[00:00:05] You're listening to The Kate Dalley Show. Our problem is that we just want to follow Jesus, but we also want to slap people. Dilemmas. The show starts now. Have you ever heard of some fellas who first came over to this country? You know what they found? They found a howling wilderness. The summer's too hot and winter's freezing. Did they have insurance for their old age, for their crops, for their homes? They did not.
[00:00:33] They looked at the land and the forests and the rivers. They looked at their wives, their kids, and their houses. And then they looked up at this guy and they said, thanks, God. We'll take it from here.
[00:00:51] Hallelujah, John Wayne. All right. Welcome to the show, of course. And live, it's Thursday. And guess who I have? I'm so excited. KrisAnne Hall, our constitutional attorney and expert. How are you? I am fabulous. Yeah? There was a… Yeah, I'm working on building my natural immunity and leaving a lot. Hey, I love it. And by the way, I pardon you just for whatever you do in your life. Yes, I pardon you too. I just want you to know, preemptively.
[00:01:21] You are pardoned. All right. So… You are pardoned not only from what you have done, but from things you have not done yet. Yes, because that makes sense and it's totally legal. So, I love it. Do you want to say one word about that? You know, the only one that can do that is Jesus. Thank you. So, I suggest if you're really interested in a preemptive pardon, you need to give your life to Christ. Yeah, there you go. I like that. Yeah, you're right on the money. I really appreciate that.
[00:01:48] Do you want to say something, just like a sentence about that before we talk about your latest, which is charting a course through 2025, which I love? Oh, and a piece of good news that you want to share. Yeah. Okay. I'm not sure I want to talk about preemptive pardon, but you know, I mean, we can. Okay. Just for a second. Just for a second.
[00:02:09] It's just stunning to me that otherwise intelligent people who have what appear to be large spheres of influence are actually debating this issue.
[00:02:26] It is stunning to me. I can't wrap my brain around it, other than maybe because it's something that grasps and pokes at the emotions of the people and is guaranteed to get people to click and look. Other than that, I really don't see any justification for it. There's no such thing as a preemptive pardon in the Constitution. Nope.
[00:02:50] There's no precedent to justify preemptive pardon. Somebody said to me, oh, but Abraham Lincoln issued blanket pardons for people so they could go after the Confederate. I'm like, yeah, I'm not going to let you use Abraham Lincoln as a kind of example of what is constitutional. Yeah. Because he's probably the worst example of what is constitutional. Yeah. People don't realize that. Yeah. Right.
[00:03:19] You don't really have a precedent unless the precedent has been a challenge and nobody's had the challenge any of this because the reality is this, Kate. Pardons really don't do anything. So you can't preemptively pardon someone because pardon is actually a physical process. Mm hmm. You actually sign a piece of paper and that piece of paper is filed with the court.
[00:03:48] If there's no charge, there's no accusation, there's no place to file anything. And these preemptive pardons are nothing more than political pandering. That's all they are. And and base building and, you know, political base building and emotion grabbers. Well, people are people are leaving prison. So. So there is something physical going on right now. Right. Well, but that's because pardons restore civil rights.
[00:04:17] Right. Right. They do not remove criminal proceedings. Yes. Yes. I'm glad you clarified that. Criminal charges are still there. Mm hmm. The criminal record is still there. You must get it expunged for it not to be there. Right. But a pardon doesn't do any of that. The pardon only restore stores certain civil rights.
[00:04:43] And so that's where the people need to realize a preemptive pardon doesn't do anything because there's no civil rights to be restored. Right. And so they say, well, it'll prevent prosecution. No, it doesn't. Yeah. Pardon doesn't stop prosecution. It only stops the imposition of certain sentences that impose on civil rights. Mm hmm. So and only at the federal level. So all these preemptive pardon people, they could even be fully prosecuted and sentenced at the state level. Mm hmm. Yeah.
[00:05:10] Me thinks that it might be used as an excuse not to go after people. That should be. Well, it could. It would be used as an excuse to not go after people because what's the point of going? It's a cost benefit analysis for a prosecutor, for a state, for a government. What's the point of going through the expense of trying and due process and all of that? If when it comes time, do you get the guilty? You're like, well, you're guilty. Great. But I can't impose any sentence on you. Right.
[00:05:39] Because you were preemptively pardoned. So it doesn't make any sense. Yeah. I'm so glad you talked about that. Thank you. You should see the emails I get. So talk about your latest. Oh, by the way, they removed security clearance. You want to mention. Oh, yeah. My two favorite things. Mm hmm. Two of my favorite things that Trump has done so far by EO was to remove the security clearance from Bolden and Bolton and Brennan. Yeah.
[00:06:09] I think that's amazing. I think that's great. I, I served in military intelligence. So I had a top level security clearance. Mm hmm. And most people realize they expire every 10 years. But for people like Bolton and Brennan, they keep renewing them and they actually profit off of them. Now, these two men have no business having security clearances anyway, the way they denigrated the Constitution and the rights of people on a regular basis. Right.
[00:06:38] So they should have never had them in the first place. But the fact that they were allowed to keep them and they were continuing because it's just a given. They just renew these for these people. Jeez. So that they can profit off of them. They actually make tens of thousands, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars in positions just because they have that security. Awesome. What's the other thing? You said two. Yeah. Bolton and Brennan. Okay. Okay.
[00:07:04] So talk about your course chart, the charting, charting towards a 2025 charting through it. In other words, what, what advice do you have for people and what do you want to point out? Yeah. So I actually published this right after the first year and it's called charting the course for liberty in the new year. And it's, it's really an understanding that this is not the time that we sit back and sigh like we did during the first time Trump's administration.
[00:07:31] And it's, it's a bensel of a quote from Samuel Adams that I came across a couple of years ago. And it said, Samuel Adams wrote, let us contemplate our forefathers and posterity and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former for the sake of the latter. Instead of sitting down satisfied with small efforts, let's elevate our minds to the dignity
[00:08:00] of that glorious cause to which we are engaged. This is not the time for us to sit back and, and be happy with small victories. This is the time where we are supposed to be taking the momentum that we have and the support that we have in the, you know, China and the bull shop, a bull in a China shop philosophy of Donald Trump and start really, really pushing.
[00:08:30] And we need to push for accountability, full accountability. We need to push for even limited government. I think one of the other things that Trump is doing that I really like is that for the first time in the history of America, Trump is actually reducing the size of government. Mm-hmm . And I'm not, that's not an exaggeration. For the first time in the history of America, reducing the size of government.
[00:08:57] Now, I mean, a re, a firing 250 people would be a reduction of the size of government that's never happened before. Right. But nonetheless, this is a moment, it's a small victory when you think of the BMS size of the government. But we can make it bigger if we don't just sit back on, on Trump's laurels and say, oh,
[00:09:20] look, we, we got more people fired or, or we pulled power away from this gun control committee and, and, and what have you. So this is not the time for us to sit back and just take the sigh of relief and let Trump fix everything. And, and it's, it's just so much rooted in who we are.
[00:09:44] Um, Abigail Adams said this, these are the times in which a genius would wish to live. It is not in the still calm of life or in the repose of a specific station that great character is formed. The habits of a vigorous mind are formed in contending with difficulties. And in that understanding, we can't rely on elect officials to save America for us. Right.
[00:10:12] Our founders did not fight for liberty so we could hand over its defense to others. They showed us, us, how to be the leaders of our country and what it takes for us to stand firm in what they believed. Taking action on our own. Right. Right. Because the reality is America can only be great and liberty will only be great again
[00:10:38] in America through our courage and leadership and not the abdication of that to someone who sits in an office. Well, amen. And what that office may be. Amen, girl. I love it. I love it. Thank you. Um, we just need to keep hearing that over and over again because it's so vital and important that we, the people unite against, uh, you know, not against, I shouldn't say against, but in a way, yes, so that we can see the government for what the government does.
[00:11:06] And we're told to focus on one man. That's not what we should be doing. We should be focusing on the whole of what government's doing. The whole mantra is make America great again, which is really kind of puzzling to me because then the American people, uh, settle for mediocrity and complacency. Right. If you're going to make America great again, that has to come through the people. And we, as a people have to reject mediocrity and complacency. Yeah.
[00:11:36] We, the people have to rise ourselves to meet the moment. We need to draw strength from the sacrifices of those who, who came before us. I mean, history is fragmentally full of men and women who gave everything for the future of freedom in America. America.
[00:12:06] And it's not just about fighting for that bumper sticker, liberty of the past. Right. If you're going to call something a living, breathing thing, the battle for liberty is a living, breathing mission that requires everyone's effort. Right. It requires us to stand firm and lead by example, not just sit around and, and say to our kids, look what Donald Trump's going to do.
[00:12:36] Right. Oh, I'm with you, sister. We have to inspire others to join the cause. Chris Ann Hall. And stay in it. ChrisAnnHall.com. That's right. Get over there. Thank you. I love it. Thank you. Words of wisdom. Thank you. Perfect. Be right back. All Family Pharmacy is finally a pharmacy that after 14 years of doing this on the air, I can actually stand by and go, hey, this is a great family run pharmacy with doctors in house. So you can get your scripts from the privacy of your own home.
[00:13:07] You can get actual prescriptions for ivermectin, prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics, Z-Packs. You can actually round these up and get these and they'll give them to you in just a few days. They'll ship them out, which I think is amazing. It's really convenient ordering, easy online ordering, comfort of your own home, trusted treatments. So you can get those for parasites, for cancer, all kinds of things. Flexible options.
[00:13:34] You can choose how much you want pertaining to your budget and order that when you can, which I love. There's a doctor prescription included. There's no need to search out for a doctor. They provide the prescription with every order because they have in-house doctors, fast shipping, emergency preparedness. This is your key because you can stock up on treatments and prevention bundles. And there are over 200 medications that you can order if you want to. And of course, take advantage of this.
[00:14:04] I'm telling you that all family pharma.com is that good that I would recommend it. All family pharma.com. They're right here in America and no need to go out of the country. Just put in the code, uh, Kate 10, the number 10, or go to all family pharma.com forward slash Kate. And then in the dropdown menu, when it says, how did you hear about this? Put Kate Dally. Okay. There's one of your options right there, but put Kate 10 is the code and you'll get a nice little discount too. And it'll help the show. Help me stay on the air.
[00:14:33] All family pharma.com. Go there now. This is the Kate Dally show. Buy the world a home and furnish it with love.
[00:15:01] I like to teach the world to sing. Sing with me. Good old Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola perfected, uh, the Santa image that we have today. And, uh, right on top of the whole, uh, climate world, um, messaging that started really hurling at us in the seventies and, uh, this song part of that. So very, very interesting Coca-Cola. Uh, so welcome back to the show. I have some information to get to you.
[00:15:31] So, okay. Um, first of all, all family pharma.com. Let me get that out of the way because this is such a great thing for you. And I, I, in the history of the show, I've never said go to this particular pharmacy and you can get doctor prescriptions sent to your home. So this is a first for me, but I'm telling you, please do Ivermectin. I've, please do, um, what is it called? Fembenzenol. Um, please, please, please, please, because I have so much to share with you.
[00:16:01] Um, not today, but at another point in time about, um, parasites and tumors and how similar they are and all kinds of stuff with health. Please be doing cleanses, please. Um, for your own health, but all family pharma.com. You can get it online. Doctor prescribed sent to you. It's amazing. Please do that and put in the code Kate 10. You'll get a 10% discount. Okay. Um, I did want to mention that.
[00:16:25] Um, of course we didn't mention it actually this week yet, but Cecile Richards planned parenthood CEO died during the inauguration on Monday. Yeah. She was the one that at the helm of planned parenthood calling every baby a clump of cells. And so the Babylon B in its great satire reporting report had a picture of her and then reported that a clump of cells has died. I thought it was brilliant anyway.
[00:16:52] Um, and Chris Ann Hall also posted that and I just wanted to relay that she died of brain cancer, um, that she got a year ago. Um, I'm wondering if she took the shots, but I'm sure she did. Uh, but, uh, but a fearless, uh, a fearless murderer. So there you go. She was the one in the body parts videos. Remember? Okay. So also fires, we've got fires going on, uh, in LA, more of them, and it is not over yet.
[00:17:20] Uh, in fact, it's the Hughes fire and it's 14% contained by the way, uh, in 2014, they got all kinds of money to do all kinds of things to shore up water supply. And they did nothing. And that was, that was 11 years ago. They did nothing with that money. They never did what they said they were going to do. So, uh, we've got that going on in LA and it's a, it's a big one too, through all the mountains north of Los Angeles.
[00:17:49] Some people are wondering if it's in the, uh, line fire of, um, where they want certain, uh, transportation to happen. Could be, could be, um, yes. And BlackRock is trying to buy up land there. So just so for everybody's reference, they're coming on in and offering a quarter, an eighth of what those homes are worth. It just makes me sick. Okay.
[00:18:15] So with that pushed aside, I do want to talk about, uh, the Paris, uh, treaty accords, the Paris accords, the Paris treaty, whatever you want to call it. It's all the same thing. And this is interesting because of these two actions. So we had, um, this one right, um, on Monday. Next item here is the withdrawal from the Paris climate treaty. Okay. So yes, we're all cheering and I get it.
[00:18:42] Um, but don't you kind of want to know what we're, what we're doing? Because of course the gobbledygook of climate change. Well, Al Gore said that we would fry by now. Right. Um, and it's gobbledygook. It's a bunch of lies. Okay. You, you cannot impact climate. Climate, um, will shift and change, but you cannot impact it as a human being. So, um, it's all gobbledygook.
[00:19:08] And so we have the Paris treaty, the Paris accords that Obama signed in 2016. And this is, this is important because it, um, I think more or less, this is a, uh, paper tiger, if you will. This is something that we're cheering and not really understanding why we're cheering. And is it a good thing that we're out of it? Yes. Except that there's more to it than that.
[00:19:38] There's more to what we're actually getting out of, if you will. And I want to discuss that with you because this is a really important that we kind of understand how the deep state operates. And this is a huge clue into how they do things. So when I come back, I want to explain what I'm talking about. Um, the Paris, uh, the Paris treaty, the Paris accords, and the batting back and forth between Obama, Trump, Biden, Trump.
[00:20:08] So I'll talk about that when I come back, be right back. This is important stuff. Be right back. Kate Daly show, Kate Daly radio.com. Stay with me. This is the Kate Daly show.
[00:20:40] Like a picture out of the, uh, UN. Hmm. So welcome back to the video for the song. I don't know if you guys remember, but it was on a hilltop. Yeah. Uh, totally like circa 1971. I think anyway. Yeah. 1971. Welcome. Welcome back. Uh, uh, also go to patriot.tv forward slash Kate.
[00:21:09] You can get, uh, some awesome gear for the show. It supports the show and, uh, also sign up for a Patriot TV because Patriot period TV, because it is amazing. There's some great shows there and, uh, I'm there on prime time. You can watch the show in the evening, which I love. Uh, all right. So, um, okay. Where do I start? Uh, there's so much, but, uh, I want to, I, well, I'll start here. Okay.
[00:21:35] So the Paris treaty accords, as you guys know, happened in 2015 and it was signed towards the end of 2016. Okay. By Obama. I just, sorry. I shiver whenever I think about him. Anyway, um, it was signed by him and it was, um, a lot of political posturing. Is it a paper tiger? What is it? What is the Paris treaty? Because I love that Trump announced and, and did an executive order to get out of it. It's not a bad thing.
[00:22:05] It's a positive thing, but how effective is that? Right? Hmm. Okay. So this was the goal of the Paris treaty accords. Here we go to quote, strengthen and accelerate a global response effort in combating the threat of climate change. Now notice the wording, not just not climate change, just the threat of climate change. They always tell you who they are. Okay.
[00:22:35] So the threat of climate change. Okay. To strengthen and accelerate a global response. What does that even mean? Okay. What does that, what does that actually mean? You should be asking that. So they said they want to keep global temp well below 2.0, um, and 3.6 Fahrenheit. Okay. 2.0 Celsius, 3.6 Fahrenheit by the year 2100. And to pursue efforts to limit temperature increase even further to 1.5 Celsius. Okay.
[00:23:03] It's a hilarious goal because they may as well have just said, our goal is to shift the sun 10 decimal points to the left. That's how asinine this whole thing is. Okay. So they put out a goal that is mind boggling that somebody would actually utter that, but okay, that we could actually shift those things. Okay. With human mankind. Okay.
[00:23:28] But, um, they, what they were really doing was saying this review each. We want to review each country's contribution to cutting emissions, but only every five years. So basically send us a report every five years and tell us what you're going to do, what your plans are. I kid you not. This, this is the Paris treaty accord. Okay.
[00:23:51] Um, and they're encouraging people to say limit greenhouse gases emitted by human activity by just basically telling us what you have in mind. What are you doing to come to this goal? So there, I, their big idea was we know we're socialists. So rich, rich countries, but mostly us can help poor nations by providing climate finance money. So that was the, this is really what we want is just money.
[00:24:21] And so we're going to call it climate finance money because we're going to give it to the poorer countries and tell them that this will help them to put in things that what they can't afford to do. I don't know. Um, and this will further the effort for, for rich countries to help other countries. Okay. Poor countries. Keep in mind that we fund almost every single nation on earth right now and have been doing this for an extremely long time.
[00:24:50] Just keep that in mind and then push that aside for just a moment. The target was that they put out there. This was just a goal that they set. Okay. To have at least a hundred billion dollars a year in contributions with all 196 countries combined. Right? So, but where does it go? And they, they talk about the Paris treaty accord as entered into force. Aren't those interesting words?
[00:25:16] They want to make it seem as though this is by force that once you sign, it is in blood. No, that is not. That is not the case. Um, it is an agreement. It is an agreement. It's really not even by definition, a treaty. Really? It's an agreement. Okay. And so what they said was, well, if you go look on this, if you go look on this, they, they say consistently entered into force. That, that means nothing. That's just words they're choosing. Okay. Entered into force. It's an agreement.
[00:25:47] And Obama signs it, right? Um, that little communist. And he goes, agreement sends a powerful signal that we are firmly committed to a low carbon future. What does that even mean? What does that even mean? Agreement. Agreement. This agreement sends a powerful signal. What? A signal. Okay. Uh, does it have teeth? Not really. And, uh, has the potential. He said, potential, just potential to unleash investment in clean energy potential.
[00:26:16] So in 2016, we were going to, uh, rip up the agreement, right? And stop payment to all the world climate programs. That's what Trump said when he came into office. But the agreement says, and I read it personally. So I'm telling you what it says that you could not leave before three years. Okay. You could only X if you wanted out of the agreement, you had three years before you could actually exit. So, uh, 2020 was when we could exit. Okay.
[00:26:46] And so then by 2024, what they said was back in 2016. Okay. In 2024 and some places have it 2023 and some places have it 2025. So any one of these three years. Okay. That all the countries had to do was simply outline goals. We just, we want your goals. We would like you to outline on paper for us your goals. I'm like that. Oh, uh, okay. That w what is that? So they're going to outline their goals.
[00:27:16] And then the UN FCCC. Okay. This is who basically runs the Paris treaty accord, even though it's just an outlining of goals 10 years later. Okay. Um, sends back in writing how they can achieve those goals. So we, as Americans, we go, those are our goals. And then you send them in and then they write back and they go, this is why we're making so much money. Uh, we're now going to tell you how to achieve those goals, basically tax and regulate everybody to death.
[00:27:44] Um, and that's basically how we're going to achieve this, this asinine goal that we've set. Okay. That can't happen. So, um, it's an agreement more than a treaty. Okay. Senate never said yes to this. Okay. This was, this was Obama. Okay. And then under international law, legally binding agreements can become treaties. Yes. The UN stated that the Paris agreement is a hybrid. I kid you not.
[00:28:13] This is what the UN said about the Paris agreement. It's a hybrid of legally binding and non binding provisions, both contained. So no one really knows what it is, an agreement, a treaty. What is it? Because really you're just outlining your goals and they're going to write back, you know, send it by pigeon and tell us how to achieve the goals. Is anything actually happening? No, not really.
[00:28:37] Except that, uh, Obama gave it, uh, $500 million, half a billion to kick off a goal that, that, uh, that wasn't really a goal. It was more like the U S will pay you money over time and I'm going to kick it off with $500 million. Okay. So money was given. Yes. But I don't think it's like what people think it is.
[00:29:04] So when we say we're out of the Paris accords, it's not really a thing because right now the goal is to 2030, we have to report again. Okay. So five years from now, we, we simply report again. So, so if we're, if money is going out, then where is the money going to for climate? Ah, you didn't actually ask me that question, but I, you have to be thinking it, right? Because money is going out. You're right.
[00:29:34] But where is it actually going? This is, this is the big question at large. Okay. So does this thing have teeth? Not really. Not, not, not by itself. No. Why? Because we're sending money to a lot of other things that aren't going by by. Okay. So, so this is a document in which countries voluntarily outline their goals every five years. Hmm.
[00:30:04] Okay. I'll come right back. I've got more. You got to hear this. Be right back. Kate Daly show. Kate Daly radio. We're current. I defend home is amazing. I'm not joking. I'm not joking. This is so amazing. Digital age.
[00:30:33] We're in the digital age, privacy, financial assets. Our families are at risk. You've got all kinds of spam emails, spam texting, all kinds of robo calls coming in. I mean, honestly, there are over 20 services that I defend home does, and they actually help you to lock your home down from all of this. And they have a customer service. That's amazing. And we'll answer as many questions as you have whenever you need them. This is one of the best services I've ever seen.
[00:31:00] I'm not kidding around 20 different areas of security, full identity theft protection, financial account monitoring, home title theft protection, private web browsing, social media monitoring, blocking robo calls, you name it, complete protection for the kiddos and grandkids. All of it. Go to I defend home forward slash Kate. I defend home forward slash Kate or put in the code Kate and you're going to get 30% off. They're not doing this for anybody else.
[00:31:27] So make sure you take advantage of that because it is an amazing deal. You get this for pennies on the dollar. It's so affordable for everybody. And I know you're secure. You know, you're secure and you have somebody to call if you have a question about your computer or something's happening or, or you have a question about an email. You can call them first real quick and get an answer. It is incredible. I defend home.com forward slash Kate.
[00:31:51] This is the Kate Daly show. The real thing, right? It's anything but real. Okay.
[00:32:20] So, um, although going back to Coke with cocaine would be very interesting. Just had to be said. All right. So, uh, welcome back to the show. And I just, uh, there's so much to explain. So, okay. Okay. When we're talking about the Paris Accords and I know everyone's thrilled and it's not like it's a nothing.
[00:32:45] It's, it's a good thing to say we're out of the Paris Accords, but if you were to take all the climate agencies and the money going to climate and you were to liken it to a home, okay. Like a house. Okay. On a plot of land. What part of the Paris Accords, um, is the home? Is it the structure walls? The, you know, is it the, the, which part is it? Okay. It's the landscaping out in front.
[00:33:15] That's what I would liken it to the Paris treaty in, in, in the context of all the climate stuff that we send money to, which is disgusting, but we do is we're talking about the landscaping in front of the house, not the actual structure of the home. So this is why I wanted to bring this up today was because if we're, if when we're cheering, we need to understand what it is we're cheering and that's important, right? I would imagine that's an important thing. Okay. Okay.
[00:33:45] So, um, the UN FCC that controls this. Okay. And it's all under the UN. Okay. Um, secretary, it was established 1992, uh, in Geneva. Okay. And Bonn, Germany. So many things happen in Germany. Hmm. Uh, 450 staff were employed at the UN climate change. Okay. It goes clear back, goes back really to the seventies on steroids. Right. Um, but in the messaging and everything else, but this, uh, you, uh, what is it?
[00:34:14] UN F CCC. Okay. Is in charge of this Paris climate thing. Okay. The Paris accords. And they, what they do at the secretariat is review and analyze climate change information. Okay. Reported by the countries. Okay. So if you really look in context, um, to how many people we actually have in the world, only about a million people even visit this site, even, even are super interested in this,
[00:34:42] by the way, for context, when you think the whole world is smitten with this idea and put, no, not at all. About only about a million people actually have gone to their website. So, okay. So, um, how much does the federal government really spend on climate change programs? And this is where it gets kind of interesting.
[00:35:02] So according to the office of management and budget, and this was clear back in 2017, eight years ago, they were doing 13.2 billion across 19 agencies that has grown. Okay. Then you had Barack Obama, sorry. Oh, B M, um, which was his climate action plan, which was announced in 2013. Yes. A lot of money being siphoned for this cause, right?
[00:35:27] Which isn't a cause, but they were reporting clear back in, um, in Obama under the Obama regime, 154 billion for funding since 1993 had gone in. I actually think it was way more than that, but that's what they were reporting was 154 billion. Is it money laundering? That would be my guess. Yeah. Um, so in 2023, ding-a-ling King ding-a-ling, um, basically, uh, averaging 150 billion, right?
[00:35:57] That he was saying 150 billion in damages each year between 2018 and 2022 for climate change gobbledygook. But here, uh, so they were trying to claim these numbers. They're trying to consistently tell you that money has to be given, but it's not really all being given to the Paris and then we're out of this. Okay. And even though I just told you that that's really, what are your goals? Here are your goals. I mean, does it have any teeth? Not really. Okay.
[00:36:27] Um, but there is a lot of money going into the green climate fund. Okay. The green climate fund, um, a billion dollars, uh, into that, right? 2023 ding-a-ling announced a billion bucks, a billion dollars into the green climate fund. We need to get out of that. Um, we need to get out of, um, all of these different ones. Actually, the U S pledged 3 billion pledged 3 billion to the, to the Paris thing. Okay.
[00:36:57] But so far people are guesstimating a billion dollars has been given to it, but there's more money. Okay. More money given with green climate fund and the Copenhagen, uh, uh, green climate fund. Okay. Okay. There's all these different groups and agencies where the money goes, the adaptive fund. Okay. Um, we're talking billions of dollars, billions of dollars to each one of these, the, um, uh,
[00:37:26] the Copenhagen green climate fund, um, contributing a $3 billion, right? The adaption fund that's over a billion dollars since 2010. Okay. So long before the Paris treaty, um, or the Paris agreement. Um, you have the LDCF fund, the special climate change fund. Okay. You've got the United, uh, nations framework convention on climate change.
[00:37:52] You've also got the, um, um, oh my gosh, there's like a whole range of these programs where money is going. Okay. The, um, S CCF, which is the special climate, uh, change fund and the GEF fund, which is the global environment. The local environment facility fund. And they all fund the same things. The, um, international waters, land degradation, um, mercury, right? Uh, sustainable forest management, food security, sustainable cities.
[00:38:22] They're all basically saying that they're funding the same things, but they're all separate organizations. And then they have NGOs under these guys. It's endless. It's like this, this, the tentacles are endless on this. So we're giving money to all of these things, but we're not removing ourselves from any of these things. We're only saying we remove ourselves from Paris. So if you really want to make this country great again, then you say we're out of all of it, all of it.
[00:38:52] Because that's what we're not talking about. The GEF fund alone, okay, $22 billion in grants and mobilized another $120 billion for co-financing in 5,200 projects and programs that are aimed through small grants, even though they're not grants. It's just our tax money and printed money rolled into these types of programs, right? We're talking, and we do it with other countries. We're not the only one. All right, let's be fair.
[00:39:20] It's a lot of countries, basically us, China, Japan, that fund these, but for the most part. But it goes into so much else. And you have the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. And you have the Convention on Biological Diversity. And you have all of these different things. We're involved in so many. It's endless. So when you say we're out of the Paris, that's just a, here are our goals.
[00:39:48] And then you come back and send it by pigeon courier and tell me how to do it. That doesn't have the teeth that all of these things have. These things actually have more teeth because we're sending a lot more money through them. So if you want to make America great again, then let's get out of the hole, kit and caboodle. So let's say no to all of it. All of it. Okay? Maybe the other countries will follow too. But I don't think we're going to see that happen. Sadly.
[00:40:18] But I just wanted to kind of let you know, is it a paper tiger? More or less. So they bounce it back and forth through each presidency to say, well, we're going to get rid of this. But what are they actually getting rid of and then implementing? It doesn't, it's not next to everything else. There's so much more. Sorry. I know. But we need that realization. Be right back. We'll be right back.