for certain. But I will say that it's too compelling to not look at. It's too compelling to not understand. You know, I think North Korea has also just been such a use for U.S. intelligence.
[00:36:16] The entire country, their mission, everything that they're about. Because we suddenly stopped caring about anything that ever happened there. Remember, we were worried about the people. They were being eaten by dogs. And then all of a sudden, nothing. Nada. Didn't care. Whatever. Back to the same old business. So they used them on the stage for a long time. But they're kind of trying to say, the NSA is trying to point a finger, just like we did with COVID. Oh, that's China. No, it's not. No, it's not. It's not China. It's us.
[00:36:44] Did they have some things happen over in China? Yes. But China didn't start it. So the COVID narrative. So anyway, I leave all this with you, just as thought. It just kind of peruse that. And of course, the private-public partnership, which is the most important thing about today's show, that is certainly going to be dialed down to a personal level for us. And you have all the counties and all the cities on board. And they don't have the character and integrity. I'm so sorry to say that.
[00:37:13] But they don't to say no to it, to stand up against it, to single it out. They will not. You have to be on board if you're selected. So, elected. Be faithful. Be fearless. Let's hope and have some more courage and integrity, right? And of course, I'll see you tomorrow. Thanks, everybody. KateDallyRadio.com for the podcast of this show and share it. Thank you.