[00:00:06] Free speech. It's more important than your feelings. The Kate Dalley Show starts now. The success of those is only possible with President Trump and with the outstanding cabinet that he selected. It would be impossible without the support of the president and the cabinet. But you're finding the money. I mean, it's big numbers, right? Yeah. Like you said, the minimum impulse bid is often a billion dollars. So, for example, the $830 million, which was the online survey, that's an enormous amount of money
[00:00:34] that wouldn't have been found if the DOGE team wasn't working with it, in that case, the Department of Interior. But then taking it one step further, DOGE then publishes these things on our website for maximum transparency. So now the general public, it would have been impossible for the general public to have seen that. Now anyone can just log into DOGE.gov anytime and see these payments. They're not yet in real time. They're close. But they'll probably be in real time within the next few weeks. Usually when they attack DOGE, they never attack any of the specifics.
[00:01:01] So they'll say what we're doing is somehow unconstitutional or legal or whatever. We're like, well, which line of the cost savings do you disagree with? And they can't point to any. And we list them all on DOGE.gov and the DOGE handle on X. And you'll see just outrageous things, one outrageous thing after another. So really critical systems are old. They cost a lot of money to maintain.
[00:01:27] And the efforts to improve them are often very delayed. Social Security is because of all the fraud loopholes in the Social Security system. How do you reassure people that what you all are doing is not going to affect their benefits? No, in fact, what we're doing will help their benefits. Legitimate people as a result of the work of DOGE will receive more Social Security, not less. I want to emphasize that.
[00:01:54] As a result of the work of DOGE, legitimate recipients of Social Security will receive more money, not less money. It's a Friday show. I love my Fridays. Anyways, wow, OK, there was a lot in that clip. And well, it's Friday. I'm wearing my camo pants. You can't see me. I'm on the radio.
[00:02:25] Zelensky had a garage sale, picked up an extra pair of camos. OK, so there's a lot to say about that clip. Good and bad. I mean, not bad so much as as the direction of that interview and how it went and maybe analyzing it a little bit to see where we're at and what happens next, I guess, is my point.
[00:02:54] I'm also going to show you a little bit of a deep dive on something that happened a while back. And then I want to sort of correlate some of these things together and make some points. So that's on the agenda today. And let me just say for the record, OK, going back to to DOGE, let's just go to DOGE for just a second. Everything in that clip, it sounded pretty decent, right?
[00:03:20] I mean, I think it sounded like who wouldn't who wouldn't like that? OK, that's how it sounded to me. Well, who wouldn't like that? Who wouldn't like getting more Social Security that were owed from the money that is taken from us? That is put into that program and that we receive later on in life. Who would not want more money? The promise of more money? Nice promise. Also, the systems. Man, the systems.
[00:03:47] They've gotten in there and the systems are bad that they're using and they need to modernize it. They need to upgrade it. OK, so you heard from the systems kind of analyst software guy. OK, and then, of course, Elon. Now, you know, I've done shows on Elon. OK, so you know where I stand with Elon. But he sounds really good, right? He sounds really good there. I can't deny that he's saying, hey, look, line item by line item.
[00:04:15] The left is saying, you know, DOGE as a general term. And they're not really coming out and saying which thing they disagree with, except for the loss of jobs. You'll hear loss of jobs, loss of jobs, loss of jobs, right? The jobs that should have never existed in the first place. You don't hear that part, but you just hear loss of jobs. Then you hear about this money and you're thinking, OK, well, transparency is good. You're thinking that, good, they're going after line item by line item.
[00:04:45] Now, the government spends almost $7 trillion a year. And Social Security is about $1.3 trillion of it. OK, now, the thing I'm looking at from where I sit, and that's really the only thing I can give you on my show, right, is offer up what I'm seeing and what I'm looking at and what I'm hearing. Now, all of that sounds good. You could walk away from that interview going, wow, we're getting rid of corruption.
[00:05:14] And they're explaining it line by line. And for some reason, it's all centered on Social Security right now-ish, you know. It's mostly Social Security, OK? Is that fair to say? And that, hey, you know, this is good. We should have done this a long time ago. So this is what I want to talk about today is, and this will give us kind of a more of a concrete, in-context conversation about the cuts of wasteful spending and fraud, OK?
[00:05:43] So I'm viewing this, and I'm thinking something's wrong. Something's wrong, though, because now you have people that run the government, all right, and the same people that put in King Dingling in 2020. And by the way, Trump was far ahead in the polls. Trump should have had that nailed down because usually they get that second term. And for some reason, we got told lie after lie after lie that America voted for Joe Biden, which we know they didn't.
[00:06:14] OK. So I'm taking all this in, and you can go back to each election, which I have, and kind of describe the events of each election, and something seems very off there, OK? So why in the world would they now want the elite, those that run the country, to cut their own throats and not be able to hide their spending, OK? So you heard a lot about transparency. You heard a lot about we are here to change transparency rules.
[00:06:41] We're here to showcase, we're here to bring up the fraud and then tell you what needs to be done. And then, lo and behold, you had the Modernization Act happen three days ago. Now, this is executive order, and this is Section 1, the purpose of the Modernization Payments Act. The continued use of paper-based payments by the federal government, including checks and money orders flowing in and out of the United States General Fund,
[00:07:10] which might be thought of as America's bank account, OK, imposes unnecessary costs, delays, risks of fraud, lost payments, theft, inefficiencies. Mail theft complaints have increased substantially since the COVID-19 pandemic. But that's kind of weird because I thought they upped security by giving everybody a screenshot of what's coming in their mailbox and things like that, right?
[00:07:35] But, OK, historically, Department of Treasury checks are 16 times more likely to be reported lost or stolen, returned undeliverable, OK? Altered, all right? Then an electronic funds transfer, an EFT. Maintaining the physical infrastructure and specialized technology for digitizing paper records cost the American taxpayer over $657 million in fiscal year 2024 alone.
[00:08:06] So now they're phasing out paper check disbursements and receipts as of September 30th of this year. And to the extent permitted by law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall cease issuing paper checks for all federal disbursements inclusive of intragovernmental payments, benefit payments, vendor payments, tax refunds, except as specified in Section 4 of this order. OK, it goes on.
[00:08:31] It describes the payments, direct deposits, debit and credit card, digital wallets, real-time payment systems, and other modern electronic payment options. So the government no longer pays in a paper check. Everything is done by digital, OK? Now, go back to the CARES Act for just a second, 2020. Interesting.
[00:08:58] I remember screenshotting it because the first draft that they tried to pass had the whole entire first section was the development and millions going into government ATMs located at your local post office. And that the money would come on a card, you'd go into your local post office, since they're everywhere in the country, and that you would redeem your money out of this machine.
[00:09:26] And these machines were to be delivered to every single post office. And then you would get a card. Oddly enough, before they passed the CARES Act of 2020, the ripping off of America, the trillions, right, in there, which was bumped from billions before that to trillions. But see, we were all not watching because it was 2020. And they took it out. And then they passed it. And it was really odd, I thought. I took screenshots of it because I thought it was so strange. Really?
[00:09:55] ATM? Government? ATM? Bank account machines in the post offices. And you would get the card and go in. It was just really a strange thing. But it was the first thing on the list. They took it out. They passed the CARES. Okay? Now, with that being said, this Modernization Act only means that they're changing it. It doesn't mean they're modernizing it. It means that they are out talking about government as a whole.
[00:10:22] It's out talking about DOGE in a way to say, look, we have to step it up. Look at all the fraud. And by the way, Social Security, everyone's concerned about Social Security. So this is the thing they're talking about the most. And then the carrot of you could have more money. You could have more money. We're just trying to get you more money. I thought that was weird, to tell you the truth.
[00:10:51] I mean, a little alarm bell went off in my head. I'm like, hmm, there are carrots out there. You're going to get more money. Weird. Okay. So, and now they're promising the checks, five grand apiece, you know, to all the money saved. Instead of going toward the debt, it's coming back to us. It's just a lot of weird things going on, right? I think it's right to be at least skeptical.
[00:11:17] You don't have to be completely suspicious, but at least be skeptical of how they're going about this. Because this is only a fraction of the entire system. Okay. So Social Security is a fraction of the money. Now, can they do it all at once? No. Could they go after all seven billion at once? No. No. I don't think a miracle could happen. No.
[00:11:42] But it is weird that they're passing this as an executive order this week, and then they have an interview on what Doge is doing. And, hey, it sounds credible. Sounds good. Everything sounds like it should be, right? Who doesn't want to get rid of fraud? Except the pink-haired leftists, the zombies. I do. I do. You do. We all want to get rid of the fraud. We all know there's so much fraud. Do we know the extent of the fraud? There's another question for you.
[00:12:09] I'm going to come back, and I'm going to give you the end of a story before I give you the beginning of it. When I come back, you'll see what I mean. But it's really a weird thing right now, because as I'm listening, little alarm bells are going off, and I'm like, we're being enticed into this situation. And so what they're trying to do is say the leftists are against fraud and the right is for fraud. But what's the real story? What's the real story here? If we're going to take a big-picture view, what is it?
[00:12:38] And it is to make the argument about the cuts, right, without making the argument of the entire government and what's been going on. And to transform our digital payment system to only digital tyranny.
[00:13:08] This is the Kate Daly Show. The Kate Daly Show on a Friday. Today, I'm going to explain a couple of things, and then I'm going to open phone lines for the rest of the show. I do want to give you an opportunity to call in.
[00:13:34] And also go to allfamilypharmacy.com forward slash Kate. When you do that, you're going to take advantage of the big BOGO sale, the big buy one, get one. This is huge, you guys. They don't do this but a couple of times a year, so take advantage right now. Buy one, get one. Ivermectin, fembenzinol, Z-Packs, antibiotics, hormones, you name it. And make sure you have extra supply. I just don't know what's coming, and that worries me.
[00:14:03] It worries me a little bit, a lot. It worries me a little bit, a lot. There you go. How's that for your Friday show? So, okay, let me describe this. I'm going to give you the end of a story before I give you the beginning. I know I'm going to go backwards today for you. Okay.
[00:14:22] There was a situation in government where over 20 scientists died in the span of about five years mysteriously. Much of it was called suicide, although the suicide in the way that it happened could have never, ever, ever happened that way. So you and I know. You and I both know, right? It's, it's, come on, guys. It's, yeah.
[00:14:50] They didn't die by suicide, okay? And 20, over 20 scientists. In fact, some reports are 25 scientists. These are huge scientists, okay? You know, working on some of the most classified things in government. This happened between 82 and 88. All right? They were part of the Strategic Defense Initiative Program. These are called the GEC Marconi Murders, okay?
[00:15:20] Which they call a conspiracy. It's far from a conspiracy. In fact, even if you look to see whether it's actual conspiracy, they'll go, well, I don't know that it's a conspiracy because they all died in really strange ways. And they all worked on the Star Wars program. Hmm. Just think about that for just a moment. This was back in Reagan's time. Now, growing up, we were huge fans of Reagan. And who wouldn't be? Reagan was funny.
[00:15:49] He was endearing. He was kind of the grandfather, father of the nation. And he always had this great sense of humor. But so much was going on under Reagan. And Reagan, I don't think, knew about a lot of it. I think that they sort of just kept him as the guy on stage, more or less, more than he was really running things. Bush was his VP for a reason. Bush was his handler. So, I do believe.
[00:16:17] So, there was a lot going on under Bush. Kind of like Cheney and George W. Same kind of relationship where Cheney was really running things behind the scenes. Same thing with Reagan, okay? I would go as far as to say show pony. I think that bothers people, though, because they love Reagan. And whenever I would interview people for why they were running for Congress or the Senate, and we would kind of just laugh a little bit because I'd go, well, who's your hero in politics? And they'd go, Reagan. And I'm like, well, I mean, yeah, he was great.
[00:16:47] And I've always been a conservative. And he's great. Who wouldn't love Reagan? But you do know that lots of stuff was going on under him, right? And you could tell that somebody didn't know very much about government. And that was just a great talking point to get people to like them, to be honest, just being blunt. Okay. So, these scientists, the GEC Marconi, it was a British defense company, and it was involved in our SDI project. Think about that for a moment.
[00:17:15] British defense company involved in our strategic defense. Okay. And so, the scientists, a few of the scientists, only one was apparently of natural causes. And Frank Jennings, 60-year-old engineer for electronic weapons, said to have died of a heart attack in 1987. Victor Moore died of a drug overdose. His death was ruled a suicide. They had several that in a two-year window, many deaths in a two-year window.
[00:17:44] And they pretty much said most all of it was suicide. One guy put a rope around his neck and then hit the gas, so he decapitated himself. Kind of a weird way. Weird way to do that. And then also, Shannie Warren was found drowned in 18 inches of water. She was gagged, hands bound behind her back, feet tied, noose around her neck. They did rule that a suicide.
[00:18:12] Don't know how somebody would do that to themselves. And then, of course, scientists had fallen off of railway bridges on the same day. Another one was found near that guy. I could go on and on. But you get the point, right? Okay. That's a lot of scientists to die that worked on a project that could have done some whistleblowing. Be right back. I'll explain some more. Be right back. The Kate Daly Show. KateDalyRadio.com
[00:18:41] This is The Kate Daly Show. Say absolutely nothing. I'm going to raise my hand. I know what war is good for.
[00:19:13] Sadly. Okay. Welcome back. Kate Daly. A lot of money disappears in war. Yeah. They keep them coming for a reason. Wink, wink. So, okay. So, welcome back to the show. And just doing a little bit of a deep dive with you today. Because this is obviously in the headlines today. The big interview about Doge. And I want to go back to this because this will explain some things.
[00:19:40] So, I'm giving you the ending before I'm giving you the beginning of that story. And, unfortunately, these people died. And this is the thing. There were a number of them that had complained. These scientists that were murdered. They had complained to family and friends that they had been tasked with strange, impossible, and unscientific tasks by their employers when working on the Star Wars program in the 1980s.
[00:20:09] They weren't mentally unstable. And all the men were employed up until the day of their deaths and had not shown any sign of mental illness. So, you can cross that out. Okay? Hmm. All the men that were murdered, that had complained to family and friends, had recently found new jobs and were preparing to leave those jobs that they were employed at. And so, that was a really strange part of the story. Okay?
[00:20:40] And so, what were the strange, unscientific projects that the men were complaining of? And why had they all booked appointments? This is Britain, remember, with their MPs to talk about something. Hmm. Yeah. Okay. Similar deaths and disappearances amongst defense figures in Sweden and Italy occurred at the same time. It wasn't just Britain. And then, what did they say?
[00:21:09] Well, they came out with the narrative that it must be Russia. It must be Russia. And they were the ones that were getting rid of these scientists because the Star Wars program was going to be a direct result of being able to take these weaponized,
[00:21:34] kind of like, you know, weaponized machinery, put it up into space and be able to stop a nuke. That was the idea of Star Wars. Okay? And it was talked about throughout the whole 80s. And the reason was, was because we were so afraid of Russia nuking us. Now, your other question was, we should be right here, should be. And so, did they ever send, did they ever send anything over or did they ever actually send a nuke? No, no.
[00:22:04] No, they didn't. But we were going to spend a lot of money to construct this strategic defense initiative. And it was built from the fear, again, that Russia was going to get us. Okay? So, even though not a single case of a weapon of mass destruction was ever fired between us and Russia. So, remember, the International Space Station cost $150 billion.
[00:22:29] So, it was going to be expensive, right, to plan to be able to stop a weapon from space impacting the United States. So, using satellite for communication, of course, right, is one thing. But then making sure it's equipped with a laser that would actually work when you wanted it to. Obviously, a whole other thing. Okay? So, they said that the Star Wars program was never fully funded.
[00:22:58] The money that they're talking about, even up to today, the money that they'll claim, and I know that it's far more. Because they have these huge black budgets in government, is over $415 billion. We are still funding the Star Wars program. Let that sink in for just a second. 40 years. 40. Okay. So, all right.
[00:23:25] So, the proposed missile defense system was supposed to protect us from an attack by ballistic nuclear missiles. It was announced in 1983. Reagan called for a system that would render nuclear weapons obsolete, and then to end the doctrine of the mutually assured destruction, called MAD. Mutually assured destruction. Okay? You blow us up, we blow you up. Okay? That's what that is.
[00:23:50] And so, he described it as a suicide pack, and the elements of the program reemerged in 2019, right? Just six years ago, under the Space Development Agency, SDA. So, the U.S. held this significant advantage in advanced missile defense systems. This was our narrative. Okay? Through decades of all this extensive research and testing. This is what we were told. Okay?
[00:24:19] And we weren't really told what. We were just told that. Okay? And then, this is what they had to do. It was set up in 19...
[00:24:27] So, the SDI, the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, where all those scientists died, was set up in 1984 through the U.S. Department of Defense in advanced weapon concepts, including lasers, particle beam weapons, ground and space-based missile systems, along with sensor, command and control computer systems needed to control a system consisting of hundreds of combat centers. And satellites spanning the globe. Okay? So, there were articles.
[00:24:56] And these emerged in the mid to late 1980s. And it was like, well, what did we get for our $30 billion investment? Billion, with a B, so far. Okay? And that was kind of interesting because everything that was written about it was written in theory. It was written in theory.
[00:25:16] So, when they started out with all this money, it was, we're going to review the geopolitical management and technical consequences of establishing the strategic defense missile system. And then, we're going to describe in some detail how the $30 billion was spent. And then, we're going to discuss the research activity that was converted into a serious acquisition program. Hmm. Okay. It reminded me of Stargate, to tell you the truth.
[00:25:46] It reminded me of like, okay, here's the announcement. Here's the money. And we're going to spend $500 billion. And we're going to spend this. And, all right. So, now we're going to go to the table. And we're just going to discuss it for quite a long time. Okay? We're just going to talk about it. But we got the money. We got the money. So, this is weird.
[00:26:10] So, the program led to conditions of the first arms control agreement out of a scare tactic. And the scare tactic was we could be hit any moment with a Russian nuke. This is the 80s. Okay? We were dressing like Madonna. I mean, I was in high school in the 80s. So, this is the 80s. Okay? And we are not hiding under our desks in the 50s. But we are afraid that Russia is going to nuke us at any moment. Why?
[00:26:37] Because we're the biggest military on the face of the earth. And everyone's afraid of us. But we're now suddenly afraid that Russia is going to nuke us. Okay. This was about the time they started selling the idea. Well, maybe that was the 90s that North Korea was going to nuke us too. Okay. So, the money kept rolling in. And in 1987, the American Physical Society concluded that the technologies were decades away from readiness. Yeah. Yeah.
[00:27:06] The SDI, decades away. Decades away. And another decade of research was required to know if such a system was even possible. Now, this was after all the money. This was four years later. They were going, well, we don't really actually think we can do it. Is it even possible? I don't know. Oh, yeah. Okay.
[00:27:31] So, then, by the late 1980s, the effort refocused itself when George Papa Bush came on, Mr. New World Order himself, which, by the way, when people always described him, when conservatives would describe him, they would always go, well, they love the troops. So, therefore, they're a good guy. George Bush was never a good guy. And if you're conservative and you don't know that yet, your head's been in the sand or you're living in a cave. Okay.
[00:28:01] He was never the good guy here. He was Reagan's handler. Then he became president. Okay. Because, you know, they control the elections. So, they did the brilliant pebbles. And brilliant pebbles came out. So, they kept this, missed this, this redirection effort even into the Clinton administration. When I come back, when I come back, believe me, there's a reason I'm telling you all this. I'll be right back.
[00:28:29] Stay with, you got to stay with me for this. You have to understand this. Big picture. Be right back. Kate Daly Show. KateDalyRadio.com. This is the Kate Daly Show.
[00:28:59] A mystery ship for sure. Welcome back. Kate Daly Show on a Friday show. And welcome back. All right. A lot to talk about. CozyEarth.com. Grab it now for Mother's Day. Set that aside for a month. You'll be so happy you did.
[00:29:27] You'll get 40% off. Use the code Kate. And they have the most luxurious sheets that they'll get to enjoy an entire third of their life. Because we spend a third of our life sleeping. So, do you want the best sheets on the planet? I mean, I do. So, I have them on my bed. I love them. And, I mean, love isn't even the word. I just adore them. And so, just make sure that you go and use the code Kate. Go to CozyEarth.com. Get her a lounge set. Get her some amazing sheets. The amazing slippers. She's going to love you.
[00:29:58] CozyEarth is like luxury, luxury items. So, it's a good way to splurge because you're supporting free speech on the air. Which we don't have very much of anymore. Okay. There's a lot of people doing a lot of rah-rahs with Doge. And I understand that things are sounding good to the ear.
[00:30:19] But, if you're really going to be a true thinker, you really have to go big picture and understand why they're saying what they're saying and what's happening here. Yeah, it sounds good. But, the problem is that we are living in a society where there are nefarious forces behind the presidency. And what are they actually doing? And I'm sorry, but you need to ask those questions if you're going to think. And I know you guys are because otherwise you wouldn't be listening to this show.
[00:30:48] And we're always trying to understand really what's going on. Not the story we're told. So, but what's actually happening here. Most people don't revisit this. And they should because of the nature of this program, this SDI program. In the late 80s, the under Bush, Papa Bush, the effort refocused to Brilliant Pebbles using small orbiting missiles. Now, you have to understand that this has been going on quite a while.
[00:31:15] Money keeps flowing in every year to a Star Wars program. But they haven't actually done anything. They haven't actually given us anything. Okay. They were refocusing. They were saying different things about it and what it could do. Everything is under the context of could, maybe, and would. Nothing under the this is what it's actually doing.
[00:31:39] In fact, when you look at this, even going back to the 60s with Eisenhower, you're looking at prototypes. Always a prototype. Always. So, why did Reagan even want to do this? Well, Reagan visited the NORAD command base. You know, Denver, right? Cheyenne Mountain Complex, right? That weird airport and the Cheyenne complex and whatever they have going on in there is very weird sometimes. I think, you know, I've done shows on it. But wow.
[00:32:09] He was introduced to this extensive tracking and detection system extending throughout the world and into space. And he was struck by their comments that they could track the attack down to the individual target, but they couldn't stop it. Now, I think they might have lied just a little bit to him on. And it was kind of amazing that they could track it, but they couldn't do anything about it. It was just kind of strange.
[00:32:32] So, he felt in the event of attack that this would place the president in a terrible decision, having to choose between immediate counterattack and absorbing an attack. And so, they decided to move ahead with this SDI program. Okay. So, he was briefed by the former head of the DIA, Daniel Graham, and briefed Reagan on the updated Bambi that was held over from the 60s. And they now called it High Frontier.
[00:33:01] It was a missile shield composed of multi-layered space-based weapons that could track and intercept and destroy ballistic missiles. Theoretically, theoretically, still in the theory stage. Okay. You get my drift, right? Still there. Not moving into anything concrete. Just theory. In fact, there was a 1982 report entitled High Frontier, A New National Strategy. How it would function. Not that it did function.
[00:33:31] Just how it would function. So, we're going through all of these years. Money is being spent. Okay. And in 1983, when Reagan gave his speech, he goes, I call upon the scientific community in this country, those who gave us nuclear weapons. I've done shows on nuclear weapons. To turn the great talents to the cause of mankind and world peace. To give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons obsolete. So, that's interesting.
[00:34:00] He's saying that he wants to do that. But, I have newspaper clippings, screenshots of newspaper clippings where we're sending nukes to Russia. We're sending nukes all over. We're sending them to Iraq. And, hey, France, can you overlook this? We're going to send some to Iraq. And, we're sending them everywhere. And, now, all of a sudden, they want to make them obsolete? But, we've been sending them places. We're the ones that created those, they said.
[00:34:28] So, why were we giving them out? Okay. And, the technology. Now, you can say the technology was stolen and they created their own. Except for the fact that there are articles saying that we were giving them. Okay. So, when we did the whole 80s and 90s and 2000s and recently Iraq. Do they have weapons? Do they not? We were literally giving them weapons. It says so in the newspaper. It was the big, big, splashy articles.
[00:34:55] We're sending them over and we, gee, we just hope they don't do anything with them. Were we creating our own fear tactics? Yeah. We were. Yeah. Okay. So, this keeps going and it's sort of then revamped when the Clintons get it. It's then revamped when George W. Bush gets it. And, all of a sudden, you just keep seeing articles like, gee, kind of questioning it, but not really. Because the press won't do that.
[00:35:25] Because the AP News and Reuters will not question programs like this. They won't bring them up. Sometimes on a surface level, nothing deep. Because they are not your good journalists. They're not your good reporters. They are told what to say by the Pentagon. And the Pentagon did not want this black budget on everybody's mind. They did not want people thinking that they were sending stuff to smoke and mirrors. Things that we could not do. And so, they even went as far. Okay. Not AP.
[00:35:55] But, the government went as far to put this out there. And, it wasn't really for the public as much as it was in a report. But, basically, they were saying this. They concluded that none of the systems could be deployed as an anti-missile system until the next century. I kid you not. All this money. And, that was two decades into major billions going into this.
[00:36:26] They concluded. Okay. They did a report. They did their own investigation. And, they actually came out with this. And, they said, yeah, we can't actually do an anti-missile system until the next century. Just let that sit for a second. This is after tons of money. Tons and tons and tons of money. Okay. The Brilliant Pebbles thing was about missiles firing a short period.
[00:36:54] Warheads didn't rise high enough for them to be easily tracked into the satellite above them. And, so, then they had a system called Brilliant Eyes to feed the Brilliant Pebbles. I kid you not. So, it doesn't matter who's president. It doesn't matter. The money keeps flowing. The money, it's just redirected. It's just reformed. New program. New direction. Same problem. They never actually really get there.
[00:37:24] It doesn't matter who's president. It doesn't matter what side of the aisle. They're all marching to the same tune. Be right back. I have so much more. Wait till I get to the rest of it. Be right back. Kate Daly Show.